- Mention the definition of a Joint session and it’s goals.
- Enumerate, in what instances the sessions would happen and when it won’t.
Answer:
India has a bicameral legislature, passage of any bill requires concurrence of both houses (the lower house, Lok Sabha and the upper house, Rajya Sabha). The Constitution makers foresaw such situations where a deadlock may occur between the two houses of the Parliament and to resolve this deadlock provision of joint sitting is provided in Indian Constitution.
Details about Joint sitting of Parliament
Article 108 of the Indian Constitution provides for a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament
- The joint session is summoned by the President.
- It is presided over by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha
- The joint sitting is governed by the Rules of Procedure of Lok Sabha and not of Rajya Sabha.
- The quorum to constitute a joint sitting: 1/10th of the total number of members of the House.
- The Bill is passed by a simple majority of the total number of members of both the Houses present and voting in the joint sitting,
Occasions when Joint Session of Parliament is summoned:
- To resolve deadlock when any house of the Parliament passes a bill and:
- The other House rejects this bill, or
- The Houses do not agree on the amendments made to the bill, or
- More than six months elapsed with the bill being received by the other House without it being passed.
- According to Article 87 of the Constitution, there are two instances when the country’s President specifically addresses a joint sitting of both Houses. They are:
- At the start of the first session after a general election. This is when the reconstituted ok Sabha meets for the first time after being elected.
- At the start of the first session every year.
- When any foreign dignitary may addresses the Parliament e.g. Barack Obama addressed a joint session of Parliament during his visit in 2010.
Some Examples of Joint Sessions to resolve deadlock
Since 1950, the provision regarding the joint sitting of the two Houses has been invoked only thrice. The bills that have been passed at joint sittings are:
- Dowry Prohibition Bill, 1960.
- Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill, 1977.
- Prevention of Terrorism Bill, 2002.
Exceptions to Joint Session
According to the Indian Constitution, there are two exceptions when a joint sitting cannot be summoned. They are for the following bills:
- Constitution Amendment Bill: According to Article 368, both houses of Parliament must pass a Constitutional Amendment bill separately. There is no provision for a joint sitting in case of a disagreement.
- Money Bill (Article 110): As per the Constitution, money bills require the Lok Sabha’s approval only, Rajya Sabha has limited powers in this regard.
Joint sitting is an extraordinary machinery provided by the Constitution aimed to maintain a much-needed synergy between the two houses of the Parliament.
Please review
Please provide the payment ID while submitting the answers for quick reviews.
Whenever there is a static question related to polity, always mention the relevant article numbers of the constitution related to it. Otherwise, you will not be able to show the depth of your knowledge in the answer.
The overall content is OK but do mention the incidents when the Indian parliament has had joint sittings and regarding which affair.
The 1st part of the answer should discuss these points:
The joint session is summoned by the President.
It is presided over by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha
The joint sitting is governed by the Rules of Procedure of Lok Sabha and not of Rajya Sabha.
The quorum to constitute a joint sitting: 1/10th of the total number of members of the House.
The Bill is passed by a simple majority of the total number of members of both the Houses present and voting in the joint sitting,
Always underline the imp stuff.
MOJO9a22Y0081423116
A very good intro.
Everything is correct in your answer except the last point where you discussed the instances of joint sittings.
So far, Joint Session of the Parliament of India has been called for only three bills that have been passed at joint sessions: the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, the Banking Service Commission Repeal Bill, 1978, and the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002.
The women reservation bill has been pending before the parliaments for a long time and it is yet to be passed or rejected by both the houses.
Therefore avoid such glaring factual mistakes in the answer.
Apart from that, the answer is quite decent and the language, explanation and presentation all are fine.
Good and crisp points.
Decent hand writing
MOJO9a02U00D28381180
Avoid making pointers or headers in your intro. That is a bok styled answer writing which is not suitable in the UPSC Mains.
The overall content is OK but do mention the incidents when the Indian parliament has had joint sittings and regarding which affair.
Just a simple one-liner will do wonders here like:
So far, Joint Session of the Parliament of India has been called for only three bills that have been passed at joint sessions: the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, the Banking Service Commission Repeal Bill, 1978, and the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002.
Also, do mention the concept of foreign dignitaries addressing the “joint sitting of parliament”
The language is decent and explanation is fine.
Make your presentation and structure look like continuous and not fractured.
please review…
payment id:MOJO9a29300A6177473
do mention the incidents when the Indian parliament has had joint sittings and regarding which affair.
Just a simple one-liner will do wonders here like:
So far, Joint Session of the Parliament of India has been called for only three bills that have been passed at joint sessions: the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, the Banking Service Commission Repeal Bill, 1978, and the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002.
Also, do mention the concept of foreign dignitaries addressing the “joint sitting of parliament”
Apart from that, the content is very good and to the point.
Excellent conclusion.
The approach is decent.
The presentation is very much improved this time.
But give some gap after each subheading.
Underline the imp stuff
ID
MOJO9b01C00A90817216
A very detailed and informative answer.
The overall coverage is perfect.
Your answer has all the necessary headers and points.
The structure is perfect and you have managed to present them really well.
The language is also smooth.
Nothing wrong with the attempt
Payment ID:MOJO9b01O00A90839766
Please review
*not checked*
Because the submission was late in terms of the weekly deadline of 7 days. Wait for the review once the rest are done.
If the answer is not submitted in the same week of the test then the 7 days criteria is not applicable because the priority is given to the current week and timely submissions. So once we finish all the tests we come back from day one to see the pending answers. Hence wait for that to happen. Thanks
Sure sir, thank you.
Your introduction is good and contain all relevant information — but it is one full page long. In actual exam, you may not have shortage of page, but most probably you will be running out of time.
Good attempt at drawing a diagram.
Overall structure is good with use of subheadings to deal with different parts of questions.
If you have made a mistake and want to change it (like you made in writing 2010), just strike it off neatly and write again. Overwriting should be avoided. It looks ugly and at same time makes reading difficult.
When writing exceptions, please mention both exceptions (Amendment bill and Money bill) separately and mention reason. You have written a single line for both, however reason behind exceptions in both cases are different. Is it not?
Good attempt.
Keep writing!!
The overall content of the answer is ideal and to the point.
The structure of the answer is fine.
The points are informative.
When discussing the exceptions, do mention the reasons for them being exempted under the joint sittings.
The language and explanation are on the expected line.
You have met all the demands of the question perfectly.
MOJO9b03K00A07920521
Introduction should mention Article 108.
Beware of generalizations (not all bill passed needs concurrence of both houses, money bill is exception!!). Factual mistakes can be costly.
You have made proper subheadings and mentioned Article in main body. Good!!
You have underlined important areas which will help examiner see important points without extra effort.
Your hand writing is neat and legible. Spacing is also proper.
But Divya… Your answer is so similar in content and structure to model answer that it gives impression that you have first read model and then reproduced it.
It will help you more if you first write your own answer and submit it. Then refer to model to see what you missed.
All the best!!
Thanks sir for the Review. Yes sir, you are right. I have read the model answer before attempting my question. I will try my own answer from next time onwards before referring to the model answer sir.
I have a doubt sir. In questions like these, how to score extra Marks when the content is same and can be reproduced by all in an equal manner?
Am No sir… Banke will do fine 🙂
These are static problems and facts remain same. But
1. Not all will be able to recall all the facts in pressure cooker situation of exam. So trick is frequent revision and thinking over topics.
2. Your structure overall is good. You may try drawing some diagram to express same fact. like refer to 2nd page of Sahithya`s answer to the same question.
Thank you Banke sir. ? Points Noted. ?
Whenever discussing the provisions of the constitution, always mention the relevant articles numbers in the intro. These are small steps in getting extra marks. Plus you will be able to show the depth of your knowledge.
In terms of the structure, bring the discussion of the occasion of a joint sitting after the intro. Then only discuss the modalities of the joint sitting.
Rest of the answer is fine.
Good content and presentation.
Explanation is decent.
How to attach a file. I am not getting attachment option. Is it because I have not joined Daily Answer Writing
In the join the discussion box, there is an option of attaching the pdf file. Upload your pdf there.
I am not able to see that option of attachment. Can you show by attaching screenshot where I can find it. Or is it not visible to just me?
https://www.civilsdaily.com/submission-of-awe-answers/
@Parth Verma @Root I am not getting this attach option
It’s working. If not please email a screenshot to @Civils Daily.com">hello@Civils Daily.com
payment id-MOJO9925Q00A88602377
You should have defined what a deadlock means (i.e disagreement between Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) in introduction it self.
Whenever you use a technical term, just make it clear what you meat by that. Please do not assume that examiner will understand himself.
Good that you mentioned Article number. This gives credibility to your answer.
This is 15 marks question. So you should have dealt with provisions of Article 108 in some more details (like Who presides over it? Whether a bill in joint session is passed by simple majority or special?).
You made a table which is a good way to list different conditions.
But…. complete the table by drawing horizontal and vertical partitions. You wont want examiner to struggle to find where your 1st condition ended and where 2nd started. More s/he struggles, more you are in trouble. Make examiners life easy!!
Reason behind application of Article 108 in all the three conditions listed by you is same — To break deadlock over an important legislation.
You have missed mentioning other two scenarios when a joint session can be called (Address by the President and address by a foreign dignitary). See model.
In exceptions
Please mention Article number of Provision for Amendment Act (Article 368) and Money bill (Article 110).
In writing reasons, you referred to constitutional provisions. Better if you can write logic behind those provisions also. (You did tried doing so in amendment bill.. good)
You should answer this question — Why Rajya Sabha has not been given same power over Money bill as Lok Sabha?
You could have listed 3 occasions when Article 108 have been invoked. Examples, just like Articles, makes your answer more credible.
Hariom, now, Some general points!!
1. Try to improve your hand writing. Even small improvement will be good.
2. Keep proper spacing between lines and paragraphs. In exam, you will have ample space. Proper spacing makes your answer neat. This may also hide your handwriting issue.
3. Work on sentence structuring. It should be simple and lucid. Refer to your Introduction sentence. Same sentence could have been written as “In case of deadlock over a bill between two houses of the Parliament, the constitution has provision for joint sitting of the two houses.”
Good attempt.
Keep improving… one step at a time!!
The intro of the answer lacks the context of deadlock. What is the deadlock in parliament over a bill?
The overall content lacks the depth needed in the answer.
Do mention the incidents when the Indian parliament has had joint sittings and regarding which affair.
Just a simple one-liner will do wonders here like:
So far, Joint Session of the Parliament of India has been called for only three bills that have been passed at joint sessions: the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, the Banking Service Commission Repeal Bill, 1978, and the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002.
Also, do mention the concept of foreign dignitaries addressing the “joint sitting of parliament”
More explanation was needed in the answer.
Read the model answer.
Always underline important stuff.
so the joint setting is held in which house?
Hi there
In your model answer you have not provided REASONS and question clearly asks for reasons in both the cases. Kindly mention reasons as well since reasons are not there in Laxmikanth.
It’ll be great help to us.
Thank you