Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Dear students,
1. In the comments section, share your score and also let everyone know the logic you’ve used to mark certain answers. This will trigger intelligent discussions benefitting everyone.
2. Completing the test should be your top priority. Focus on accuracy rather than simply attempting more questions. Give enough thought to each question, we have increased the time limit so you can do this.
3. At the end of the test, click on ‘View Questions’ button to check the solutions.
*You can attempt the test multiple times for your own practice but only your first attempt will be counted for rankings.
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly.
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points (0).
Average score |
|
Your score |
|
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Table is loading | ||||
No data available | ||||
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
1 pointsThe term BHAVINI sometimes seen in news is a:
Correct
Inspired by: [pib] Indian Nuclear Insurance Pool
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/pib-indian-nuclear-insurance-pool/
Answer: (d)
The Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Limited (BHAVINI) is a wholly owned Enterprise of Government of India under the administrative control of the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) incorporated on 22 October 2003 as Public Limited Company under the companies act, 1956 with the objective of constructing and commissioning the first 500 MWe Fast Breeder Reactor (FBR) at Kalpakkam in Tamil Nadu.
Incorrect
Inspired by: [pib] Indian Nuclear Insurance Pool
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/pib-indian-nuclear-insurance-pool/
Answer: (d)
The Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Limited (BHAVINI) is a wholly owned Enterprise of Government of India under the administrative control of the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) incorporated on 22 October 2003 as Public Limited Company under the companies act, 1956 with the objective of constructing and commissioning the first 500 MWe Fast Breeder Reactor (FBR) at Kalpakkam in Tamil Nadu.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements with respect to the Forest Rights Act (2006):
- It was enacted to protect the marginalized socio-economic class of citizens and balance the right to environment with their right to life and livelihood.
- The Act empowers District Collector to manage Community Forest Resource Right (CFRR).
- The rule sanctions a wide range of evidence, including “statements by village elders” as evidence for forest dwellers.
Which of the given statements is/are correct?
Correct
Inspired by: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/forests/wanted-better-governance-models-for-india-s-forests-65571
Answer: (c)
The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
- It was enacted to protect the marginalised socio-economic class of citizens and balance the right to environment with their right to life and livelihood.
- The Act recognizes that tribal and other traditional forest-dwelling communities would be hard put to provide documentary evidence for their claims.
- The Act empowered Gram Sabhas with the Community Forest Resource Right (CFRR) to manage, conserve and protect forests and improve the quality of forests while ensuring livelihoods through sustainable harvest of forest produce.
- Rule 13 of the Act, therefore, stipulates that the gram sabhas should consider more than one evidence in determining forest rights.
- The rule sanctions a wide range of evidence, including “statements by village elders”, “community rights” and “physical attributes such as houses, huts and permanent improvements made to land such as levelling, bunds and check dams”.
Incorrect
Inspired by: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/forests/wanted-better-governance-models-for-india-s-forests-65571
Answer: (c)
The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
- It was enacted to protect the marginalised socio-economic class of citizens and balance the right to environment with their right to life and livelihood.
- The Act recognizes that tribal and other traditional forest-dwelling communities would be hard put to provide documentary evidence for their claims.
- The Act empowered Gram Sabhas with the Community Forest Resource Right (CFRR) to manage, conserve and protect forests and improve the quality of forests while ensuring livelihoods through sustainable harvest of forest produce.
- Rule 13 of the Act, therefore, stipulates that the gram sabhas should consider more than one evidence in determining forest rights.
- The rule sanctions a wide range of evidence, including “statements by village elders”, “community rights” and “physical attributes such as houses, huts and permanent improvements made to land such as levelling, bunds and check dams”.
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
1 pointsWhich of the following statements with respect to the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 is/are correct?
- It includes protection/change of identity of witnesses, their relocation, installation of security devices at the residence of witnesses, usage of specially designed Court rooms, etc.
- The endorsement of Witness Protection Scheme is binding on all Courts within the territory of India and enforceable in all States and Union Territories.
Select the correct codes:
Correct
Inspired by: [pib] Witness Protection Scheme
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/pib-witness-protection-scheme/
Answer: (c)
Witness Protection Scheme
- Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 provides for protection of witnesses based on the threat assessment and protection measures.
- It includes protection/change of identity of witnesses, their relocation, installation of security devices at the residence of witnesses, usage of specially designed Court rooms, etc.
- As per Article 141/142 of the Constitution, the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 endorsed in the said Judgment of the Supreme Court is binding on all Courts within the territory of India and enforceable in all States and Union Territories.
Incorrect
Inspired by: [pib] Witness Protection Scheme
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/pib-witness-protection-scheme/
Answer: (c)
Witness Protection Scheme
- Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 provides for protection of witnesses based on the threat assessment and protection measures.
- It includes protection/change of identity of witnesses, their relocation, installation of security devices at the residence of witnesses, usage of specially designed Court rooms, etc.
- As per Article 141/142 of the Constitution, the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 endorsed in the said Judgment of the Supreme Court is binding on all Courts within the territory of India and enforceable in all States and Union Territories.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements with respect to the establishment of Human Rights Courts in India:
- The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 calls for establishment of Human Rights Courts in India.
- The Governors and Administrators of respective States and Union Territories are responsible to specify for each district a court of session as a court of human rights for the speedy trial of violation of rights.
Which of the given statements is/are correct?
Correct
Inspired by: Human Rights Courts in India
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/human-rights-courts-in-india/
Answer: (a)
HR Courts
- The Human Rights Act calls for the establishment of special courts in each district to conduct speedy trial of offences arising out of violation and abuse of human rights.
- Section 30 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 envisages that a State government, with the concurrence of the CJ of High Court should specify for each district a court of session as a court of human rights for the speedy trial of violation of rights.
- Section 31 of the Act provides the State government to specify and appoint a special public prosecutor in that court.
- Sessions Court of the district concerned is considered as the Human Rights Court.
- Under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 a Sessions Judge cannot take cognizance of the offence.
- He can only try the cases committed to him by the magistrate under Section 193 of the Cr.P.C.
Incorrect
Inspired by: Human Rights Courts in India
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/human-rights-courts-in-india/
Answer: (a)
HR Courts
- The Human Rights Act calls for the establishment of special courts in each district to conduct speedy trial of offences arising out of violation and abuse of human rights.
- Section 30 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 envisages that a State government, with the concurrence of the CJ of High Court should specify for each district a court of session as a court of human rights for the speedy trial of violation of rights.
- Section 31 of the Act provides the State government to specify and appoint a special public prosecutor in that court.
- Sessions Court of the district concerned is considered as the Human Rights Court.
- Under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 a Sessions Judge cannot take cognizance of the offence.
- He can only try the cases committed to him by the magistrate under Section 193 of the Cr.P.C.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
1 pointsIn India, if a species of tortoise is declared protected under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, what does it imply ?
Correct
Inspired by: CSP 2017
Answer: (a)
Since Tiger is protected under Schedule I, it will enjoy the same level of protection as the tiger.
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
- The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted for protection of plants and animal species.
- It has six schedules which give varying degrees of protection.
- Schedule I and part II of Schedule II provide absolute protection – offences under these are prescribed the highest penalties.
- Species listed in Schedule III and Schedule IV are also protected, but the penalties are much lower.
- Schedule V includes the animals which may be hunted. The specified endemic plants in Schedule VI are prohibited from cultivation and planting.
Incorrect
Inspired by: CSP 2017
Answer: (a)
Since Tiger is protected under Schedule I, it will enjoy the same level of protection as the tiger.
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
- The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted for protection of plants and animal species.
- It has six schedules which give varying degrees of protection.
- Schedule I and part II of Schedule II provide absolute protection – offences under these are prescribed the highest penalties.
- Species listed in Schedule III and Schedule IV are also protected, but the penalties are much lower.
- Schedule V includes the animals which may be hunted. The specified endemic plants in Schedule VI are prohibited from cultivation and planting.
Results
3 of 5 questions answered correctly
You have reached 3 of 5 points, (60%
Results
3 of 5 questions answered correctly
You have reached 3 of 5 points, (60%)