Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Hindutva Rate of Growth
Mains level: Read the attached story
Central Idea
- A popular orator and a Parliamentarian, introduced the term “Hindutva rate of GDP growth” during the discussion.
- This term is distinct from the ‘Hindu rate of growth’, a phrase coined by economist Raj Krishna in 1982 to describe India’s modest growth rate of 3.5%.
Understanding the ‘Hindutva Rate of Growth’
- Argument: The MP attributed India’s recent economic growth, including a 6.3% GDP growth rate, to the policies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, aligning spending with ‘Dharma (the order)’.
- Historical and Religious Context: He linked economic transformations to key events in India’s history, including the Ram Temple movement and the Supreme Court’s Babri Masjid judgment.
Comparative Analysis of Growth Rates
- Per Capita Income Disparity: Despite high GDP growth rates, India’s per capita income remains low compared to developed countries.
- Post-Covid Growth Calculation: 7.8% ‘Hindutva rate of growth’ refers to the average GDP growth post-Covid, excluding the year of the pandemic.
- Comparison with ‘Hindu Rate of Growth’: Including the Covid year in calculations, the growth rate closely resembles the criticized ‘Hindu rate of growth’.
Economic Growth during Different Governments
- Growth under Modi vs. UPA: The average GDP growth rate under PM Modi is 5.8%, compared to 6.8% under the Congress-led UPA.
- Impact of Global Crises: Both governments faced major global crises, with the UPA dealing with the Global Financial Crisis and the Modi government facing the Covid-19 pandemic.
- Historical Growth Trends: Comparing growth rates across different eras, including PM Vajpayee’s and PM Narasimha Rao’s tenures, provides a broader perspective on India’s economic trajectory.
Conclusion
- Similarity to Historical Growth Rates: The ‘Hindutva rate of growth’ closely aligns with historical growth rates, challenging its portrayal as a significant departure from the past.
- Electoral Implications: The discussion raises questions about the role of economic performance in India’s electoral politics, especially in the context of the BJP’s focus on ‘Hindutva’.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Tear Gas Canisters
Mains level: critical lapses in security
Central idea
The breach of India’s Parliament, a symbol of democratic strength, on the anniversary of the 2001 attack reveals critical lapses in security, prompting a high-level inquiry. This collective failure of intelligence agencies underscores the need for thorough investigations, corrective measures, and strengthened security protocols to prevent recurring breaches and uphold the sanctity of parliamentary institutions.
Key Highlights:
- Fortress Breached: The Parliament building in India, known for its security, faces a significant breach, exposing flaws in the robust system.
- Anniversary Irony: The intrusion occurs on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament attack, questioning the preparedness of security agencies.
- High-Level Inquiry: The government initiates an inquiry to identify lapses and rectify security vulnerabilities.
Key Challenges:
- Collective Security Failure: The breach underscores a failure of intelligence and security agencies responsible for safeguarding Parliament.
- Questionable Access: Intruders obtained an entry pass signed by an MP, raising concerns about verification processes.
- Efficacy of Corrective Measures: Doubts arise about the effectiveness of measures to prevent recurrent security breaches.
Key Terms:
- Security Blanket: Enhanced security measures implemented in a specific area.
- Inquiry Committee: A high-level committee formed to investigate the breach and recommend improvements.
- Tear Gas Canisters: Devices used for dispersing tear gas, hidden by intruders during the breach.
Key Phrases:
- “Temple of our Democracy”: Symbolic reference to the Parliament building as a stronghold of India’s democratic strength.
- “Sanctum Sanctorum of India’s Democracy”: Describing the innermost and most sacred area of the Parliament.
Key Quotes:
- “How did a breach occur again? This is the main question. Those responsible should be punished.” – The author, a retired director general of Police.
- “The incident happened on the very day on which the dreadful Parliament attacks took place 22 years ago.” – The article highlighting the irony of the timing.
Key Examples and References:
- Arrests Made: Four individuals, including one with an entry pass signed by an MP, are arrested in connection with the breach.
- Historical Comparison: Drawing parallels with the 2001 Parliament attack to emphasize the breach’s significance.
Key Statements:
- “Egg on the Face”: The breach is described as an embarrassment to the security establishment, questioning overall preparedness.
- “Collective Failure”: The incident is considered a collective failure of intelligence agencies, police, and security agencies responsible for Parliament security.
Key Facts:
- Enhanced Security: The new Parliament building, inaugurated earlier in the year, is believed to be more secure than its predecessor.
- Timely Breach: Occurred on the day Parliament paid tributes to the martyrs of the 2001 Parliament attack.
Key Data:
- Total Arrests: Four individuals are arrested in connection with the breach.
Critical Analysis:
- Security Vulnerabilities: The breach raises concerns about the ability to prevent intrusions into highly secure areas.
- Symbolic Timing: The timing on the anniversary adds symbolic weight to the security lapse, emphasizing the need for improvement.
Way Forward:
- Thorough Investigation: A comprehensive inquiry is essential to identify lapses and implement corrective measures.
- Strengthen Security Protocols: Stricter verification processes for entry passes and enhanced security measures are crucial for preventing future breaches.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: NA
Mains level: Outcome of the Rusisan Invasion of Ukraine
Central Idea
- It has been six months since Ukraine launched its counteroffensive against Russian forces.
- Despite initial expectations, Ukraine has failed to achieve significant advancements on the battlefield.
- President Zelensky is actively touring Western capitals, including Washington, to secure ongoing military assistance.
Ukraine’s Counteroffensive: Progress and Challenges
- Initial Strategy and Targets: The counteroffensive focused on three fronts, aiming to disrupt Russia’s land bridge to Crimea and make gains in the south and east.
- Challenges in Advancement: Despite receiving advanced weaponry and training from Western allies, Ukrainian forces struggled against Russia’s fortified defenses, particularly in the south.
- Setbacks and Losses: Ukrainian advances were hindered by minefields, electronic warfare, and lack of air power, leading to significant losses and little change in the frontline.
Russia’s Current Position in the War
- Recovery and Defense Building: After initial retreats, Russia has fortified its defensive positions and is on the offensive in certain areas like Avdiivka.
- Mobilization and Military Production: Russia has mobilized additional troops and ramped up its military production, countering Western sanctions and supply challenges.
- Economic Stability Despite Sanctions: Despite Western sanctions, Russia has managed to maintain economic stability by diversifying its energy trade, particularly with China and India.
Waning Western Support for Ukraine
- Shift in U.S. and EU Stance: There are indications that the U.S. and EU might be encouraging Ukraine to initiate talks with Russia.
- Political and Financial Challenges: In the U.S., Republican opposition and declining public support are affecting aid to Ukraine, with potential implications for the 2024 presidential elections.
- Uncertainty Over Continued Aid: The future of Western support is uncertain, especially if Ukraine fails to achieve significant military successes.
Future Outlook: No End to the Conflict in Sight
- Putin’s Stance on Peace Talks: Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed no urgency in peace talks, focusing instead on achieving Russia’s objectives.
- Ukraine’s Position on Negotiations: Ukraine, similarly, is not considering negotiations at the moment.
- Potential Strategies and Challenges Ahead: As winter sets in, the conflict is expected to see a temporary freeze in frontline movements, with both sides possibly preparing for future offensives and counteroffensives.
Conclusion
- Continued Dependence on Western Aid: Ukraine’s prospects in the conflict remain heavily reliant on sustained Western military and financial support.
- Uncertain Future for Ukraine: The ongoing war, coupled with geopolitical and economic dynamics, leaves Ukraine in a precarious position as it navigates a complex and evolving conflict landscape.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi
Mains level: Read the attached story
Central Idea
- On December 14, the Allahabad High Court allowed an application for the inspection of the Shahi Idgah mosque complex, reigniting the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Masjid dispute.
- Hindu petitioners assert that the mosque, constructed by Emperor Aurangzeb in 1670, was built over Lord Krishna’s birthplace in Mathura. The mosque is adjacent to the Krishna Janmasthal Temple, a significant pilgrimage site.
Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi: Latest Legal Plea
- Nature of the Application: The application is part of a petition initiated by eight individuals including the “next friend” of Bhagwan Shree Krishna Virajman.
- Survey Approval: Allahabad High Court approved the survey of the Shahi Idgah mosque on December 14.
- Petition’s Demands: The petitioners seek the removal of structures allegedly encroaching on the disputed land by the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board and the mosque committee, and the transfer of this land to the Shree Krishna Janmbhoomi Trust.
- Challenge to the 1968 Agreement: The plea contests the legality of a compromise agreement dated October 12, 1968, between the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan and the Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah.
Historical Background and Claims
- Aurangzeb’s Alleged Demolition: The Hindu petition cites historical records, claiming Aurangzeb ordered the demolition of Hindu temples, including one at Lord Krishna’s birthplace, to construct the Idgah Mosque in 1669-70.
- Reference to Official Records: The petition mentions the Official Court Bulletin (Akhbaraat) from January to February 1670 as evidence of Aurangzeb’s orders.
Counterclaims by the Muslim Side
- Legal Arguments: Representatives of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board and the mosque committee argue in the High Court that the mosque does not fall within the disputed 13.37 acres and dispute the location of Krishna’s birthplace.
- Challenging the Hindu Claims: They assert that the Hindu claims are based on speculation and lack documentary evidence.
Historical Ownership and Management
- Land Ownership Changes: The site, originally nazul land, was auctioned by the East India Company in 1815 to Raja Patni Mal of Benaras.
- Subsequent Transactions: The land was later sold to Jugal Kishore Birla, and the ownership rights were transferred to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust, established by Birla.
- Temple Management: In 1956, the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Sewa Sangh, later renamed as Sansthan, was established for temple management.
Parallel with the Gyanvapi Case
- Similar Legal Proceedings: The Mathura case is comparable to the Gyanvapi Mosque dispute in Varanasi, where a court-ordered survey led to the discovery of a structure claimed as a “shivling” by Hindus and a “fountain” by Muslims.
- Archaeological Surveys and Legal Challenges: The Varanasi district court’s order for a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi mosque and the subsequent legal hurdles reflect similar developments in the Mathura case.
Conclusion
- Continuation of Legal Battles: The dispute, rooted in deep historical and religious significance, continues to unfold through legal channels.
- Broader Implications: These cases underscore the complexities of addressing historical claims, legal processes, and maintaining communal harmony in the context of religiously significant sites in India.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: AI
Mains level: awareness and critical evaluation of information in the age of AI and deep fakes
Central idea
The article explores the evolving concept of authenticity in the context of AI, deep fakes, and post-truths, highlighting the challenges of discerning between real and fake information. It emphasizes concerns about declining trust in a potential “post-authentic” era and advocates for increased awareness, technological solutions, and ethical AI use to safeguard societal norms and integrity.
Key Highlights:
- Merriam-Webster’s word of the year for 2023 is “authentic,” following the 2022 choice of “gaslighting.”
- The article explores the evolving concept of authenticity in the context of AI, deep fakes, and post-truths.
- The rise of AI-generated content poses challenges to distinguishing between real and fake, impacting trust and societal norms.
Key Challenges:
- The prevalence of deep fakes and AI-generated content challenges the authenticity of information, leading to a blurred line between truth and falsehood.
- The post-authentic era raises concerns about the potential misuse of AI in creating deceptive narratives, impacting trust in various fields, including journalism and research.
- The article questions whether we are entering an era of “post-authenticity,” marked by a decline in trust and a growing inability to take information at face value.
Key Terms:
- Deep Fakes: Realistic-looking audio, video, or textual content generated by artificial intelligence.
- Post-Truth Era: A period characterized by the prioritization of emotional or personal beliefs over objective facts.
- Infocalypse: The potential information and communications crisis in the age of AI and social media.
Key Phrases:
- “To thine own self be true.”
- “Post-authentic age”
- “Trust No One”
- “Infocalypse”
- “Liar’s dividend”
Key Quotes:
- “When we question authenticity, we value it even more.” – Merriam-Webster
- “Trust No One” – Journalist Michael Grothaus
- “Infocalypse,” the biggest information and communications crisis in world history, is imminent.” – AI scientist Nina Schick
Key Examples and References:
- Instances of AI-generated content, including deep fakes of well-known personalities and manipulated images of public figures.
- The fake news incident regarding Amartya Sen’s passing in October.
Key Statements:
- The article suggests that the rise of AI and social media may lead to a “post-authentic” era, where trust becomes a casualty.
- The concept of “Trust No One” is highlighted as a potential consequence of the evolving technological landscape.
Key Facts:
- Merriam-Webster’s word of the year for 2023 is “authentic.”
- Concerns are raised about the impact of AI on the integrity of data and text in various societal aspects, such as GDP, employment, and COVID-19 statistics.
Critical Analysis:
- The article critically examines the challenges posed by AI and post-truth dynamics to the notion of authenticity, emphasizing the potential consequences for trust in society.
- Hazy lines between truth and falsehood are highlighted as a significant issue in the post-authentic era.
Way Forward:
- Emphasize the need for increased awareness and critical evaluation of information in the age of AI and deep fakes.
- Advocate for the development and implementation of technologies to detect and counter AI-generated deceptive content.
- Promote a culture of transparency and ethical use of AI to mitigate the potential negative impacts on trust and authenticity.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: na
Mains level: broader ethical concerns raised by Moitra's allegations to maintain the credibility of Parliament
Key Highlights:
- Mahua Moitra, a former investment banker turned politician, faced allegations of sharing her Parliament ID and password with an industrialist to post questions about a rival group.
- The Ethics Committee recommended her expulsion from Parliament, and on December 8, the motion for expulsion was adopted through a voice vote.
- Moitra admitted to sharing her ID and password, receiving gifts, and made broader allegations that many MPs do not draft their own questions.
Key Challenges:
- The credibility of Parliament is at stake due to false claims by Moitra and another MP, Giridhari Yadav, that MPs generally do not frame their own questions.
- The issue of MPs sharing their ID and password, a violation of rules, raises concerns about the security and integrity of parliamentary processes.
- The definition of “cash for query” is debated, involving considerations of gifts, hospitality, and other non-monetary benefits.
Key Terms:
- Parliament Portal: The online platform where MPs submit questions, Zero Hour submissions, and Special Mentions.
- Ethics Committee: A parliamentary committee responsible for examining matters related to the ethical conduct of MPs.
- Cash for Query: The alleged practice of accepting material benefits in exchange for asking questions in Parliament.
Key Phrases:
- “Cash for query”
- “Parliamentary question”
- “Expulsion from Parliament”
- “Ethics Committee”
- “ID and password sharing”
- “Motion for expulsion”
- “Voice vote”
Key Quotes:
- Giridhari Yadav: “Even I do not remember my password. My PA knows it. I have not asked any questions, thinking God knows what will happen.”
- Speaker’s Response: “I request all MPs to frame their questions themselves and put it up. No one else is allowed to do that.”
Key Examples and References:
- Mahua Moitra’s admission to sharing her ID and password, receiving gifts, and the subsequent recommendation for expulsion by the Ethics Committee.
- Giridhari Yadav’s statement about not framing his own questions and relying on his PA.
Key Statements:
- Sharing ID and password with an outsider is a gross violation of parliamentary rules.
- Moitra’s confession and broader allegations cast doubt on the autonomy of MPs in drafting their questions.
Key Facts:
- Moitra graduated from Mount Holyoke College, worked as an investment banker, and joined politics with stints in the Indian National Congress and Trinamool Congress.
- The motion for expulsion was adopted through a voice vote after the Opposition walked out of Parliament.
Key Data:
- Date of Mahua Moitra’s expulsion: December 8
- Number of questions MPs are allowed to submit: Five (two starred and three unstarred).
Critical Analysis:
- False claims about MPs not framing their own questions undermine the reputation of Parliament.
- The issue of ID and password sharing raises questions about the security of parliamentary processes.
- The definition of “cash for query” is explored, considering various non-monetary benefits.
Way Forward:
- Strengthen security measures to prevent unauthorized access to parliamentary portals.
- Emphasize the importance of MPs independently framing their questions for the integrity of parliamentary proceedings.
- Address the broader ethical concerns raised by Moitra’s allegations to maintain the credibility of Parliament.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Loss and Damage Fund (LDF)
Mains level: global climate justice movements
Key Highlights:
- Shift in Focus: COP28 saw a historic shift as all 198 signatories agreed to “transition away” from all fossil fuels, moving beyond the earlier emphasis on coal.
- India’s Role: India played a crucial role in modifying language at COP26 and supported the UAE Consensus at COP28, signaling a departure from coal-centric agreements.
Key Challenges:
- Loopholes and Criticism: The COP28 outcome faced criticism for not achieving a complete fossil fuel phase-out, with concerns about loopholes such as nuclear abatement and carbon capture.
- Developing Country Struggles: Developing countries, lacking expertise, face challenges in effectively de-carbonizing sectors and raising ambition due to financial constraints.
Key Terms:
- COP28: The 28th United Nations’ Conference of the Parties.
- UAE Consensus: The agreement to transition away from fossil fuels in a just, orderly, and equitable manner.
- Loss and Damage Fund (LDF): Operationalized at COP28, the fund addresses climate impacts but currently falls short in funding.
Key Phrases:
- “Transitioning away from fossil fuels in a just, orderly, and equitable manner.”
- “Compromise after 30 years” regarding the LDF funding.
- “Deep, rapid, and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.”
Key Quotes:
- Harjeet Singh: “The outcomes have been unprecedented and historic.”
- Karthik Ganesan: “It’s a maze of words. What is clear is that subsidies for fossil fuels must go.”
Key Statements:
- Developing countries insist on technology transfer and removal of trade barriers for effective renewable energy transition.
- India faces a dilemma in balancing economic growth, environmental concerns, and contributions to global climate initiatives.
Key Examples and References:
- India’s role in modifying language at COP26 and supporting the UAE Consensus at COP28.
- Comparison of the economic value of coal and solar sectors in India.
Key Facts and Data:
- The LDF has raised $700 million, falling short of the trillions needed to address climate impacts.
- India is the third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases with a significantly smaller per capita emission rate.
Critical Analysis:
- The COP28 outcome is criticized for loopholes and a lack of ambition, emphasizing the need for a balance between economic growth and environmental concerns.
- The dichotomy of India’s role as a regional power, emerging economy, and its responsibility to contribute to global climate initiatives is highlighted.
Way Forward:
- Developing countries must focus on technology transfer and removing trade barriers for effective renewable energy transition.
- India needs to reassess its economic paradigm, prioritizing environmental concerns and adopting a sustainable growth model.
- Continued engagement, contribution, and learning from large countries like India are essential for global climate justice movements.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now