Context

The Personal Data Protection Bill which was introduced in Lok Sabha contains a certain provision that might have implications for India’s digital economy. These provisions must be carefully considered as Parliament reviews the proposed legislation.

What are the stated objectives of the bill?

• The first purpose deals with privacy concerns.
• Its purpose is to safeguard the constitutional guarantee of privacy for Indian citizens
• The second purpose is to provide a just and equitable vision for the future of India’s digital economy

What are the incongruent provisions?

• One of the provision enables the central government to direct the regulated entity under the act to provide anonymised personal data.
• The government wants to use this anonymised personal data to enable the targeted delivery of services or evidence-based policymaking
• The above provisions could have certain implications that need to be carefully considered.

Anonymised data and issues with it

• Under the bill, anonymised data refers to data from which all the markers of identity have been irreversibly removed.
• Recent research shows that the present methods of anonymisation are imperfect.
• With the use of modern machine learning techniques, the data released as “anonymous” can be re-identified.
• So, the approach to regulation of anonymised data must be contextual and sectoral- with a focus on finance and healthcare.

Use of big data and AI in governance

• The government also plans to use big data and artificial intelligence within governance and planning systems.
• The use of these techniques has the potential to increase government capacity and transparency.
• It can also help in making an informed decision about economic and social planning.
• However, the provision ignores the multiplicity of existing and inchoate rights like IPRs (Intellectual Property Rights), copyrights and trade secret protections.

Consequences of the conflicting provision

• While the government wants the data to be open for acquisition similar to the power of “eminent domain” over land, but it comes in conflict with existing laws.
• It comes in conflict with the copyright acts, intellectual property rights, and trade secret laws.
• Databases are commercially significant for commercial companies.
• Overlap of these existing rights within the government system can jeopardise accountability and transparency.

 Problems with Big data and AI in governance

• Unregulated use of the database in governance could have consequences for the people and communities who are being made visible or being invisible by this data.
• A shift from a qualitative method like census to the quantitative method like big data which is collected in a different context and used for a different purpose may not be smooth.
• Such data will be incomplete for governance.
• The data could also be replete with biases of the private entity collecting the data.
• So, the use of this unregulated data for policymaking or targeting beneficiaries could be disastrous.

Way forward

The regulation of non-personal data must take into account both the potential harms to individual privacy as well as the wider social and political consequences of the use of data for governance.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now