Central Idea:

The article discusses the resolution of the Babri Masjid-Ram Janambhoomi dispute in Ayodhya, emphasizing the significance of mediation in preventing bloodshed. It highlights the positive outcomes, including the absence of violence post the Supreme Court judgment in favor of Hindus. The author, Sriram Panchu, reflects on the factors contributing to the peaceful resolution, such as Muslim forums advocating against similar disputes and the recognition that ending the conflict is in the nation’s interest. The Places of Worship Act 1991 is cited as a crucial legislative tool, and the author stresses the need for its strict implementation to prevent similar disputes.

Key Highlights:

• Successful mediation in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janambhoomi dispute avoided violence.
• Factors contributing to the resolution include Muslim forums discouraging similar conflicts and the national interest in ending the dispute.
• The Places of Worship Act 1991 played a vital role in preventing such disputes but had an exception for the Ayodhya case.
• The article mentions the initial hasty end to mediation, but a subsequent agreement was reached with significant support from both Muslim and Hindu parties.
• The Supreme Court’s acknowledgment of the settlement effort and its decision to grant the disputed land to Hindus are discussed.

Key Terms:

• Babri Masjid-Ram Janambhoomi dispute: The longstanding conflict over the Ayodhya site between Hindus and Muslims.
• Places of Worship Act 1991: Legislation prohibiting the conversion of places of worship with an exception for the Ayodhya dispute.
• Mediation: A process involving positive communication and negotiation to reach a resolution.

Key Phrases:

• “Last of such disputes”: The voiced utterance in Muslim forums that the Ayodhya case should set a precedent for ending similar disputes.
• “Primordial interest of the nation”: Recognizing that resolving the Ayodhya dispute is crucial for the nation’s well-being.
• “Basic Structure of the Constitution”: Referring to the Places of Worship Act’s status as a constitutional safeguard against majority decisions.
• “Maryada Purushottam”: Referring to Lord Ram as the ideal man.

Key Quotes:

• “Even though a settlement may ‘seem to pass on the wings of the wind’, it shall return.” – Reference to the return of the settlement effort after the initial hasty end to mediation.
• “Building a temple and installing a statue and creating an airport and the like is of far less worth than following the dharma of Ram Rajya.” – Emphasizing the importance of embodying Lord Ram’s principles.

Key Statements:

• “Building the Ram Temple is a landmark achievement, but not the only important thing here.” – Stresses the importance of preventing similar disputes through the strict implementation of the Places of Worship Act.

Key Examples and References:

• Reference to Kashi and Mathura as places with historical temples rebuilt on adjoining land, distinguishing them from Ayodhya.

Key Facts:

• The Places of Worship Act 1991 prohibits the conversion of places of worship, except for the Ayodhya dispute.

Key Data:

• The Kashi Vishwanath temple was built in 1780, and the Srikrishna Janmasthan in 1982.

Critical Analysis:

• The article does not deeply analyze the critique of the Supreme Court’s judgment, leaving room for further exploration of its implications.
• Specific instances or challenges in implementing the Places of Worship Act are not detailed, limiting a comprehensive understanding.

Way Forward:

• Emphasizes the need for strict implementation of the Places of Worship Act to prevent the recurrence of similar disputes.
• Encourages following the principles of Lord Ram’s governance (Ram Rajya) as a more valuable achievement than building physical structures.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now