Mentors Comment:
Gandhi Ji published Hind Swaraj which contained an ideological critique of western civilization and its practices. When seen in isolation, these criticisms are mere rebuttal of what western nations and civilizations practiced and their institutions. But when seen in the light of the national freedom movement, you will realize that these criticisms were the backbone of Gandhi’s idea of opposing British rule through his non-violent approach. After all, the British, for a long time, justified their rule over India and other parts of the world through their western superiority. This is the premise of this question and how you have to approach the answer.
Start with just a brief intro of what was the idea of the superiority of western nations and then discuss how they justified their rule over India and other parts through these ideas of superiority.
Then discuss the critique of Gandhi Ji on these western concepts of capitalism, politics, and institutions. He based his non-violent approach through these ideas of swaraj.
The last part discusses how this approach made Indian people aware of their own superiority and showed the backwardness of western societies and hypocrisies existing in those parts of the world.
Answer:
British colonial rule subjugated and oppressed Indians, and enforced a system where the white British controlled the economic structure. For centuries, the British East India Company exploited the natural resources of the region, generating massive profits and forming a monopoly from trade. Over time, British culture and lifestyle infiltrated every aspect of Indian life, impacting the legal system, medicine, science, education, religion, and the very foundation of Indian society. This notion was finally broken by Gandhi ji through his ideological critique of western civilization.
How the British rested their claim through western superiority:
- Britain always tried to justify their imperialism in the name of protecting democratic values, freedom, and justice and as if they were doing it selflessly by taking pain themselves for the betterment of the people they mastered.
- British have ruled by creating the myth that British rule “ is not only benevolent for the subjects but also is invincible.”
- Britain, being the earliest nation to modernize and industrialize, considered its citizens as the most civilized of all men.
- Even the common man of England took pride in being a modern ‘white’.
- It is this arrogant pride of being white that threw Gandhiji out of his train in South Africa.
- Hence Britain justified imperialism by saying that in occupying third world countries in Asia and Africa it is actually civilizing the inhabitants who are uncultured and barbaric.
- It was said to be the White Man’s burden, his additional responsibility, to bring the dark men to a civilized society.
Critique of western civilization by Gandhi:
- Gandhi’s critique of the British is grounded in opposition to many aspects of British life, government, and rule over India.
- Gandhi in 1908, in Hind Swaraj, denounced all the instruments and institutions of Western civilization.
- Gandhi’s critique of British colonialism was grounded in a rejection of cultural and racial supremacy; capitalism or socioeconomic inequality; and materialism.
- Therefore Gandhi employed the concepts of Swaraj and satyagraha in his effort to liberate the Indian people from the stranglehold of British rule.
- For him, the salvation of India lies in unlearning most of the things she had learned from the British.
- Tolstoy’s writings strengthened Gandhi’s ability to resist Westernization and build a new culture from traditional foundations.
- He challenged the practicalities of modern western civilization.
- According to him, modern civilization was equal to darkness and disease.
- He condemned severely western democratic politics because they were plague-ridden with a threefold contradiction.
- Gandhi even criticized the Parliamentary form of governance that has its origin in Western civilization.
- Gandhi never aspired for a Parliamentary democracy but Swaraj, wherein there is a scope for self-regulation and the state, though not wither away, it would govern the least.
- Gandhi concentrated that non-violence could lead to an exact democracy. Democracy and violence could not be reconciled.
- As an idea and strategy, swaraj gained unusually in the context of the nationalist articulation of the freedom struggle and the growing democratization of the political processes that have already brought in hitherto socio-economic and cultural differences.
Through constantly targeting the concept of western superiority, through which the British justified their rule over half of the world and India, Gandhi contested the rule of British. His thoughts on western civilizations and practices opened the eyes of Indian masses about the bubble that the British have created. Swaraj became the demand of Indians and the gradual benevolence of the British was no longer sort after.
These ideals and his severe condemnation of modern western civilization played a decisive role in bringing about what Nehru called “a vast psychological revolution” among the Indian masses, which led to the success of the largely non-violent Indian national movement. Gandhi was also a pioneer in pointing out the inherent divisiveness, exploitation, marginalization, violence and moral deficiency of the project of Western modernity.
MOJO9b04S00N25297271. Please review
Hi Siddhant
Very good answer.
The 1st part of the answer is decent.
The overall coverage of the answer is very good.
Decent language and explanation.
The presentation is very good.
Please review. Payment ID MOJO9b05300A74622986
Hi Mohita
Start with just a brief intro of what was the idea of the superiority of western nations and then discuss how they justified their rule over India and other parts through these ideas of superiority.
Apart from that, the content is OK.
But structure needs to be more coherent.
Right now the points are placed haphazardly.
Discuss your points under relevant subheadings and through bullet points.
MOJO9a31K00N58111047
MOJO9a31K00N58111047
Hi Balakumaran
Your intro is very large.
No need to discuss Tilak or Tagore.
After the 1st paragraph, jump to the discussion on Gandhi.
In the main body of the answer, you have discussed various points but they are not answering how they were related to the ideological critique of the western civilization.
Hence, discuss the critique of Gandhi Ji on western concepts of capitalism, politics, and institutions.
Read the model answer.
Read the question and mentor comments carefully.
MOJO9b04X00D25275001
Hi Amit
The 1st part of the answer is general in nature.
You have to discuss points like this:
How the British rested their claim through western superiority:
-Britain always tried to justify their imperialism in the name of protecting democratic values, freedom, and justice and as if they were doing it selflessly by taking pain themselves for the betterment of the people they mastered.
-British have ruled by creating the myth that British rule “ is not only benevolent for the subjects but also is invincible.”
-Britain, being the earliest nation to modernize and industrialize, considered its citizens as the most civilized of all men.
-Even the common man of England took pride in being a modern ‘white’.
-It is this arrogant pride of being white that threw Gandhiji out of his train in South Africa.
-Hence Britain justified imperialism by saying that in occupying third world countries in Asia and Africa it is actually civilizing the inhabitants who are uncultured and barbaric.
-It was said to be the White Man’s burden, his additional responsibility, to bring the dark men to a civilized society.
The overall content is OK but their explanation lacks that X-Factor.
You have to work on your language in the answer.
Points are placed haphazardly, and hence, the structure is poor.
Discuss your main body with bullet points.
Please review
MOJO9b04600W25293262
Hi Yash
You haven’t uploaded the last page of the answer I guess!!
The review will be done on the 1st part only then and no marks will be offered!
The content in the 1st part of decent but you don’t have to discuss that supremacy part in such details.
Just a brief discussion will do. Read the model answer for that.
Good language but points are over-explained.
Please review
payment id.-: MOJO9b01K00A90842206
Hi Palash
A very good answer.
You have covered all the elements nicely.
The balance is perfect and main focus is given to Gandhi’s critiques.
The points are well divided into various segments.
Points are apt and well explained.
All in all a near perfect attempt
But do underline your important points.
MOJO9930Q00N64198657
Hi Swetha
The 1st part of the answer is missing.
Read the mentor’s comment to get hold of the structure and direction needed.
You have to discuss points in the 1st part like this:
How the British rested their claim through western superiority:
-Britain always tried to justify their imperialism in the name of protecting democratic values, freedom, and justice and as if they were doing it selflessly by taking pain themselves for the betterment of the people they mastered.
-British have ruled by creating the myth that British rule “ is not only benevolent for the subjects but also is invincible.”
-Britain, being the earliest nation to modernize and industrialize, considered its citizens as the most civilized of all men.
-Even the common man of England took pride in being a modern ‘white’.
-It is this arrogant pride of being white that threw Gandhiji out of his train in South Africa.
-Hence Britain justified imperialism by saying that in occupying third world countries in Asia and Africa it is actually civilizing the inhabitants who are uncultured and barbaric.
-It was said to be the White Man’s burden, his additional responsibility, to bring the dark men to a civilized society.
The rest of the answer is decent.
But do underline imp points.
Also in order to break the monotonicity of the points, you can use small flowcharts or diagrams or boxed presentations.
The 2nd part of the answer is decent and well explained,
Payment id : MOJ09a31D00D58068663
MOJO9b02200D52463423
Hi Khus
The intro can be expanded a bit more and made the 1st part of the answer where you need to discuss how the British rested their claim through western superiority. The points you will get from the model answer.
The rest of the answer is very good.
You have covered all the points nicely.
Underline imp points.
Good language.
Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558
Hi Sanu
Do not use subheadings for intro and conclusion.
Very large intro.
This is not the ideal length for an introduction.
Your content can be divided into the intro and the 1st part of the answer.
That will be a better structure and presentation.
The intro can be cut into half and that content can be made the 1st part of the answer where you need to discuss how the British rested their claim through western superiority. The points will remain the same as in your intro.
Never write a point like this: “There were many aspects where Gandhi criticized the western civilization and showed Indian culture…..” This is your last line of the main body before the conclusion. But the question is asking what those critiques were? What were those aspects? Avoid such a generalization of the content. This is not a boards or college exam answer. You have to be specific with your points in UPSC Mains exams.
Avoid lengthy statements.
The points need to be deep and you need to get more coverage with relevant and to the point examples.
Read the model answer.
Underline imp points
MOJO9b03K00A07920521
Hi Divya
The 1st part of the answer is missing.
Read the mentor’s comment to get hold of the structure and direction needed.
You have to discuss points in the 1st part like this:
How the British rested their claim through western superiority:
-Britain always tried to justify their imperialism in the name of protecting democratic values, freedom, and justice and as if they were doing it selflessly by taking pain themselves for the betterment of the people they mastered.
-British have ruled by creating the myth that British rule “ is not only benevolent for the subjects but also is invincible.”
-Britain, being the earliest nation to modernize and industrialize, considered its citizens as the most civilized of all men.
-Even the common man of England took pride in being a modern ‘white’.
-It is this arrogant pride of being white that threw Gandhiji out of his train in South Africa.
-Hence Britain justified imperialism by saying that in occupying third world countries in Asia and Africa it is actually civilizing the inhabitants who are uncultured and barbaric.
-It was said to be the White Man’s burden, his additional responsibility, to bring the dark men to a civilized society.
The rest of the answer is decent.
But do underline imp points.
Decent language
Thank you sir for the detailed review. There are many topics that are new to me and I dint have in depth knowledge. Daily AWE is helping me exploring more topics with detailed understanding. Will inculcate all your suggestions sir.
Always a pleasure Divya. Civilsdaily is glad to be of some help in your preparation. Keep writing.
MOJO9a31100A58098507
Hi Pratik
Your answer is very good.
But use bullet points rather than using short paragraphs in the main body.
Use proper subheadings and use bullet points under each subheading.
That will make your points short and crisp.
The content is perfect and the structure is well balanced.
The answer has perfect flow to it.
Decent language
MOJO9b01C00A90817216
Please review
Hi Paran
The 1st part of the answer is missing.
Read the mentor’s comment to get hold of the structure and direction needed.
You have to discuss points in the 1st part like this:
How the British rested their claim through western superiority:
-Britain always tried to justify their imperialism in the name of protecting democratic values, freedom, and justice and as if they were doing it selflessly by taking pain themselves for the betterment of the people they mastered.
-British have ruled by creating the myth that British rule “ is not only benevolent for the subjects but also is invincible.”
-Britain, being the earliest nation to modernize and industrialize, considered its citizens as the most civilized of all men.
-Even the common man of England took pride in being a modern ‘white’.
-It is this arrogant pride of being white that threw Gandhiji out of his train in South Africa.
-Hence Britain justified imperialism by saying that in occupying third world countries in Asia and Africa it is actually civilizing the inhabitants who are uncultured and barbaric.
-It was said to be the White Man’s burden, his additional responsibility, to bring the dark men to a civilized society.
The rest of the answer is perfect.
Good presentation.
Decent language
MOJO9a05K00A19952476
A well-structured answer.
Good 1st part of the main body.
The balance is perfect and the main focus is given to Gandhi’s critiques.
The points are well divided into various segments.
Points are apt and well explained.
Good explanations.
The depth of the content is decent