Mentor’s comment:
- https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/when-defection-is-a-mere-detour-for-an-mla/article30463693.ece
- The article deals with the recent events including the Supreme Court Judgement in the case of application of Anti-Defection Law against the Karnataka assembly legislators.
- The question wants us to discuss the provisions of the law and amendments and changes made in it and the purpose of these changes. Subsequently, we have to discuss the loopholes still existing in the law and the ways in which these loopholes are being exploited repeatedly.
- Write a few introductory lines on the Anti-Defection Law.
- In the main body of the answer discuss the various incidents including the Karnataka case and explain how the purpose of the law is being defeated by using various stratagems. Along with that discuss the various measures that could be taken to make the law more effective.
- Conclude the answer on an optimistic note.
MOJO0101D00A20979010
Bhai How to attach answer?
In comment section you’ll find the link for attaching the file just next to image attachment tab.
Cant find it
https://www.civilsdaily.com/submission-of-awe-answers/
And if the issue still persists then please mail your issue along with the screenshot to @Civils Daily.com">hello@Civils Daily.com
Before discussing the changes needed in the law, briefly discuss its need and recent issues with it.
Otherwise, your answer will lack balance.
The reference of the case and the relevant amendment are decent.
The way forward is very good.
Good that you mentioned the relevant committees and their recommendations.
So your main content is something which should be in the 2nd part of the main body while the 1st part is missing.
Good presentation.
MOJO9c31Y00D50827870
Payment id MOJO9c31Y00D50827870
Decent intro.
But structure can be made better in the answer.
In order to make the answer relevant, discuss the challenges faced by the 10th schedule in the 1st part of the answer, post intro.
Only then you should discuss the interventions done in the law.
Also, discuss why we need the law and discuss its intended benefits. This will also be done briefly and in the 1st part.
The overall discussion is good in terms of content and presentation.
Do read the mentors comment before attempting the answer in order to get a better idea for the structure of the answer.
MOJO0103200A78838407
MOJO9c30X00D35455509
The main demand of the question is this: “In light of the above statement discuss the measures to make the law more effective.”
You have done a good analysis of the law but the main demand, which was supposed to be your way forward, is missing.
The 1st part of the answer is good.
The use and content of the flowchart is very good.
Read the questions carefully as well as the mentor’s comments beneath the question to get the idea of the demand of the question s well as the intended structure of the answer.
The language and presentation are good.
The content is well placed and it’s deep.
But because you haven’t discussed the demand of the question, you won’t get many marks.
@Parth verma
sir, i have focused on GS2,3,4 (GS1 is getting neglected as i am not even done with the syllabus for that) for last two months but i have seen improvement only in GS4 and infact for GS2,3 the performance is not even on a constant note , it is being decreasing. Please suggest me some measures to tackle this.(consider- prelims is also approaching)
Thank you
MOJO0102A00A52642901
The answer lacks depth in terms of content and concrete discussion.
Give more content in each subheading to justify the question being of 15 marks.
Right now the answer seems like an editorial with bits of discussion on each dimension.
Special focus should be given to the way forward because that is the main demand of the question: “In light of the above statement discuss the measures to make the law more effective.”
The conclusion is lengthy and out of context with the topic of the question. It is suited in essay but not in GS answers.
Payment ID
MOJO9c07A00N41102924
Your coverage of the answer is very good.
The answer, right from the 1st part to the end is perfectly managed and written in a coherent manner.
The intro of the law is very good.
The critical analysis of the law is perfect in terms of depth and width is also good.
The language of the answer is fine and well explained.
The way forward, which is the main demand of the question, is handled perfectly.
There is nothing wrong with the attempt.
Keep it up
MOJO0101500D20984167