Mentors Comment:
- The reform movement of 19th century played a prominent role in the social life of the 19th century. The highlight of these reforms were education of women and banning of various evil practices that were aimed at women only. But when looked closely, it can be seen that fell short of giving equality to women with respect to men in society. This last statement is the crux of the question. You have to discuss how reform movements failed to provide equal status to women.
- Introduce the reform movements in the intro briefly and discuss its focus areas. And towards the end, in a single statement mention the shortcoming of the movement when it came to equality of women.
- Then base the main body of the answer on the discussion on how the reform movement failed to see women as equal and how their thought process was confined to the four walls of households and the old concept of morality and purity of women. The inequality of women reflected in all parts of life like low wages for working women, less number of female reformers, opposition of work done by female reformers, idea of educated wife and mother, backseat in early freedom movement. Towards the end of the discussion do mention the reform movement did give women education and freedom from evil practices but it failed to launch the second stage where women could have claimed the equal status in society.
- To score better, mention some female reformers who faced opposition from their fellow male reformers.
- In the end, summarise the whole discussion but mention how the advent of Gandhi ji changed this whole condition and suddenly women found themselves on equal footing with men in the freedom movement.
Answer:
India in the 19th century witnessed a series of reform movements undertaken in various parts of the country which were oriented toward a restructuring of the Indian society along modem lines. Thoughtful Indians began to look for the defects of their society and for ways and means of removing them. Early reformers were groping to find suitable answers for problems with women’s emancipation. But somewhere in the reform movement, they missed the opportunity to bring women to the equal footing as they were.
Reform movement and missing equal status of women:
- Hunter commission of 1882 noted that 98% of women in India were illiterate and recommended special attention for their education.
- The degraded condition of women was often used as an attack on Indian culture, so reformers often imagined a golden past where women were treated with dignity and honor.
- As reformism gave way to revival, Hindu women became an ideal emblem of the moral order.
- Through the movement of reformists in the 19th Century, middle-class women started getting an education and their number started rising steadily.
- But the purpose of this education, meant for women, was different and never for the emancipation of women.
- The colonial government wanted educated wives so that the English speaking mothers could inculcate English taste in the children from the beginning which would lead to loyalty towards the government.
- In their educated wives, the educated Indian males dreamt of the western ideal of companionate marriage.
- Wrongly educated or the over-educated women were considered a threat even by the liberals.
- Similarly, Muslims educators of women too wanted women who would be better wives, better mothers, and better Muslims.
- Even when the women worked, their reproductive role was considered primary and economically productive role secondary and their incomes were considered to be supplementary only.
- Thus they received low wages and were first to be fired and were not expected to take part in labor agitations.
- One Pandita Ramabai took the lead and started Arya Mahila Samaj in Maharashtra. She also started Mukti Mission and Sharda Sadan to uplift the condition of widows. She also defied many of the social practices like hypogamy, seclusion, conversion, etc. She was equally criticized by reformers and conservatives.
- Thus even in the early revolutionary movement, there were a few women who participated but they were assigned secondary roles only and not the main roles.
- It is not as if the reform movement did nothing for women. The education they received and various peculiar customs were done away with, through these movements only. Job opportunities were created for women and their voices gained weight.
- But when it came to equality, the reform movement came short on that promise.
By the turn of the 19th century, whatever be said, the fact remains that a number of women in the middle-class Hindu households were educated. But this did not improve the conditions of their social existence very remarkably at that time. Eventually, it was Gandhi who changed this concept and shifted the emphasis from their reproductive power to their selfless sacrificing power. He always held men and women equal and he had already seen their capacity of sacrifice in SAF and he sought to harness it. Thus Basanti Devi, Urmilla Devi, and Suniti Devi shocked the nation by participating in an open demonstrations on the streets of Calcutta and courting arrest.
MOJO9b04X00D25275001
Hi Amit Ojha
Welcome to the Daily AWE program.
The introduction is not on lines of the question asked as there is no need to link it to contemporary issues.
The body part is also drifted away from the approach of the question asked as it specifically asks about Indian freedom struggle.
So no need to mention names of Plato etc.
Mention of Ganhiji is appreciated but whole answer is deviated in its approach.
MOJO9b11000A63126792
Hi Aakriti Kumari
Welcome to the Daily AWE program.
Introduction is good and in line with question asked.
In body part, the inequalities faced by women despite reform movements could have been mentioned in points.
Mention of Gandhi ji to elevate women status is good one and the conclusion is satisfactory with foreseeing approach.
MOJO9930Q00N64198657
Hi Swetha K
Welcome to the Daily AWE program.
Introduction is good and to the point.
Flow chart is appreciable.
Achivements of male reformers could have been shortened.
The paradox of reform movements with gender equality is explained well.
Conclusion is satisfactory.
MOJO9b03K00A07920521
Hi Divya Murugesan
Welcome to the Daily AWE program.
Introduction is well in line with the question asked.
In body part you can shorten the achievements of male reformers in 2-3 lines
Instead you can elaborate more on the failure of these reforms to uplift woman to come out publicly and assert their rights.
Advent of Gandhi ji and mention of Sarojini Naidu is well appreciated.
Conclusion should have emphasised upon the post-Gandhian time only.
payment ID – MOJO9a21ROON30518033
Good intro.
Avoid large statements. The second last paragraph is almost made up of a single statement.
This affects the quality of the discussion.
Also, avoid modern-day lingos like “wanna.”
The main discussion should have more content. Base the main body of the answer on the discussion on how the reform movement failed to see women as equal and how their thought process was confined to the four walls of households and the old concept of morality and purity of women. The inequality of women reflected in all parts of life like low wages for working women, less number of female reformers, opposition of work done by female reformers, idea of educated wife and mother, backseat in early freedom movement. Towards the end of the discussion do mention the reform movement did give women education and freedom from evil practices but it failed to launch the second stage where women could have claimed the equal status in society.
Avoid lengthy paragraphs and stick to the bullet points.
Read the model answer for more talking points in the ain body