Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Dear students,
1. In the comments section, share your score and also let everyone know the logic you’ve used to mark certain answers. This will trigger intelligent discussions benefitting everyone.
2. Completing the test should be your top priority. Focus on accuracy rather than simply attempting more questions. Give enough thought to each question, we have increased the time limit so you can do this.
3. At the end of the test, click on ‘View Questions’ button to check the solutions.
*You can attempt the test multiple times for your own practice but only your first attempt will be counted for rankings.
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly.
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points (0).
Average score |
|
Your score |
|
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Table is loading | ||||
No data available | ||||
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements about the Government of India Act 1858.
1. It abolished the East India Company Rule in India.
2. It changed the entire structure of government in India prevailing earlier.
3. As per the Act, Indian Government was to be supervised and controlled in England.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?Correct
1 and 3 are correct.
This significant Act was enacted in the wake of the Revolt of 1857. The act known as the Act for the Good Government of India, abolished the East India Company rule, and transferred the powers of government, territories and revenues to the British Crown.
Features of the Act
1. It provided that India henceforth was to be governed by, and in the name of, Her Majesty. It changed the designation of the Governor-General of India to that of Viceroy of India. He (viceroy) was the direct representative of the British Crown in India. Lord Canning thus became the first Viceroy of India.
2. It ended the system of double government by abolishing the Board of Control and Court of Directors.
3. It created a new office, Secretary of State for India, vested with complete authority and control over Indian administration. The secretary of state was a member of the British cabinet and was responsible ultimately to the British Parliament.
4. It established a 15-member Council of India to assist the secretary of state for India. The council was an advisory body. The secretary of state was made the chairman of the council.
5. It constituted the secretary of state-in-council as a body corporate, capable of suing and being sued in India and in England.
The Act of 1858 was, however, largely confined to the improvement of the administrative machinery by which the Indian Government was to be supervised and controlled in England. It did not alter in any substantial way the system of government that prevailed in India.Incorrect
1 and 3 are correct.
This significant Act was enacted in the wake of the Revolt of 1857. The act known as the Act for the Good Government of India, abolished the East India Company rule, and transferred the powers of government, territories and revenues to the British Crown.
Features of the Act
1. It provided that India henceforth was to be governed by, and in the name of, Her Majesty. It changed the designation of the Governor-General of India to that of Viceroy of India. He (viceroy) was the direct representative of the British Crown in India. Lord Canning thus became the first Viceroy of India.
2. It ended the system of double government by abolishing the Board of Control and Court of Directors.
3. It created a new office, Secretary of State for India, vested with complete authority and control over Indian administration. The secretary of state was a member of the British cabinet and was responsible ultimately to the British Parliament.
4. It established a 15-member Council of India to assist the secretary of state for India. The council was an advisory body. The secretary of state was made the chairman of the council.
5. It constituted the secretary of state-in-council as a body corporate, capable of suing and being sued in India and in England.
The Act of 1858 was, however, largely confined to the improvement of the administrative machinery by which the Indian Government was to be supervised and controlled in England. It did not alter in any substantial way the system of government that prevailed in India. -
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
1 pointsWhich of the following Parliamentary committees are not chaired by Speaker?
1. Public Accounts Committee
2. Business Advisory Committee
3. Estimates Committee
4. Rules Committee
5. Committee on Public Undertakings
6. General Purposes Committee
Select the correct answer codeCorrect
1, 3 and 5 are correct.
The Speaker appoints the chairman of all the parliamentary committees of the Lok Sabha and supervises their functioning. He himself is the chairman of the Business Advisory Committee, the Rules Committee and the General Purpose Committee.Incorrect
1, 3 and 5 are correct.
The Speaker appoints the chairman of all the parliamentary committees of the Lok Sabha and supervises their functioning. He himself is the chairman of the Business Advisory Committee, the Rules Committee and the General Purpose Committee. -
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
1 pointsWhat are the possible actions an Election Commission can take against candidates and political parties?
1. Election Commission cannot bar candidates or leaders from campaigning for specified periods.
2. The EC monitors the adherence of political parties and candidates to the ‘Model Code of Conduct’.
3. It can postpone elections to any constituency, cancel an election already notified, but cannot abrogate or annul an election already held.
Which of the above statements is/are incorrect?Correct
1 and 3 are incorrect.
What are the possible actions EC can take against candidates and parties?
The EC monitors the adherence of political parties and candidates to the ‘Model Code of Conduct’.
If the violations are also offences under election law and the criminal law of the land, the EC has the power to recommend registration of cases against the offenders.
However, for some violations — such as canvassing for votes during a period when electioneering is barred, making official announcements while the MCC is in force, and making appeal to voters on sectarian grounds — the EC has the power to advise or censure candidates, in addition to directing registration of cases. In some cases, as recent incidents would show, the EC may bar candidates or leaders from campaigning for specified periods.
Asking individuals to leave a constituency or barring entry into certain areas are other powers that the EC may exercise. These powers are not necessarily traceable to any provision in law, but are generally considered inherent because of the sweeping and plenary nature of the EC’s responsibility under the Constitution to ensure free and fair elections.
Its powers extend to postponing elections to any constituency, cancelling an election already notified, and even to abrogate or annul an election already held.Incorrect
1 and 3 are incorrect.
What are the possible actions EC can take against candidates and parties?
The EC monitors the adherence of political parties and candidates to the ‘Model Code of Conduct’.
If the violations are also offences under election law and the criminal law of the land, the EC has the power to recommend registration of cases against the offenders.
However, for some violations — such as canvassing for votes during a period when electioneering is barred, making official announcements while the MCC is in force, and making appeal to voters on sectarian grounds — the EC has the power to advise or censure candidates, in addition to directing registration of cases. In some cases, as recent incidents would show, the EC may bar candidates or leaders from campaigning for specified periods.
Asking individuals to leave a constituency or barring entry into certain areas are other powers that the EC may exercise. These powers are not necessarily traceable to any provision in law, but are generally considered inherent because of the sweeping and plenary nature of the EC’s responsibility under the Constitution to ensure free and fair elections.
Its powers extend to postponing elections to any constituency, cancelling an election already notified, and even to abrogate or annul an election already held. -
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements about the office of ‘whip’.
1. The office has been established by Rules of Business in each House of Parliament.
2. Only the ruling party is allowed to have a whip in each house of Parliament.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?Correct
Both the statements are incorrect.
The office of ‘whip’ is mentioned neither in the Constitution of India nor in the Rules of the House nor in a Parliamentary Statute. It is based on the conventions of the parliamentary government.
Every political party, whether ruling or Opposition has its own whip in the Parliament. He is appointed by the political party to serve as an assistant floor leader.
He is charged with the responsibility of ensuring the attendance of his party members in large numbers and securing their support in favour of or against a particular issue. He regulates and monitors their behaviour in the Parliament. The members are supposed to follow the directives given by the whip. Otherwise, disciplinary action can be taken.Incorrect
Both the statements are incorrect.
The office of ‘whip’ is mentioned neither in the Constitution of India nor in the Rules of the House nor in a Parliamentary Statute. It is based on the conventions of the parliamentary government.
Every political party, whether ruling or Opposition has its own whip in the Parliament. He is appointed by the political party to serve as an assistant floor leader.
He is charged with the responsibility of ensuring the attendance of his party members in large numbers and securing their support in favour of or against a particular issue. He regulates and monitors their behaviour in the Parliament. The members are supposed to follow the directives given by the whip. Otherwise, disciplinary action can be taken. -
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
1 pointsThe Constitution lays down which of the following conditions for the governor’s office or selection to the Governor’s office?
1. The Governor should not belong to the state where is appointed.
2. The Governor’s appointment must be made after consulting the chief Minister of the state.
3. A serving Governor cannot be a member of either House of Parliament or a House of the state legislature.
Select the correct answer codeCorrect
Only 3 is correct.
Article 157 and Article 158 of the Constitution of India specify eligibility requirements for the post of governor.
They are as follows:
A governor must:
• be a [citizen of India].
• be at least 35 years of age.
• not be a member of the either house of the parliament or house of the state legislature.
• not hold any office of profit.
Additionally, two conventions have also developed over the years. First, he should be an outsider, that is, he should not belong to the state where he is appointed, so that he is free from the local politics.
Second, while appointing the governor, the president is required to consult the chief minister of the state concerned, so that the smooth functioning of the constitutional machinery in the state is ensured. However, both the conventions have been violated in some of the cases.Incorrect
Only 3 is correct.
Article 157 and Article 158 of the Constitution of India specify eligibility requirements for the post of governor.
They are as follows:
A governor must:
• be a [citizen of India].
• be at least 35 years of age.
• not be a member of the either house of the parliament or house of the state legislature.
• not hold any office of profit.
Additionally, two conventions have also developed over the years. First, he should be an outsider, that is, he should not belong to the state where he is appointed, so that he is free from the local politics.
Second, while appointing the governor, the president is required to consult the chief minister of the state concerned, so that the smooth functioning of the constitutional machinery in the state is ensured. However, both the conventions have been violated in some of the cases.
Leaderboard: 20th Sep 2023 | Prelims Daily with Previous Year Questions
Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Table is loading | ||||
No data available | ||||
UPSC 2024 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)