Central idea

The breach of India’s Parliament, a symbol of democratic strength, on the anniversary of the 2001 attack reveals critical lapses in security, prompting a high-level inquiry. This collective failure of intelligence agencies underscores the need for thorough investigations, corrective measures, and strengthened security protocols to prevent recurring breaches and uphold the sanctity of parliamentary institutions.

Key Highlights:

• Fortress Breached: The Parliament building in India, known for its security, faces a significant breach, exposing flaws in the robust system.
• Anniversary Irony: The intrusion occurs on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament attack, questioning the preparedness of security agencies.
• High-Level Inquiry: The government initiates an inquiry to identify lapses and rectify security vulnerabilities.

Key Challenges:

• Collective Security Failure: The breach underscores a failure of intelligence and security agencies responsible for safeguarding Parliament.
• Questionable Access: Intruders obtained an entry pass signed by an MP, raising concerns about verification processes.
• Efficacy of Corrective Measures: Doubts arise about the effectiveness of measures to prevent recurrent security breaches.

Key Terms:

• Security Blanket: Enhanced security measures implemented in a specific area.
• Inquiry Committee: A high-level committee formed to investigate the breach and recommend improvements.
• Tear Gas Canisters: Devices used for dispersing tear gas, hidden by intruders during the breach.

Key Phrases:

• “Temple of our Democracy”: Symbolic reference to the Parliament building as a stronghold of India’s democratic strength.
• “Sanctum Sanctorum of India’s Democracy”: Describing the innermost and most sacred area of the Parliament.

Key Quotes:

• “How did a breach occur again? This is the main question. Those responsible should be punished.” – The author, a retired director general of Police.
• “The incident happened on the very day on which the dreadful Parliament attacks took place 22 years ago.” – The article highlighting the irony of the timing.

Key Examples and References:

• Arrests Made: Four individuals, including one with an entry pass signed by an MP, are arrested in connection with the breach.
• Historical Comparison: Drawing parallels with the 2001 Parliament attack to emphasize the breach’s significance.

Key Statements:

• “Egg on the Face”: The breach is described as an embarrassment to the security establishment, questioning overall preparedness.
• “Collective Failure”: The incident is considered a collective failure of intelligence agencies, police, and security agencies responsible for Parliament security.

Key Facts:

• Enhanced Security: The new Parliament building, inaugurated earlier in the year, is believed to be more secure than its predecessor.
• Timely Breach: Occurred on the day Parliament paid tributes to the martyrs of the 2001 Parliament attack.

Key Data:

• Total Arrests: Four individuals are arrested in connection with the breach.

Critical Analysis:

• Security Vulnerabilities: The breach raises concerns about the ability to prevent intrusions into highly secure areas.
• Symbolic Timing: The timing on the anniversary adds symbolic weight to the security lapse, emphasizing the need for improvement.

Way Forward:

• Thorough Investigation: A comprehensive inquiry is essential to identify lapses and implement corrective measures.
• Strengthen Security Protocols: Stricter verification processes for entry passes and enhanced security measures are crucial for preventing future breaches.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now