Air pollution is now the third-highest cause of death among all health risks, ranking just above smoking, in India. An environment think tank Centre for Science and Environment in its report “At the crossroad” has said that Life expectancy in India has gone down by 2.6 years due to deadly diseases caused by air pollution.
Reasons For Air Pollution in Delhi
- Stubble Burning: Stubble burning in Punjab, Rajasthan, and Haryana is blamed for causing a thick blanket of smog in Delhi during winters.
- It emits large amounts of toxic pollutants in the atmosphere which contain harmful gases like methane (CH4), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Volatile organic compounds (VOC) and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
- Vehicular Emission: The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) have declared vehicular emission as a major contributor to Delhi’s increasing air pollution. Vehicles contribute 40% of the total pollution load in the city.
- Topography: Delhi lies in landlocked Indo-Gangetic region which does not have a geographical advantage that eastern, western or southern parts of the country enjoy. There is no sea breeze to disperse the concentrated pollutants.
- Construction Sector: Large scale construction in Delhi-NCR is another culprit that is increasing dust and pollution in the air.
- Fire Crackers: Despite the ban on cracker sales, firecrackers were a common sight this Diwali. It may not be the top reason for air pollution, but it definitely contributed to its build-up.
- Dust Storm from Gulf countries: During the smog in the year 2017, the dust storm from Gulf countries was also the reason which enhanced already worse condition.
- Multiple Authorities: The causes of air pollution are multifold and several agencies and ministries are involved, therefore appropriate legislative measures for multi-sectoral participation and collaborating the efforts of state and federal pollution control boards should be taken urgently.
As air pollution in Delhi NCR has become a regular phenomenon, therefore to mitigate the silent killer, the government needs to move beyond tokenism to concrete grassroots steps to curtail the menace.
Various measures have been described below:
- Stubble Burning: The most efficient technology to counter crop burning at the moment is Turbo Happy Seeder (THS) which is a machine mounted on a tractor that not only cuts and uproots the stubble but can also drill wheat seeds in the soil that have just been cleared up. The straw is simultaneously thrown over the sown seeds to form a mulch cover.
- Establish Farm Machinery Banks for custom hiring of in-situ crop residue management machinery.
- Financial Assistance to the farmers for the Procurement of Agriculture Machinery and Equipment.
- Public Transport: The push for public transport has long been highlighted as a potential solution. However, we are far from implementing it on the ground.
- The current public transport system is disintegrated. We need to integrate it physically ensuring that it is reliable, comfortable and provides last-mile connectivity but without additional cost.
- The subsidy given to personal vehicle users makes personal transport comparatively more affordable than public transport. Therefore, parking fees, minimal charges for using the roads and cost of congesting the roads must be aligned in the direction to incentivize personal transport.
- Municipal Planning: Open burning of municipal solid waste and industrial waste is fouling up the air.
- The need is to build institutional capacity for implementation and enforcement and have the necessary legal back-up for compliance and strong deterrence.
- Appropriate political will and aware citizenry is a prerequisite to tackle the menace, otherwise, all the measures will remain on paper only.
- Greater public transparency is essential to the success of winning the war on air pollution.
- There is no better watchdog than active citizens, which is why the pollution targets must be made public every year for their perusal and to be evaluated at the end of the year.
Breathing clean air is a fundamental right of every Indian citizen. Therefore, human health must become a priority when it comes to tackling air pollution.
Payment ID:MOJO9b01O00A90839766
Please review
The answer is near perfect.
The presentation makes it more effective.
The overall approach of the answer is decent.
Good content in the main body.
Structuring is quite decent
Very good way forward.
It’s good that you discussed all the solutions in two different subheadings.
MOJO9b04S00N25297271. Please review
You keep surprising me with your presentation style!
A very good answer.
You hit the core demand of the question nicely.
But what makes the answer most effective is its way forward and the tabular form of discussion.
These little things go a long way in increasing 1-2 marks in each answer because the overall content is the same as everyone. It is the way to present them, which makes the difference.
The overall content is decent and well explained.
Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558
hey,
Your answer is nice but I am suggesting some points
– Your answer is not deviated from question but it is not crisp.
– Extra long points which makes it boring to read.
– No proper suggestion from your side.
– No conclusion.
you have potential you can write better. Proper formation of sentence but it seems like keywords are missing.
Thank you for your suggestion….I will follow it…..But can you please help me with giving some examples regarding how to make my answer crisp? Parth sir also suggested the same but i am confused. Please suggest…..
Crispness means writing short and to the point content and writing in bullet points (in the main body). Ideally, your statements should not have more than 10-12 words and the paragraphs should not be lengthy. An intro should have ideally only a couple of statements. To get how the same points can be made crisp, you should read the answers of Shambhavi or Sahithya. They write one of the best answers in terms of the effectiveness of the points and they have proper depth and coverage in their points.
Coming to your answer, it is general in nature.
It is because it lacks proper presentation and structure.
Remember one thing: Answers in Mains GS are not about putting points after points. You have to have proper flow and presentation. For example, to make your answer effective you can divide the 1st part of the answer in two parts; one discussing anthropogenic and other discussing non-anthropogenic reasons. The points that you discussed in the 1st part will remain the same but they will be divided into these.
To bring X-factor, you can also use flowcharts or diagrams. To see how to use flowcharts, see the answers of Siddhant. He uses flowcharts effectively in his answers.
Your way forward are quite general and they lack depth. They are too general.
We all know that banning stubble burning is the ideal solution but how to achieve it? Always give why and how in your forwards.
MOJO9b04X00D25275001
“Delhi has been reported as one of the worst polluted country in the world.” Avoid such factually wrong statements at the very beginning of your answer!!! Think carefully before writing. These silly mistakes, especially in the intro, creates a negative image.
Good content in the main body.
Structuring is quite decent
But solutions lack depth.
You need to improve your presentation style.
Make sure that your subheading is not hidden among the points. Prominently highlight it.
Please review.
Payment id- MOJO9a05700D19953140
The only blip in the answer is that you should not use a subheading for the conclusion!
Otherwise, the attempt is very good.
Your answer has proper balance and structure.
The content in both parts have good coverage.
Decent presentation.
Points are solid and crisp.
please review..
Payment ID MOJO9a29300A61774733
Good content in the main body.
Structuring is quite decent
Very good way forward.
But you need to improve your presentation style.
Make sure that your subheading is not hidden among the points. Prominently highlight it.
Do not cut your statement and points so frequently. It shows indecisiveness on your part. Think carefully before writing.
Also, avoid lined pages to write the answers. You will not be able to get the sense of the alignment of statements while writing the answers.
Write clearly.
Underline important stuff.
One minus marks for bad presentation
Please review MOJO9b05300A74622986
To make your answer effective you can divide the 1st part of the answer in two parts; one discussing anthropogenic and other discussing non-anthropogenic reasons. The points that you discussed in the 1st part will remain the same but they will be divided into these.
Also, discuss some other aspects like geographical location, construction, ineffective green cover, etc.
Good 2nd part of the answer.
Your solutions are good.
Good language.
Payment id : MOJ09a31D00D58068663
please review
Hi HRUDAYESH
The overall content is decent but they lack distinctiveness because almost everyone will be discussing the same points. Then how to score more with the same content?
Remember one thing: Answers in Mains GS are not about putting points after points. You have to have proper flow and presentation.
For example, to make your answer effective you can divide the 1st part of the answer in two parts; one discussing anthropogenic and other discussing non-anthropogenic reasons. The points that you discussed in the 1st part will remain the same but they will be divided into these.
Good solutions.
Good language
MOJO9930Q00N64198657
Decent structuring of the answer.
Good that you discussed all the reasons in different subheadings, thus giving wider coverage to your answer while making the points distinct.
It’s a good style. Keep it up.
The 2nd part of the answer is also good.
The language is short and calculative.
The presentation is decent but underline imp points.
MOJO9b03K00A07920521
The overall approach of the answer is decent.
Good content in the main body.
Structuring is quite decent
Very good way forward.
Its good that you discussed all the reasons in two different subheadings.
MOJO9a31100A58098507
Decent answer Pratik.
Your coverage is satisfactory.
The balance is very good and your content is fine.
It is good that you discussed the solution under long term as well short term measures. They make them effective. Keep it up.
Good structure.
MOJO9a31K00N58111047
Your 1st paragraph of the answer is one single statement. This length of the statement should be avoided. Keep your statements short and crisp. Ideally, they should not have more than 10 -12 words.
The 1st of the answer is very good.
You have discussed the core demand very well.
But it could have been structured and presented in a better manner through better subheading after you discussed causes. A simple subheading like “unique state of pollution in Delhi” could have been a much better option before that short paragraph.
The way forward lacks depth. Read the model answer for that.
Underline important stuff in your answers
ID
MOJO9b01C00A90817216
One of the best presentation for this question.
Decent structuring of the answer.
Good that you discussed all the reasons in different subheadings, thus giving wider coverage to your answer while making the points distinct.
It’s a good style. Keep it up.
The 2nd part of the answer is also good.
The language is short and calculative.
The presentation is decent but underline imp points.
Also, avoid bullet points as your conclusion.
Payment id : MOJO9a25MOON56192840
Good intro.
decent use of flowchart in the 1st part.
The content in it is fine.
Very good way forwards.
The language is short and calculative.
The presentation is decent but underline imp points.
Effective conclusion
MOJO9a02U00D28381180
Good content in the main body.
Structuring is quite decent
Very good way forward.
Underline important stuff.