Central Idea:

The article discusses the absence of voting records during the recent Parliament session, highlighting the significance of recorded votes in representing legislators’ stances and fostering transparency in the legislative process. It also explores the impact of the Anti-Defection Law on MPs’ dissent and the increasing use of voice votes, leading to a lack of accountability.

Key Highlights:

• 19 bills were passed in the recent Parliament session, but voting records were not made available.
• The use of voice votes, lacking individual records, is a preferred method for passing legislative motions.
• The Anti-Defection Law has limited MPs’ ability to dissent, reducing the significance of debates and votes.
• The scarcity of voting records hampers Opposition parties in communicating their positions to the electorate.

Key Challenges:

• Lack of transparency due to the absence of voting records.
• The impact of the Anti-Defection Law on MPs’ freedom to dissent.
• Dismissal of division calls during crucial legislative moments.

Key Terms:

• Voice vote
• Anti-Defection Law
• Division call
• Legislative transparency
• Accountability
• Dissent

Key Phrases:

• “A shadow of opacity has fallen over our legislative processes.”
• “The scarcity of voting records can be a symptom of a deeper problem.”
• “The impact of the Anti-Defection Law on MPs’ dissent is a matter of concern.”

Key Quotes:

• “Transparency defines the measure to which our parliamentarians’ political decisions are traceable, which begets accountability.”
• “The right to a division, meant to be readily available, has become shrouded in subjective judgement.”

Key Examples and References:

• The passage of the Jan Vishwas Bill 2023 and the farm bills through voice votes.
• Asaduddin Owaisi’s dissent on various bills, illustrating the importance of voting records.
• Dismissal of division calls during the passage of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Bill and the Electricity Amendment Bill.

Key Facts:

• In Modi I, 40 divisions were raised for 180 bills, while in Modi II, only 20 divisions were allowed for 209 bills.
• Only 15.4% of bills in the BJP’s 10-year tenure have voting records.

Critical Analysis:

The article critically examines the impact of voice votes, the Anti-Defection Law, and the dismissal of division calls on legislative transparency and accountability. It emphasizes the need for voting records to ensure a clear representation of MPs’ stances.

Way Forward:

• Reevaluate the impact of the Anti-Defection Law on MPs’ dissent.
• Ensure the availability of voting records to enhance legislative transparency.
• Address the dismissal of division calls to uphold the right to record votes.
• Promote a more accountable and transparent legislative process through recorded votes.

In essence, the article advocates for the restoration of transparency in the legislative process through the provision of voting records and a reconsideration of the Anti-Defection Law’s impact on MPs’ dissent.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now