Central Idea:

The article discusses the University Grants Commission’s (UGC) guideline, Mulya Pravah 2.0, aimed at instilling human values and ethics in higher education institutions. It emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct among administrators, teachers, and students.

Key Highlights:

• Mulya Pravah 2.0 addresses unethical practices in higher education, identified through a survey of human resource managers.
• The guideline focuses on transparency, accountability, and fairness in decision-making processes.
• It calls for the eradication of discriminatory privileges, punishment for corruption, and encourages a conducive culture for teaching, learning, and research.

Key Challenges:

• The article suggests that the guideline may be seen as a mere formality unless backed by sincere efforts to implement its provisions effectively.
• The emphasis on confidentiality conflicts with the right to information, raising concerns about accountability.
• The expectation for unions to support administration activities may limit their role in protecting the rights and interests of their members.

Key Terms/Phrases:

• Mulya Pravah 2.0
• Unethical practices
• Transparency and accountability
• Discriminatory privileges
• Conducive culture
• Right to information
• Staff and student unions

Key Quotes:

• “The UGC must get credit for notifying the guideline.”
• “Higher education institutions must voluntarily disclose critical information and subject themselves to public scrutiny.”
• “Teaching is a noble profession, and teachers play a crucial role in shaping the character, personality, and career of the students.”

Key Statements:

• The guideline emphasizes the importance of transparency in administration and urges punishment for corrupt practices.
• Mulya Pravah 2.0 expects staff and student unions to support administration in development activities.

Key Examples and References:

• Survey findings on unethical practices in organizations.
• Mention of the need for public disclosure of critical information by higher education institutions.

Key Facts/Data:

• Mulya Pravah 2.0 is a modified version of a guideline notified in 2019.
• The guideline highlights various unethical practices prevalent in organizations.

Critical Analysis:

• The article suggests that the guideline, while commendable, may face challenges in implementation, especially regarding the conflicting emphasis on confidentiality and the role of unions in supporting administration activities.

Way Forward:

• Ensure sincere efforts to implement Mulya Pravah 2.0 effectively.
• Address concerns related to confidentiality and right to information.
• Encourage a collaborative approach between administration and unions for the betterment of higher education institutions.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now