Mentor’s comment:
- https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/ending-inaction/article30627769.ece
- In the intro, briefly explain what is an anti-defection law.
- In the body, explain various cases in which the Speakers have acted impartial and let the political parties defeat the purpose of the law. This impartial nature whether in acting against the defectors or in some case not acting against the defectors is at the root of the controversies in many cases. Explain how a tribunal would be a better option to the Speaker under 10th Schedule.
- In conclusion, state the importance of anti-defection law for political stability and how making it effective is a necessity.
please review
The answer seems more like an editorial than a UPSC Mains level answer.
This is because most of your discussion is roaming around ADL and not on the actual demand of the answer which is the pros and cons of having a permanent tribunal for ADL.
The explanation done on the ADL needs to be shortened and instead, the main focus should be on the critical analysis of the proposed tribunal.
Your structure needs to be in sync with the demand of the question.
MOJO0102A00A52642901
sir!! there is some technical faut while logging in trough fb i have to loggin through some other route- it’s showing that site is under development please convey it to your technical team so as to fix it as sooon as possible
MOJO0101500D20984167