“Mentor’s Comments”
- https://indianexpress.com/
article/opinion/columns/its- time-for-rbi-to-turn-its- attention-to-inflation- 7372814/ - In the intro, mention the worrying level of CPI inflation above RBI’s upper limit of 6%.
- In the body, describe how inflation benefits the government as a borrower as nominal GDP is used to calculate various fiscal ratios, also the value of past debt and debt servicing costs gets pared in real terms as inflation rises. Also, as the gap between growth and interest rates rises, the debt/GDP ratio falls. Inflation hits the purchasing power and hits private consumption. Inflation trends, specifically input prices (reflected better by WPI), matter for corporate performance as well.
- Conclude by mentioning that the RBI will have to closely monitor inflation trends and calibrate its policy response as the current spell of inflation is over a high base.
Refid# 422544
Anupam
Introduction is fine. You have mentioned how inflation effects borrowers, that is good too.
Points in implication are factually fine but generic. Mention the effects on government as that is a core demand of the question- Nominal GDP will rise due to surge in inflation and since it is used as a base for computing the fiscal ratios, these will get deflated. Value of past debt and debt servicing costs will become less and as the gap between growth and interest rates rises, the debt/GDP ratio falls.
For private sector too, mention what is happening in the current context- Currently, producers seem to be bearing a part of the burden of rising input costs for now but these could get passed on in greater measure to consumers once demand recovers.
Point about decreasing private consumption is good. Also, you can mention-
Incomes are under stress, so impact on consumption may get worse.
Private consumption in rural areas is hit more than in urban areas since non-food inflation is higher this time than food inflation. Also govt support to rural area/farmer is less this time.
Conclusion is good.
Read some other answers. Keep writing, structure of your answer is good, just improve your content a bit.
pay_HH1EGxOD3EGEhl
Subhashree
Introduction is fine. Inflation actually benefits the borrowers as the value of the money or the interest they pay back is less than what it would have been expected at the time of borrowing.
This principle applies to government also. Debt and debt servicing cost becomes less. You have mentioned the implication on government, that is good. Try to write in your own words, it will help build upon your concept.
Point about private consumption being hurt in rural areas more is due to non-food inflation being higher this time than food inflation, be careful in writing, if food inflation is higher, urban areas might get hit harder.
For private sector mention that-currently, producers seem to be bearing a part of the burden of rising input costs for now but these could get passed on in greater measure to consumers once demand recovers.
Conclusion is fine. Go through the article once more and clear all your concepts. In such questions, if concepts aren’t clear, it can become totally awkward in exam. Keep writing. 🙂
Please review
Payment Id pay_HHWzC2O9xhkaqA
Utkarsha
Introduction is fine, implications on government is also fine, you can mention about interest rate remaining same, and growth in nominal gdp due to surge in inflation- debt/gdp ratio falls.
Points about other stake holders are fine. This happens in most of the cases. You can also mention some points for the current context when non-food inflation is higher than food inflation and what effect does it have.
Incomes are under stress, so impact on consumption may get worse.
Private consumption in rural areas is hit more than in urban areas since non-food inflation is higher. Also govt support to rural area/farmer is less this time.
Conclusion is good. Read some other answers. Keep writing.
Payment id-HJHAZEWKSzM3CX
Ankita
Keep the introduction simple, the question is not asking about trends in WPI & CPI in so much detail. Define inflation and more than 6% CPI inflation is a worrying sign.
In the implications on government part too, you have mentioned so much data, these data will keep on changing, just mention the concept neatly and move on.
Nominal GDP will rise due to surge in inflation and since it is used as a base for computing the fiscal ratios, these will get deflated. Value of past debt and debt servicing costs will become less and as the gap between growth and interest rates rises, the debt/GDP ratio falls- this should be enough.
For private sector you can mention that-currently, producers seem to be bearing a part of the burden of rising input costs for now but these could get passed on in greater measure to consumers once demand recovers.
Rest of the points are fine, conclusion is okay too.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
4.5/10
Razor payment id:- HHOoNABVzCCLcD
Aabha
Your introduction is good. Points about implication on government are also fine, also mention that since interest rates remain same and nominal GDP increases due to rising inflation, debt/GDP ratio decreases.
You have to mention about effect on other stakeholders -private citizens, corporates, farmers etc.
For private sector – Currently, producers seem to be bearing a part of the burden of rising input costs for now but these could get passed on in greater measure to consumers once demand recovers.
Private consumption is decreasing. Also, Incomes are under stress, so impact on consumption may get worse.
Private consumption in rural areas is hit more than in urban areas since non-food inflation is higher this time than food inflation. Also govt support to rural area/farmer is less this time.
Conclusion is good.
Read some other answers. Keep writing, take the help of the article you need to work a bit on the content. 🙂
3.5/10
Payment Id: pay HFrdyJMOEZ9967. Please review, Sir.
Sumita
Good attempt, introduction is fine, you can make it more concise.
Rest of the answer is fine, structure is good and your understanding is also fine.
In other stake holders, mention about impact on private sector, investors, exporters, importers also -currently, producers seem to be bearing a part of the burden of rising input costs for now but these could get passed on in greater measure to consumers once demand recovers.
Higher imports, reduced exports reduce returns on fixed income investments etc
Conclusion is good.
Read some other answers. Keep writing🙂
order id #0000422220 please review it sir
Rajesh
Good attempt. Introduction is fine, implications that you have written are also fine.
Exports won’t rise as value of raw materials, labour etc increases with inflation, also imports will be cheaper and increase as price of imports won’t rise, question is about domestic inflation.
Also you can write some points keeping in mind the current nature of inflation. Private consumption in rural areas is hit more than in urban areas since non-food inflation is higher this time than food inflation. Also govt support to rural area/farmer is less this time.
Conclusion is fine.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
Please review sir
Payment Id: pay_HHNZ7RGmO4BG6P
Sushmita
Introduction is fine, in implications for government, mention that Nominal GDP will rise due to surge in inflation and since it is used as a base for computing the fiscal ratios, these will get deflated.
In points about consumers, bring more clarity, you have mentioned food inflation> non-food, that is not the case.
Rest of the points are good, you can also mention impact on investors, lenders, export-import etc
Way forward and conclusion is good.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
pay_HHogiMPYpQ87sC
Kartikey
Good attempt, you can mention the current context too in introduction. In implications on government, mention about rise in nominal GDP, interest remaining unchanged, there will be fall in debt/GDP ratio.
Rest of the points are fine, you should also mention the different effects on rural and urban population in the current context-Private consumption is decreasing. Also, Incomes are under stress, so impact on consumption may get worse.
Private consumption in rural areas is hit more than in urban areas since non-food inflation is higher this time than food inflation. Also govt support to rural area/farmer is less this time.
Currently, producers seem to be bearing a part of the burden of rising input costs for now but these could get passed on in greater measure to consumers once demand recovers.
Conclusion is fine.
Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂
REF ID: #0000425733
Please review @Swatantra Sir
Dr House
You can start with defining inflation. Implications on government should be explained in a bit more detail. Nominal GDP will rise due to surge in inflation and since it is used as a base for computing the fiscal ratios, these will get deflated. Value of past debt and debt servicing costs will become less and as the gap between growth and interest rates rises, the debt/GDP ratio falls.
Rest of the points are good. In way forward, you have mentioned further accomodative monetary policy, not sure that will work since it means further lowering interest rates, which will lead to more money in the hands of people, increasing demand which might further increase inflation. You can frame the statement better. RBI stance is already accomodative, you can mention the need to be careful.
Rest of the points and conclusion are fine.
Read some other answers. Keep writing.
kindly review @Swatantra sir
ref id #420326
kindly review @Swatantra sir
ref id #420326
Deepali
You can start with defining inflation. Implications on government are well written, elaborate a bit on private consumption- Private consumption is decreasing. Also, Incomes are under stress, so impact on consumption may get worse.
Private consumption in rural areas is hit more than in urban areas since non-food inflation is higher this time than food inflation. Also govt support ( MGNREGA support is budgeted at a lower level, and price trends are not supportive) to rural area/farmer is less this time.
Currently, producers seem to be bearing a part of the burden of rising input costs for now but these could get passed on in greater measure to consumers once demand recovers.
Points mentioned are good. Way forward and conclusion is also fine. You have mentioned a point about RBI and supply-side, actually supply side interventions can mostly be impacted by the government, RBI can intervene through monetary policy. Frame that point better.
Read some other answers. Keep writing.
pay_HH4AoVE2qPd386 please review
Shivanshu
Decent attempt but very generic answer. You can start with defining inflation. Implications on government should be explained in a bit more detail. Nominal GDP will rise due to surge in inflation and since it is used as a base for computing the fiscal ratios, these will get deflated. Value of past debt and debt servicing costs will become less and as the gap between growth and interest rates rises, the debt/GDP ratio falls.
Rest of the points are fine, in the last point you have mentioned imports, better mention input prices, also this jump in production prices might be shifted to consumers when demand becomes normal. Also, domestic inflation might lead to rise in imports because imports will become cheaper.
You can write a short way forward. Conclusion is fine.
Read some other answers. Keep writing.
ID-HJjQFLvck5DhqQ
Please review
@Swatantra sir