Mentors Comment:
The question is simple and straightforward. You have to discuss how Ac of 1919 or Montagu Chelmsford Reform (MCR) influenced our present-day constitution. Most of the discussion on constitution takes into the account GoI Act of 1935 and how it influenced provisions in our constitution. But if not more, then equally important was MCR with respect to our constitution. Most of the important provisions of our present-day political system are the result of MCR.
Features like the bicameral legislature, devolution of power to local self-governance, federal polity with state governments, state lists & union lists, public service commission, the practice of voting in choosing our representatives etc are some of the key features of MCR that got reflected in our constitution.
Before ending the answer, mention a few shortcomings of MCR but not in detail.
Answer:
The Government of India Act 1935 had introduced several features that form the nucleus of our Constitution. But equally important is the Montagu Chelmsford Reforms (MCR) which was also known as the Government of India Act 1919. The MCR stands out for proposing some of the most radical administrative changes and for giving provincial legislatures the mantle of self-governance.
How the GoI Act 1919 has shaped our constitution:
The report advocated the need to emancipate the local governments and legislatures from central control; and to advance, by successive stages, in the direction of conferring responsible government on the provinces.
MCR established the framework for devolution of powers and gave credence to the cry for self-governance.
The present idea of Council of Ministers being responsible to the parliament came from the MCR. It elucidated the principle of accountable governance by directing that the “Government of India must remain wholly responsible to Parliament.”
MCR provided for partial transfer of power to the electorate through the system of Dyarchy.
MCR also prepared the ground for the Indian federalism, as it identified the provinces as units of fiscal and general administration.
MCR made a provision for the classification of the central and provincial subjects. The provincial subjects were divided into two groups. One was reserved and another was transferred.
MCR also made the central legislature bicameral. The first house which was the central legislature was called central Legislative Assembly and second called was called Council of States.
The central legislature can be called a primitive model of today’s Lok Sabha & council of states can be called a primitive model of Today’s Rajya Sabha.
MCR provided for the establishment of a Public Service Commission in India for the first time.
MCR marked the end of the policy of benevolent despotism, and thus began the genesis of the responsible government in India.
It was for the first time, that elections to the legislatures were known to the people and this created political consciousness among the masses.
It was the GOI Act 1919, whereby, the Indians came in direct contact with administration for the first time. This was a very useful experience.
It was also for the first time that a number of Indian women got the right to franchise for the first time.
Some shortcomings of the Government of India Act 1919:
Absence of responsible government at the center
Separate electorates for different communities.
The introduction of diarchy in the province was too complicated to be smoothly worked.
Although the Mont-ford Report had declared that the separate electorate was a very serious hindrance to the development of the self-governing principles, yet separate electorate came to be a significant feature of Indian political life.
The key principles of responsible government, self-governance, and federal structure grew out of these reforms. Most scholars look at the Act as the first attempt by the British to introduce self-government in India albeit with significant restrictions. The MCR would go on to become the basis for the Government of India Act, 1935, and, ultimately, the Constitution.
PFA
Please mention your payment ID for getting timely review.
Write on paper to get hang of space and presentation.
Points discussed are vague. The last part where you discussed provisions from other countries need not be mentioned in the answer.
The first part needs more content.
Towards the end discuss the shortcoming of the MCR.
Read the model answer.
Please review and revert
MOJO9902Y00D71079365
Very huge intro. This is not the ideal way Anmol. Start working on it ASAP.
Whatever you have discussed in the intro can be summarised in a shorter paragraph like this:
“The GoI Act 1935 had introduced several features that form the nucleus of our Constitution. But equally important are the Montagu Chelmsford Reforms (MCR) which was also known as the GoI Act 1919. The MCR stands out for proposing some of the most radical administrative changes and for giving provincial legislatures the mantle of self-governance.”
Learn the economy of the statements. That will help you a lot in the actual exam. Never over-explain your points because space and time are the most valuable assets in your mains examinations.
Underline your subheadings.
Good discussion in the main body.
It is a more suited style for the answer writing.
But you did not discuss the 2nd part of the answer which was, before ending the answer, mention a few shortcomings of MCR but not in detail.
MOJO9727T00D60304985
Hi Sumona
Very good intro.
Good 1st part.
Points are extensive.
Some of the points are overexplained though. Keep the discussion short.
Try to write on A4 Sheet.
Overall decent attempt.
MOJO9903H00A58015579
Hi Akankhya
Intro is very big. Shorten it. Ideally, the intro and conclusion should not be of more than 4 lines.
Underline important points in your answers.
idea of Council of Ministers being responsible to the parliament; bicameral central legislature; ended the policy of benevolent despotism; the genesis of the responsible government in India; Indians came in direct contact with the administration etc are the other imp points.
Good 2nd part.
Work on your structuring and presentation. The direction of the content is decent.
Payment ID: MOJO9802W00A98715356
Please review
Hi Sahithya
Very good answer.
You can remove the last part where you discussed the NCM and round table conferences etc.
Apart from that, very good points.
The content is exhaustive and well discussed.
Very good presentation.
MOJO9803C00N96073071
Hi Ashraf
Underline important points.
The 1st part needs more content and dimensions like the idea of Council of Ministers being responsible to the parliament; ended the policy of benevolent despotism; the genesis of the responsible government in India; Indians came in direct contact with the administration; franchise to women; UPSC; etc are the other imp points
Good 2nd part.
Decent conclusion.
Read the model answer for the 1st part.
Payment ID: MOJO9731Y00N34245077
Hi Kanchan
Underline important points.
The structure is weak.
Over explanation is done in the discussion on the 1935 GoI Act while the main question of the 1919 Act is discussed in one-liners.
Good ending to the answer.
Read the model answer.
Use subheadings
Mojo id-MOJO9908R00A36163556