- 1. Brief what RCEP is
- 2. Highlight the potential benefits offered by RCEP
- 3. Why did India choose to stay away? What did we miss?
- 4. Suggest way ahead
Answer:
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is a trade deal that was being negotiated between 16 countries. The RCEP is billed to be the “largest” regional trading agreement. The countries involved account for almost half of the world’s population, contribute over a quarter of world exports, and makeup around 30% of the global Gross Domestic Product.
Reasons for India’s Withdrawal
- Unfavorable Balance of Trade
- Though trade has increased post-FTA with South Korea, ASEAN countries and Japan, imports have risen faster than exports from India.
- According to a paper published by NITI Aayog, India has a bilateral trade deficit with most of the member countries of RCEP.
2. Dumping of Chinese Goods
- India has already signed FTAs with all the countries of RCEP except China.
- This is the major concern for India, as after signing RCEP cheaper products from China would have flooded the Indian market.
3. Non-acceptance of Auto-trigger Mechanism
- In order to deal with the imminent rise in imports, India had been seeking an auto-trigger mechanism.
- Auto-trigger Mechanism would have allowed India to raise tariffs on products in instances where imports cross a certain threshold.
- However, other countries in the RCEP were against this proposal.
4. Protection of Domestic Industry
- India had also reportedly expressed apprehensions on lowering and eliminating tariffs on several products like dairy, steel etc.
- For instance, the dairy industry was expected to face stiff competition from Australia and New Zealand.
- Currently, India’s average bound tariff for dairy products is on average 35%.
- The RCEP binds countries to reduce that current level of tariffs to zero within the next 15 years.
5. Lack of Consensus on Rules of Origin
- India was concerned about a “possible circumvention” of rules of origin.
- Rules of origin are the criteria used to determine the national source of a product.
- Current provisions in the deal reportedly do not prevent countries from routing, through other countries, products on which India would maintain higher tariffs.
Implications of India’s Exit of RCEP:
- Exiting RCEP, India can still keep a check on China’s dumping of goods in India. However, from needles to the turbine, Chinese goods are all over the Indian market.
- Refraining from RCEP will provide protection to the Indian domestic industry from cheap imports.
- RCEP is a China-backed trade deal, signing it without India will further strengthen China’s economic power. It will affect India’s neighborhood as China already tries to influence the region through its deep pockets.
- India envisages becoming a manufacturing hub. However, staying out of the RCEP reduces opportunities for trading with these countries, which together account for roughly a third of global trade.
- Manufacturing today requires greater integration with global supply chains.
- Signing the agreement would have signaled an embrace of freer trade, which could have aided in the shift of companies out of China to India.
- India’s exit of RCEP may also affect India’s Act East policy.
- India should have used this as an opportunity to push through contentious but necessary reforms that would boost competitiveness.
India needs to work on reforms and frame policies to prepare the economy for facing global competition. This can be done by easing land acquisition, reforming labor laws, and bridging Infrastructure deficit
MOJO9828N00A10807750
Apart from a missing way forward, there is nothing wrong with the discussion of the answer.
The main body of the answer is perfect in terms of content and its depth.
The balance is apt in the main body with proper coverage in both discussions.
The only issue is that you should have given concrete way forwards and not pass them off as your conclusion.
please review..
Payment ID MOJO9a29300A61774733
Intro is very large.
The content in the main body is OK.
Work on your presentation. The structure is unclear because of the way you have placed your points. Subheadings are missing in the crowded points.
Do not over-explain. Keep your points to the minimal.
You should have given concrete way forwards and not pass them off as your conclusion.
Underline imp stuff
MOJO9b04X00D25275001
Good discussion overall.
You catered to the demand of the question very well.
The only issue is the weak presentation.
The content is OK.
But do mention the demands of India in the 2nd part. Avoid general statements.
Good conclusion
Please review.
Payment id- MOJO9a05700D19953140
Good discussion, all in all.
Your content is good.
The explanation is decent and well crafted.
The structuring of the answer is excellent.
Decent language.
The last part of the answer is the strength of the whole answer.
Nice presentation
Payment id : MOJ09a31D00D58068663
please review
Good start to your answer.
The 1st part of the main body is very good in terms of coverage and content.
But the balance is missing from the answer.
Your 2nd part lacks content.
What did we miss? Highlight the potential benefits offered by RCEP. Give more content.
read the model answer.
No way forward in the answer.
MOJO9b02200D52463423
The overall content is good.
Presentation needs work.
Avoid too much cutting in your answers.
Write clearly.
The structure is decent.
Good intro.
Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558
Good content.
The structure is also decent.
But gove proper way forwards.
Avoid large bullet points.
Sir,
Give brief points regarding the +ves of India joining the RCEP..
Rest of the answer is very good.
The content is very good.
Decent presentation.
Underline the imp keywords.
Please review MOJO9b05300A74622986
Decent coverage in terms of content.
But do not pass off way forwards as your conclusion,
Write proper way forwards and the conclusion should be a separate entity.
Work on your presentation.
Underline imp points
MOJO9930Q00N64198657
Page 2
A very good answer.
You have covered almost all the points.
Good coverage.
Decent presentation.
But underline imp stuff in your answers.
Good structuring
MOJO9a31K00N58111047
Avoid large intros
The answer lacks way forward, in any form.
Before ending the answer, briefly discuss the way forward.
The rest of the content is OK.
Decent structuring.
MOJO9a31100A58098507
Decent answer.
Points are informative and well explained.
A very good presentation.
Good structuring of the points.
The answer has perfect flow in it.
Decent way forwards
MOJO9b03K00A07920521
Good content.
The structuring is quite fine in your answer.
But do not pass off way forwards as your conclusion,
Write proper way forwards and the conclusion should be a separate entity.
Good presentation but avoid too much cuttings
Payment ID:MOJO9b01O00A90839766
Please review
Fine attempt.
Your answer has covered almost all the arguments from both sides.
Decent width and depth.
The presentation is superb.
Good flow of the points.
Very good way forwards
MOJO9b04S00N25297271. Please review
Good structure.
The content is quite decent.
It has proper depth and it is well explained.
But avoid large statements. Some parts suffer from it.
Good presentation.
Very good discussion in the way forwards.
ID
MOJO9b01C00A90817216
Please review.
Before ending the answer with the way forward, briefly discuss did India missed out?
The rest of the answer is very good.
Decent content.
But do explain some of your points.
The structure is very good.
Good presentation.
MOJO9a02U00D28381180
Please upload clear and large pictures.
The first part of your answer is very good.
Fine intro.
Good content overall.
The structuring is quite fine in your answer.
But do not pass off way forwards as your conclusion,
Write proper way forwards and the conclusion should be a separate entity.
Good presentation
MOJO9a25MOON56192840
What will be the implication of India missing out on the RCEP deal?
This should be in your answer in the 2nd part of the main body. After this close the answer with your concluding remarks or way forward.
Read the model answer for these talking points. It is one of the important elements of the question.
The rest of the answer is well dealt with.
The discussion in the main body is crisp and well explained.
A very good use of the flowchart.
The presentation is well done.
The depth of the points in the answer is very good.