What’s the news?

• The recent release of the NITI Aayog’s Multidimensional Poverty Report for the period 2019-21 marks a significant milestone in India’s pursuit of poverty alleviation.

Central idea

• The NITI Aayog’s Multidimensional Poverty Report’s unveiling of a noteworthy decline in the poverty headcount, from 24.85 percent in 2015-16 to 14.96 percent in 2019–2021, presents a promising trajectory of progress. These revelations, rooted in data sourced from standardized National Health Status Reports, underscore the government’s commitment to transparency and evidence-based policymaking.

Complexity of poverty management

• Challenging Task: Poverty management is more complex now compared to the era of global expansion (1980 to 2007).
• Economic Factors: Economies like India, characterized by large populations and lower middle-level per capita incomes, face difficulties in allocating resources to further reduce poverty ratios.
• Technological Advancements: Technological progress, automation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and bionics add complexity to poverty management.
• Job Creation Risk: Technological advances can freeze the addition of productive global jobs, which in turn jeopardizes household incomes.
• Population Increase: India’s anticipated population rise of about 250 million by 2050 introduces additional complexity.
• Youth Demographic: While a youthful population could be beneficial, ensuring appropriate employment for this growing workforce remains uncertain.
• Future of Work: The impact of technological advances such as automation, AI, and bionics on job creation and household income stability is unclear.
• Need for Innovation: Overcoming the complexity of poverty management requires innovative strategies and adaptable approaches.

Significance of the Report

• In-Depth Analysis: The NITI Aayog’s Multidimensional Poverty Report provides a detailed analysis of poverty at the state level, offering insights into the status of poverty in different regions.
• Flexible Tool for Poverty Identification: The report introduces a flexible tool with 12 indicators to identify the poor and assess the intensity of deprivation. This approach offers a nuanced understanding of poverty beyond income-based measurements.
• Inclusivity: The methodology prioritizes inclusivity over rigid statistical precision. This acknowledges the practical necessity of balancing misidentification while ensuring poverty reduction.
• Contextual Barriers to Poverty Reduction: The Alkire-Foster methodology recognizes that barriers to ending poverty can vary across jurisdictions, enabling contextual priorities to be factored into poverty reduction efforts.
• The Changing Nature of Poverty: The report acknowledges that poverty’s face evolves over time and across states. This underscores the importance of flexible monitoring systems to map, assess, and address poverty.
• Policy Implications: The report’s findings have significant policy implications as they highlight disparities in education, health, and quality of life among the poor. This can guide targeted interventions and policy decisions.
• Methodological Comparison: The report introduces a methodological approach distinct from traditional methods, which can lead to more accurate and comprehensive poverty assessments.

Effectiveness of the Poverty Reduction Strategy

• Education and Health Impact: The poor constitute a significant portion of those requiring higher levels of assistance in education and health. They make up 62% of households not meeting schooling norms and 43% not receiving minimum health support.
• Quality of Life Disparities: The poor are particularly disadvantaged in terms of quality of life. Around 56% of poor households lack access to electricity, raising concerns about the effectiveness of ground-level electrification efforts. Additionally, 47% of poor households don’t possess assets like a telephone or TV.
• MDPI as a Tracking Tool: The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MDPI) serves as a valuable tool to assess the results of government programs aimed at poverty reduction. It offers a comprehensive framework to monitor and evaluate poverty initiatives.

Way forward

• Contextual Grassroot Initiatives: Given the complexity of poverty management, it’s a necessity to promote and implement context-specific initiatives at the grassroot level. These initiatives should address the unique challenges and needs of different regions.
• Adapt to Changing Dynamics: With the potential freezing of job creation due to technological advances, there’s a need to formulate strategies that adapt to the changing nature of work. This includes preparing the workforce for emerging job sectors and bolstering social safety nets.
• Employment Generation: Considering the projected population increase, efforts to generate meaningful employment opportunities must be a priority. Ensuring employment for the growing workforce is crucial for poverty reduction.
• Innovative Monitoring Systems: The changing face of poverty demands flexible monitoring systems that can accurately map, assess, and respond to evolving poverty patterns across states and over time.
• Inclusive Approaches: The inclusive nature of poverty reduction efforts, as demonstrated by the methodology in the report, should be maintained. Balancing misidentification while ensuring inclusivity is essential.
• Quality Education and Healthcare: Effective interventions should be designed to address gaps in education and healthcare for the poor. These areas play a significant role in breaking the cycle of poverty.
• Digital Inclusion: Disparities in access to electricity and digital connectivity need to be addressed. Expanding access to these services can improve the quality of life and open economic opportunities.
• Dignified Assistance: While providing merit goods for free is important, policymakers must ensure that such assistance doesn’t undermine the dignity of the poor. Balancing charity with preserving self-respect is crucial.

Conclusion

• The NITI Aayog’s report signifies a significant step toward comprehending and addressing multidimensional poverty in India. As India’s per capita incomes rise, the country must internalize the lesson that poverty’s face evolves asymmetrically across states. This realization underscores the need for adaptable monitoring and targeted strategies.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now