Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Dear students,
1. In the comments section, share your score and also let everyone know the logic you’ve used to mark certain answers. This will trigger intelligent discussions benefitting everyone.
2. Completing the test should be your top priority. Focus on accuracy rather than simply attempting more questions. Give enough thought to each question, we have increased the time limit so you can do this.
3. At the end of the test, click on ‘View Questions’ button to check the solutions.
*You can attempt the test multiple times for your own practice but only your first attempt will be counted for rankings.
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly.
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points (0).
Average score |
|
Your score |
|
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Table is loading | ||||
No data available | ||||
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements about the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) Act-2008-
1. The act also applies to persons on ships and aircrafts registered in India wherever they may be.
2. The decision on whether the offence is scheduled offence or not is taken by the Central Government.
Which of the above is/are correct?
Correct
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/chhattisgarhs-congress-govt-challenges-nia-act-a-upa-era-law-6218863/
Statement 1 is correct- The law applies to persons on ships and aircrafts registered in India.
Statement 2 is correct- The decision is taken by the Central Government.Incorrect
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/chhattisgarhs-congress-govt-challenges-nia-act-a-upa-era-law-6218863/
Statement 1 is correct- The law applies to persons on ships and aircrafts registered in India.
Statement 2 is correct- The decision is taken by the Central Government. -
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements with respect HSN (Harmonised System of Nomenclature)-
- This system has been introduced for the systematic classification of goods all over the world.
- HSN code is a 9-digit uniform code.
- It was developed by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and it came into effect from 1988.
Which of the above is/are correct?
Correct
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/pib-hsn-code/
Statement 1 is correct-The system assigns unique code for the type of a good and it helps in export and importer to quickly identify the good.
Statement 2 is not correct- It is 6 digit number which helps to identify over 5000 products.
Statement 3 is not correct- It was developed by the World Customs Organisation (WCO)
Incorrect
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/pib-hsn-code/
Statement 1 is correct-The system assigns unique code for the type of a good and it helps in export and importer to quickly identify the good.
Statement 2 is not correct- It is 6 digit number which helps to identify over 5000 products.
Statement 3 is not correct- It was developed by the World Customs Organisation (WCO)
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements-
1. A state cannot move to the Supreme Court under Article 32.
2. The Supreme Court cannot grant special leave (special leave petition) to appeal from a judgement by a tribunal constituted under the law relating to the Armed Forces.
Which of the above is/ are correct?
Correct
Statement 1 is correct-State cannot move the Supreme Court under article 32. Article 12 and 13 of the Constitution are addressed to the wide definition of the State.
Statement 2 is correct- Except for the decision of the tribunal and court constituted under laws dealing with the Armed forces, all the decision by the tribunal and court in the country are liable to be taken under special leave to appeal by the SC under Article 136 of the Constitution.
Incorrect
Statement 1 is correct-State cannot move the Supreme Court under article 32. Article 12 and 13 of the Constitution are addressed to the wide definition of the State.
Statement 2 is correct- Except for the decision of the tribunal and court constituted under laws dealing with the Armed forces, all the decision by the tribunal and court in the country are liable to be taken under special leave to appeal by the SC under Article 136 of the Constitution.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements with reference to the Constitution of India-
1. Constitution explicitly speaks about the review power of the Supreme Court under Article 137.
2. There is no explicit mention of ‘curative power’ in the Constitution.
Which of the above is/are correct?
Correct
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/explained-what-is-curative-petition-151681
Statement 1 is correct- Power to review its own judgements provided to the SC under Article 137 of the Indian Constitution.
Statement 2 is correct- There is no explicit mention of the curative power in the Constitution, it flows from Article 142 of the Constitution.
Incorrect
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/explained-what-is-curative-petition-151681
Statement 1 is correct- Power to review its own judgements provided to the SC under Article 137 of the Indian Constitution.
Statement 2 is correct- There is no explicit mention of the curative power in the Constitution, it flows from Article 142 of the Constitution.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
1 pointsWho among the following was/were associated with the introduction of Ryotwari Settlement in India during the British rule?
1. Lord Cornwallis
2. Alexander Read
3. Thomas Munro
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Correct
UPSC-2017 Prelims question.
Incorrect
UPSC-2017 Prelims question.
Q4’s option 2nd says no mention of curative power in constitution and the explanation of Statement 2 says there is mention of it explicitly in Constitution. And the answer given is both 1 and 2.
please elaborate.
Sorry, there should have been ‘no explicit mention’ instead of ‘explicit’ in the explanation.
Both the statements in the questions are correct though.