“Mentor’s Comments”
- https://www.thehindu.com/
opinion/op-ed/acquitted-but- not-forgotten/article34834341. ece - In the intro, mention the recent Delhi High Court judgement about removal of its own judgment from the internet to honour the right to be forgotten of a person.
- In the body, mention the 2017 judgement by the Supreme Court recognising the right to be forgotten of the person as a part of right to privacy, in the next part, mention the issue related to implementation such as limits due to countervailing rights such as right to free speech, whether the content serves the public purpose, concept of fair criticism and accountability etc.
- Conclude by mentioning the need to strike the balance between privacy and public interest.
Ref id 422329
Please review
Vishal
You have explained some points but missed some. Introduction is good, link with current affairs by mentioning Delhi HC judgement of deleting the whole judgement from record in which the petitioner was acquitted after he filed a petition demanding the same.
Question is about right to forgotten, so mention SC judgement also where it was declared as a subset of right to privacy.
In issues mention some contradictions between right to forgotten and right to free speech, also you cannot demand to be forgotten if your case serves a public purpose.
Go through the article once, you will understand some contradictions.
Way forward is fine.
Keep writing. Read some other answers. 🙂
Payment I’d 11500045817
Santosh
You have written well, content is good.
Write few lines about why right to be forgotten is required.
Issues mentioned are good, you can mention about the contradiction when right to be forgotten comes in conflict with the presence of identity, details etc serves a public purpose.
Way forward is fine. You can work on improving the presentation of the answer.
Good attempt. Keep writing. 🙂
Payment Id: pay HFrdyJMOEZ9967. Please review, Sir.
Sumita
You have mentioned most points. Good attempt.
Write a few lines on why we need a right to be forgotten in the first place. You can write it after introduction.
Rest of the points are good. Not much change needed.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
Payment Id pay_HHlJ1R1WIIMdGT
Gauri Shankar
Nice attempt. In introduction, mention about the recent Delhi HC judgement where it ordered deletion of its full judgement from public domain when an acquitted person filed the petition demanding it. Link answers with current affairs, it will give you some extra marks.
After introduction you can write a few lines about why in the first place we need a right to be forgotten.
You can add some points in issues such as – criticism of public figures etc will be in jeopardy, also deleting data which serves a public purpose is not desirable. Rest of the points are good.
Conclusion is good.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
Refid# 422544
Anupam
Nice attempt. In introduction, mention about the recent Delhi HC judgement where it ordered deletion of its full judgement from public domain when an acquitted person filed the petition demanding it. Link answers with current affairs, it will give you some extra marks.
You can also mention briefly about why right to be forgotten is needed.
In issues, both points are good but you can add some such as whether the content serves the public purpose, concept of fair criticism and accountability should also be taken care of. Also mention article 19,with which it comes in direct conflict.
Conclusion is good.
Read some other answers. Keep practicing.
Please review it sir
Pay I’d – pay_HHhwlNw9vfR4HH
Shubham
You have written well. In introduction, mention about the recent Delhi HC judgement where it ordered deletion of its full judgement from public domain when an acquitted person filed the petition demanding it. Link answers with current affairs, it will give you some extra marks.
Ralation with right to privacy has been written well. You can mention briefly why we need right to be forgotten.
Issues are good too, add the contradiction with freedom of speech and expression (press freedom to publish) under article 19, also it can shut down criticism and accountability of public figures.
Conclusion is fine, you can mention the need to bring a holistic data protection law.
Read some other answers. Keep writing.
4.5/10
Payment is HHU8LODcXby9Db
Arpit
Well written answer. In introduction, mention about the recent Delhi HC judgement where it ordered deletion of its full judgement from public domain when an acquitted person filed the petition demanding it. Link answers with current affairs, it will give you some extra marks.
Also since we need to write about relation with right to privacy, you can mention SC judgement which considered right to be forgotten as a part of right to privacy.
Rest of the points, diagram are good.
In issues you can add that it is not desirable to remove such data from public domain which serves a public purpose , also it can shut down criticism and accountability of public figures.
Conclusion is good.
Read some other answers. Keep practicing. 🙂
Payment id-HJHAZEWKSzM3CX
Ankita
Your answer is fine but I think you can use pointwise format in at least some parts of the answer (ex- issues). It will make your answer more concise and also you can cover more points.
Introduction is good. Write up after that is good too but try to make it more concise.
In issues, mention the contradiction with article 19,freedom of speech and expression, publishing by press. Rest of the points are good.
Conclusion can be better, you can mention some way forward- bringing a holistic data protection law, adding privacy exception in article 19 etc
Keep practicing. Read some other answers.
ID-HJjQFLvck5DhqQ
Please review
@Swatantra
Sana
You have written well. Introduction and first part of the answer is good, you have mentioned relevant points.
In issues, mention article 19 in your points. You can add some more issues such as it is undesirable to remove such data which serves a public purpose, absence of legal structures in India to decide upon utility of data etc
Conclusion is okay, but you have written it specific to this HC judgement, make it more broad, you can talk of bringing a holistic data protection law or introducing a privacy exception in article 19 etc
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
pay_HHogiMPYpQ87sC
Kartikey
Introduction is good. In relationship with right to privacy, mention SC judgement ruled that right to be forgotten is a part of right to privacy under article 21. Rest of the points are good.
Issues mentioned are good, but some key points are missing. Mention the contradiction with freedom of speech and expression. It can impinge upon publishing rights of press and hamper journalism, even make journalists liable to punishment. The right can be misused to shut down criticism and accountability of public figures.
Conclusion is okay, you can also talk of bringing a holistic data protection law or introducing a privacy exception in article 19 etc or write a brief way forward separately.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
Razor payment id: HHOoNABVzCCLcD
Aabha
First mention what is right to be forgotten in introduction and then come to privacy and it’s relationship with privacy. You have written the content but structure can be better. Judgements mentioned are good.
Issues mentioned are fine, you can add some- undesirable to remove such data from public domain which serves a public purpose, it can shut down fair criticism and accountability of public figures etc
Also write a brief way forward where you can talk of bringing a holistic data protection law or introducing a privacy exception in article 19 etc
Conclusion is good. Keep practicing. 🙂
@swatantraIdpay_HJ2s89guguFYwg
Harshaa
Introduction and first part of your answer is very good. Issues, you can write in points, that way you will be able to cover more in less words.
Some more issues you can mention- undesirable to remove such data from public domain which serves a public purpose for example court judgements, health and scientific studies etc, also it can shut down fair criticism and accountability of public figure if they invoke their right to be forgotten, absence of proper legal structure in India to decide upon utility of data etc
Also write a brief way forward where you can talk of bringing a holistic data protection law or introducing a privacy exception in article 19 etc
Conclusion is good. Keep practicing. 🙂
4.5/10
REF ID: #0000425733
Please review @Swatantra Sir
Dr House
Nice attempt. Introduction and first part of your answer is very good.
Some more issues you can mention- it can shut down fair criticism and accountability of public figure if they invoke their right to be forgotten, absence of proper legal structure in India to decide upon utility of data, contradiction with right to information of public, also mention article 19 in free speech point etc
Also write a brief way forward (here you can talk of bringing a holistic data protection law), introducing a privacy exception in article 19 etc
Conclusion is good. Keep practicing. 🙂
kindly review
ref id 420326
Deepali
Well written answer. In introduction, mention about the recent Delhi HC judgement where it ordered deletion of its full judgement from public domain when an acquitted person filed the petition demanding it. Link answers with current affairs, it will give you some extra marks.
Also briefly mention why in the first place we need right to be forgotten (misuse of data, stigmatisation over past incidents etc).
Issues you have covered well, but explain a bit about contradiction with free speech- it can lead to harassment of journalists, muzzling of press, shut down criticism of public figures, also mention article 19; one point about contradiction with right to information of public should also be mentioned.
Conclusion is good, you can write a brief way forward with 1-2 points too.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
@Swatantra
Order id -#0000420396
Rohan
Good attempt. The recent Delhi HC judgement where it ordered deletion of its full judgement from public domain when an acquitted person filed the petition demanding it can be mentioned in introduction only, then you can start with defining right to be forgotten. First part of the answer is good.
Some more issues you can mention- it can shut down fair criticism and accountability of public figure if they invoke their right to be forgotten, absence of proper legal structure in India to decide upon utility of data, contradiction with right to information of public, also mention article 19 and impact on press freedom to publish data in free speech point. Remaining points are good.
Way forward is fine too, you can finish with a concluding statement.
6.5/10
Payment Id : 115213946268
Vivek
First part of your answer is fine. You have mentioned why we need the right to be forgotten, that is good.
Both points written in issues are fine but some key ones are missing-
Contradiction with article 19, right to free speech and expression, freedom of press to publish, it can lead to harassment of journalists etc
It can shut down fair criticism of public figure if they invoke their right to be forgotten
Absence of proper legal structure in India to decide upon utility of data
It is undesirable to remove such data from public domain which serves a public purpose for example, health and scientific studies.
Also write a brief way forward where you can talk of bringing a holistic data protection law, introducing a privacy exception in article 19 etc
Conclusion is good. Keep practicing.
5.5/10
Please review
Payment Id pay_HHWzC2O9xhkaqA
Utkarsha
After introduction, you can define right to be forgotten and mention briefly why we need it (misuse of data, stigmatisation over past incidents etc). Comparison is good.
Some issues you should mention- contradiction with free speech(mention article 19), it can lead to harassment of journalists, impinge upon freedom of press,- this is a key issue you should mention.
Additionally, it can shut down fair criticism of public figure if they invoke their right to be forgotten, absence of proper legal structure in India to decide upon utility of data etc can be written too. Remaining points are good.
Conclusion is decent, but it will be better if you can write a separate way forward (talk about bringing law there) with 2-3 points and then end with a general conclusion mentioning the need to balance different fundamental rights.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
5.5/10
pay_HH4AoVE2qPd386
Shivanshu
Some of your statements are incomplete and poorly framed, you have just mentioned keywords and moved on, don’t do that on a regular basis- it is okay if you have lack of time in exam or a word limit issue with lot of content to write, otherwise it gives a bad impression on the examiner.
Your knowledge is good, just frame your arguments more coherently for example – define right to forgotten, mention why we need it, then mention all legal angles at one place(judgements etc, it is all scattered right now), then you can put your views or compare privacy and right to be forgotten, then mention issues, way forward and finally conclude.
Mention of judgements is good. In issues you can explain a bit about contradiction with free speech- it can lead to harassment of journalists, impinge on press freedom, one point about contradiction with right to information of public should also be mentioned,undesirable to remove such data from public domain which serves a public purpose for example court judgements, health and scientific studies etc
Conclusion is fine.
Keep writing. Also read some other answers. 🙂
Order id: 0000422561
Vishnu
The Delhi HC order revoking its judgement can be mentioned in introduction itself ,definition is good, you have repeated it , avoid that. Instead you can write few lines about why we need a right to be forgotten (misuse of data, stigmatisation over past incidents etc).
Mention of Puttaswamy judgement is good. Issues mentioned are good too. Also you can mention it is undesirable to remove such data from public domain which serves a public purpose for example , health and scientific studies. Remaining points are good, mention article 19 in free speech point.
Also write a brief way forward where you can talk of bringing a holistic data protection law, introducing a privacy exception in article 19 etc
Conclusion is good. Keep practicing. 🙂