LGBT Rights – Transgender Bill, Sec. 377, etc.

Article 142 of the Indian Constitution

Note4Students

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level: Article 142

Why in the News?

The Supreme Court declined a PIL seeking directions under Article 142 to include sexual offences against men, trans-persons, and animals in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Supreme Court’s Observations:

  • The petitioner argued that the new BNS omitted Section 377 of the IPC, which previously criminalized ‘unnatural sex’ and carnal intercourse involving a man, woman, or animal.
  • In the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) case, the Supreme Court struck down Section 377 to the extent that it criminalized consensual sexual acts between adults.
  • Non-consensual homosexual acts remained punishable under this provision.
  • The BNS does not include provisions criminalizing sexual offences against men, trans persons, and animals.
  • During the hearing, the bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra stated that:
    • The Court cannot direct Parliament to create or reintroduce an offence.
    • The creation of offences falls within the parliamentary domain, not under the court’s jurisdiction, even with Article 142.

About Article 142:

Details
Definition • Grants discretionary power to the Supreme Court to pass orders or decrees necessary for complete justice in matters before it.
• Allows the court to act beyond the limits of statutory law if required.
Purpose • Ensures justice is delivered in cases where regular laws may not provide adequate remedies.
• Aims to empower the Supreme Court to address extraordinary situations effectively.
Key Clauses Article 142(1): Allows the Supreme Court to pass enforceable orders across India for doing complete justice.
Article 142(2): Empowers the court to secure attendance, discovery of documents, or punishment for contempt.
Notable Cases Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1989): Supreme Court awarded $470 million compensation, bypassing limitations of ordinary law.
Ayodhya Case (2019): Directed the formation of a trust for Ram Mandir construction.• Liquor Sale Ban (2016): Imposed a 500-metre ban on liquor shops along highways using Article 142, extending it beyond central government orders.
Constructive Application • Invoked for environmental protection, such as in the Taj Mahal cleanup.
Justice for undertrials by addressing systemic delays in the judicial process.
Controversies • Accusations of judicial overreach in certain cases, where actions have seemingly breached the separation of powers principle.
Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India: Clarified that Article 142 should supplement, not replace the law.
Impact on Governance • Empowers the Supreme Court with a tool for upholding justice, but raises debates over checks and balances in a democratic system.

 

PYQ:

[2019] With reference to the Constitution of India, prohibitions or limitations or provisions contained in ordinary laws cannot act as prohibitions or limitations on the constitutional powers under Article 142. It could mean which one of the following?

(a) The decisions taken by the Election Commission of India while discharging its duties cannot be challenged in any court of law.

(b) The Supreme Court of India is not constrained in the exercise of its powers by laws made by the Parliament.

(c) In the event of grave financial crisis in the country, the President of India can declare Financial Emergency without the counsel from the Cabinet.

(d) State Legislatures cannot make laws on certain matters without the concurrence of Union Legislature.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.

💥Mentorship December Batch Launch
💥💥Mentorship December Batch Launch