💥UPSC 2026, 2027, 2028 UAP Mentorship (March Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: News

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-United States

    [13th March 2026] The Hindu OpED: Is India tailing the U.S in its West Asia policy?

    op-ed snap | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2022] How will I2U2 (India, Israel, UAE and USA) grouping transform India’s position in global politics?Linkage: The question examines India’s participation in West Asian minilateral groupings and its shift toward multi-alignment with the U.S., Israel, and Gulf countries. It connects with the debate on whether India’s evolving West Asia policy reflects strategic autonomy or growing alignment with the U.S.-led regional framework.

    Mentor’s Comment

    West Asia is currently facing a major geopolitical crisis involving Israel, Iran, and the United States. India has traditionally maintained a balanced approach in the region based on strategic autonomy and multi-alignment, maintaining relations with all sides. However, recent developments, such as India’s response to Israeli actions, its engagement with Iran, and participation in the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), have raised questions about whether India’s West Asia policy is gradually moving closer to the United States.

    The debate has gained attention in the context of the Israel-Hamas conflict, U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran, rising oil prices, and the safety of nearly 10 million Indians living in the Gulf region, making India’s diplomatic approach in West Asia strategically significant.

    Why Has India Traditionally Maintained Strategic Balance in West Asia?

    1. Strategic Autonomy: India historically avoids aligning fully with any single power bloc to maintain independent foreign policy decision-making.
    2. Energy Dependence: West Asia supplies a significant share of India’s crude oil imports, making stability in the region vital for economic security.
      1. As of early 2026, despite India diversifying its energy imports to include more Russian oil, West Asia remains a critical backbone for India’s energy needs, accounting for approximately 49% to 55% of India’s total crude oil imports
    3. Diaspora Protection: Approximately 10 million Indian citizens reside in Gulf countries, contributing substantially to remittance inflows.
    4. Economic Partnerships: India maintains strong trade relations with Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE simultaneously, necessitating balanced diplomacy.
    5. Connectivity Projects: India supports initiatives such as Chabahar Port and broader regional connectivity to Central Asia and the South Caucasus.

    Does India’s Response to the Israel-Iran Conflict Indicate Strategic Alignment with the U.S.?

    1. Diplomatic Silence: India avoided strong criticism of Israeli and U.S. military actions against Iran, reflecting cautious diplomatic signalling.
    2. Prime Ministerial Engagement: The warm diplomatic engagement between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reinforced perceptions of closer political alignment.
    3. Security Cooperation: Israel remains a major supplier of defence and security technology to India.
    4. Strategic Calculations: Security partnerships sometimes outweigh broader national interests, creating concerns about perceived diplomatic bias.

    Why Do Gulf Countries View the Conflict Primarily as Defensive?

    1. Defensive Framing: Gulf countries describe their actions as defensive measures rather than offensive military campaigns.
    2. Regional Stability Concerns: Gulf states aim to prevent the conflict from escalating into a regional war involving Iran.
    3. Air Defence Measures: Active interception of Iranian drones and missiles indicates defensive security responses rather than offensive alignment.
    4. Avoidance of Strategic Alignment: Direct participation in strikes against Iran would signal joining the Israel-U.S. military coalition, which Gulf states seek to avoid.

    Why Is India’s Relationship with Iran Strategically Significant?

    1. Connectivity Gateway: Iran provides India with access to Central Asia and the South Caucasus, bypassing Pakistan and Afghanistan.
    2. Chabahar Port Project: The port facilitates India’s trade and connectivity strategy in Eurasia.
    3. Economic Cooperation: Bilateral trade with Iran has historically remained strong despite sanctions.
    4. Strategic Leverage: Engagement with Iran strengthens India’s ability to maintain multi-alignment diplomacy in West Asia.

    How Much Does the United States Influence India’s West Asia Policy?

    1. Personal Diplomacy: Close political relations between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli leadership influenced regional diplomatic dynamics.
    2. Economic Pressure: U.S. sanctions and tariffs have previously forced India to adjust oil imports and financial transactions involving Iran.
    3. Diplomatic Expectations: The United States expected India to publicly credit Washington for brokering the India-Pakistan ceasefire, reflecting influence attempts.
    4. Strategic Autonomy Challenge: Balancing U.S. strategic expectations while maintaining independent diplomacy remains a core challenge.

    What Are the Economic and Strategic Consequences of the West Asia Crisis for India?

    1. Energy Price Shock: Conflict-driven oil price increases threaten India’s energy import bill and inflation stability.
    2. Economic Vulnerability: Rising energy costs risk triggering broader economic stress for developing economies.
    3. Trade Corridor Uncertainty: Instability affects the viability of connectivity initiatives like the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).
    4. Human Security Risk: Escalating conflict threatens the livelihoods of millions of Indians working in the Gulf region.

    Can India Play a Diplomatic Role in De-escalating the West Asia Conflict?

    1. Dialogue Facilitation: West Asia lacks an effective regional security dialogue platform.
    2. Track-1.5 Engagement: Government-to-government and expert dialogues can facilitate conflict mediation and confidence-building.
    3. Middle-Power Diplomacy: Countries such as India, China, Russia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam possess diplomatic credibility to facilitate dialogue.
    4. Constructive Neutrality: India’s balanced relations with all parties position it as a potential mediator

    Conclusion

    India’s West Asia policy continues to operate within the framework of strategic autonomy and balanced engagement. However, evolving geopolitical alignments, U.S. influence, and deepening India-Israel ties have created perceptions of strategic tilt. Sustaining credibility as an independent diplomatic actor will require careful balancing of strategic partnerships with long-standing regional relationships, particularly with Iran and Gulf countries.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Parliament – Sessions, Procedures, Motions, Committees etc

    Women’s political participation in India

    Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Parliament & State Legislatures

    Why in the News?

    There is new data highlighting the widening gap between women voters and women representatives in India’s political system. Over the past six decades, women’s participation in elections has grown dramatically. In the 1967 Lok Sabha elections, female turnout was only 55.5% compared to 66.7% for men, a gap of 11.2 percentage points. This gap steadily narrowed and by 2019 and 2024 elections, women voted at nearly the same rate as men. In several State Assembly elections since the 1980s, women voters have even surpassed men, indicating a profound transformation in India’s electoral landscape.

    Why has women’s voter participation increased significantly in India?

    1. Electoral Inclusion: Women voters now participate at rates comparable to men due to universal franchise and electoral awareness. The gender turnout gap narrowed from 11.2 percentage points in 1967 to near parity by 2019-2024.
    2. Political Mobilisation: Political parties increasingly target women voters through welfare schemes and campaign strategies, encouraging greater turnout.
    3. Improved Literacy and Awareness: Rising female literacy and social awareness have strengthened participation in democratic processes.
    4. State Election Trends: Women’s turnout has exceeded men’s in several State Assembly elections since the 1980s, indicating sustained growth.

    Why does women’s political representation remain low despite high voter participation?

    1. Candidate Nomination Gap: Political parties nominate fewer women candidates despite growing voter participation. Women remain a small minority among total election contestants.
    2. Low Parliamentary Representation: Women constituted only 22 MPs in 1952 and even today remain below 15% in the Lok Sabha.
    3. Nomination Bottleneck: Parties often justify fewer nominations by claiming women candidates are less “electable,” despite evidence showing comparable success rates.
    4. Success Rate Reality: Data shows women candidates often have equal or slightly higher success rates than men, indicating structural barriers rather than electoral disadvantage.

    How do structural and social barriers limit women’s political engagement?

    1. Patriarchal Structures: 22% of surveyed women identified patriarchy as the primary obstacle preventing entry into politics.
    2. Household Responsibilities: 13% cited domestic responsibilities as limiting participation in political activities.
    3. Individual Barriers: 12% reported lack of confidence, awareness, or political exposure as obstacles.
    4. Cultural Norms: 7% identified restrictive social norms as barriers.
    5. Financial Constraints: 6% cited financial barriers, highlighting the cost-intensive nature of electoral politics.
    6. Negative Image of Politics: 3% reported concerns about the perceived negative nature of politics.

    Why do women face constraints in participating in political campaigns?

    1. Permission Requirement:
      1. 64% of women require permission to attend political rallies
      2. 62% require permission to attend candidate meetings
      3. 63% require permission to join protests
      4. 61% require permission to campaign for a candidate
    2. Limited Public Participation: Although women vote in large numbers, their visible engagement in campaigning, mobilization, and political activism remains limited.
    3. Family Influence: 58% believe women with political family backgrounds find it easier to enter politics.

    How do political parties contribute to the gender gap in representation?

    1. Party Bias: 44% believe parties routinely favour men over women candidates, regardless of merit.
    2. Resource Allocation: Male candidates receive greater financial and organizational support.
    3. Political Networking: Male-dominated party structures limit women’s access to political networks and leadership roles.
    4. Candidate Pipeline: Women often lack opportunities to build political careers through party hierarchies.

    What does the data reveal about women MPs and candidate trends?

    1. Gradual Growth: The number of women MPs increased from 22 in 1952 to 78 in 2019, but declined slightly to 74 in 2024.
    2. Candidate Numbers:
      1. 2014: 726 women candidates
      2. 2019: 800 women candidates
      3. 2024: 806 women candidates
    3. Small Share: Despite growth, women candidates remain a small fraction of total contestants.

    Way Forward

    1. Implementation of Women’s Reservation Act: Ensures 33% reservation in Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, expanding women’s legislative representation.
    2. Political Party Reforms: Introduces mandatory quotas for women candidates in party nominations.
    3. Leadership and Capacity Building: Strengthens training, mentorship, and political leadership programmes for women aspirants.
    4. Financial Support: Provides campaign finance assistance and reduced electoral costs for women candidates.
    5. Leveraging Local Governance: Utilises Panchayati Raj institutions as leadership pipelines for higher political roles.
    6. Social Norm Transformation: Promotes gender-sensitive awareness and education campaigns to address patriarchal barriers.

    Conclusion

    Women’s political participation in India reflects a dual reality of democratic progress and structural exclusion. Electoral participation has reached near gender parity, demonstrating the success of universal franchise and increased political awareness among women. However, this progress has not translated into proportional representation in legislatures or decision-making structures, revealing deep institutional and socio-cultural constraints within the political system.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Discuss the contribution of civil society groups for women’s effective and meaningful participation and representation in state legislatures in India.

    Linkage: The question examines women’s political representation and participation in democratic institutions. The article highlights the paradox of rising women voter turnout but low representation in legislatures, and the need for institutional and societal support mechanisms to enhance women’s participation in politics.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-Middle East

    Electrifying industrial heat as a path for thermal independence

    Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

    Why in the News?

    Rising tensions in West Asia, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, have raised concerns about disruptions in global natural gas supplies. Since India imports nearly half of its natural gas, recent supply cuts have reduced gas allocation to industries to about 65-80% of contracted volumes, affecting manufacturing clusters such as Morbi (ceramics) and Ludhiana (textiles) that depend heavily on gas-based industrial heat. The situation has revived discussions on reducing industrial dependence on imported fuels for heat generation and moving toward electrified heat systems and concentrated solar thermal (CST) to achieve greater thermal independence and energy security.

    What is Industrial Heat?

    1. Industrial heat refers to the thermal energy required for manufacturing processes like melting, drying, and refining, accounting for ~74% of industrial energy demand.
    2. Primarily generated by burning fossil fuels, this sector contributes ~18% of global greenhouse gases. Transitioning to electrification, green hydrogen, and thermal storage is crucial for decarbonization.

    Key Aspects of Industrial Heat:

    1. Temperature Ranges:
      1. Low (<150°C): Food/beverage, paper/pulp (drying, pasteurization)
      2. Medium (150-400°C): Chemical separation, refining
      3. High (>400°C): Steel (up to 1,600°C), cement (1,400-1,500°C), glass.
    2. Primary Sources: Mostly natural gas, coal, and oil.
    3. Common Applications: Process heat is used for steam production, drying, calcining, and smelting.

    Why Does Industrial Heat Represent a Strategic Energy Challenge for India?

    1. Industrial Energy Demand: Industrial heat accounts for nearly 25% of India’s total energy consumption, making it a major driver of fossil-fuel demand.
    2. Fossil Fuel Dependence: Manufacturing sectors rely heavily on coal, natural gas, and LPG to produce process heat.
    3. Geopolitical Vulnerability: Heavy dependence on imported natural gas exposes India to global supply disruptions and price volatility.
    4. Industrial Clusters: Manufacturing hubs such as Morbi (ceramics) and Ludhiana (textiles) rely on gas-based boilers for steam generation.
    5. High Temperature Requirements: Industrial processes often require temperatures exceeding 1000°C, limiting easy substitution with conventional renewable electricity.

    How Does Electrification of Industrial Heat Improve Efficiency and Sustainability?

    1. Electromagnetic Heating: Electric heating technologies generate heat using electromagnetic fields and plasma, improving energy conversion efficiency.
    2. Higher Efficiency Levels: Electric heating systems achieve efficiency levels exceeding 90%, significantly higher than fossil-fuel boilers.
    3. Reduced Heat Loss: Conventional gas boilers lose 20-30% of energy through exhaust gases, reducing system efficiency.
    4. Direct Heat Generation: Technologies such as induction heating transfer heat directly into materials rather than heating an intermediary fluid like steam.
    5. Process Precision: Plasma torches enable controlled high-temperature heating, reducing overheating and improving manufacturing quality.

    Can Concentrated Solar Thermal (CST) Technologies Support Industrial Heat Requirements?

    Concentrated Solar Thermal (CST) technology, often known as Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), uses mirrors or lenses to focus a large area of sunlight onto a small receiver, generating high temperatures (often > 500 degree celcius). This thermal energy is captured by fluids (like oil or molten salt) to produce steam, driving turbines for electricity or providing direct industrial heat

    1. Solar Heat Generation: CST uses mirrors to concentrate sunlight onto receivers, heating fluids such as molten salts or water to temperatures up to 400°C.
    2. Suitable Industrial Applications: Textile processes like scouring and bleaching require temperatures between 100°C and 180°C, which CST can supply.
    3. Large National Potential: India possesses approximately 15 GW CST potential, indicating significant scalability.
    4. Declining Payback Period: Rising gas prices have reduced the payback period for CST installations from seven years to less than three years.
    5. On-site Energy Generation: CST enables industries to generate heat directly at factory premises, reducing reliance on external fuel supply.

    What Infrastructure Constraints Limit the Electrification of Industrial Heat?

    1. Grid Capacity Constraints: If large industrial clusters shift simultaneously to electric heating, existing power grids may face severe load pressure.
    2. Industrial Electricity Demand: Industrial heat already accounts for about 25% of total energy consumption, creating high electricity demand if electrified.
    3. Storage Limitations: India’s energy storage capacity remains underdeveloped, limiting round-the-clock renewable electricity supply.
    4. Distribution Network Stress: Studies indicate that up to one-third of transformers in industrial clusters operate near peak load, leaving minimal capacity for additional demand.
    5. High Voltage Requirements: Electric heating systems require high-capacity substations and reinforced transmission networks.

    How Can Thermal Storage Strengthen Industrial Electrification?

    1. Thermal Energy Storage: Heat generated during daytime can be stored in insulated tanks or molten salts for later industrial use.
    2. Lower Cost Advantage: Thermal storage systems are significantly cheaper than lithium-ion battery storage for industrial heat applications.
    3. Grid Independence: Stored heat enables factories to operate without continuous grid electricity supply.
    4. Peak Load Management: Thermal storage reduces electricity demand spikes during peak industrial operations.
    5. Round-the-Clock Operation: Industries can maintain 24×7 production cycles despite intermittent renewable energy generation.

    What Policy Measures Are Required to Accelerate Industrial Heat Electrification?

    1. National Thermal Policy: Establishes a coordinated framework for industrial heat decarbonisation and energy security.
    2. Targeted Subsidies: Extends production-linked incentives to CST mirror manufacturing, similar to solar photovoltaic incentives.
    3. Carbon Market Integration: Enables industries to trade avoided emissions through carbon credit markets, improving financial viability.
    4. Industrial Cluster Upgradation: Strengthens distribution infrastructure in manufacturing clusters to support electric heating.
    5. Energy Market Reform: Facilitates heat purchase agreements, allowing industries to buy heat as a service.

    What Global Experiences Offer Lessons for India’s Industrial Heat Transition?

    1. Hybrid Industrial Systems: Solar thermal systems operate during the day while gas-based systems provide backup at night.
    2. Oman Solar Thermal Project: Integration of large CST plants with gas-fired industrial operations reduces gas consumption by nearly 80%.
    3. Plug-and-Play Solar Systems: Modular solar thermal units allow quick installation in factory rooftops or parking areas.
    4. Energy Service Companies: External providers install and operate solar heat infrastructure, supplying heat at fixed prices.
    5. Market Reform Models: Liberalized energy markets allow heat supply contracts similar to electricity power purchase agreements.

    Conclusion

    Achieving greater thermal independence in industrial heat generation is essential for strengthening India’s energy security, industrial competitiveness, and climate commitments. Electrification of industrial heat and the adoption of concentrated solar thermal technologies can significantly reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels while improving efficiency and lowering emissions. However, this transition requires grid strengthening, thermal storage development, supportive policy frameworks, and targeted incentives for industries. A coordinated strategy integrating technology adoption, infrastructure expansion, and market reforms will be crucial to enable a resilient and sustainable industrial energy system in India.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] Describe the benefits of deriving electric energy from sunlight in contrast to the conventional energy generation. What are the initiatives offered by our Government for this purpose?
    Linkage: Concentrated Solar Thermal (CST) highlights the role of solar energy in industrial heat generation and energy transition, linking directly with UPSC questions on renewable energy and decarbonisation. CST is important for Prelims MCQs as UPSC frequently asks about types of solar technologies (Solar PV vs Solar Thermal) and their applications.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Economic Indicators and Various Reports On It- GDP, FD, EODB, WIR etc

    CPI Inflation Rises to 10-Month High in February 2026

    Prelims Only | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Indian Economy

    Why in the News

    India’s retail inflation, measured by the Consumer Price Index, rose to 3.2% in February 2026, the highest in ten months. The data was released by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.

    Key Highlights

    1. Increase in Inflation

    • CPI inflation increased from January 2026 levels to 3.2% in February.
    • The last time inflation was higher was April 2025 (3.3%).

    2. Major Drivers of Inflation

    The rise was mainly driven by:

    • Food and Beverages
    • Inflation increased to 3.35% in February from 2.1% in January.
    • This segment contributed 44 basis points of the 47-basis-point increase in overall inflation.
    • Paan, Tobacco and Intoxicants: Inflation rose to 3.5% from 2.9%.
    • Personal Care and Miscellaneous Goods
      • Inflation remained very high at around 19.6%, largely due to rising gold and silver prices.

    Core Inflation

    • Core inflation (excluding food and fuel) remained stable at 3.4% between January and February.

    Impact of Global Factors

    Economists warn inflation may rise further due to:

    • Energy supply disruptions caused by the West Asia conflict.
    • Higher prices in electricity, gas, fuel, restaurants, and accommodation.
    • Depreciation of the Indian rupee.
    [2020] Consider the following statements: The weightage of food in Consumer Price Index (CPI) is higher than that in Wholesale Price Index (WPI). The WPI does not capture changes in the prices of services, which CPI does. Reserve Bank of India has now adopted WPI as its key measure of inflation and to decide on changing the key policy rates. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-Middle East

    India Co-Sponsors UNSC Resolution Against Iran

    Prelims Only | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Why in the News

    India co-sponsored a resolution at the United Nations Security Council calling for the immediate cessation of attacks by Iran on Gulf countries amid the ongoing West Asia conflict.

    Key Points of the Resolution

    • The resolution was backed by 134 countries.
    • 13 members of the UNSC voted in favour, while Russia and China abstained.
    • It demands that Iran stop attacks against Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.

    GCC Countries Mentioned

    • The resolution refers to members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, including: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Jordan (partner country).

    Maritime Security Concern

    • The resolution also condemns attempts by Iran to interfere with navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route for global energy supplies.

    India’s Position

    According to the Ministry of External Affairs:

    • India prioritises the safety of all civilians in the conflict.
    • The GCC region is important because:
      • Around 10 million Indians live and work there.
      • The region supplies about 50% of India’s crude oil imports and around 90% of LPG imports.

    Criticism of India’s Stance

    Some former diplomats argued that:

    • India condemned Iran’s actions but did not explicitly criticise strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran.
    • Critics say diplomacy should recognise the complexity of the conflict rather than blame a single side.
    [2016] Which of the following is not a member of ‘Gulf Cooperation Council’? (a) Iran (b) Saudi Arabia (c) Oman (d) Kuwait

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Parliament – Sessions, Procedures, Motions, Committees etc

    Speaker Says MPs Can Speak Only as Per Parliamentary Rules

    Prelims Only | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Parliament & State Legislatures

    Why in the News

    Om Birla stated that every Member of Parliament has the right to speak in the Lok Sabha, but only according to the Constitution, Rules of Procedure, and Standing Orders.
    His remarks came a day after a motion seeking his removal was defeated in the House.

    Constitutional Basis

    • Freedom of Speech in Parliament: Under Article 105 of the Constitution of India:  MPs have freedom of speech in Parliament. However, this freedom is subject to parliamentary rules and procedures.

    Key Parliamentary Rules Governing Speeches

    • Recognition by the Chair: An MP can speak only when recognized by the Speaker. Members cannot stand and speak without permission.
    • Time is allocated based on: Party strength, Business of the House and Decision of the Speaker.
    • Agenda-Based Discussions
      • Members can speak mainly during: Question Hour, Zero Hour, Debates on Bills, Motions and Resolutions, Budget discussions

    Rules of Conduct: 

    • Members must:
      • Address the Chair (Speaker) and not other members directly.
      • Avoid unparliamentary language.
      • Speak only on the subject under discussion.

    Special Procedures

    Certain issues can be raised through specific procedures such as:

    • Adjournment Motion
    • Calling Attention Motion
    • Short Duration Discussion
    • Points of Order

    Role of the Speaker

    The Speaker:

    • Maintains order and discipline in the House.
    • Decides who speaks and for how long.
    • Can expunge remarks or suspend members for disorderly conduct.
    [2025] With reference to the Indian polity, consider the following statements: I. The Governor of a State is not answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his/her office. II. No criminal proceedings shall be instituted or continued against the Governor during his/her term of office. III. Members of a State Legislature are not liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said within the House. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) I and II only (b) II and III only (c) I and III only (d) I, II and III

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Supreme Court Verdict on OBC Creamy Layer Criterion

    Prelims Only | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that income alone cannot determine the “creamy layer” among OBCs, and clarified how children of private sector and PSU employees should be treated in comparison with those of government servants. The judgment was delivered by Justices P. S. Narasimha and R. Mahadevan.

    What is the “Creamy Layer”?

    • The concept emerged from the landmark Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992).
    • It excludes the economically and socially advanced members of the OBC category from reservation benefits.
    • Currently, the income ceiling for creamy layer is ₹8 lakh per year.

    What the Supreme Court Said

    1. Income Cannot Be the Sole Criterion

    • The Court held that salary income alone cannot determine creamy layer status.
    • The social position and post of the parents must also be considered.

    2. Equality Between Government and Private Sector Employees

    • The Court addressed discrimination created by a 2004 government clarification:
    • Earlier:
      • Salary of private sector and PSU employees was counted in income.
      • Salary of government employees was not counted.
    • The Court ruled this creates “hostile discrimination” between similarly placed OBC candidates.

    This violates equality principles under:

    • Article 14 of the Constitution of India
    • Article 15 of the Constitution of India
    • Article 16 of the Constitution of India

    What Changes After the Verdict

    • Equal Treatment
      • Children of PSU and private sector employees will now be assessed similar to government employees, considering the status of the post, not only income.

    Benefits for Affected Candidates

    • Candidates previously denied OBC status in exams (like the Civil Services Examination) may now receive benefits.
    • The Court allowed the government to create supernumerary posts if necessary to accommodate them.

    Background of the Issue

    • 1993 DoPT guidelines excluded salary and agricultural income while determining creamy layer.
    • A 2004 clarification included salary income for private/PSU employees, causing the dispute.
    [2023] Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgements that the reservation policies made under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India would be limited by Article 335 for maintenance of efficiency of administration. Statement-II : Article 335 of the Constitution of India defines the term ‘efficiency of administration’. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Right To Privacy

    Supreme Court to Examine Definition of “Personal Data” under DPDP Law

    Prelims Only | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court of India has agreed to examine what constitutes “personal data” and “public data” under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, amid concerns that the law may restrict access to information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

    Background of the Case

    • The petition was filed by journalist Geeta Seshu and the Software Freedom Law Center India.
    • It was argued by senior advocate Indira Jaising.

    The petition claims the DPDP law may:

    • Restrict journalists’ access to information in the public interest
    • Allow excessive state surveillance
    • Weaken transparency provisions under RTI.

    Issues Raised in the Petition

    1. Restriction on RTI Access

    • Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act allegedly blocks disclosure of personal information through RTI requests.
    • The term “public interest” has reportedly been removed, making access to information harder.

    2. Lack of Clear Definitions

    • The petition argues the law does not clearly define: Personal data, Public data, and Information. This ambiguity may allow authorities to deny access to important information.

    3. Compensation Concerns

    • Penalties for data breaches go to the Consolidated Fund of India.
    • Individuals whose data is violated do not receive direct compensation.

    Court’s Observations

    The Bench headed by Surya Kant said:

    • A balance must be maintained between privacy and transparency.
    • Data privacy should not undermine the public’s right to information.
    • The Court also noted that data has become a major economic and strategic resource, requiring careful regulation.

    What Happens Next

    • The petitioners have been asked to frame specific legal questions.
    • The case will be heard further on March 23, 2026.

    Significance

    • The case could shape how privacy laws interact with RTI in India.
    • It may clarify the scope of personal data in governance and journalism.
    • The judgment could influence the future of digital rights and transparency in India.
    [2024] Under which of the following Articles of the Constitution of India, has the Supreme Court of India placed the Right to Privacy? (a) Article 15  (b) Article 16  (c) Article 19  (d) Article 21

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Disasters and Disaster Management – Sendai Framework, Floods, Cyclones, etc.

    [12th March 2026] The Hindu OpED: A seismic decision: On revision to India’s earthquake zoning, rollback 

    op-ed snap | Geography | Mains Paper 3: Disaster Management

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2021] Discuss about the vulnerability of India to earthquake related hazards. Give examples including the salient features of major disasters caused by earthquakes in different parts of India during the last three decades.Linkage: It highlights India’s seismic vulnerability and the need for accurate hazard assessment. The revision of the earthquake zoning framework and adoption of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment strengthen disaster preparedness and risk mapping.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The rollback of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) revision of India’s earthquake zoning framework has revived debate over seismic risk assessment. The proposed revision sought to replace the simplified fixed seismic zoning model with probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, a method widely used globally. It also introduced a new high-risk Zone VI covering vulnerable regions such as Kashmir and the Himalayan belt. However, stricter zoning raised economic concerns, as construction costs could increase by about 20% with a one-zone rise and nearly one-third with two zones. 

    Why does India require a revised earthquake zoning framework?

    1. Urban Expansion and Risk Exposure: Rapid urbanisation increases population and infrastructure in seismically vulnerable areas. Large infrastructure such as metro systems, dams, highways, and power stations require updated seismic design standards.
    2. Disaster Preparedness: Accurate zoning enables safer city planning, infrastructure design, and disaster management strategies. It reduces casualties and economic losses during earthquakes.
    3. Climate and Disaster Resilience: Earthquake-resilient infrastructure contributes to broader climate-resilient development and sustainable cities.
    4. Infrastructure Protection: Critical infrastructure projects must incorporate seismic design standards to prevent catastrophic failure during earthquakes.

    What is the current earthquake zoning system in India?

    1. Fixed Zoning Model: India currently uses a simplified seismic zoning map, dividing the country into fixed categories based on historical seismic activity.
    2. Seismic Zones: India’s seismic classification includes Zones II, III, IV and V, with Zone V representing the highest risk areas.
    3. Limitations of Fixed Zoning: Fixed zones rely heavily on past earthquake records and may not fully capture future seismic probabilities or micro-level risk variations.
    4. Urban Planning Integration: These zones influence building codes, infrastructure design standards, and urban planning guidelines.

    What changes were proposed in the BIS revision?

    1. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA): Introduces probability-based simulations to estimate earthquake intensity and frequency rather than relying solely on historical data.
    2. Introduction of Zone VI: Adds a new highest-risk seismic zone, covering Kashmir, parts of the Himalayan belt, Kutch in Gujarat, and the northeast.
    3. Improved Risk Modelling: Uses dynamic modelling of ground motion probabilities to improve earthquake preparedness.
    4. Alignment with Global Practice: Aligns India’s seismic risk assessment methodology with advanced economies and seismically active regions worldwide.

    Why did the proposed revision face opposition?

    1. Economic Cost: Construction costs could rise significantly.
      1. One-zone increase: Costs may rise by around 20%.
      2. Two-zone increase: Costs may rise by nearly one-third.
    2. Infrastructure Cost Escalation: High-value projects such as metro systems, dams, and power stations may face substantially higher structural design costs.
    3. Development Concerns: Urban planners fear stricter zoning could slow infrastructure development in economically fragile regions.
    4. Housing Informality: Nearly 80% of India’s housing stock lies in the informal sector, raising concerns that stricter regulations may increase unregulated construction.

    What are the broader governance and policy challenges?

    1. Institutional Coordination: The proposal faced resistance from multiple agencies including Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Home Affairs, Central Water Commission, and National Dam Safety Authority.
    2. Policy Consultation Gap: Large regulatory changes require extensive consultation across government agencies, industry stakeholders, and technical experts.
    3. Balancing Safety and Affordability: Stricter building standards improve safety but increase construction costs and housing affordability pressures.
    4. Implementation Capacity: Enforcement challenges remain significant due to informal housing markets and limited regulatory capacity.

    How does the debate intersect with climate and sustainability goals?

    1. Construction Sector Emissions: The construction sector is among the largest dispersed sources of carbon emissions in India.
    2. Infrastructure Lifecycle: Seismic-resilient structures reduce the need for reconstruction after disasters, lowering long-term carbon and economic costs.
    3. Resilient Urban Development: Disaster-proof infrastructure supports climate adaptation strategies and sustainable urbanisation.

    Conclusion

    Revising India’s earthquake zoning framework remains essential for ensuring disaster-resilient urban growth and infrastructure safety. However, scientific improvements must be accompanied by broad institutional consultation, economic feasibility assessments, and strong implementation mechanisms. A balanced framework that integrates advanced risk modelling with practical governance capacity is critical for strengthening India’s long-term disaster resilience.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Euthanasia Mercy Killing

    The framework behind Supreme Court’s euthanasia verdict

    Explained | | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court permitted withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for 32-year-old Harish Rana, who has been in a vegetative state since a severe head injury in 2013. Applying the framework evolved through the Aruna Shanbaug Case and Common Cause v. Union of India, the Court allowed withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition after medical boards confirmed the condition was irreversible. It also waived the 30-day reconsideration period, highlighting urgency where treatment is medically futile. The ruling is significant as India still lacks a comprehensive euthanasia law and relies mainly on constitutional interpretation under Article 21 and judicial precedents for end-of-life decisions.

    What constitutional principles guide euthanasia decisions in India?

    1. Right to Life with Dignity: Article 21 has been interpreted to include the right to live with dignity, which extends to a dignified death in cases of terminal illness or irreversible vegetative states.
    2. Judicial Interpretation: The Supreme Court clarified that Article 21 does not include a general “right to die”, but it protects patients from being forced to live through invasive or futile medical interventions.
    3. Withdrawal vs Assisted Death: The Court distinguished passive euthanasia (withdrawing treatment) from active euthanasia (intentional administration of lethal substances).
    4. Protection of Patient Autonomy: The constitutional framework recognizes the patient’s autonomy through advanced medical directives (“living wills”).
    5. Ethical Medical Practice: Courts emphasize medical ethics, compassion, and dignity, recognizing the complexity of end-of-life care.

    How did judicial precedents shape India’s euthanasia framework?

    1. Aruna Shanbaug Case (2011): The Supreme Court permitted passive euthanasia under strict safeguards, requiring approval from the High Court in each case.
    2. Common Cause Judgment (2018): Recognised advance directives or living wills, allowing individuals to specify refusal of life-prolonging treatment.
    3. 2018 Procedural Guidelines: Required two medical boards and judicial verification, but these safeguards proved difficult to implement.
    4. 2023 Simplification: The Supreme Court simplified procedures by removing mandatory magistrate approval and enabling hospital-level medical boards to decide.
    5. Current Application: The Harish Rana case represents the first full application of this evolving framework in a real medical scenario.

    Why does India still lack a comprehensive euthanasia law?

    1. Legislative Gap: India has not enacted a comprehensive statute governing euthanasia or end-of-life care.
    2. Judicial Governance: Courts have effectively created the framework through constitutional interpretation rather than legislation.
    3. Ethical Sensitivity: Euthanasia debates involve ethical, religious, and cultural sensitivities, slowing legislative consensus.
    4. Medical Complexity: Determining medical futility, patient autonomy, and consent requires careful safeguards.
    5. Policy Vacuum: Absence of statutory law results in procedural ambiguity across hospitals and states.

    What procedural safeguards govern withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment?

    1. Primary Medical Board: Hospital forms a board including the treating physician and specialists to assess medical futility.
    2. Secondary Medical Board: Independent board with senior doctors reviews the decision to prevent misuse.
    3. Advance Directive Recognition: Living wills must be documented and stored in digital health records where possible.
    4. Family Consent: Family members participate in decision-making when the patient lacks decision-making capacity.
    5. Hospital Responsibility: Hospitals inform magistrates before withdrawal but do not require judicial approval.

    What ethical dilemmas arise in passive euthanasia decisions?

    1. Sanctity vs Quality of Life: Balances the principle of preserving life with human dignity in terminal suffering.
    2. Medical Futility: Raises questions about continuing treatment when recovery is medically impossible.
    3. Family Burden: Long-term vegetative states impose emotional and financial strain on families.
    4. Risk of Misuse: Concerns about coercion, inheritance disputes, or pressure on vulnerable patients.
    5. Healthcare Resource Allocation: Intensive care for irreversible cases may divert limited healthcare resources.

    How does India’s euthanasia approach compare globally?

    1. Active Euthanasia Legal: Countries such as Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, and parts of the United States permit physician-assisted dying under strict conditions.
    2. Passive Euthanasia Accepted: Many jurisdictions allow withdrawal of treatment when it is medically futile.
    3. Strict Regulatory Frameworks: Countries that permit euthanasia maintain strong documentation, psychiatric evaluation, and oversight mechanisms.
    4. India’s Model: Focuses on passive euthanasia with strong medical safeguards, avoiding active euthanasia.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court’s decision in the Harish Rana case reinforces the constitutional principle that dignity must extend to the end of life. By clarifying procedural safeguards for withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, the Court has advanced patient autonomy while maintaining strict medical oversight. However, reliance on judicial precedents rather than legislation underscores the need for a comprehensive end-of-life care law in India to ensure clarity, consistency, and protection against misuse.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] The Constitution of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society.” Illustrate with special reference to the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty.

    Linkage: The euthanasia debate emerges from the expanded interpretation of Article 21, where the Supreme Court recognised the right to die with dignity in cases like Aruna Shanbaug and Common Cause.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Economic Indicators and Various Reports On It- GDP, FD, EODB, WIR etc

    A revision of GDP and its implications

    Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Indian Economy

    Why in the News?

    India’s National Statistical Office (NSO) has released a new GDP series with 2022-23 as the base year, revising earlier national income estimates. The revision reduces the absolute size of India’s GDP by around 3-4% compared with estimates based on the 2011-12 base year and introduces changes in sectoral and institutional shares of output.

    What is Gross Domestic Product (GDP)?

    1. Gross Domestic Product (GDP): Measures the total monetary value of all final goods and services produced within the geographical boundaries of a country during a specific period, usually one year.
    2. Indicator of Economic Performance: Serves as the primary measure of economic size, growth rate, and overall economic activity used in national and international comparisons.
    3. Measurement Methods: Calculated through three approaches, Production (Value Added) Method, Income Method, and Expenditure Method to estimate economic output.
    4. Policy Relevance: Guides macroeconomic policy, fiscal planning, investment decisions, and development assessment.

    How is GDP Revision Done?

    1. Base Year Revision: Updates the reference year for calculating GDP at constant prices to reflect current economic structure and price levels.
    2. Data Source Updating: Incorporates new surveys, administrative datasets, enterprise records, and sectoral statistics for more accurate estimation.
    3. Methodological Improvements: Adopts updated statistical techniques and classifications aligned with the UN System of National Accounts (SNA).
    4. Sectoral Reclassification: Revises sectoral contributions (agriculture, industry, services) and institutional sectors such as households and corporations.
    5. Institutional Responsibility: Conducted by the National Statistical Office (NSO) under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) to maintain credible national accounts.

    Why is the Revision of India’s GDP Series Significant?

    1. Fiscal Indicator Recalibration: Revises key macroeconomic ratios such as Fiscal Deficit-to-GDP, Debt-to-GDP, and Tax-to-GDP, influencing budgetary planning, fiscal responsibility targets, and macroeconomic stability assessments.
    2. Reassessment of Past Economic Performance: Recomputes historical GDP estimates using the new base year, enabling more accurate evaluation of growth trends, policy outcomes, and economic cycles during the previous decade.
    3. Global Economic Standing: Alters India’s comparative GDP size, affecting its position among major economies and influence within international institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, and G20.
    4. Policy Planning Baseline: Establishes a new benchmark for long-term economic planning, including projections related to development targets, productivity growth, and sectoral policy frameworks.
    5. Investor and Market Signalling: Provides updated macroeconomic indicators for investors, rating agencies, and financial markets, shaping perceptions about India’s growth potential, economic resilience, and investment attractiveness.

    What Does Re-basing the GDP Series Mean and Why is it Necessary?

    1. Base Year Revision: Updates the reference year for calculating GDP to reflect contemporary economic structure. The new base year is 2022-23, replacing 2011-12.
    2. Structural Updating: Captures changes in production patterns, prices, and sectoral contributions within the economy.
    3. Methodological Revision: Incorporates new datasets, surveys, and statistical techniques to improve accuracy.
    4. Periodic Exercise: Conducted roughly every 5-10 years under the System of National Accounts (SNA) framework.
    5. Institutional Responsibility: Managed by the National Statistical Office (NSO) under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI).

    How Has the Revision Changed the Estimated Size of India’s Economy?

    1. GDP Contraction: Shows a 3-4% reduction in the absolute size of GDP compared with the 2011-12 series.
    2. Growth Rate Differences: Indicates minor variations in growth rates, generally within one percentage point between the two series.
    3. Revised Growth Estimates:
      1. 2022-23 to 2023-24: Earlier series estimated 12% growth, revised series estimates 11%.
      2. 2023-24 to 2024-25: Earlier estimate 9.8%, revised estimate 9.7%.
    4. Interpretation: Suggests the earlier GDP series may have slightly overstated economic expansion.

    How Has the Sectoral Composition of the Economy Changed?

    1. Agriculture: Share increased from 18.1% to 20% of Gross Value Added (GVA).
    2. Industry: Share increased marginally from 27.7% to 28.1%.
    3. Manufacturing: Share increased from 14.3% to 14.7%.
    4. Services: Share declined from 54.3% to 51.8%.
    5. Interpretation: Indicates a modest shift toward primary and industrial sectors, while services appear slightly smaller in the revised structure.

    What Changes Have Occurred in Institutional Classification of Output?

    1. Private Non-Financial Corporations (PNFCs): Share declined from 35.4% to 33.9% of GVA.
    2. Household Sector: Share increased from 44.3% to 45% of GVA.
    3. Interpretation: Suggests greater recognition of informal and household economic activity in the revised dataset.

    Does the Revision Address Earlier Concerns About India’s GDP Estimates?

    1. Overestimation Debate: Concerns existed that growth rates under the 2011-12 series were overstated.
    2. International Evaluation: IMF review of member countries’ economic statistics assigned India a ‘C’ grade for NAS quality.
    3. Partial Correction: Reduction in GDP size suggests a possible statistical correction.
    4. Remaining Uncertainty: Lack of detailed methodological explanation leaves questions about the reliability of the revised estimates.

    What Are the Policy Implications of the GDP Revision?

    1. Economic Benchmarking: Revises the baseline for measuring economic performance and growth trajectories.
    2. Policy Planning: Affects macroeconomic planning, fiscal projections, and development targets.
    3. International Comparisons: Influences India’s global economic ranking and comparisons with other economies.
    4. Development Targets: May impact timelines for achieving goals such as the $5 trillion economy target.
    5. Statistical Credibility: Emphasizes the need to strengthen statistical transparency and methodological clarity.

    Conclusion

    The revision of India’s GDP series with 2022-23 as the base year represents a necessary statistical update to align national income estimates with the evolving structure of the economy. While the revised estimates moderately alter the size and sectoral composition of GDP, the exercise underscores the importance of robust data systems, transparent methodology, and credible statistical institutions for sound economic policymaking. Strengthening India’s statistical architecture, expanding high-quality datasets, and ensuring institutional independence of statistical agencies will be critical to improving the reliability of macroeconomic indicators and enabling evidence-based governance and development planning.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] Define potential GDP and explain its determinants. What are the factors that have been inhibiting India from realizing its potential GDP?

    Linkage: The revised GDP series directly relates to debates on accurate measurement of GDP and assessment of India’s real growth potential. This makes statistical revisions crucial for understanding true economic performance and policy planning.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-Middle East

    IEA Announces Record Release of Strategic Oil Stocks

    Prelims Only | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Why in the News

    The International Energy Agency announced a record release of 400 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves to stabilise global markets after oil prices surged due to the US-Israel war with Iran.

    Key Points

    • Largest Release Ever
      • IEA’s 32 member countries agreed to release 400 million barrels of oil.
      • This is the largest coordinated release in the agency’s history.
      • It is the sixth emergency release since the IEA was created in 1974 after the oil crisis.
      • India is not a full member of the IEA.
    • Reason for the Decision
      • The conflict disrupted oil supply routes in the Middle East.
      • Tanker movement through the Strait of Hormuz has been blocked or restricted.
      • Around 20 million barrels per day of oil flows are affected.
    • Contribution by Countries
      • Member countries will release oil based on their national circumstances.
      • Japan plans to release about 80 million barrels from its reserves.
    • Market Reaction
      • Oil prices initially fell but rebounded later.
      • Markets doubt whether the release will offset the large supply disruption caused by the conflict.
    • Comparison with Earlier Crisis
      • During the Russia–Ukraine War, IEA countries released 182.7 million barrels, previously the largest coordinated action.

    Strategic Oil Reserves

    • IEA member countries collectively hold over 1.2 billion barrels in emergency reserves.
    • An additional 600 million barrels are held by industry under government obligations.

    Significance

    • Aims to stabilise global oil prices and supply.
    • Demonstrates international coordination during energy crises.
    • Highlights global vulnerability to disruptions in key energy transit routes like the Strait of Hormuz.
    In the context of global oil prices, “Brent crude oil” is frequently referred to in the news. What does this term imply? It is a major classification of crude oil. It is sourced from the North Sea. It does not contain sulphur. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?(a) 2 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Festivals, Dances, Theatre, Literature, Art in News

    National Book Trust’s India@75 Series Highlights Forgotten Figures

    Prelims Only | Art and Culture | Mains Paper 1: Arts & Culture

    Why in the News

    New books in the India@75 series are bringing attention to overlooked scientists, freedom fighters, and social leaders, such as Anna Mani, whose contributions had received limited public recognition.

    About the India@75 Series

    • Launched during Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav.
    • The series aims to document India’s historical journey before and after independence.
    • Categories in the Series: The books are divided into four themes: People, Places, Events, and Themes

    Focus on Unsung Personalities

    • Under the People category, the series highlights both famous and lesser known figures such as:
      • Anna Mani
      • Janaki Ammal
      • Dhyan Chand
      • Minoo Masani
      • Rani Chennamma

    Anna Mani

    • Known as India’s “weather woman.”
    • Designed and standardised more than 100 meteorological instruments.
    • Contributed significantly to meteorology, solar radiation research, and wind energy studies.

    Janaki Ammal

    • Full name: Edavaleth Kakkat Janaki Ammal (1897–1984).
    • One of India’s first women botanists and cytogeneticists.
    • Known for pioneering work in plant breeding and genetics.

    Dhyan Chand

    • Born: 1905, Prayagraj; died: 1979.
    • Known as the “Wizard of Hockey.”
    • One of the greatest hockey players in history.

    Minoo Masani

    • Full name: Minocher Rustom Masani (1905–1998).
    • A prominent Indian liberal political leader and writer.
    • Co-founder of the Swatantra Party in 1959 with C. Rajagopalachari.
    • Advocated free markets, individual liberty, and democratic values.

    Rani Chennamma

    • Born: 1778 in present-day Karnataka.
    • Queen of the Kittur.
    • Role in Freedom Struggle: Led an armed rebellion against the British East India Company in 1824.
      • Opposed the British refusal to recognize her adopted heir to the throne.
    [2023] Consider the following pairs with regard to sports awards: 1. Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna Award : For the most spectacular and outstanding performance by a sportsperson over period of last four years 2. Arjuna Award : For the lifetime achievement by a sportsperson 3. Dronacharya Award : To honour eminent coaches who have successfully trained sportspersons or teams 4. Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puraskar : To recognize the contribution made by sportspersons even after their retirement How many of the above pairs are correctly matched? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) Only three (d) All four

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • International Space Agencies – Missions and Discoveries

    Starship Delays May Affect NASA’s Moon Landing Timeline

    Prelims Only | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Awareness in various sc and tech fields

    Why in the News

    A report by NASA’s Inspector General warns that delays in SpaceX Starship could affect the timeline of the Artemis Program, which aims to land humans on the Moon before 2030.

    Background: Artemis Moon Mission

    • NASA is working with private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin
    • The Artemis programme aims to establish sustainable human missions to the Moon and eventually support missions to Mars.
    • Originally, the Moon landing under Artemis III was targeted for 2024, but delays have pushed the timeline to around 2028 or later.

    Why It Is Difficult

    • Starship uses liquid methane and liquid oxygen as fuel. These must be stored at cryogenic temperatures below −150°C.
    • The system must perform multiple docking and fuel transfers in Low Earth Orbit (LEO).
    • LEO already has heavy satellite traffic, increasing operational risk.
    [2011] An artificial satellite orbiting around the Earth does not fall down. This is so because the attraction of Earth (a) does not exist at such a distance. (b) is neutralized by the attraction of the moon. (c) provides the necessary speed for its steady motion. (d) provides the necessary acceleration for its motion.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Pension Reforms

    New Employees’ Pension Scheme (EPS-2026) Removes Higher Pension Clause

    Schemes | Governance | Mains Paper 2: Governance, Transparency & Accountability, Citizens Charters,Schemes For Vulnerable Sections

    Why in the News

    The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation approved EPS-2026, which removes a key clause that earlier allowed employees to opt for higher pension based on salary above ₹15,000. The decision was taken at the 239th meeting of the Central Board of Trustees (CBT) chaired by Mansukh Mandaviya.

    Background

    • The Employees’ Pension Scheme 1995 had a provision under Paragraph 11(4) allowing employees and employers to jointly opt for pension contributions based on salary above the wage ceiling (₹15,000 per month).
    • This option had to be exercised within one year (2014-15) after the amendment.

    Change in EPS-2026

    • The EPS-2026 has removed Paragraph 11(4), calling it “obsolete.”
    • Reason:
      • The clause applied only to a limited time window after the 2014 amendment.
      • The new scheme is being aligned with the Code on Social Security 2020.

    Supreme Court Intervention Earlier

    • In November 2022, the Supreme Court of India allowed eligible employees to apply for higher pension if they had missed the earlier option.
    • Government data:
      • 15.24 lakh applications received
      • 3.93 lakh demand letters issued
      • 1.24 lakh pension payment orders issued

    Key Provisions in New PF Rules

    • Even though EPS-2026 removed the higher pension clause:
      • The Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme still allows employees and employers to jointly contribute above the wage ceiling.
      • Employees may also make additional voluntary contributions, though employers are not obligated to match them.

    EPFO’s Concerns

    The EPFO earlier argued that:

    • EPS was meant mainly for low-income workers.
    • Higher pension options created “reverse subsidy” where lower-paid workers indirectly supported higher-paid employees.
    • The pension fund faces an actuarial deficit.

    Significance

    • Aligns pension rules with the new labour codes.
    • Limits the higher pension option in the new scheme.
    • Continues to raise debates on pension adequacy and fund sustainability.
    [2021] With reference to casual workers employed in India, consider the following statements: 1. All casual workers are entitled to Employees Provident Fund coverage. 2. All casual workers are entitled to regular working hours and overtime payment. 3. The government can, by notification, specify that an establishment or industry shall pay wages only through its bank account. Which of the above statements are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2, and 3

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Euthanasia Mercy Killing

    Supreme Court Upholds Right to Die with Dignity

    Prelims Only | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court of India allowed withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, reaffirming the right to die with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The judgment was delivered by Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. V. Viswanathan.

    Key Features of the Judgment

    1. Withdrawal of Life Support Allowed

    • The Court permitted withdrawal of Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (CANH) for a patient in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS).
    • This allows the natural process of death rather than artificially prolonging life.

    2. Replacement of the Term “Passive Euthanasia”

    • The Court clarified terminology: Active euthanasia remains illegal in India.
      • The earlier term passive euthanasia will now be called “withholding or withdrawal of medical treatment.”

    3. Structured Medical Process Required

    Withdrawal of life support must not be a single act. It must involve:

    • A structured palliative care plan
    • Medical assessment of whether treatment is futile or non-beneficial
    • Ensuring the patient does not suffer unnecessary pain.

    4. Medical Board Review

    • Primary and secondary medical boards must examine such cases.
    • If both boards approve withdrawal, hospitals must inform the Judicial Magistrate of First Class.

    5. Focus on Patient’s Best Interest

    The Court clarified the test:

    • Not whether it is better for the patient to die
    • But whether it is better not to artificially prolong life through futile treatment.

    Legal Background

    • The ruling implements guidelines laid down in the landmark case: Common Cause v. Union of India (2018)
    • That case recognised:
      • Right to die with dignity
      • Living wills or advance medical directives

    Court’s Recommendations

    The Court urged the Government of India to enact a specific law governing withdrawal of life support and end-of-life care.

    Significance

    • Strengthens the interpretation of Article 21 to include dignified death.
    • Clarifies procedures for end-of-life medical decisions.
    • Balances medical ethics, patient autonomy, and constitutional rights.
    [2024] Under which of the following Articles of the Constitution of India, has the Supreme Court of India placed the Right to Privacy? (a) Article 15 (b) Article 16 (c) Article 19 (d) Article 21

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Breakthrough

    [11th March 2026] The Hindu OpED: AI and the national security calculus

    op-ed snap | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Awareness in various sc and tech fields

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2023] Introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI). How does AI help clinical diagnosis? Do you perceive any threat to privacy of the individual in the use of AI in healthcare?Linkage: The article discusses AI as a dual-use technology with security implications, highlighting concerns about surveillance, military integration, and governance of AI systems. The PYQ connects through debates on ethical risks, regulation, and societal impacts of AI deployment.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The rapid rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has pushed it from a commercial technology to a strategic national security asset. The debate intensified after American AI company Anthropic urged the U.S. government to classify Chinese AI labs like DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax as national security threats. The controversy reflects a deeper policy dilemma: Should AI be treated like nuclear technology requiring strict controls, or like a dual-use digital technology that thrives on open innovation? The issue has implications for military decision-making, global technological competition, and governance of autonomous systems.

    Is AI becoming a national security technology comparable to nuclear weapons?

    1. Dual-Use Technology: AI functions as a general-purpose technology used for civilian innovation and military operations. Unlike nuclear weapons, AI also drives sectors such as healthcare, finance, and digital governance.
    2. Military Integration: AI models assist in accelerating the military “kill chain”, supporting target identification, intelligence analysis, and operational decisions.
    3. Technological Diffusion: AI research occurs across universities, private firms, and open-source communities, enabling rapid global diffusion.
    4. Comparative Argument: Nuclear non-proliferation succeeds due to scarcity of fissile material, whereas AI relies on widely accessible resources like data and computing.

    What is AI model distillation and why is it controversial?

    1. Model Distillation: Distillation involves training smaller AI models using the outputs of larger frontier models to replicate capabilities at lower computational cost.
    2. Industrial-Scale Claims: Anthropic alleges 16 million interactions with its Claude model through around 24,000 accounts, suggesting systematic distillation efforts.
    3. Strategic Advantage: Distillation enables competitors to achieve frontier-level performance at a fraction of the cost of original research.
    4. Intellectual Property Issues: Companies argue distillation violates terms of service and proprietary model safeguards.

    Why are export controls and technological restrictions facing limitations?

    1. Circumvention of Restrictions: Export controls on advanced chips and inputs often face workarounds through alternative supply chains or domestic development.
    2. Human Capital Mobility: AI researchers frequently work across countries, making technological containment difficult.
    3. Diffusion of Knowledge: AI research spreads through academic publications, open-source models, and global conferences.
    4. Policy Ineffectiveness: Restrictions may fail to prevent competitors from achieving comparable performance, as illustrated by emerging Chinese AI models.

    Do corporate guardrails effectively regulate military uses of AI?

    1. Corporate Governance Limits: Private companies can modify or remove safeguards when responding to government contracts.
    2. Defense Integration: AI firms increasingly compete for military and national security contracts, accelerating integration into defence systems.
      1. Example: Some firms accept permissive contracts allowing military use of AI models, illustrating the competitive pressure in defence technology markets.
    3. Regulatory Gap: Corporate policies alone cannot substitute state-led governance frameworks for military AI use.

    Why does AI governance require international cooperation?

    1. Inevitable Military Adoption: Armed forces globally are integrating generative AI into surveillance, cyber warfare, and autonomous systems.
    2. Need for Global Norms: Effective regulation requires plurilateral commitments among states rather than unilateral corporate decisions.
    3. Human Control: Governance frameworks must ensure meaningful human oversight in lethal decision-making systems.
    4. Restrictions on Mass Surveillance: Global norms should prohibit large-scale civilian surveillance enabled by AI systems.

    Way Forward: Strengthening Global Governance of AI in National Security

    1. Multilateral AI Governance Framework: Establishes global rules for responsible AI deployment through platforms like the United Nations and the UNESCO which already adopted the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021) promoting transparency, accountability, and human rights protection.
    2. AI Safety and Risk Management Regimes: Strengthens international cooperation through initiatives like the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) and the OECD AI Principles, which promote responsible AI innovation, democratic values, and safeguards against misuse.
    3. Regulation of Military AI Systems: Develops binding norms on autonomous weapons through negotiations under the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), focusing on meaningful human control over lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS).
    4. Global Technology Export and Monitoring Mechanisms: Expands export-control regimes such as the Wassenaar Arrangement to include AI algorithms, advanced chips, and surveillance systems to prevent uncontrolled proliferation.
    5. Data Governance and Digital Rights Protection: Aligns AI regulation with frameworks such as the European Union AI Act, which classifies AI systems by risk level and restricts high-risk surveillance technologies.
    6. International Research Collaboration: Promotes open but secure collaboration among states, universities, and companies through forums like the G20 and World Economic Forum, ensuring innovation while maintaining safeguards.
    7. India’s Strategic Role: India can leverage platforms such as the BRICS, Quad, and G20 to push for ethical AI standards, responsible military use, and inclusive technological governance.

    Conclusion

    Artificial Intelligence is transforming the intersection of technology, geopolitics, and national security. Unlike nuclear technology, AI cannot be easily contained due to its open research ecosystem, global talent mobility, and digital diffusion. Effective governance therefore requires international norms, state-led oversight, and responsible corporate practices to balance innovation with security.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Electoral Reforms In India

    Impeaching the CEC: The law and the process

    Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Constitutional Bodies

    Why in the News?

    The Opposition has initiated efforts to move an impeachment motion against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, alleging biased conduct during the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal. The issue also arises shortly after the implementation of the 2023 Election Commissioners Act, which reshaped the appointment and service framework of election commissioners.

    What constitutional safeguards protect the independence of the Chief Election Commissioner?

    1. Article 324 of the Constitution: Establishes the Election Commission of India and vests the superintendence, direction, and control of elections in the Commission.
    2. Security of Tenure: Protects the CEC from arbitrary removal by requiring a removal process similar to that of a Supreme Court judge.
    3. Institutional Autonomy: Ensures independence from executive interference in electoral management.
    4. Parity with Supreme Court Judges: Removal requires proof of misbehaviour or incapacity, the same standard applied to judges.
    5. Protection of Election Commissioners: Other Election Commissioners can only be removed on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner.

    How is the Chief Election Commissioner removed under the Constitution?

    1. Article 324(5): Specifies that the Chief Election Commissioner cannot be removed except in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court judge.
    2. Grounds for Removal: Includes proved misbehaviour or incapacity, identical to judicial impeachment standards.
    3. Judicial Parity: Aligns the institutional protection of the Election Commission with the judiciary to ensure independence from political pressure.

    What is the parliamentary process involved in the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner?

    Procedure follows the framework used for removal of Supreme Court judges under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

    1. Initiation of Motion: At least 100 members in the Lok Sabha or 50 members in the Rajya Sabha submit a signed removal motion against the Chief Election Commissioner to the Speaker of Lok Sabha or the Chairman of Rajya Sabha under the framework used for removal of a Supreme Court judge.
    2. Admission of Motion: The Speaker/Chairman decides whether the motion should be admitted or rejected.
    3. Inquiry Committee: If admitted, a three-member inquiry committee is constituted consisting of
      1. A Judge of the Supreme Court,
      2. A Chief Justice of a High Court, and
      3. A Distinguished jurist

    The committee investigates allegations of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.

    1. Parliamentary Voting: If the committee finds the charges proven, both Houses of Parliament must pass the removal motion with
      1. Majority of the total membership of the House, and
      2. Two-thirds majority of members present and voting.
    2. Final Removal Authority: After both Houses pass the motion, the President of India issues the order removing the Chief Election Commissioner.

    How does the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023 affect the removal process?

    1. Statutory Framework: Provides legislative clarity regarding appointment, service conditions, and tenure of Election Commissioners.
    2. Section 11 of the Act: Reaffirms the constitutional removal procedure, maintaining parity with Supreme Court judges.
    3. Institutional Continuity: Ensures that statutory provisions do not dilute constitutional safeguards.
    4. Administrative Clarity: Defines resignation and removal procedures within the broader constitutional structure.

    Why is the allegation of “biased conduct” politically and institutionally significant?

    1. Electoral Credibility: Allegations of bias challenge the perceived neutrality of the Election Commission, a cornerstone of democratic legitimacy.
    2. Federal Sensitivity: The controversy relates to electoral roll revision in West Bengal, raising concerns about regional political neutrality.
    3. Institutional Precedent: An impeachment attempt against a CEC would be extremely rare and could reshape norms governing independent institutions.
    4. Political Contestation: Demonstrates increasing political scrutiny over constitutional authorities involved in election management.

    Conclusion

    The constitutional design surrounding the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner reflects a careful balance between independence and accountability. By equating the removal process with that of a Supreme Court judge, the Constitution ensures that electoral authorities remain insulated from political pressure while still being subject to parliamentary oversight. Current developments highlight the continuing importance of safeguarding the neutrality of institutions that underpin democratic elections.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] Discuss the role of the Election Commission of India in the light of the evolution of the Model Code of Conduct.

    Linkage: The removal procedure of the Chief Election Commissioner under Article 324(5) reflects the constitutional safeguards ensuring the independence of the Election Commission. Questions on ECI autonomy, electoral integrity, and constitutional protections for constitutional bodies are frequently asked in GS-2, linking directly to debates on the CEC’s removal process.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Finance Commission – Issues related to devolution of resources

    41% illusion: a quiet re-engineering of India’s fiscal landscape

    Prelims Only | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Constitutional Bodies,Federalism

    Why in the News?

    The Union government accepted the Sixteenth Finance Commission’s recommendation to retain States’ share in the divisible pool at 41%. However, the effective share of States has declined because the divisible pool itself has shrunk relative to gross tax revenues. Simultaneously, the Union has increased reliance on cesses and surcharges that are not shareable with States, while discontinuing several revenue deficits and state-specific grants. The result is a structural shift toward greater fiscal centralisation, even though the headline devolution figure remains unchanged.

    Why is the “41% devolution” being called an illusion?

    1. Headline Continuity vs Real Decline: Retention of 41% vertical devolution creates an impression of continuity. However, the divisible pool is not the same as gross tax revenue, reducing the effective share transferred to States.
    2. Rise of Cesses and Surcharges: Cesses and surcharges are retained entirely by the Union and excluded from the divisible pool. Their growing share reduces the amount available for distribution to States.
    3. Shrinking Shareable Pool: The divisible pool averaged 89.2% of gross tax revenue during FC-XIII, declined to 82.1% during FC-XIV, and further to 78.3% during FC-XV.
    4. Effective Devolution: When calculated as a share of total Union tax revenue, the States effectively receive about 41% of a shrinking pool, lowering the real transfer.

    How has the divisible pool evolved over time?

    1. FC-XIII Period (2010-15): Divisible pool averaged around 89.2% of gross tax revenue, ensuring larger transfers to States.
    2. FC-XIV Period (2015-20): States’ share increased to 42%, but the divisible pool reduced to 82.1% of gross tax revenue.
    3. FC-XV Period (2020-25): States’ share reduced to 41%, while the divisible pool further declined to 78.3%.
    4. Trend: Declining shareable revenue base despite stable devolution percentage.

    Why are cesses and surcharges central to the fiscal federal debate?

    1. Exclusion from Divisible Pool: Cesses and surcharges are not shared with States under Article 270.
    2. Growing Fiscal Instrument: The Union increasingly uses cesses and surcharges to finance schemes, bypassing revenue sharing.
    3. Impact on State Finances: Rising non-shareable revenues reduce States’ fiscal autonomy.
    4. Example: Education cess, infrastructure cess, and other targeted levies contribute to Union revenues but do not increase States’ transfers.

    What structural changes in Finance Commission transfers affect States?

    1. Discontinuation of Revenue Deficit Grants: FC-XVI proposes removal of revenue deficit grants, previously used to support fiscally weaker States.
    2. End of State-specific Grants: Instruments providing targeted relief for State fiscal stress have been discontinued.
    3. Shift toward Conditional Grants: Transfers increasingly depend on States’ compliance with Central monitoring requirements.
    4. Change in Devolution Formula: Criteria such as tax and fiscal effort have been removed, while contribution to GDP has been introduced.

    How does the new horizontal devolution formula affect States?

    1. Income Distance (42.5% weight): Continues to prioritise poorer States with lower per-capita income.
    2. Population (17.5% weight): Based on 2011 Census, increasing weight relative to earlier formulas.
    3. Demographic Performance (10% weight): Rewards States with better population control outcomes.
    4. Area (10%) and Forest Cover (10%): Recognises geographical and ecological constraints.
    5. Contribution to GDP (10% new criterion): Rewards States contributing more to national output.

    What fiscal stresses among States shaped the Commission’s approach?

    1. Punjab: Debt-to-GSDP ratio around 42.9% in 2023-24; revenue deficit estimated at 3.7% of GSDP.
    2. Rajasthan: Outstanding liabilities around 37.9% of GSDP.
    3. Andhra Pradesh: Debt levels approximately 34.6% of GSDP.
    4. Observation: States increasingly borrow to finance salaries and service existing debt rather than build capital assets.

    Why is the shift toward conditional transfers significant?

    1. Performance-linked Transfers: Local body grants divided into basic and performance components.
    2. Conditionality: Access to funds linked to timely audits, compliance with Central databases, and performance benchmarks.
    3. Governance Impact: States with weaker administrative capacity may receive lower actual transfers despite formal entitlement.

    What broader implications does this have for fiscal federalism?

    1. Centralisation of Fiscal Power: Increasing Union control over tax revenue and grants.
    2. Reduced Fiscal Autonomy: States depend more on conditional transfers rather than formula-based devolution.
    3. Structural Imbalance: Growing gap between State expenditure responsibilities and fiscal resources.
    4. Long-term Concern: Persistent asymmetry may weaken cooperative federalism.

    Conclusion

    The retention of the 41% devolution figure conceals deeper structural changes in India’s fiscal architecture. The shrinking divisible pool, rising use of cesses and surcharges, and growing conditionality of grants indicate a gradual centralisation of fiscal authority. Sustaining cooperative federalism will require greater transparency in tax sharing and a stronger balance between Union and State fiscal powers.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] How have the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission of India enabled the states to improve their fiscal position?

    Linkage: The PYQ Tests understanding of Finance Commission’s role in fiscal federalism and tax devolution between Centre and States. The issue of retaining 41% devolution while the divisible pool shrinks due to rising cesses and surcharges highlights emerging tensions in Centre-State fiscal relations and effective resource transfers.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Parliament – Sessions, Procedures, Motions, Committees etc

    Lok Sabha Debates Motion to Remove Speaker

    Prelims Only | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Parliament & State Legislatures

    Why in the News

    The Lok Sabha has taken up a resolution moved by Opposition MPs seeking the removal of Om Birla, leading to intense debate between the Treasury and Opposition benches.

    Key Developments

    • The motion was initiated by Congress leaders including Gaurav Gogoi, Mohammad Jawed, K. Suresh, and Mallu Ravi.
    • The Opposition alleged partisan behaviour and lack of neutrality by the Speaker.
    • The government defended the Speaker, with Kiren Rijiju calling the motion an “attack on democracy.”
    • The debate has been allotted 10 hours, after which the House will vote on the motion.
    • Amit Shah is expected to intervene in the debate.

    Procedure for Removal of Lok Sabha Speaker

    The removal of the Speaker is governed by Article 94 of the Constitution of India.

    • Notice of Motion: A written notice must be given at least 14 days in advance.
    • Support for Admission: At least 50 members must support the motion for it to be admitted in the House.
    • Presiding Officer
      • During the discussion, the Speaker does not preside over the House.
      • A member from the Panel of Chairpersons presides instead.
    • Debate and Voting: The motion is debated in the House.
      • It must be passed by a majority of the members present and voting.
    • Outcome: If the motion is passed, the Speaker ceases to hold office immediately.

    Constitutional Significance

    • The Speaker is expected to maintain neutrality and impartiality while conducting proceedings.
    • Removal motions are rare and politically sensitive, as they question the neutrality of the Chair and the functioning of parliamentary democracy.
    [2025] Consider the following statements: I. On the dissolution of the House of the People, the Speaker shall not vacate his/ her office until immediately before the first meeting of the House of the People after the dissolution. II. According to the provisions of the Constitution of India, a Member of the House of the People on being elected as Speaker shall resign from his/her political party immediately. III. The Speaker of the House of the People may be removed from his/her office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the (then) Members of the House, provided that no resolution shall be moved unless at least fourteen days’ notice has been given of the intention to move the resolution. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) I and II only (b) II and III only (c) I and III only (d) I, II and III

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

Join the Community

Join us across Social Media platforms.