Central idea 

The article critiques the G20 Summit’s Declaration on women’s empowerment, highlighting past implementation challenges and questioning the clarity of “women-led development.” It emphasizes the discrepancy between rhetoric and actions, especially regarding declining budget allocations for women’s development. The central theme revolves around the need for a reevaluation of women-led development strategies to address persistent inequalities effectively.

Key Highlights:

• The G20 Summit’s Declaration on the empowerment of women is acknowledged, but past working groups and sustainable development goals have seen limited implementation.
• The term “women-led development” in the Declaration lacks clarity, and the article questions its parameters and implications for the existing development models.
• The G20 Declaration reaffirms the role of private enterprise in driving economic growth, raising concerns about the compatibility of women-led development with the prevailing macroeconomic model.

Key Challenges:

• The article highlights the persistent discrimination against women and girls globally, emphasizing the need for more effective measures to achieve Sustainable Development Goals.
• Women-led development schemes, as mentioned in government bulletins, are criticized for masking the reduction in government investment in projects benefiting women’s development.
• The Gender Budget, intended to prioritize women’s development, has shown a decline in total expenditure, raising concerns about the commitment to women-led development.

Key Terms/Phrases:

• Women-led development
• Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
• Trickle-down theory
• G20 Summit Declaration
• Gender Budget
• Private enterprise
• Corporate-led development

Key Quotes for value addition:

• “At the midway point to 2030, the global progress on SDGs is off-track with only 12% of the targets on track.”
• “We encourage women-led development and remain committed to enhancing women’s full, equal, effective, and meaningful participation…”

Key Statements:

• The article questions the lack of clarity in the term “women-led development” and its compatibility with existing development models.
• Concerns are raised about the reduction in the Gender Budget and the inadequate allocation for wholly women-specific schemes.

Key Examples and References:

• The article cites the decline in women’s share in regular waged work in India according to the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS).
• Specific government schemes and budgetary allocations are referenced to illustrate the disparities in women-led development.

Key Facts/Data:

• The total Gender Budget for 2023-2024 was reduced from 5.2% of the total expenditure the previous year to 5%.
• The share of women in regular waged work in India fell from 21.9% in 2018-2019 to 15.9% in 2022-2023.

Critical Analysis:

• The article critically examines the discrepancies between rhetoric and action in women-led development, highlighting concerns about declining budget allocations and the lack of clarity in the proposed development model.

Way Forward:

• The need for a reevaluation of women-led development strategies is emphasized, urging policymakers to prioritize economic independence for women and address the disparities in budgetary allocations.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now