Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Trademarks, Patents
Mains level: Not Much
Why in the news?
- A lady in New Delhi successfully obtained trademark for her Momos brand from New Delhi High Court, after a similar trademark infringed upon her rights and reputation.
- The lady’s legal action invoked ‘passing off’ provisions, seeking cancellation of the infringers’ trademark under relevant sections of the Trademarks Act.
What are Trademarks?
- A trademark is a symbol, design, word, or phrase that is identified with a business. Registering a trademark allows its owner to claim “exclusive rights” to its usage.
- The Trademarks Act of 1999 governs the regime of trademarks and their registration in India.
- It guarantees protection for trademarks registered with the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trademarks, also known as the trademark registry.
- According to Section 25 of the 1999 Act, once registered, a trademark is valid for 10 years and can be renewed by the owner periodically.
Concept of ‘Passing Off’
- ‘Passing off’ entails deceptive practices where one brand attempts to profit from the reputation of another through misrepresentation.
- In Cadila Healthcare Limited vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited (2001), the Supreme Court defined passing-off as a form of unfair trade competition, where one brand seeks to profit from the established reputation of another through deceptive means.
- Infringed parties can seek injunctions, damages, or accounts against the infringing entity to mitigate the damages caused.
Application in the Present Case: Grounds for Trademark Refusal
- Legal Provisions: Sections 11(1), 11(2), 11(3)(a), and 47 of the Trademarks Act outline grounds for refusal to register trademarks and provisions for removal from the register.
- Likelihood of Confusion: Trademarks resembling earlier trademarks, leading to public confusion, are ineligible for registration under Section 11(1).
- Protection of Distinctive Marks: Section 11(2) prohibits registration of marks that take unfair advantage of or harm the reputation of well-known trademarks.
- Non-Compliance and Non-Usage: Section 47 allows removal of trademarks from the register for non-compliance or non-use, subject to aggrieved parties’ applications.
Back2Basics: Trademarks vs. Patents
Trademark | Patent | |
Purpose | Identify and distinguish goods or services | Protect new and inventive products or processes |
Laws and Provisions | Trademarks Act, 1999 | Patents Act, 1970 |
Subject Matter | Signs like logos, brand names, slogans, packaging | Inventions including products, processes, methods |
Duration of Protection | 10 years.
Indefinite with periodic renewal |
Typically 20 years from the filing date |
Registration Process | File application with Trademarks Registry (i.e. Controller General of Patents) | File application with Indian Patent Office |
Rights Granted | Exclusive use of the trademark in connection with goods or services | Exclusive rights to exploit the invention commercially |
PYQ:
Consider the following statements:
- According to the Indian Patents Act, a biological process to create a seed can be patented in India.
- In India, there is no Intellectual Property Appellate Board.
- Plant varieties are not eligible to be patented in India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- 1 and 3 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
Practice MCQ:
With reference to Trademarks in India, consider the following statements:
- Trademark can be a symbol, design, word or even a phrase.
- It allows its owner to claim “exclusive rights” to its usage
- It is valid for 5 years.
How many of the given statements is/are correct?
- One
- Two
- Three
- None
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024