The U.S. objectives

• Following  4 were the states as objectives of the Afghan peace process.
• 1) An end to violence by declaring a ceasefire.
• 2) An intra-Afghan dialogue for a lasting peace.
• 3) The Taliban cutting ties with terrorist organisations such as al Qaeda.
• 4)  U.S. troop withdrawal.

Evolving Indian stand in the peace process

• India’s vision of a sovereign, united, stable, plural and democratic Afghanistan is one that is shared by a large constituency in Afghanistan, cutting across ethnic and provincial lines.
• At Doha meeting, India’s External Affairs Ministerreiterated that the peace process must be “Afghan led, Afghan owned and Afghan controlled”.
• But Indian policy has evolved from its earlier hands-off approach to the Taliban.
• U.S. and Russian representatives suggested if India had concerns regarding anti-India activities of terrorist groups, it must engage directly with the Taliban. In other words.

Limited interest of the major powers

• Major powers have limited interests in the peace process.
• The European Union has made it clear that its financial contribution will depend on the security environment and the human rights record.
• China can always lean on Pakistan to preserve its security and connectivity interests.
• For Russia, blocking the drug supply and keeping its southern periphery secure from extremist influences is key.
• That is why no major power is taking ownership for the reconciliation talks, but merely content with being facilitators.

Conclusion

A more active engagement will enable India to work with like-minded forces in the region to ensure that the vacuum created by the U.S. withdrawal does not lead to an unravelling of the gains registered during the last two decades.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now