Mentors Comments:
- Mention the state of global temperature rise.
- Explain the reasons for the continued gap in meeting climate change targets, both at national and international level.
- Suggest technological and policy level ways to address the same.
- Source : https://www.thehindu.com/
opinion/editorial/widening- gap/article30109742.ece
Answer:
The UN’s Emissions Gap Report comes as a sharp warning to countries preparing to meet in Madrid in December, under the aegis of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Every year of inaction is jeopardising the main goal of the Paris Agreement: to keep the rise in global temperature over pre-industrial times well below 2°C, and ideally at 1.5°C.
Emissions gap represents the difference between current actions to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) and what is needed to meet the target. In quantitative terms, the UN report estimates that there would have to be a 2.7% average annual cut in emissions from 2020 to 2030 for temperature rise to be contained at 2°C, while the more ambitious 1.5° C target would require a 7.6% reduction.
Highlight of the report:
- The world will fail to meet the 1.5°C temperature goal of the Paris Agreement unless global greenhouse gas emissions fall by 7.6 per cent each year.
- Global temperatures are set to rise about 3.2 degrees C by 2100, the report says, bringing catastrophic weather including hotter, deadlier heatwaves and more frequent floods and drought.
- The top four emitters (China, USA, EU and India) contributed to over 55% of the total emissions over the last decade, excluding emissions from land-use change such as deforestation.
- The rankings would change if land-use change emissions were included, with Brazil likely to be the largest emitter.
- India is the fourth-largest emitter of Green House Gases (GHGs).
- It is among a small group of countries that are on their way to achieve their self-declared climate targets under the Paris Agreement.
Are governments doing enough?
- Today, countries are not doing enough.
- An increasing number of countries and regions are adopting ambitious goals in line with the transformation needed, but the scale and pace is not sufficient.
- Most nations are expected to strengthen their climate commitments in 2020.
- To date, 71 countries and 11 regions, accounting for about 15% of global GHG emissions in total, have long-term objectives to achieve net-zero emissions, differing in scope, timing and the degree to which they are legally binding.
- This leaves countries representing the remaining 85% of global GHG emissions still to make similar commitments.
- G20 members account for 78 per cent of all global greenhouse gas emissions.
- Out of the 20 members, six of them which include China, the EU28, India, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey are slated to meet their unconditional NDC targets with current policies.
- Theirs is the biggest opportunity to lead the world into a thriving, renewable future.
- However, India, Russia, and Turkey are projected to be more than 15 per cent lower than their NDC target emission levels the report highlighted.
- If current unconditional NDCs are fully implemented, there is a 66 per cent chance that warming will be limited to 3.2°C by the end of the century.
- If conditional NDCs are also effectively implemented, warming will likely reduce by about 0.2°C.
Way Forward:
- A full decarbonization of the energy sector is necessary and possible.
- Renewables and energy efficiency are critical to the energy transition.
- The potential emission reduction thanks to renewable energy electricity totals 12.1 gigatonnes by 2050.
- Electrification of transport could reduce the sector’s CO2 emissions by a huge 72 per cent by 2050.
- Each sector and each country has unique opportunities to harness renewable energy, protect natural resources, lives and livelihoods, and transition to a decarbonization pathway.
Climate emergency declarations are, broadly, symbolic motions rather than legally binding legislation. The UK’s declaration, for example, did not require any changes to the Climate Change Act or the nation’s Paris Agreement contributions. As the UN report points out, India could do much more. It needs to provide more consistent support for renewable energy, have a long-term plan to retire coal power plants, enhance ambition on air quality, adopt an economy-wide green industrialisation strategy, and expand mass transport.
In the key area of buildings, the energy conservation code of 2018 needs to be implemented under close scrutiny. With a clear vision, India could use green technologies to galvanise its faltering economy, create new jobs and become a climate leader.
MOJO9a22Y0081423116
The structure needs to be improved.
Whenever the question is about any report or survey or findings, then do mention the name of it in the intro itself and link it to the answer.
After intro, simply discuss the salient features or findings of those reports.
Those should be 6 7 bullet points, nothing more than that.
In the 2nd part of the main body, you were supposed to discuss why nations are failing to achieve their targets.
Then you should have given way forwards, for the world as well as India.
Read the model answer to understand the approach of the answer.
Good language.
Presentation is decent but use subheadings to show the direction of the discussion.
Please review
After the intro, you have started discussing the way forward, which is a weak structure.
Your main body of the answer is missing.
The opening statement of your question is your 1st part of the main body.
After intro, simply discuss the salient features or findings of those reports.
Those should be 6 7 bullet points, nothing more than that.
In the 2nd part of the main body, you were supposed to discuss why nations are failing to achieve their targets.
Read the model answer for those parts.
The way forward is ok.
Underline imp stuff
MOJO9a02U00D28381180
The structure is little wayward here.
In the 2nd part of the main body, you were supposed to discuss why nations are failing to achieve their targets.
Read the model answer for those parts.
After intro, simply discuss the salient features or findings of those reports.
Those should be 6 7 bullet points, nothing more than that.
Your answer should be wholesome Deepanshu. Right now, it is lacking depth and also it is a bit scattered.
Good way forwards.
ID
MOJO9b01C00A90817216
In the 2nd part of the main body, you were supposed to discuss why nations are failing to achieve their targets.
Apart from that, the content and the direction of the answer is decent.
The language is fine and explanation is short and crisp.
For the missing 2nd part of the answer, see the model answers to get talking points.
A very good way forward and conclusion
Very good presentation
please review…
payment id:MOJO9a29300A6177473
Kindly upload in a better manner!
We have to search for the right page!
In terms of content, once again there is no problem in your answer.
It is the structure and presentation which is letting you down scoring the max marks.
Avoid continuous writing.
Write with a gap after changing each subheading. That way, your structure will also improve and there will be a visible structure in the answer.
Your content will be more visible and the value of the content will be reflected in it.
MOJO9c07A00N41102924
After intro, simply discuss the salient features or findings of those reports.
Those should be 6 7 bullet points, nothing more than that.
Apart from it, the answer is detailed and informative.
The overall structure in the main body is fine.
You have covered all the necessary elements in the answer.
For the missing elements after the intro, read the model answer to get the talking points
Payment ID:MOJO9b01O00A90839766
Please review
After discussing the steps taken by the governments in various parts of the world, briefly discuss the reasons for nations not able to do enough in another subheading.
That will give a better balance and base to your answer.
This discussion is provided in the model answer just before the way forward subheading.
Go through them once. You will get the talking points.
The rest of the answer in terms of content is fine.
The soundness of the overall discussion is fine.
The points are well organized and they are well elaborated without being sounding too preachy or explained.
That is the beauty of your answers. You cover all the major aspects with such minimal approach.
Keep it up.
The presentation is decent overall.
Just that one part of the discussion is missing.
These little details will help you get better marks overall.
MOJO9c14400D21388857
This style of presenting the answer is not suitable.
There are no relevant subheadings in the answer to show the direction of the content.
There are points after points with no demarcation between the different points.
You have discussed the report in great length but that was not needed.
Instead, explain the reasons for the continued gap in meeting climate change targets, both at national and international level.
Also, a 15 mark question need more depth and content then what you have provided.
Read the model answer.
Your writing is smooth. Use it with a better presentation style and back up with detailed content.
MOJO9b03K00A07920521
Before discussing the way forward, explain the reasons for the continued gap in meeting climate change targets, both at national and international level.
That is the main body of your answer which you completely skipped.
The rest of the content is very good.
The overall points are informative and well placed.
Read the model answer for the reason subheading.
Good presentation.
payment id-MOJO9925Q00A88602377
Give some gap after changing any subheading. Otherwise, your content will be lost in the milieu of the discussion.
Also give proper spacing in your content.
Underline keywords in your answers.
Good intro.
The discussion on the highlights of the report is short and crisp.
But before discussing the way forward, explain the reasons for the continued gap in meeting climate change targets, both at the national and international level.
That is the main body of your answer which you completely skipped.
The way forwards are near perfect in terms of the coverage that they have.
Good discussion in them.
But please keep your content readable and clear.
Right now it is messed up, even in the flowcharts.
Work on it.
You have good language