Civil servants must ensure that they analyze the performance of their juniors critically. They should let their juniors know about these shortcomings so that they can improve upon them. Following precautions are needed while criticizing the performance of subordinates:
• Specificity: Criticism or comments should be specific.
• Providing or suggesting a solution: The senior civil servant should offer a solution to the shortcomings.
• Face to face contact: They should say whatever they want to say on the face of the subordinate.
• Empathy: The subordinate should be treated in an empathetic manner. One should always remember that mistakes in performance take place because of lack of experience. So rather than being rude or arrogant, they must be soft towards their subordinates or juniors.
While making comments on the performance of a subordinate who has been involved with the distribution of food grain, comment should be specific that in a particular village 2 or 4 families have been left out and could not be provided with food grain.
The subordinate could be suggested that this omission could be corrected while providing them food grain in the second round. It is always better to call the officer separately and tell him instead of making this comment when he is not there. Since the officer is quite junior and lacks experience hence one should be empathetic to him. He should tell him that though he has performed well but there are certain things which he can improve upon next time.
Pls review
Payment ID – MOJO9731S00A34242506
Good answer but i think point no .6 is redundant in first part.. And 2nd part can be more formal to the demand of question. Rest is fine. Good Use of ethical values to substantiate answer.
The first part of the answer is very good.
But the 2nd part is overly explained. You dont have to go in such details.
What would be your overall approach. That should be the mantra of the 2nd part rather than detailing all the actions, step by step.
The direction of that part is good though.
But that could have been explained in less space and words.
Read the model answer for that particular area.
Overall decent attempt.
You grasped the content of the question really well.
Please review and revert.
Please mention your payment from the next time to get timely reviews.
The overall idea of the answer is fine but you need to place them in a better manner.
Remember, when writing mains, your copy will be among 11000 other aspirants. hence you have to make sure the examiner sits back and reads your answer thoroughly. For that, paragraph style is never suited.
Divide all these points intro various subheadings and put them into bullet points.
Plus your paragraphs are very bulky. If opting for paragraph style then make sure that your paragraphs are small and crisp with suitable subheadings in each paragraph.
The content is ok and ethical issues are discussed in good manner.
Payment ID: MOJO9802W00A98715356
Please review
Decent answer.
All the areas are covered.
Nothing wrong here.
Subheadings are apt.
Ethical issues are well discussed.
Fine language.
Dear @Parth sir , Please provide your valuable suggestions.
Hi Siddhant
Please mention your payment ID in order to get timely reviews.
The intro should have a brief mention of the issue in hand.
Good use of flow charts. The points in it are suited for the demand of the answer.
The second part is quite explained.
Keep the theme of that discussion intact but explain less.
Keep that part short. The main focus should be on the 1st part of the question.
The direction of the 2nd part is good but not the execution.
MOJO9803C0096073071
In the 2nd part, you were supposed to discuss “how will you comment on his performance” and not how you will look after the whole process.
Hence the question is asking about your person skills and man management in the disaster management process.
Some of the details given in the 2nd part are not suited for that.
Simply, discuss what will be your way of communicating with him regarding his under-achievement.
Good 1st part. That is very good and well explained.
Read the model answer for the 2nd part.
IDMOJO9728J00A50299555
Overall good attempt.
The answer has perfect balance in terms of discussion in the 1st and 2nd parts.
The 2nd part is well explained.
the ethical dimensions mentioned in the 1st part are fine.
All in all decent try.
Mojo id-MOJO9908R00A36163556