- Mention the constitutional provisions for local bodies in the country.
- Highlight the significance of these bodies.
- Discuss the challenges faced by these institutions in financing developmental projects.
- Mention steps ahead regarding financing developmental projects.
Answer:
Envisaged in the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP – Article 40 of Indian Constitution) Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) were given constitutional status through the 73rd and 74th Amendment Act to the Constitution of India. They added Schedule 11 and 12 to the Indian Constitution giving powers to the local bodies.
Importance of the Panchayat system in India as a part of the local government:
- People participation: PRIs working at the grassroots, ensure the opportunity for people’s participation and involvement in the formulation and implementation of rural development programmes.
- Women empowerment: through the provision of reservation of one-third seats for women in PRIs which has even been increased up to fifty per cent by some states (Article 243D of Indian Constitution).
- Empowerment of Depressed sections of society through reservation of one-third of the seats SCs and STs (Article 243D of Indian Constitution)
- Through powers devolved under Schedule 11 (Article 243G), it makes Panchayats as institutions of local governance by responsibilities such as agriculture development, land development, rural development etc.
- District Planning Committee (Article 243ZD) ensures bottom-up planning of development activities.
Sources of Finance of PRIs
- Article 243I of Indian Constitution envisages creation of State Finance Commissions to ensure sharing of State finances and Government grants to the PRIs.
Issues with the funding of PRIs:
- The inadequacy of funds has stood in the way of successful working of the Panchayati Raj.
- The Panchayati Raj bodies have limited powers in respect of imposing cesses and taxes.
- They have very little funds doled out to them by the State Government.
- Further, they are generally reluctant to raise necessary funds due to the fear of losing popularity with the masses.
Other sources the Panchayats can look out for financing developmental projects
- Article 243H – The taxes imposed by the Village Panchayats are an important source of income of Gram Panchayats, such as:
- taxes on land and houses
- the custom duty
- toll tax
- license fees
- Under Article 243H State Governments may devolve more powers of tax collection.
- Money collected from gifts through Government schemes such as MPLADS also becomes a source of earning for the Panchayat.
Way Forward
PRIs in India are the most important level of governance due to their proximity to people. Their fiscal empowerment can and should be ensured through:
- Other sources the Panchayats by State governments under Article 243G and more powers of taxation under Article 243H.
- Dedicated cadre of panchayat officers to help functioning of elected PRI representatives such as in Karnataka.
- Training should be provided to local representatives to develop expertise so that they contribute more in planning and implementation of policies and programmes.
- States should adopt the concept of ‘activity mapping’, wherein each state clearly delineates the responsibilities and roles for the different tiers of the government.
Mahatma Gandhi a true supporter of village republics said that “If we would see our dream of Panchayat Raj, i.e., true democracy realized, we would regard the humblest and lowest Indian as being equally the ruler of India with the tallest in the land.”
If we have to realise this dream of equal participation of all in governance, empowerment of PRIs should be the cornerstone.
Pls check my answer
Hi Amandeep
The answer starts really well.
The intro and the 1st part of the main body are very good.
The content discussed there is satisfactory.
But when discussing the issues with the PRI, stick to the demand of the question.
The question specifically asks about the issues regarding financing developmental projects.
Hence keep your points in this domain only. Do not discuss other issues like the issue of manpower etc. That is called moving away from the periphery of the question.
Secondly, your way forward should be concrete. Right now, the answer ends abruptly.
Give proper and explained way forwards.
Point number 1 and 4 in the way forward are similar in nature. Also, if you read about the issues with PRI, then you will realize that all the measures that you have mentioned are already there in the domain of PRIs. Hence the question is asking about “additional source of finances.” Therefore your way forward should have those extra points.
Always write a conclusion. That is a soft landing for your answer.
Also, if a question is about 15 marks, then your coverage should be according to it. For example, in each subheading, a 10 marker should have 4-5 points and in 15 marker it should have 6-7 points. Plus use all the space given in the answer sheet.
Your presentation and structure of the answer are top-notch.
The language is proper and well explained in most parts.
Clear writing makes your answer more suitable.
please review
The answer lacks depth and structure.
After discussing the importance, mention the current provisions of finance for PRIs.
Then discuss what are the issues and challenges in accessing those funds. The main point would be the devolution from the state governments.
Then discuss the way forward in a proper explanation manner rather than using a flow chart.
The content and structure of the answer should justify the marks allotted to the question.
The 1st part of the answer is very good where you discussed the importance of PRIs.
Good intro.
In recent times, you are putting depth in your content which is affecting your marks
Sir why are model answers not available?
They will be available by tomorrow.
MOJO9a02U00D28381180
Good 1st part of the answer.
The discussion for the importance of PRIs is very good and it is discussed well through the flowchart.
But the 2nd part needs more dimensions.
After discussing the importance, mention the current provisions of finance for PRIs.
Then discuss what are the issues and challenges in accessing those funds. The main point would be the devolution from the state governments.
The way forward is well attempted.
The overall explanation and language are quite decent.