Central idea
The Lok Sabha Ethics Committee is checking if Mahua Moitra took money for asking questions, mixing parliamentary rules with possible law-breaking. Without a clear definition of ‘unethical conduct,’ it shows the challenge of balancing parliamentary norms and legal issues. The case highlights the complex process of handling allegations of misconduct among MPs.
Key Highlights:
- Mahua Moitra, a Trinamool Congress MP, faces proceedings from the Lok Sabha Ethics Committee over allegations of receiving money for posing questions in Parliament.
- Accepting money for parliamentary work is considered a breach of privilege and contempt of the House.
- Past instances include expulsion of MPs found guilty of accepting money for putting up questions, emphasizing the seriousness of such charges.
Challenges:
- Lack of clear definitions for ‘unethical conduct’ places the evaluation of MPs’ actions on the Ethics Committee’s discretion.
- The term ‘unethical conduct’ remains undefined, and decisions rely on the committee’s judgment.
- Cases of misconduct, misuse of privileges, and personal indiscretions fall under the purview of the Ethics Committee.
Concerns:
- The Ethics Committee examines cases of moral lapses by MPs, ranging from personal misconduct to misuse of official privileges.
- Legal implications of accepting illegal gratification for parliamentary work might involve criminal investigations, separate from parliamentary proceedings.
- The scope of investigation by parliamentary committees differs from judicial probes, and evidence evaluation is based on the preponderance of probabilities.
| Prelims focus
Establishment: Formed in 2000. Mandate: Examines complaints related to unethical conduct of MPs. Responsibilities: Investigates complaints, recommends action, and formulates a code of conduct. Scope: Focuses on behavior that may not have a clear definition, leaving it to the committee’s discretion. Decision Authority: Decides whether specific acts are unethical or not.
|
Analysis:
- Past cases include MPs found guilty of unethical conduct, such as bringing companions under false pretenses on official tours.
- Serious cases of misconduct, violating laws like the Passports Act, are often dealt with by the Committee of Privileges or special committees, not the Ethics Committee.
- Investigative methods include examining written documents, oral testimonies, expert depositions, and findings are based on a common-sense approach.
Key Data:
- The Ethics Committee was established in 2000 to examine complaints related to the unethical conduct of MPs and recommend actions.
- MPs facing expulsion due to misconduct, such as accepting money for parliamentary work, may still face criminal charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Key Terms for mains value addition:
- Breach of privilege and contempt of the House.
- Unethical conduct, moral lapses, and misuse of privileges.
- Committee of Privileges, special committees, and the Ethics Committee.
- Article 105 of the Constitution grants MPs the freedom to speak without disclosing their information sources.
Way Forward:
- The Ethics Committee’s role in probing MPs’ conduct necessitates a balance between parliamentary discipline and legal considerations.
- Clarity in defining ‘unethical conduct’ and guidelines for online submission of questions could enhance transparency.
- Recognizing the distinction between parliamentary discipline and criminal investigations in handling serious allegations against MPs.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
