Mentors Comment:
- Look at the war of 1962 in the present-day context.
- After 1962, China suddenly became the leader of third world nations, a place which India was vying for under the leadership of Nehru.
- Therefore, base your answer on the rise of China post-1962 and how the war was used by the Chinese govt to push forward its international agenda for decades to come.
- Points to discuss would be strategic calculations by Chinese for using India’s NAM credentials if India asked for help from any superpower that time; using war to show India as an aggressor in the international arena and maligning its image worldwide; for creating a goodwill among the rest of the nations in the subcontinent; picking upon US and Soviets if they supported India and making a case against anti-Chinese sentiments in international forums etc.
Answer:
The Sino-Indian war was a war between China and India that occurred in 1962. A disputed Himalayan border was the main pretext for war, but other issues played a role. In the wake of the Doklam crisis, it’s imperative to understand what was the motive behind the move by China in 1962. In the aftermath of the war, India was largely perceived as the provocateur, due to the Nehru’s Forward Policy, as part of which India allegedly established a string of outposts on and beyond the Line of Actual Control. But with recent reports and commentaries on the war coming out, questions are being asked as to whether this war was pre-planned by China by keeping long term gains in mind. The year 1962 saw China, with Mao back at the helm, successfully challenging both India and the Soviet Union and, in the end, becoming the leader of the Third World’s progressive and revolutionary forces.
- According to classified documents, China began planning the war as early as 1959.
- The motivation to attack India was not a response to India’s outpost in Dhola, but a part of China’s strategy to establish its international political dominance.
- The claim that Indian troop movements around the Dhola Post and some skirmishes between the Indians and the Chinese in mid-October determined the timing of the attack is part of this twisted interpretation of the causes of the 1962 War.
- From the Chinese point of view, it was a masterstroke to decide to wage war on India at the same time that America was preoccupied with the Cuban Missile crisis.
- A direct American intervention supporting India in the war would be out of the question due to the ongoing Cuban Missile crisis, but if it did happen, it would force India to compromise its commitment to non-alignment.
- After the end of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States did decide to send military aid but by then it was too late for India. The Chinese had already achieved their objectives by the time Western military assistance arrived.
- China was able to project successfully, that years of striving for India’s neutrality went to waste and capitalists were supplying arms to India thanks to the Chinese aggression.
- China managed to force India to seek help from the United States, and also put the Soviet Union in the same anti-Chinese camp. It was a masterstroke that placed China as the leader of the Third World.
- Nehru’s appeal for Western aid in his hour of need dented, if it did not destroy, India’s image as a non-aligned nation, thus diminishing its status both in the Communist bloc and the Third World
- While China unilaterally imposed a ceasefire and ended the war, many scholars doubted the intention behind this. Some argued that the US and USSR were about to come out in support of India while others argued that with winters approaching, China would have found it difficult to manage the war in Himalayan regions.
- But whatever were the reasons, none of these explanations are consistent with the broader picture of China’s overall policies and strategic ambitions at the time of the war.
1962 war was a limited action aimed at punishing India, dethroning it from its leadership position in the non-aligned movement, and forcing the Soviets to take sides in the wider conflict that had been raging within the international communist movement since 1960. China wanted to demonstrate its military might and superiority and, by withdrawing, it had shown its “goodwill” towards its neighbors and the rest of the world, demonstrating that it was not an aggressive power bent on capturing land from other countries. It was against the backdrop of these events that China emerged as the winner and the road now lay open for China to become the leader of the Third World. With one stroke, China had managed to capture three birds.
Please review.
Payment id- MOJO9a05700D19953140
Hi Shambhavi
Link your intro with the demand of the question. It should not be in silo but linked with the main body of the answer.
Towards the end of the intro, simply add “Inspite of prevalent notion of that time, China played its cards really well during the war, to emerge as the champion of the cause of the third world nation”
The main body of the answer is awesome.
You have covered almost all the dimensions required in the answer.
The discussion is well explained and informative.
The answer has a perfect balance. Good that you discussed both sides of the argument.
Do not put subheadings on the conclusion.
The presentation is superb in the answer. Very good handwriting, coupled with good content. Deadly combo!
cThe question asks for “Analyze” and not “Critically Analyze”, so is it okay that I have given both sides of the arguments and not picked one?
MOJO9B03K00A07920521
Hi Divya
Very good discussion.
But link your intro with the demand of the question. It should not be in silo but linked with the main body of the answer.
The main body of the answer is very good.
Its points are on the right line.
But do underline your important points in the answer.
Good analysis towards the end.
All in all, quite a decent attempt.
Please review
MOJO9b04600W25293262
Hi Yash
Wrong upload. You uploaded the same page twice.
Will review the content that I have.
Your intro is lengthy and you have overexplained it.
Simply introduce the indo-china war of 1962 in the intro and then from the main body onwards, discuss why China played a masterstroke in the 1962 war as well as prior to it.
Avoid paragraphs in the main body.
Use bullet points under subheadings.
Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558
Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558
Hi Sanu
No need to put subheadings for intro and conclusion.
Avoid such large intros.
To make the content more structured, use smaller bullet points and do not over-explain.
You give facts about the war in the bullet points and towards the end give your analysis through small paragraphs.
The content is in the right direction.
A proper conclusion is needed in terms of analysis. Read the model answer.
Sorry sir for my same repeated mistakes regarding intro and smaller paragraphs. But i had changed my writting style ……. I think you will find same mistakes till 6th nov daily awe because i saw my first time answer review on that day. I realised that my way of wriitng since few days was not right…… I have already rectified myself and with your future valuable reviews i know i can write much better from now…
MOJO9b04X00D25275001
Hi Amit
Link your intro with the demand of the question. It should not be in silo but linked with the main body of the answer.
Towards the end of the intro, simply add “Inspite of prevalent notion of that time, China played its cards really well during the war, to emerge as the champion of the cause of the third world nation”
When changing the direction of the discussion, then please use subheadings.
You have not discussed why China became the leader of the third world nations and what were its strategic calculations that paved off.
You have mostly discussed the after-effect of the war on India as well as China.
Points to discuss would be strategic calculations by Chinese for using India’s NAM credentials if India asked for help from any superpower that time; using war to show India as an aggressor in the international arena and maligning its image worldwide; for creating a goodwill among the rest of the nations in the subcontinent; picking upon US and Soviets if they supported India and making a case against anti-Chinese sentiments in international forums etc.
Read the model answer.
You have missed the elements of the question. This is reflected in the last paragraph of your answer.
The question is not about China’s economic might but instead its rise as the leader of the 3rd world country.
MOJO9930Q00N64198657
Hi Swetha
Please do not upload pictures in landscape mode.
It becomes hard for us to read it on the system.
Avoid subheading for the intro and conclusion
Very good intro.
You can skip the contributing factor’s discussion or you can use a small flowchart to discuss them.
The rest of the answer is very good in terms of the content.
Do underline important points in your answers.
The direction of the answer is apt and on the expected lines.
MOJO9b01C00A90817216
Please review
Hi Paran
Link your intro with the demand of the question. It should not be in silo but linked with the main body of the answer.
Towards the end of the intro, simply add “Inspite of prevalent notion of that time, China played its cards really well during the war, to emerge as the champion of the cause of the third world nation”
Most of your main body is discussing the reasons for the war, while only a small part went into the discussion on the main demand of the question: “How China claimed the leadership of the 3rd world with the 1962 war”
Points to discuss would be strategic calculations by Chinese for using India’s NAM credentials if India asked for help from any superpower that time; using war to show India as an aggressor in the international arena and maligning its image worldwide; for creating a goodwill among the rest of the nations in the subcontinent; picking upon US and Soviets if they supported India and making a case against anti-Chinese sentiments in international forums etc.
Read the model answer.
Always stick to the demand of the question.
Payment I’d MOJO9a31100A58098507
Hi Pratik
Link your intro with the demand of the question. It should not be in silo but linked with the main body of the answer.
Towards the end of the intro, simply add “Inspite of prevalent notion of that time, China played its cards really well during the war, to emerge as the champion of the cause of the third world nation”
Very good content in the answer.
You have aptly divided your main body into two parts.
The grasp of the question is decent.
Your discussion is to the point and the explanation is crisp.
Well done.
In terms of presentation, please avoid frequent cutting. This shows indecisiveness on your part. Think calmly before writing.
Very good conclusion
MOJO9b04S00N25297271. Please review
Hi Siddhant
Very good intro.
The structure and the placement of the subheadings in the answer are very good.
You have given breaks to each discussion and your points are crisp.
But with writing in long fonts, sometimes it will come across as overexplained.
So, work on it.
The content is to the point and discussion is apt.
Good presentation.
Effective conclusion.
ID: MOJO9a29V00D61774546
Thank you.
HI MeMax
Link your intro with the demand of the question. It should not be in silo but linked with the main body of the answer.
Towards the end of the intro, simply add “Inspite of prevalent notion of that time, China played its cards really well during the war, to emerge as the champion of the cause of the third world nation”
The first part of the main body is to the point.
But apart from that, most of your main body is discussing the implications for the war, while only a small part went into the discussion on the main demand of the question: “How China claimed the leadership of the 3rd world with the 1962 war”
You do not need to discuss the military or political implications for India.
Points to discuss would be strategic calculations by Chinese for using India’s NAM credentials if India asked for help from any superpower that time; using war to show India as an aggressor in the international arena and maligning its image worldwide; for creating a goodwill among the rest of the nations in the subcontinent; picking upon US and Soviets if they supported India and making a case against anti-Chinese sentiments in international forums etc.
Read the model answer.
Always stick to the demand of the question. Do not move out of the periphery of the question. Read the question and subsequent mentors’ comments carefully.
Ok sir, I’ll work on the comments. Thank you 🙂
MOJO9a02U00D28381180
Hi Deepanshu
Link your intro with the demand of the question. It should not be in silo but linked with the main body of the answer.
Towards the end of the intro, simply add “Inspite of prevalent notion of that time, China played its cards really well during the war, to emerge as the champion of the cause of the third world nation”
You haven’t answered the core demand of the answer.
Always stick to the demand of the question. Do not move out of the periphery of the question. Read the question and subsequent mentors’ comments carefully.
Most of your main body is discussing the reasons or background for the war, while only a small part went into the discussion on the main demand of the question: “How China claimed the leadership of the 3rd world with the 1962 war”
You do not need to discuss the issue with great leap forward or Dalai Lama issue or the construction of a road, etc.
Also, you do not need to discuss the impacts on India.
You have to discuss how China planned the war much before it actually happened and how it played the moves well to gain from the 1962 war on the international front.
Points to discuss would be strategic calculations by Chinese for using India’s NAM credentials if India asked for help from any superpower that time; using war to show India as an aggressor in the international arena and maligning its image worldwide; for creating a goodwill among the rest of the nations in the subcontinent; picking upon US and Soviets if they supported India and making a case against anti-Chinese sentiments in international forums etc.
Read the model answer.
Avoid large paragraphs. If writing in paragraphs, then simply use short paragraphs.
MOJO9a05K00A19952476
Hi Dikshant
Decent coverage in the answer.
The points are well placed and well discussed.
Good structure
Is mentioning both aspects of China being a leader and not being a leader important (since you asserted on the given statement in the model answer)? Or more emphasize on a background of third world countries is important? Can you elaborate? Thanks.