Answer the following questions:. (a) How does the cultural relativism defines “good”? Which method does it follow for arriving at moral beliefs? (b)Why does cultural relativism supposedly make us more tolerant of other cultures and, critically examine the view that moral values are relative?(250 Words)

(a)
Cultural Relativism is of the view that moral or ethical systems, which vary from culture to culture, are all equally valid and no one system is really “better” than any other. This is based on the idea that there is no ultimate standard of good or evil, so every judgment about right and wrong is a product of society. Therefore, any opinion on morality or ethics is subject to the cultural perspective of each person.

It defines “good” as what is socially approved. Ultimately, this means that no moral or ethical system can be considered the “best,” or “worst,” and no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.”

(b)
A pluralist society is one in which there are different views on questions of politics, morality, religion. The conflicts of ideas and practices are an inevitable and permanent part of human society. But to maintain peace and tolerance in the society, the concept of cultural relativism came up. It states that individual person’s beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of that individual’s own culture. This enhances tolerance towards other beliefs and norms.

However moral values are relative as there is no objective truth, it changes with context and situation.
– It changes with society to society and region.
– It varies with cultural heritage.
– It varies with era.
– Faith-based morality may differ from secular humanist-based morality.

Absolute moral relativism is self-contradictory and impossible. However, the ultimate end of all moral values is inner happiness.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
User Avatar
5 years ago

Q4

IMG_20190725_161427~2.jpg
IMG_20190725_161436~2.jpg
User Avatar
5 years ago
Reply to  sourav singh

Not checked

User Avatar
5 years ago
Reply to  sourav singh

Good intro.
In terms of structure, avoid lengthy paragraphs. Try to keep it small and simple. Give proper breaks otherwise examiner will not be interested in reading bulky paragraphs.
Your answer is very good.
It is descriptive, balanced with arguments from both sides, informative and has some good examples.
Language is easy and smooth.
Just avoid large paragraphs.

Marks
6
User Avatar
5 years ago

MOJO9611C00A14581096

User Avatar
5 years ago
Reply to  Varsha Chauhan

Hi Varsha
Its been long since you uploaded your answers. Keep writing.
Quite a good discussion.
All the examples are apt and put in right perspective.
Nothing wrong with your answer.
Good approach.

Marks
6
User Avatar
5 years ago

Please Review

mycams (3)_7.jpg
mycams (3)_8.jpg
User Avatar
5 years ago
Reply to  Borne

Your direction is good but lack of content makes the answer weak.
In both a and b you have to put in more discussion.
Examples are good.
In b, the discussion towards the end where you discussed the cons of need more points as it will lend balance to your answer.

Marks
3

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.

💥Mentorship New Batch Launch
💥Mentorship New Batch Launch