Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: LNG imports by India
Mains level: Read the attached story
India-Qatar Diplomatic Spat
- The recent death sentences handed down to eight former Indian Navy personnel by a Qatari court pose a significant challenge to the traditionally amicable ties between New Delhi and Doha.
- In international relations, trade dynamics often play a pivotal role, and in the case of India and Qatar, the balance of trade is heavily skewed in Qatar’s favor, primarily due to imports.
LNG Dependency and Diplomacy
- Trade Imbalance: Qatar enjoys significant leverage in the bilateral relationship because the trade balance is weighted heavily in its favor, with imports from Qatar far exceeding India’s exports.
- LNG Dominance: Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is at the heart of this trade relationship, accounting for nearly 50% of India’s imports by value from Qatar.
- Energy Security: India’s import dependency on natural gas is around 50%, and with a national drive to increase natural gas consumption, LNG imports are expected to grow, even with potential increases in domestic production.
Need for India’s Energy Transition
- Cleaner Alternative: Natural gas is viewed as a cleaner and more affordable alternative to conventional petroleum fuels, aligning with India’s efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to cleaner energy sources.
- Energy Security: Given India’s high import dependency on crude oil, natural gas is seen as a critical component of energy security.
- Ambitious Targets: India aims to raise the share of natural gas in its primary energy mix to 15% by 2030, a goal likely to drive increased LNG imports in the years ahead.
Sensitivity of the Present Situation
- Diplomatic Challenge: The case of the retired Navy personnel presents a sensitive challenge for Indian diplomacy, given India’s energy security concerns and ambitions.
- Trade Dependency: India’s energy security relies on Qatar, making diplomatic relations delicate.
Trade Figures
- Imports from Qatar: In FY2022-23, India’s total imports from Qatar were valued at $16.81 billion, with LNG accounting for $8.32 billion or 49.5%.
- Exports to Qatar: In contrast, India’s exports to Qatar in the same period amounted to only $1.97 billion.
- LNG Dependency: Of the 19.85 million tonnes of LNG imported by India in FY23, 10.74 million tonnes (54%) came from Qatar.
Global LNG Dynamics
- Seller’s Market: The global LNG market has become a seller’s market following geopolitical disruptions, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
- Term Contracts vs. Spot Purchases: Term contracts offer more stability compared to spot purchases, particularly during supply gluts or shortages.
- Qatar’s Position: Qatar, as the world’s largest LNG exporter, has gained significant leverage and stability in the LNG market.
- Long-Term Contracts: LNG importers worldwide, including India, are seeking long-term contracts with major suppliers like Qatar to secure stable supplies.
Future Prospects for India
- Long-Term Contracts: India is actively negotiating for long-term LNG contracts, and Petronet’s existing contract with Qatar is set to expire in 2028.
- Buyer’s Market: Industry experts predict that the global LNG market may become a buyer’s market in the coming years due to new LNG export projects. Qatar remains a key player in this scenario.
Conclusion
- Balancing India’s energy security needs with diplomatic challenges in the backdrop of trade dependency on Qatar, especially in LNG, is a complex task.
- India’s pursuit of long-term LNG contracts reflects its determination to secure stable energy supplies while navigating international relations sensitively.
- The evolving global LNG market dynamics will continue to influence India’s energy choices and diplomatic strategies.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Central idea
The article discusses the recent approval of Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) rates for Rabi and Kharif seasons in 2022-23 by the union cabinet. It explains the NBS regime, its objectives, and challenges, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to address economic, environmental, and distribution issues.
Understanding Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) Regime:
- Subsidized Fertilizers: Farmers get fertilizers at lower rates based on nutrients like Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potash, and Sulphur.
- Additional Subsidy: Fertilizers with extra nutrients like molybdenum and zinc receive added subsidies
Key Features of Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS):
- Targeted Subsidy: Fertilizers are subsidized based on the nutrients they contain, such as Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potash (K), and Sulphur (S).
- Additional Subsidy for Fortified Fertilizers: Fertilizers containing secondary and micronutrients, like molybdenum (Mo) and zinc, receive extra subsidies.
- Annual Determination of Rates: The government announces subsidy rates for Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers annually, considering factors like international and domestic prices, exchange rates, and inventory levels.
- Promotion of Balanced Fertilization: NBS aims to achieve an optimal balance (N:P:K = 4:2:1) in fertilization, improving soil health and crop yields.
- Implementation Authority: Administered by the Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers since April 2010.
Rationale for Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS):
- Efficient Resource Allocation: NBS ensures subsidies are directed to farmers based on nutrient requirements, promoting judicious use of fertilizers.
- Optimal NPK Fertilization: By encouraging a balanced nutrient ratio (N:P:K = 4:2:1), NBS aims to enhance soil health, leading to increased crop yields and farmer income.
- Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The policy supports environmentally sustainable practices by preventing imbalanced fertilizer usage, reducing soil degradation, and minimizing nutrient runoff.
- Food Security: Subsidized P&K fertilizers availability during Kharif season supports agricultural productivity, contributing to food security in India.
- Long-Term Soil Health: NBS promotes a long-term approach to soil management, addressing nutrient deficiencies and ensuring the fertility of agricultural land.
Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) Rates Approval:
- Rabi Season 2022-23: Subsidy rates given for essential nutrients like Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potash, and Sulphur.
- Kharif Season 2023: Approval for Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) Fertilizers.
Objective of NBS Policy:
- Balanced Fertilization: Aims for an optimal balance (N:P:K=4:2:1) to enhance soil health and crop yield.
- Increased Income: Boosts farmers’ income through improved productivity.
- Reducing Subsidy Burden: Expects rational fertilizer use to ease the subsidy burden on the government.
Significance of NBS Subsidy:
- Agricultural Support: Ensures affordable availability of DAP and other P&K fertilizers during Kharif for better agricultural productivity.
- Resource Allocation: Crucial for efficient allocation, directing subsidies where needed for sustainable agriculture.
Challenges with NBS Policy:
- Economic and Environmental Costs: High subsidy burden strains the economy, leading to imbalanced fertilizer use and environmental issues.
- Black Marketing and Diversion: Subsidized urea faces illegal sale and smuggling to non-agricultural users.
- Leakage and Misuse: Inefficient distribution can lead to fertilizer misuse or non-delivery to intended farmers.
- Regional Disparities: Uniform policy may not cater to diverse regional needs, impacting nutrient application and productivity.
Way Forward for NBS Policy:
- Uniform Policy: A necessary step for essential nutrients (N, P, K) with considerations for regional variations.
- Cash Subsidy Alternative: Long-term shift to a per-acre cash subsidy for flexible fertilizer purchase.
- Balancing Act: Striking a balance between price control, affordability, and sustainable nutrient management for NBS success.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Central idea
Qatar’s unprecedented death sentences for eight retired Indian naval personnel on espionage charges pose a formidable diplomatic challenge for the government. Minister Jaishankar’s cautious response and public expectations add layers to this sensitive situation.
What Happened?
- Recently, Qatar handed death sentences to eight retired Indian naval personnel, a shocking move.
- Unlike previous cases involving murder or narcotics, these charges relate to espionage.
Minister Jaishankar’s Response and Diplomatic Sensitivity
- Assurances to Parliament: Minister Jaishankar assured Parliament that the matter is a priority, urging patience due to its sensitivity. The focus is on keeping the welfare of the eight individuals at the forefront.
- Media Statements and Caution: Media statements exercise caution due to the confidential nature of the case. Not commenting further is a diplomatic approach, respecting the sensitivity of ongoing proceedings.
Current Challenges:
- Diplomatic Problem: The government faces a tough situation with Qatar giving death sentences to eight retired Indian naval people.
- Public Worries: People, along with opposition parties, are worried about the safety of those convicted, putting pressure on the government to bring them back home.
- Sensitive Matter: The case involves spying charges against a group of retired defense officers, making it a delicate issue in the diplomatic world.
- Limited Information: Because the case details are confidential, the government can’t share much, leading to people guessing and worrying more.
Way Forward:
- Talking with Qatar: India should keep discussing with Qatar, telling them to be fair and just while following their laws.
- Helping with Consular Stuff: Making sure the convicted individuals can meet with Indian officials regularly and watching over their court case is really important.
- Telling People What’s Up: The government needs to tell people what it can, being honest but also keeping some things private.
- Getting Support: Asking other countries for support and help can make Qatar rethink its decision.
- Using Legal Moves: Trying legal ways, like making appeals and talking with Qatar, is crucial to get the naval people released.
- Calming People Down: Making sure veterans and the public know what’s happening and addressing their worries is super important.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Central idea
The article highlights Arun Maira’s insights on the gender disparity in economic narratives, emphasizing the undervaluation of women’s contributions, the evolving challenges in global employment patterns, and the need for a more inclusive and care-focused approach to economic development, particularly in the context of India and the G-20’s call for a holistic vision beyond GDP
Challenges in How We See Money and Work:
- Not Enough Women Recognized: The Nobel Prize in Economics mostly goes to men, leaving out women’s important contributions. Only three women have won it so far.
- Forgetting the Value of Care: The work women do at home, taking care of family and community, isn’t seen as important for the economy. This is a big problem.
- Jobs Changing Globally: The way people work is changing worldwide. More jobs are now short-term or in the gig economy. This is a big challenge for India, which has a lot of young people.
- Not Paying Enough for Important Jobs: Jobs like taking care of families or working in health and education are crucial, but the people doing these jobs, mostly women, are not paid well.
India’s Economic Situation:
- Problems for Young People: In India, even though the economy is growing fast, it’s hard for young people to find good jobs with good pay and security.
- Need More Focus on Care: India ranks 132nd in human development, and we need to spend more on services that take care of people. But sadly, jobs like taking care of families or working in health and education are not paid much.
- G-20’s Call for a Different Way: Our Prime Minister has asked the G-20 for a new approach, one that looks beyond just making money. He says it’s time to think of the world as one family.
Checking How Well We’re Doing:
- Progress Slow for Big Global Goals: The G-20 says we’re not doing great halfway to our big global goals. Only 12% of the things we wanted to achieve are on track.
- Time for a Big Change: Arun Maira says we need to change how we solve problems. The usual way is not working, so we need to try something new.
Seeing Economics in a New Way:
- Thinking About Everyone: Maira says we need to change how we see our economy. It’s not just about making things and competing. It’s about taking care of people.
- Looking at What Women Do: Women, according to Maira, do a lot of important work that isn’t always noticed. Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom showed that when women are in charge, communities work well together.
What Needs to Change:
- Giving Women More Power: Maira says we need to let women shape how things work, not just follow what men have set up.
- Letting Local Communities Decide: Instead of having big experts decide everything, Maira says we should let local communities come up with their solutions. What works in one place might not work in another.
| Unique phrases from article for upsc mains exam value addition
“Tragedy of the Commons Revisited:”
Referring to Nobel Laureate Elinor Ostrom’s insights, this phrase underscores the importance of cooperative governance, particularly led by women, in managing local resources sustainably.
“Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam: One Family, One Earth, One Future:”
This phrase encapsulates the Indian Prime Minister’s call at the G-20, emphasizing a vision that transcends traditional economic metrics and advocates for a global community approach.
“Paradigm Change in Economics:”
Arun Maira advocates for a fundamental shift in economic thinking, moving away from traditional models dominated by men and towards a more inclusive, caring, and community-driven perspective.
“The Feminine Lens on Economics:”
This phrase highlights the article’s exploration of a feminine perspective in economics, drawing attention to the undervalued contributions of women and the need for a broader understanding of economic dynamics. |
Conclusion:
Changing how we think about our economy is not easy, but it’s important. Maira tells us that we should listen to regular people, especially women, and let them help make things better. This way, we can build a future where everyone is taken care of, and our world becomes one big family.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Gestational Surrogacy
Mains level: Read the attached story
Central Idea
- In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has safeguarded a woman’s right to parenthood, particularly in cases of medical conditions, by suspending the enforcement of a law that jeopardized her aspiration to become a mother through surrogacy.
- This significant ruling provides protection and empowerment for women facing unique medical challenges on their journey to parenthood.
Case Details
- Medical Condition: The woman suffers from the rare Mayer Rokitansky Kuster Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Medical records confirm her condition, which includes “absent ovaries and absent uterus,” rendering her unable to produce her own eggs.
- Hope through Gestational Surrogacy: She and her husband embarked on the path of gestational surrogacy using a donor’s eggs (a process where one person, who did not provide the egg used in conception, carries a fetus through pregnancy and gives birth to a baby for another person or couple.).
Threatening Amendment
- No donor gamete use: A government notification dated March 14 of the current year introduced an amendment to the law, prohibiting the use of donor gametes in surrogacy. It mandated that “intending couples” must employ their own gametes for the surrogacy process.
- A Violation of Parenthood Rights: This amendment was challenged in the Supreme Court, alleging a violation of a woman’s fundamental right to parenthood. The court found that the amendment contradicted the core provisions of the Surrogacy Act, both in form and substance.
Gametes Regulation and ART Act, 2021
- Gametes are reproductive cells. In animals, the male gametes are sperms and female gamete is the ovum or egg cells.
- On March 14, 2023, the Health Ministry published Rules that said:
- A couple undergoing surrogacy must have both gametes from the intending couple and donor gametes are not allowed;
- Single women (widow/divorcee) undergoing surrogacy must use self-eggs and donor sperms to avail surrogacy procedure.
- Section 2(h) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation Act, 2021 defines a “gamete donor” as a person who provides sperm or oocyte with the objective of enabling an infertile couple or woman to have a child.
|
Court’s Ruling: Allows Donor’s Gametes
- Prima Facie Contradiction: The SC Bench issued a decisive order, stating that the amendment obstructed the intending couple from achieving parenthood through surrogacy and was prima facie contrary to the Surrogacy Act’s intentions.
- Petitioner’s Argument: Senior advocate Sanjay Jain, representing the petitioner, argued that the amendment invalidated the possibility of gestational surrogacy, which the Surrogacy Act, 2021, recognized as a valid option for couples facing medical conditions.
- Rule 14(a) Clarification: Jain referred to Rule 14(a) of the Surrogacy Rules, emphasizing that it explicitly listed medical or congenital conditions, such as the absence of a uterus, as valid reasons for gestational surrogacy. The rule affirmed that the choice was solely the woman’s.
- Retrospective Implementation: The petitioner contended that the amendment could not be applied retrospectively to her case.
Court’s Ruling and Interpretation
- Woman-Centric Perspective: The court concurred with Mr. Jain’s argument that gestational surrogacy was “woman-centric.” It recognized that the decision to opt for surrogacy was driven by the woman’s inability to become a mother due to her medical or congenital condition.
- Validation of Rule 14(a): The court asserted that the amendment could not contradict Rule 14(a), which explicitly acknowledged medical conditions, including the absence of a uterus, as valid reasons necessitating gestational surrogacy.
- Genetic Relation Interpretation: Addressing the government’s contention that the surrogate child must be “genetically related” to the couple, the court clarified that this related to the husband when Rule 14(a) applied.
Conclusion
- The Supreme Court’s decision in favour of ‘Mrs. ABC’ not only upholds her right to parenthood but also reinforces the significance of gestational surrogacy as a woman-centric solution for individuals facing challenging medical conditions on their path to becoming parents.
- This ruling sets a precedent for protecting the parenthood rights of women across India.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Credit Information Companies (CICs), Credit Score
Mains level: Read the attached story
Central Idea
- When you apply for a loan, your credit score becomes a crucial factor. It’s determined by your debt and your history of repayments.
- In a significant move, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued directives to credit information companies (CICs) regarding the transparency of accessing your Credit Information Report (CIR).
RBI’s Directive on CIR Access
- Notification to Customers: CICs are now mandated to notify customers via SMS or email when banks and non-banking finance companies (NBFCs) access their Credit Information Report (CIR).
- Alerts on Default Information: Credit institutions, including banks and NBFCs, must also send SMS or email alerts to customers when they submit information to CICs regarding defaults or Days Past Due (DPD) on existing credit.
- Implementation Timeline: These new rules are set to take effect within six months.
Understanding Credit Information Companies (CICs)
- CIC Function: CICs maintain and analyze credit information of individuals and businesses, which is provided by banks and NBFCs.
- Credit Scores and Ranks: Based on this data, CICs calculate credit scores for individuals and credit ranks for companies to assess their creditworthiness and credit history.
- Impact on Loan Approval: A high credit score often leads to more favorable loan terms, while a low score, possibly due to previous loan defaults, can hinder loan or credit card approval.
Accessing Your Credit Score
- Payment Requirement: Typically, individuals can obtain their credit scores from CICs for a fee.
- RBI’s Directive: The RBI has now directed CICs to provide a “Free Full Credit Report (FFCR),” which includes the credit score, once every calendar year to individuals whose credit history is available with the CIC.
- Convenient Access: The link to access the FFCR must be prominently displayed on the CIC’s website for easy access.
Data Accuracy Concerns
- Correction of Data: If a customer believes that their credit information is incorrect, they can request a correction.
- Reason for Rejection: Banks and NBFCs are required to inform customers about the reasons for rejecting their data correction requests, facilitating a better understanding of the issues in the CIR.
CIC Accountability and Transparency
- Review of ‘Search & Match’ Logic: CICs must conduct a periodic review, at least semi-annually, of their ‘search & match’ logic algorithm used to generate borrowers’ CIRs.
- Root Cause Analysis: A “root cause analysis” of complaints should identify issues in the algorithm.
- Board Approval: Results and changes resulting from the analysis should be presented to the CIC’s Board of Directors for review.
- Timely Data Ingestion: CICs must ingest credit information data from banks and NBFCs within seven calendar days of receipt.
- Disclosure of Complaints: CICs are required to disclose details of complaints registered against them and credit institutions on their websites.
Conclusion
- RBI’s recent directives aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and consumer empowerment in the credit information ecosystem.
- Customers will receive alerts regarding access to their credit information, and CICs are encouraged to ensure data accuracy and promptly address customer concerns.
- These changes will likely improve the credit assessment process and provide individuals with better control over their financial data.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Dark patterns advertising
Mains level: Consumerism Issues
Central Idea
- Due to complaints of deceptive practices by airlines and online travel agents, the Indian Ministry of Civil Aviation has urged IndiGo to fix its website, which a government official termed a Dark Pattern “cybercrime.”
“Dark Patterns” in Airline Practices
- Deceptive Techniques: Airlines and online portals have been accused of employing “dark patterns” in their user interfaces, which manipulate consumers into purchasing products they did not intend to buy.
- Consumer Affairs Secretary’s Stance: The Consumer Affairs Secretary, Rohit Kumar Singh, defines “dark patterns” as tactics nudging consumers into unintended purchases, constituting unfair trading practices and possibly cybercrimes.
- Pervasive Issue: Approximately 10,000 complaints related to these practices have been lodged with the Ministry via the National Consumers Helpline over the past eight to nine months.
Manipulating Seat Selection
- IndiGo’s Practice: IndiGo Airlines, for instance, employs a tactic known as “false urgency,” creating a sense of urgency by implying that consumers must pay an extra fee (₹99 to ₹1,500) for seat selection during booking, portraying all free seats as unavailable.
- Transparency Issue: Passengers are not adequately informed that they will be auto-assigned free seats if they choose not to pay the extra fee.
- Obfuscation: The “skip” option, although present, is inconspicuously located, demonstrating “interface interference.”
Additional Unfair Practices
- SpiceJet’s Pressure for Insurance: SpiceJet’s website pressures passengers to purchase travel insurance by using alarming phrases like “I will risk my trip” if they opt out, playing on passengers’ fears.
- “Basket Sneaking” by MakeMyTrip: MakeMyTrip adds a convenience fee when customers reach the payment gateway after booking, a practice known as “basket sneaking.”
Draft Guidelines and Regulatory Perspective
- Ministry of Consumer Affairs Guidelines: These dark patterns have been defined in the draft guidelines released by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs in September.
- DGCA’s Stance: The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) permits “unbundling” airfares but emphasizes that these services must be offered on an “opt-in” basis, with clear descriptions without ambiguity.
- Parliamentary Committee Report: A parliamentary committee report urges transparency in seat-wise airfares, fair pricing mechanisms to ensure reasonable profit margins, and effective grievance redressal mechanisms.
Conclusion
- The crackdown on deceptive airline practices by the Indian Ministry of Civil Aviation signifies a push for transparency and fairness in the airline industry.
- The rise of “dark patterns” and other misleading tactics in online booking processes has raised concerns about consumer exploitation and cybercrimes.
- As the government takes action to address these issues, passengers may expect a more equitable and transparent air travel experience in the future.
Tap to read more about:
India’s Draft Guidelines on Dark Patterns
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Caste Surveys
Mains level: Read the attached story
Debate: Caste-Based Surveys
- The recent nationwide discussions on caste-based surveys and reservations have ignited debates regarding reservation limits.
- While many call for a similar census across India, Tamil Nadu’s history offers insights into the complexities of caste-based reservations.
- Despite previous efforts, the implementation of OBC (Other Backward Class) reservations remains a challenge in the state.
Genesis of Ramachandran Commission
- Background: The First BC panel (1969-70), led by A.N. Sattanathan, suggested raising BC reservations, but the idea of a creamy layer hasn’t gained political backing.
- Current Backdrop: In 1980, following electoral setbacks, the government in Tamil Nadu, led by M.G. Ramachandran, increased BC (Backward Class) reservations from 31% to 50%, totalling 68% with SC & ST reservations (later 69% with ST exclusive reservation).
- Legal Challenge: The move faced legal challenges, prompting the state government to form a commission to review BC enumeration and classification.
- Commission Formation: The Second BC Commission, chaired by J.A. Ambasankar, was established in late 1982 and submitted its report in February 1985.
Key Highlights of the Commission’s Work
- Socio-Educational-cum-Economic Survey: The Commission conducted a comprehensive door-to-door enumeration of BCs in two stages during 1983-84. Unlike the previous panel, which relied on the 1921 Census, this survey was based on contemporary data.
- Caste Classification: The Commission identified 298 BC communities within main groups such as BCs, Most BCs, Denotified Communities (DNCs), SCs, STs, and others. BCs constituted 67.15% of the state’s population.
- Educational Survey: A sample survey of students in schools and colleges was conducted, along with an assessment of BC representation in public services.
Key Recommendations
- Reservation Quantum Debate: Disagreements arose between Chairman Ambasankar and other members regarding the reservation percentage. While Ambasankar proposed reducing it to 32% to stay within the 50% limit, dissenting members argued for at least 50% due to the BC population’s size.
- Reservation Coverage: Differences also emerged regarding the coverage of reservations. Ambasankar suggested separate lists of BCs for Article 15(4) and Article 16(4), while members favored a single list.
Government Response and Legal Safeguards
- No Change in Reservation Quantum: The government retained the 50% BC reservation and did not accept Ambasankar’s recommendation to reduce it.
- Ninth Schedule: To safeguard the 69% quota, Tamil Nadu enacted a law and placed it under the Ninth Schedule following the Supreme Court’s Mandal Commission case judgment in 1992.
- Subsequent Changes: Over the years, separate quotas for Muslims and Christians were introduced within the BC reservation, but some were later withdrawn or challenged.
- SC Verdict: In 2021, the Supreme Court struck down a law providing 10.5% reservation for Vanniyars within the MBC quota, citing non-contemporaneous data from the Ambasankar panel.
Conclusion
- Tamil Nadu’s experience with caste-based reservations underscores the intricate challenges involved. While the state has maintained a high reservation percentage, debates over quantum and coverage persist.
- The recent legal developments highlight the importance of contemporary data in determining and sustaining reservations, making it a complex and evolving issue.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now