Mentors Comments:
1. Define GDP and highlight its significance as an economic indicator.
2. What issues are raised in using GDP as a standard?
3. Provide alternatives to GDP and give a futuristic solution
Answer:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is one of the most widely used measures of an economy’s output or production. It is defined as the total value of goods and services produced within a country’s borders in a specific time period
Merits of GDP as a tool to measure the economic performance of a nation:
- GDP consists of consumer spending, investment expenditure, government spending, and net exports hence it portrays an all-inclusive picture of an economy because of which it provides an insight to investors which highlights the trend of the economy by comparing GDP levels as an index
- GDP is used as an indicator for most governments and economic decision-makers for planning and policy formulation
- In the case of GDP, each component is given the weight of its relative price. In market economies, it clicks as prices reflect both marginal cost of the producer and marginal utility for the consumer, i.e. people sell at a price that others are willing to pay
- GDP helps the investors to manage their portfolios by providing them with guidance about the state of the economy
- Calculation of GDP provides the general health of the economy. A negative GDP growth portrays bad signals for the economy. Economists analyze GDP to find out whether the economy is in recession, depression or boom
- GDP growth over time enables central banks and policymakers to evaluate whether the economy is in recession or inflation. In that sense, it is still required.
- Also, GDP has held significance as a universal metric over the years.
Issues
- The fact that GDP per capita does not fully capture the broader idea of the standard of living has led to a concern that the increases in GDP over time are illusory.
- GDP includes what is spent on environmental protection, healthcare, and education, but it does not include actual levels of environmental cleanliness, health, and learning.
- GDP includes the cost of buying pollution-control equipment, but it does not address whether the air and water are actually cleaner or dirtier.
- GDP includes spending on medical care, but it does not address whether life expectancy or infant mortality has risen or fallen.
- Similarly, GDP counts spending on education, but it does not address directly how much of the population can read, write, or do basic mathematics.
- GDP has nothing to say about the level of inequality in society.
- The International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gita Gopinath, raised red flags over the way deflators are being used in India’s growth calculations and the lack of transparency around them.
Alternatives:
- Some of the recent approaches have tried to go beyond GDP and incorporate most of these factors into the measurement of the well-being within the society.
- Gini coefficient:
- measures the income inequality among a country’s citizens — but it fails to measure social benefits or interventions that reduce the gap or inequality between rich and poor.
- HDI (Human Development Index)
- overcomes most of the shortcomings of the Gini coefficient and GNH.
- However, HDI, as a measure, falls short in its capture of the unequal distribution of wealth within the country and the level of infrastructural development.
- Many prospects of a healthy society, such as environmental sustainability and personal rights, are not included in HDI.
- It is not successful in tracking the apparent progress of countries, nor is it sufficiently factorized into primary level parameters to indicate many important areas of policy.
- GNH (Gross National Happiness):
- measures the happiness levels of the citizens in a country while it ignores other important elements like gender equality, quality education and good infrastructure.
- After this, Millennium Development Goals and Sustainable Development Goals were also built along various dimensions based on the work done in understanding human development.
- SPI as a complementary index
- It goes beyond the traditional measure of GDP and has most parameters that are required to fulfill SDGs.
- SPI is based on three fundamental pillars:
- basic needs for survival
- access to the building blocks to improve living conditions
- access to opportunity to pursue goals and ambitions.
Payment ID:MOJO9b01O00A90839766
Please review.
Good intro.
The 1st part of the answer should discuss the pros of using GDP figures. Only then you should discuss the negatives of GDP. This is called balancing the answer.
The rest of the answer, especially the last part of the main body is well attempted.
The discussion on the paradox of the GDP is prefect. Keep it up.
Good presentation.
Good use of flowcharts.
Explanation is lucid.
Please review MOJO9b05300A74622986
The answer lacks balance.
You have to discuss the pros of using GDP.
Also, discuss the alternatives separately, under a different subheading rather than passing them off as a conclusion.
The answer overall lacks depth in the 2nd part of the answer. There are various alternatives yet you failed to discuss or explain them properly.
End your answer on a balancing tone and not in a pessimistic way.
Read the model answer
The language is good
Payment ID MOJO9a29300A61774733
Hi Dipanshu
Kindly upload pictures in an upright position because it becomes difficult for us to read tilted images on our system.
The 1st part of the answer should discuss the pros of using GDP figures. Only then you should discuss the negatives of GDP. This is called balancing the answer.
The overall content is OK but do write clearly and make your subheadings prominent.
Use plain paper in order to get a proper habit of using space and alignment of the statements.
Work on your presentation skills.
Decent language.
MOJO9a31K00N58111047
MOJO9a31K00N58111047
Good intro.
The 1st part of the answer should discuss the pros of using GDP figures. Only then you should discuss the negatives of GDP. This is called balancing the answer.
The rest of the answer, especially the last part of the main body is well attempted.
Points are concrete and well explained.
Good presentation.
Please review.
MOJO9b04600W25293262
The main body of the answer is decent.
Good intro.
The answer overall lacks depth in the 2nd part of the answer. There are various alternatives yet you failed to discuss or explain them properly.
Read the model answer for those explanations and points.
Good explanation in the 1st part.
MOJO9b04X00D25275001
The answer lacks depth in all the parts.
You have to discuss the pros of using GDP.
Also, discuss the alternatives separately, under a different subheading rather than passing them off as a conclusion.
The answer overall lacks depth in the 2nd part of the answer. There are various alternatives yet you failed to discuss or explain them properly.
Read the model answer for those explanations and points.
The language is good
MOJO9930Q00N64198657
A very good intro.
The main body of the answer is decent.
Good explanation.
The points are comprehensive and well structured.
The balance is perfect.
Good that you discussed the needs for using GDP.
Very good way forwards.
Write conclusion always.
MOJO9b02200D52463423
Good intro.
The 1st part of the answer should discuss the pros of using GDP figures. Only then you should discuss the negatives of GDP. This is called balancing the answer.
The rest of the answer, especially the last part of the main body is well attempted.
Points are concrete and well explained.
Good presentation.
Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558
Very large intro.
Avoid such large points, statements and paragraphs.
Ideally, your statements should not be of more than 10 12 words.
That will make your points crisp and effective.
The answer lacks depth in all the parts.
You have to discuss the pros of using GDP.
The answer overall lacks depth in the 2nd part of the answer. There are various alternatives yet you failed to discuss or explain them properly with proper balance.
Read the model answer for those explanations and points.
Underline imp points
Payment ID: MOJO9a24700A60815067
A very good intro.
The main body of the answer is decent.
Good explanation.
The points are comprehensive and well structured.
The balance is perfect. Good that you discussed the needs for using GDP.
But, discuss the alternatives separately, under a different subheading rather than passing them off as a conclusion.
The answer overall lacks depth in the last part of the answer. There are various alternatives yet you failed to discuss or explain them properly.
Read the model answer for the last part.
MOJO9b06O00N30009361
Please review.
Payment id- MOJO9a05700D19953140
Good intro.
The 1st part of the answer should discuss the pros of using GDP figures. Only then you should discuss the negatives of GDP. This is called balancing the answer.
The rest of the answer, especially the last part of the main body is well attempted.
Points are concrete and well explained.
Good presentation.
Good use of flowcharts.
Explanation is lucid.
MOJO9a31100A58098507
A very good intro.
The main body of the answer is decent.
Good explanation.
The points are comprehensive and well structured.
The balance is perfect. Good that you discussed the needs for using GDP.
But, discuss the alternatives separately, under a different subheading rather than passing them off as a conclusion.
The answer overall lacks depth in the last part of the answer. There are various alternatives yet you failed to discuss or explain them properly.
Read the model answer for the last part.
MOJO9b03K00A07920521
A very good intro.
The main body of the answer is decent.
Good explanation.
The points are comprehensive and well structured.
The balance is perfect.
Good that you discussed the needs for using GDP.
Very good discussion in the last part of the answer.
The overall coverage and direction of the answer is perfect.
ID: MOJO9a29V00D61774546
Thank you.
The answer lacks depth.
You have to explain more about the drawbacks of GDP. Do not pass off the main demand of the questions in one-liner flowcharts. They demand little but of explanations for each point.
Points are placed haphazardly and there is no direction in the main body of the answer.
Good last part of the answer.
The discussion in the last part is extensive and to the point.
Read the model answer.
The 1st part of the answer should discuss the pros of using GDP figures. Only then you should discuss the negatives of GDP. This is called balancing the answer.
MOJO9b04S00N25297271. Please review
A very good intro.
The main body of the answer is decent.
Good explanation.
The points are comprehensive and well structured.
The balance is perfect.
Good that you discussed the needs for using GDP.
But, discuss the alternatives separately, under a different subheading rather than passing them off as a conclusion.
The answer overall lacks depth in the last part of the answer. There are various alternatives yet you failed to discuss or explain them properly.
Read the model answer for the last part.
@Parth Verma
I think discussion of Alternatives is not in sync with the core demand of the question. i need to give more time and space to precise demand of question.
MOJO9a05K00A19952476
Comprehensive discussion.
Good use of graphs in the 2nd part of the main body.
Keep it up.
The points are well covered and decently structured.
The balance is perfect.
The points are well structured.
Very good discussion in the last part of the answer.
The overall coverage and direction of the answer is perfect.
Balanced conclusion.
MOJO9a25MOON56192840
The way forward should be balanced.
Briefly discuss the issue of sticking to just one formula.
The endpoint should mention that despite its issues, the GDP is an important dimension which cannot be left alone. Along with it though, we need to keep a tab on other parameters as well and together with GDP, they can give a perfect balance and glance to our performances in all aspects as a nation.
Hence, you should end the answer with a proper and balanced conclusion.
Also, a conclusion serves as a perfect soft landing to your overall discussion. hence, do not forget to write the conclusions in your answers.
Coming to the main body of the answer, the intro is decent.
The coverage in the ain body is OK and the content is well explained.
Read the model answer for the missing talking points.