PYQ Relevance:
Question: Do you think that BIMSTEC is a parallel organisation like the SAARC? What are the similarities and dissimilarities between the two? How are Indian foreign policy objectives realized by forming this new organisation? (2022)
Reason: This question explores India’s engagement with other regional groupings. India’s experience with BIMSTEC, its objectives, and the lessons learned in fostering regional cooperation can inform its approach and strategy as the chair of IORA. It also touches upon how India uses multilateral platforms to achieve its foreign policy goals, a key aspect of its IORA leadership. |
Mentor’s Comment: The Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) held its Council of Ministers (COM) meeting in Colombo on October 11, 2024, with the theme “Reinforcing Indian Ocean Identity.” Foreign ministers and senior officials from its 23 member countries attended the event. In 2024, many other countries, especially “dialogue partners” or those wanting to join as dialogue partners, showed great interest in the organization. IORA, founded 26 years ago, is believed to have been an idea originally proposed by former South African President Nelson Mandela.
Today’s editorial discusses issues related to the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) and India’s role in it, which is useful for GS Paper 2 in International Relations.
_
Let’s learn!
Why in the News?
New Delhi should create a strong base for effective governance that works at the local level and brings real impact.
What are the key priorities for India as it prepares to chair the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA)?
- Enhancing Funding Opportunities: India can engage private sector players like shipping companies (Maersk, Adani Ports), oil & gas firms (ONGC, Reliance), and marine tourism operators to contribute financially to IORA’s initiatives.
- Strengthening Maritime Security & Safety: Expanding India’s Information Fusion Centre – Indian Ocean Region (IFC-IOR) in Gurugram to enhance real-time maritime surveillance and counter threats like piracy, illegal fishing, and trafficking.
- Integrating Technology for Data Management & Policy Analysis: Promoting AI-driven marine data analytics to track ocean health, predict climate change impacts, and improve fisheries management across IORA nations.
- Developing Maritime Education & Skill-Based Training: Partnering with institutions like IIT-Madras and NIOT (National Institute of Ocean Technology) to create specialized courses in marine economy, deep-sea exploration, and coastal governance.
- Strengthening Blue Economy & Sustainable Practices: Collaborating with Australia for marine research, UAE for investment in sustainable fisheries, and Seychelles for traditional knowledge on marine conservation to develop eco-friendly economic growth models.
Why is funding a major challenge for IORA?
- Dependence on Member Contributions: IORA’s budget is primarily dependent on contributions from its 23 member states, most of which are developing economies. For example, Only a few countries like Singapore, UAE, and France have the financial capability to contribute significantly, while others struggle to meet commitments.
- Limited Private Sector Involvement: IORA lacks strong partnerships with private enterprises, which could provide alternative funding sources. For example, Industries related to shipping, oil & gas, fisheries, and marine tourism are key players in the region but are not formally involved in IORA’s funding model.
- Comparatively Small Budget: IORA’s total annual budget is just a few million dollars, making it insufficient for large-scale maritime security, climate resilience, and economic development projects. For example, The Indian Ocean Commission (IOC), despite having only five members, has a $1.3 billion budget (2020-25)—significantly larger than IORA’s budget.
- Expanding Scope of Activities: IORA is expanding into maritime safety, disaster management, technology, and blue economy initiatives, all of which require resource-intensive investments. For example, Implementing maritime surveillance systems and disaster risk management programs demands consistent funding, which is currently lacking.
- Lack of a Dedicated Fundraising Mechanism: Unlike organizations like the ASEAN Development Fund, IORA does not have a structured mechanism to raise funds through external donors, financial institutions, or international aid agencies. For example, ASEAN collaborates with ADB (Asian Development Bank) and the World Bank for project funding, while IORA lacks such institutional financial backing.
How can it be addressed?
- Diversifying Funding Sources: IORA should explore alternative funding mechanisms such as public-private partnerships (PPPs), external grants, and contributions from international financial institutions. Example: ASEAN collaborates with the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the World Bank for project funding, which IORA can emulate.
- Enhancing Private Sector Engagement: Establish formal partnerships with shipping, energy, fisheries, and tourism industries to attract investment in key maritime projects. Example: Creating an IORA Business Forum to facilitate corporate sponsorships and private sector-driven development projects.
- Setting Up a Dedicated IORA Development Fund: Establish a structured IORA Development Fund where member states, international donors, and regional banks contribute for long-term sustainability. Example: The ASEAN Development Fund (ADF) pools resources for regional projects, which IORA can replicate to support blue economy and maritime security initiatives.
- Strengthening Bilateral and Multilateral Cooperation: Strengthen financial partnerships with G20 economies, UN agencies, and regional economic blocs to access technical and financial assistance. Example: IORA can seek support from India’s Development Partnership Administration (DPA) or Japan’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) for infrastructure and capacity-building programs.
- Implementing a Tiered Membership Contribution Model: Introduce a differentiated contribution system where larger economies contribute more while smaller nations have flexible or in-kind contributions. Example: Organizations like the International Maritime Organization (IMO) use GDP-based contribution tiers to ensure fair burden-sharing among members.
India’s Role in IORA – Timeline of Key Initiatives
How does the Indian Ocean Region contribute to global trade and economic activities?
- Major Trade and Energy Corridor: The Indian Ocean facilitates 75% of global maritime trade and 50% of daily oil consumption, making it a critical route for global commerce. The Strait of Malacca, Bab-el-Mandeb, and the Strait of Hormuz are key chokepoints for oil and goods transportation.
- Rich Blue Economy and Marine Resources: The region generates $1 trillion in goods and services, including fisheries, aquaculture, and seabed resources. India, Indonesia, and Thailand have thriving fishing industries, while Mozambique and Madagascar are rich in offshore gas reserves.
- Strategic Economic Hubs and Ports: Major ports like Singapore, Mumbai, Colombo, and Dubai serve as global transhipment and logistics hubs, driving regional and global trade. Gwadar (Pakistan) and Hambantota (Sri Lanka) are being developed as part of strategic maritime infrastructure projects.
Where can India leverage its strengths and partnerships to enhance IORA’s governance and effectiveness?
- Maritime Security and Disaster Resilience: India can take the lead in strengthening maritime surveillance, anti-piracy measures, and disaster preparedness in the Indian Ocean region. Example: India’s Information Fusion Centre – Indian Ocean Region (IFC-IOR) can be expanded to assist IORA members in real-time maritime domain awareness.
- Capacity Building and Skill Development: India can offer training programs, scholarships, and technical assistance to IORA members in areas like blue economy, digital governance, and climate adaptation. Example: The Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation (ITEC) program can be expanded to provide skill development for professionals from IORA nations.
- Sustainable Blue Economy Initiatives: India can collaborate with IORA countries to promote marine biotechnology, sustainable fisheries, and ocean-based renewable energy. Example: India’s Deep Ocean Mission and expertise in offshore wind energy can be shared with IORA nations for sustainable development.
- Trade and Connectivity Infrastructure: India can enhance regional trade and connectivity through port modernization, maritime logistics, and blue economy-driven trade facilitation. Example: The Sagarmala Project can be leveraged to assist IORA nations in upgrading port infrastructure and coastal shipping networks.
- Multilateral Partnerships and Development Finance: India can work with Quad, G20, BRICS, and ASEAN to secure additional funding and policy coordination for IORA’s initiatives. Example: India’s leadership in the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) can be extended to help IORA nations build climate-resilient maritime infrastructure.
Way forward:
- Institutional Strengthening & Financial Sustainability: IORA should establish a dedicated development fund, diversify revenue streams through public-private partnerships, and enhance cooperation with global financial institutions like the World Bank and ADB to ensure long-term financial stability.
- Strategic & Inclusive Engagement: India must promote technology-driven governance, capacity-building initiatives, and regional connectivity projects while fostering multilateral partnerships with ASEAN, Quad, and BRICS to enhance IORA’s strategic relevance and effectiveness.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Mains level: Issues related to Budget;
Why in the News?
The current budget process reduces the involvement of elected representatives, weakening democratic accountability.
How does the current budget process reduce the role of elected representatives and weaken democratic accountability?
- Executive Monopoly Over Budget Formulation: The Budget is drafted exclusively by the Finance Ministry, with even Cabinet Ministers kept unaware until its presentation in the Lok Sabha. Example: Unlike legislative bills, the Union Budget is not subjected to extensive cabinet discussions before being tabled in Parliament.
- Lack of Pre-Budget Consultations: Parliamentarians do not have an institutional mechanism to provide input before the Budget is finalized. Example: In contrast to countries like the UK, where parliamentary committees discuss budget priorities in advance, India lacks such structured engagement.
- Limited Role of the Rajya Sabha: The Upper House has no direct power to amend or reject the Budget, reducing its ability to scrutinize financial policies. Example: The Finance Minister, even if a Rajya Sabha member, cannot vote on the Budget in the Lok Sabha, where financial matters are decided.
- Weak Oversight by Parliamentary Committees: Parliamentary committees do not have the authority to modify budget proposals or demand policy changes. Example: Department-related Standing Committees review Demands for Grants but can only make recommendations, which the government is not bound to accept.
- Time Constraints and Superficial Debates: The Budget session allows limited time for discussion, leading to rushed approvals without in-depth scrutiny. Example: In many cases, the Guillotine Process is used, where multiple Demands for Grants are passed without discussion due to time limitations.
What is the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO)?
A Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) is an independent, non-partisan institution that provides objective analysis of government budgets, fiscal policies, and economic forecasts to assist lawmakers in informed decision-making. It enhances legislative oversight, ensures transparency, and improves accountability in public finance management. Examples include the U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Canada’s PBO.
What about the constitutional status of the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO)?
There is no explicit mention of a Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) in the Indian Constitution. However, its establishment can be linked to broader constitutional provisions related to financial oversight and legislative accountability:
- Article 112 (Annual Financial Statement) – The Union Budget is presented before Parliament, which has the power to scrutinize and approve it. A PBO can strengthen this oversight by providing independent budgetary analysis.
- Article 266 & 267 (Consolidated and Contingency Funds of India) – Parliament controls government expenditure, and a PBO can assist in evaluating the fiscal implications of such spending.
- Article 148-151 (Comptroller and Auditor General – CAG) – While CAG audits past expenditures, a PBO would provide forward-looking budgetary insights to Parliament.
- Article 105 (Powers and Privileges of Parliament) – Parliament has the right to seek information on financial matters, and a PBO could serve as a resource for unbiased fiscal analysis.
|
Why is the establishment of a Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) considered essential for fiscal oversight?
- Independent and Data-Driven Budget Analysis: A PBO would provide legislators with non-partisan, expert analysis of government spending, revenue forecasts, and fiscal policies. Example: The U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) conducts independent evaluations of federal budgets, ensuring transparency and evidence-based policy decisions.
- Enhanced Legislative Scrutiny and Accountability: It would strengthen Parliament’s ability to evaluate the financial implications of policies and hold the executive accountable. Example: Countries like Canada and the UK have PBOs that assess fiscal policies, preventing governments from making unrealistic budgetary claims.
- Support for Informed Decision-Making by Legislators: Parliamentarians often lack technical expertise in financial matters; a PBO would equip them with research reports and policy briefs. Example: Australia’s PBO helps legislators understand the long-term economic impact of proposed policies, ensuring fiscal discipline and responsible budgeting.
How do pre-Budget discussions contribute to a more transparent and democratic Budget-making process?
- Greater Legislative Involvement and Accountability: Pre-Budget discussions allow parliamentarians to voice public concerns, debate fiscal priorities, and influence resource allocation before the Budget is finalised. Example: In Germany, the Bundestag conducts pre-budget debates, ensuring the government considers legislative recommendations before finalizing financial plans.
- Improved Public Participation and Transparency: Open discussions increase public awareness and trust by making the Budget-making process more inclusive and participatory. Example: South Africa holds public consultations before the Budget, allowing citizens to provide inputs, and ensuring financial policies align with public needs.
- Better Coordination Among Subject Committees: Structured discussions help parliamentary committees collaborate effectively, leading to more informed scrutiny of sector-wise allocations. Example: In Sweden, parliamentary finance committees review preliminary budget proposals, enabling sector-specific recommendations before the final Budget is tabled.
Which global models of legislative Budget scrutiny can India learn from to enhance parliamentary engagement?
| Country |
Features
|
Example
|
| United States – Congressional Budget Office (CBO) for Independent Analysis |
The U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) provides independent, non-partisan economic and budgetary analysis to assist lawmakers in evaluating fiscal policies. |
India could establish a Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) for similar fiscal oversight. |
| United Kingdom – Strong Parliamentary Committee System: |
The UK’s House of Commons Treasury Committee scrutinizes budget proposals, questioning government officials and publishing reports on financial policy. |
In 2021, the Treasury Committee analyzed the economic impact of the UK Budget and made recommendations for pandemic recovery, influencing fiscal decisions. India can strengthen its Parliamentary Committees to enhance budgetary oversight. |
| Germany – Pre-Budget Consultations for Legislative Input: |
The Bundestag (German Parliament) conducts structured pre-Budget discussions, allowing legislators to debate fiscal priorities before finalizing budgetary allocations. |
Germany’s Medium-Term Financial Planning Framework ensures that multi-year fiscal policies align with economic goals. India could introduce pre-Budget discussions to improve transparency and parliamentary engagement. |
Way forward:
- Establish a Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) for Independent Analysis: A PBO should be set up to provide non-partisan, expert-driven financial analysis to Parliament, similar to the U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO). This would enhance legislative oversight, fiscal transparency, and informed decision-making by equipping parliamentarians with independent budget assessments.
- Institutionalize Pre-Budget Consultations and Strengthen Committee Oversight: Implement structured pre-Budget discussions involving parliamentary committees, policymakers, and stakeholders to ensure greater transparency and inclusivity in Budget-making.
Mains question for practice:
Question: “The growth of cabinet system has practically resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy.” Elucidate. (UPSC 2024)
Reason: This question addresses the broader theme of parliamentary supremacy being undermined by the executive. The budget being primarily an executive-driven process, with limited parliamentary influence, is a prime example of this marginalization.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Mains level: Issues related to the judiciary;
Why in the News?
On Friday (March 21, 2025), the Supreme Court stated that false information and rumours were being spread about an “incident” at the home of Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma, suggesting that this led to his transfer. The Court clarified that the transfer decision was unrelated to the incident.
What was the Supreme Court’s response to the reports regarding the incident at Justice Yashwant Varma’s residence?
- Rejection of Misinformation: The Supreme Court dismissed media reports about a “huge pile of cash” being recovered during a fire at Justice Varma’s residence. Example: It stated that rumours and misinformation were being spread, clarifying that the reports were not verified facts.
- Clarification on Transfer Proposal: The Court confirmed that Justice Varma’s transfer to Allahabad High Court was an independent decision, unrelated to the in-house enquiry into the incident. Example: It emphasized that the transfer process had been initiated separately and was being reviewed by the Collegium before the enquiry even began.
- Confidentiality of the Enquiry Process: The Supreme Court maintained that the in-house enquiry was confidential and aimed at preserving judicial integrity. Example: The Court cited the 2015 Additional District and Sessions Judge ‘X’ vs. Registrar General, MP High Court judgment, which ensures fairness in such proceedings.
Removal of Judges in the Higher Judiciary:
- Impeachment Process:
- Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts can only be removed by impeachment, which requires a motion signed by 100 Lok Sabha MPs or 50 Rajya Sabha MPs.
- The impeachment motion is investigated by a three-member judicial committee, and if the committee finds merit in the allegations, Parliament votes on the motion.
- A 2/3rd majority is needed in both Houses for removal.
- Parliament can, however, consider a motion to impeach a judge according to the procedure laid down in the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.
What is in-house enquiry?
- The CJI can initiate an in-house inquiry in the event of serious allegations against a judge. This process involves the Chief Justice of the High Court submitting a report, and if the allegations are deemed serious, a three-member committee is constituted to investigate the matter.
- If the committee recommends removal, the CJI may advise the judge to resign. If the judge refuses, their judicial work is withdrawn, and impeachment proceedings may be initiated.
What is the legal precedence of it?
- Justice V. Ramaswami Case (1991): One of the first instances where an impeachment motion was attempted against a sitting Supreme Court judge, highlighting the importance of in-house mechanisms before formal parliamentary action.
- Additional District and Sessions Judge ‘X’ vs. Registrar General, High Court of Madhya Pradesh (2015): This case outlined the two-stage procedure for in-house enquiries, emphasizing exclusion of bias and ensuring due process in judicial investigations.
- In re: Justice C.S. Karnan (2017): The Supreme Court invoked its contempt jurisdiction against a sitting High Court judge, Justice C.S. Karnan, highlighting the limitations of in-house procedures when misconduct disrupts judicial functioning.
|
Why did the Supreme Court emphasize that the transfer proposal for Justice Yashwant Varma was independent of the in-house enquiry?
- To Prevent Misinterpretation of Judicial Transfers: The Supreme Court clarified that the transfer was part of routine administrative decisions, not a punitive action linked to the enquiry. Example: Justice Varma’s transfer was to his parent High Court (Allahabad), where he would be ninth in seniority, a common practice for judges.
- To Uphold the Collegium’s Credibility: The Court ensured that the Collegium’s decisions were based on judicial requirements, not external events. Example: The Collegium followed its standard procedure of consulting judges and the Chief Justices of the concerned High Courts before deciding on the transfer.
- To Avoid Pre-Judgment of the Enquiry Outcome: If the transfer was seen as linked to the enquiry, it could imply guilt before a formal investigation was concluded. Example: The Court confirmed that the Delhi High Court Chief Justice had initiated the enquiry separately, even before the Collegium met on March 20, 2025.
- To Maintain Judicial Independence and Fairness: Judges must be free from undue influence, and linking transfers to allegations could undermine judicial autonomy. Example: The Court cited the in-house enquiry framework, which ensures that any probe follows due process before any action is taken.
- To Protect the Reputation of the Judiciary: Associating the transfer with allegations could harm the judge’s integrity and create unnecessary controversy. Example: The Supreme Court press note stressed that the transfer decision was made on administrative grounds, separate from any enquiry findings.
What is the process of judicial transfers in India?
- Initiation by the Chief Justice of India (CJI): The transfer of High Court judges is initiated by the CJI in consultation with the Collegium, which includes the four senior-most Supreme Court judges. Example: In 2021, Justice Sanjib Banerjee was transferred from the Madras High Court to the Meghalaya High Court, reportedly due to administrative reasons.
- Consultation with the Government and Affected Judges: The Union Law Ministry processes the recommendation and seeks the President’s approval. The judge being transferred is consulted, but their consent is not required. Example: Justice Akil Kureshi’s transfer from Gujarat High Court to Tripura High Court in 2019 sparked debates about judicial independence.
- Final Approval by the President of India: After receiving recommendations from the CJI and the Collegium, the President issues a formal order for the transfer under Article 222 of the Constitution. Example: Justice Vijaya Kapse-Tahilramani resigned in 2019 after being transferred from the Madras High Court to the Meghalaya High Court.
|
How does the in-house enquiry procedure against sitting High Court judges ensure fairness and prevent bias?
- Two-Stage Investigation Process: The procedure involves an initial assessment by the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court, followed by a deeper probe if required, ensuring a systematic and impartial review. Example: In Justice Yashwant Varma’s case, the Delhi High Court Chief Justice first examined the allegations before forwarding a report to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) for further action.
- Principles of Natural Justice: The accused judge is given a fair opportunity to present their defense before any decision is made, preventing arbitrary actions. Example: If the CJI determines a deeper probe is needed, a three-member committee (two Chief Justices and one High Court judge) is formed, ensuring multiple perspectives in the investigation.
- Confidentiality to Protect Integrity: The enquiry remains confidential to prevent media trials and undue reputational damage before conclusions are drawn. Example: The Supreme Court’s press note stated that the findings of the Delhi High Court’s in-house enquiry would be examined privately before deciding on further action.
Way forward:
- Strengthening Transparency and Communication: The judiciary should proactively address misinformation by issuing timely clarifications and making non-confidential aspects of administrative decisions more accessible to prevent speculation and misinterpretation.
- Enhancing Institutional Safeguards: The in-house enquiry mechanism should be periodically reviewed to ensure procedural robustness, fairness, and adaptability while maintaining judicial integrity and independence.
Mains PYQ:
Question: “Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy”. Comment. (2023)
Reason: The proposed transfer of a High Court judge, especially amidst “rumours” touches upon the independence of the judiciary. While the Supreme Court clarifies the transfer is unrelated to the “incident” and in-house inquiry, questions about maintaining judicial independence in the face of potential external pressures or perceptions remain pertinent.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Public Accounts Committee, Swadesh Darshan Scheme (SDS)
Why in the News?
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has criticized the Ministry of Tourism for the poor execution of the Swadesh Darshan Scheme and highlighted lapses in planning, approvals, and project execution.
About Public Accounts Committee (PAC):
- The PAC was established in 1921 under the Government of India Act, 1919.
- It consists of 22 members, with 15 from the Lok Sabha and 7 from the Rajya Sabha, who are elected annually.
- The Chairman of the committee is traditionally selected from the Opposition since 1967.
- The PAC plays a crucial role in examining the audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), focusing on public expenditure.
- It ensures that funds are utilized efficiently, and it checks for irregularities, corruption, waste, and inefficiencies in government spending.
About Swadesh Darshan Scheme (SDS):
- The Swadesh Darshan Scheme was launched in 2015 by the Ministry of Tourism.
- Objective: Developing theme-based tourist circuits such as Buddhist, Coastal, Heritage, and Eco-tourism circuits in India, emphasising sustainable tourism.
- The scheme is 100% centrally funded, and it provides financial assistance to state governments, Union Territory administrations, and central agencies for the development of tourism infrastructure.
- Swadesh Darshan 2.0 scheme (which began from January 2023) adopts a more holistic approach, shifting from circuit-based tourism to a destination-centric model.
- This new version aims to encourage private sector investment in tourism and hospitality, aligning with India’s ‘Vocal for Local’ and Aatmanirbhar Bharat vision.
- It prioritizes long-term growth and the development of sustainable tourism destinations.
- The Challenge-Based Destination Development (CBDD) is a sub-scheme under Swadesh Darshan 2.0, focusing on the competitive development of tourism destinations.
- This initiative aims to foster sustainability, digitalization, skill development, MSME support, and effective management, ensuring that the tourism sector thrives in a more modern and organized manner.
PYQ:
[UPSC 2007] Consider the following statements:
1. The Chairman of the Committee on Public Accounts is appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
2. The Committee on Public Accounts comprises Members of Lok Sabha, Members of Rajya Sabha, and a few eminent persons of industry and trade.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Arctic Council
Why in the News?
The Russian Ambassador to India recently stated that Russia views India’s interest in the Arctic as a “stabilizing factor.”
India-Russia Collaboration in the Arctic
India and Russia have strengthened their cooperation in the Arctic, focusing on scientific research, energy resources, and shipping routes:
- Energy Resources: Joint ventures in Arctic oil and gas extraction, particularly in the Dolginskoye oil field and Vostok oil cluster.
- Northern Sea Route (NSR): India and Russia are working to improve shipping through the NSR, aiming to reduce shipping costs and improve connectivity.
|
About India’s Arctic Policy
- India’s Arctic Policy was launched by the Ministry of Earth Sciences in 2022, taking a comprehensive approach that involves multiple sectors, including scientific, environmental, economic, and strategic interests.
- It focuses on sustainability, aiming to protect the environment while exploring opportunities in energy resources, shipping routes, and scientific collaboration.
- The policy includes 6 key pillars:
- Science and Research: Focus on climate change, geosciences, and polar biology.
- Climate and Environmental Protection: Ensuring development does not compromise the Arctic ecosystem.
- Economic and Human Development: Exploring opportunities in energy extraction and shipping.
- Transportation and Connectivity: Enhancing access to Arctic shipping routes.
- Governance and International Cooperation: Strengthening ties with international partners like the Arctic Council.
- National Capacity Building: Developing expertise in Arctic research and polar navigation.
- The policy acknowledges the geopolitical dynamics of the Arctic and seeks to balance scientific, economic, and strategic interests.
India’s Mission to the Arctic
- India’s Arctic mission began in 2007, with its first research mission focused on microbiology, atmospheric sciences, and geology. India also established its research base, Himadri, in the Arctic in 2008. Recent advancements include:
- In 2023, India conducted winter expedition in polar night conditions to study climate change, sea-ice dynamics, and ocean circulation.
- India collaborates with Russia, Norway, and other Arctic nations through research institutes and joint expeditions.
- India’s focus is on understanding the Arctic’s impact on climate change and its effects on weather patterns, particularly in South Asia.
Back2Basics: Arctic Council
- The Arctic Council, established in 1996, is an intergovernmental forum for cooperation among Arctic states.
- The Council includes 8 Arctic countries and permanent participants from indigenous Arctic communities. Its focus is on environmental protection, sustainable development, and scientific research.
- India has been an observer since 2013, contributing to scientific research, climate change discussions, and policy frameworks.
- The Council’s activities were suspended in 2022 due to rising tensions from militarization by NATO countries.
- Despite this, India continues to engage constructively with the Council.
- India’s participation in the Arctic Council highlights the global importance of Arctic issues, particularly regarding climate change and energy security.
|
PYQ:
[UPSC 2015] The term ‘IndARC’, sometimes seen in the news, is the name of:
(a) an indigenously developed radar system inducted into Indian Defence
(b) India’s satellite to provide services to the countries of Indian Ocean Rim
(c) a scientific establishment set up by India in Antarctic region
(d) India’s underwater observatory to scientifically study the Arctic region
[UPSC 2018] Why is India taking keen in resources of Arctic region?
[UPSC 2015] What are the economic significances of discovery of oil in Arctic Sea and its possible environmental consequences? |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: World Happiness Index
Why in the News?
India has improved its position in the World Happiness Report 2025, climbing to 118th place among 147 countries, up from 126th last year.
About the World Happiness Index (WHI)
- The WHI is part of the World Happiness Report, a global survey conducted by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), an initiative of the United Nations.
- The report ranks countries based on citizens’ self-reported happiness, focusing on life satisfaction and overall well-being.
- The rankings are primarily based on data gathered from the Gallup World Poll, where individuals rate their own lives on a 0-10 scale using the Cantril Ladder method.
- 6 key factors influence these evaluations:
- GDP per capita
- Healthy life expectancy
- Social support
- Freedom
- Generosity
- Perception of corruption
Key Highlights of the World Happiness Report 2025:
- Top Countries: Finland remains the happiest country for the eighth consecutive year. Denmark, Iceland, and Sweden are also in the top ranks. Costa Rica (6th) and Mexico (10th) entered the top 10 for the first time. Israel ranked 8th despite conflicts.
- Declining Happiness in Western Nations: The United States dropped to 24th, and the United Kingdom fell to 23rd, with both countries experiencing increased social isolation.
- Least Happy Countries: Afghanistan remains the least happy, with Sierra Leone and Lebanon also in the bottom three.
- India’s Improvement:
- India improved its ranking from 126th to 118th, with its happiness score rising from 4.054 to 4.389.
- Despite its economic growth, technological advancements, and improvements in healthcare and education, it continues to rank lower than its neighboring countries like Pakistan (109th).
PYQ:
[UPSC 2004] Human Development Index comprises literacy rates, life expectancy at birth and-
(a) Gross Domestic Product per head in US dollars
(b) Gross National Product per head in US dollars
(c) Purchasing Power Parity in US dollars
(d) National Income per head in US dollars |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Special Category Status
Why in the News?
The Nitish Kumar government in Bihar renewed its demand for Special Category Status (SCS) before the 16th Finance Commission, which is currently touring the state.
About Special Category Status (SCS)
- Special Category Status (SCS) is a classification granted to specific states in India facing geographical, socio-economic, and infrastructural challenges.
- It provides special financial assistance for their development.
-
- Introduced in 1969 following the recommendations of the Fifth Finance Commission, based on the Gadgil formula for fund allocation.
- Initially granted to Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, and Nagaland, with other states like Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Uttarakhand, and Telangana added later.
- Eligibility Criteria (Based on the Gadgil Formula): States must meet at least one of the following:
-
- Hilly terrain: Challenging geography impeding development.
- Low population density or a large tribal population.
- Strategic location near international borders.
- Economic and infrastructural backwardness.
- Non-viable state finances: Financial instability due to lack of resources.
-
- Financial Assistance: 90% grants for centrally sponsored schemes (vs. 30% for non-SCS states).
- Special Plan Assistance: Additional funds for national importance projects.
- Tax Benefits: Concessions on excise, income, and corporate taxes (many subsumed under GST).
- Carry-Forward of Unspent Funds: Funds are carried forward to the next year.
- Higher Budget Allocation: 30% of the Centre’s budget allocated to SCS states.
Assessment of Bihar’s Demand:
- Industrial Backwardness: Lack of industrial development, worsened by state bifurcation in 2000.
- High Poverty Levels: One of the highest poverty rates in India, with low per capita GDP.
- Frequent Natural Disasters: Floods and droughts severely impact agriculture.
- Infrastructure Deficiencies: Insufficient irrigation and water systems hinder agricultural productivity.
|
About the Finance Commission
- The Finance Commission is created every 5 years to allocate financial resources from the Centre to states, based on Article 280 of the Constitution.
- Composition: Consists of a chairman and four other members appointed by the President.
- Qualifications: Members must have specialized knowledge in finance, economics, accounts, or administration.
- The Fifteenth Finance Commission’s recommendations are valid till 2025-26.
- Terms of Reference for 16th FC: Division of tax proceeds, principles for grants-in-aid, enhancing state funds for local bodies, and evaluation of disaster management financing.
PYQ:
[2023] Consider the following:
- Demographic performance
- Forest and ecology
- Governance reforms
- Stable government
- Tax and fiscal efforts
For the horizontal tax devolution, the Fifteenth Finance Commission used how many of the above as criteria other than population area and income distance?
(a) Only two
(b) Only three
(c) Only four
(d) All five |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now