Central Idea:

The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) poses a significant challenge to India’s manufacturing sector. This policy aims to tax carbon-intensive imports into the EU, impacting key sectors like steel. India’s response involves considering legal challenges and negotiating with the EU while simultaneously developing its own carbon trading mechanisms.

Key Highlights:

• The CBAM is part of the EU’s strategy to achieve a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
• It aims to be climate-neutral by 2050 – an economy with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.
• India, a top exporter to the EU, is expected to be adversely affected, particularly in sectors like steel.
• India is developing its own Carbon Credit Trading System (CCTS) to combat climate change and incentivize clean energy investments.

Key Challenges:

• India faces the challenge of protecting its industries from the potential negative impacts of CBAM.
• Limited time to formulate and implement effective carbon taxation measures aligning with the Paris Agreement.
• The EU’s failure to consider factors like cheap labor and alternative production modes influencing industry shifts.

Key Terms:

• Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
• Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions
• Carbon Credit Trading System (CCTS)
• Paris Agreement
• Special and Differential Treatment provisions

Key Phrases:

• “Ill-conceived move” – Referring to the Commerce and Industry Minister’s criticism of the CBAM.
• “Death knell for India’s manufacturing sector” – Describing the potential impact of the carbon tax on Indian industries.
• “Common but differentiated responsibilities” – Principle agreed upon under the Paris Agreement.
• “Carbon leakage” – The risk of carbon-intensive production moving from the EU to countries with lax environmental regulations.

Key Quotes:

• “Proposed carbon tax on imports is an ill-conceived move… death knell for India’s manufacturing sector.” – Commerce and Industry Minister.
• “India has challenged the CBAM before the World Trade Organization under the special and differential treatment provisions.”

Key Statements:

• The CBAM is seen as a threat to India’s manufacturing sector and competitiveness in the EU market.
• India is working on its own carbon trading mechanisms, including the CCTS and the Green Credit Programme Rules.

Key Examples and References:

• UK’s plan to enforce its own CBAM by 2027, adding to the challenges faced by India’s exports.

Key Facts:

• 27% of India’s exports of iron, steel, and aluminum products worth $8.2 billion went to the EU in 2022.

Critical Analysis:

• The EU’s focus on reducing carbon emissions should consider broader factors influencing industry shifts.
• India’s challenge lies in balancing environmental concerns with protecting its industries and economic interests.

Way Forward:

• India should actively negotiate with the EU to explore pragmatic solutions, such as returning tax funds for green technologies.
• Swift action is crucial for India to formulate and implement its own carbon taxation measures aligned with the Paris Agreement.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now