Judicial Reforms

Distrust of employers is bred into Indian policy. It needs to end

Note4Students

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level: Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0

Mains level: Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0

Jan Vishwas Bill: Will manufacturers of substandard drugs get away with  just a fine? | Current Affairs Editorial, Notes by VajiraoIAS

Central Idea:

The article delves into the repercussions of excessive jail provisions in Indian laws, particularly those affecting employers, advocating for the Jan Vishwas Bill Version 2.0 as a viable solution. The focus is on transitioning from a retail approach to a wholesale strategy for filtering out unnecessary criminal provisions, aiming to curb corruption, foster good job creation, and alleviate the judicial system’s burden.

Key Highlights:

  • Jan Vishwas Bill 1.0 successfully eliminated 113 jail provisions across 23 laws, alleviating corruption demands on employers.
  • Labor laws, notably the Factories Act, contain a significant number of imprisonment clauses, impeding high-productivity enterprises.
  • The article suggests transitioning from a retail to a wholesale filtering approach for decriminalization, involving a government committee to identify criteria justifying jail provisions.
  • Decriminalization is shown to ease the judicial system’s load, exemplified by the Ministry of Company Affairs’ actions outside the Jan Vishwas Bill.
  • Excessive regulatory cholesterol, resulting from numerous compliances and filings, obstructs the growth of productive and compliant employers.

Key Challenges:

  • Resistance to change from institutions defending the status quo.
  • Balancing the need for compliance without stifling entrepreneurship.
  • The complexity of labor laws and other regulations, making it challenging to identify and eliminate unnecessary jail provisions.

Key Terms:

  • Jan Vishwas Bill: Legislation aimed at reducing corruption demands on employers by eliminating unnecessary jail provisions.
  • Regulatory cholesterol: Excessive regulatory burden hindering productivity and compliance.
  • Decriminalization: The process of removing criminal penalties from certain offenses.

Key Phrases:

  • “Retail to wholesale filtering”: Shifting the strategy from individual ministries volunteering for change to a positive list approach for decriminalization.
  • “Regulatory arbitrage”: Corruption resulting from the subjective interpretation and enforcement of laws.
  • “Civil service reform”: Advocating for changes in the civil service to address the root cause of regulatory issues.

Key Quotes:

  • “Show me the person, and I’ll show you the crime.” – Lavrentiy Beria, highlighting the selective use of imprisonment clauses for corruption.
  • “The most sustainable reform for keeping regulatory cholesterol low is civil service reform.” – Emphasizing the need for changes in the civil service to address regulatory issues.

Key Statements:

  • “The most sustainable reform for keeping regulatory cholesterol low is civil service reform.”
  • “Excessive regulatory cholesterol currently hurts productive and compliant employers.”

Key Examples and References:

  • Mention of the Jan Vishwas Bill Version 1.0 and its success in eliminating 113 jail provisions.
  • Reference to the Ministry of Company Affairs’ decriminalization efforts outside the Jan Vishwas Bill.

Key Facts and Data:

  • Over 25,000 employer jail provisions, with 5,000 arising from central legislation.
  • The Ministry of Company Affairs decriminalized over four dozen violations, leading to increased orders issued by the Registrar of Companies.

Critical Analysis:

The article emphasizes the need for a comprehensive strategy to address the issue of excessive jail provisions in Indian laws. It identifies labor laws and other regulations as major contributors to the problem and suggests that a wholesale approach to decriminalization, guided by a government committee, would be more effective. The author contends that reducing regulatory cholesterol is crucial for fostering a conducive environment for job creation and economic growth.

Way Forward:

  • Implement Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0 with a focus on wholesale filtering for decriminalization.
  • Establish a government committee with cognitive diversity to identify criteria justifying jail provisions for employers.
  • Encourage collaboration between central ministries to remove unnecessary jail provisions that do not meet the committee’s criteria.
  • Emphasize the importance of civil service reform for long-term sustainability in reducing regulatory cholesterol.
  • Monitor and assess the impact of the Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0 on corruption, job creation, and the judicial system to ensure effectiveness.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.

💥Mentorship New Batch Launch
💥Mentorship New Batch Launch