Central Idea

The Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling, expanding the scope of arbitration agreements to include non-signatories under specific conditions.
This ruling centers on the “group of companies” doctrine within the framework of arbitration agreements.

‘Group of Companies’ Doctrine

	Details
Essence	Non-signatory entities in a corporate group can be bound by an arbitration agreement if part of the same group as a signatory.
Basis on Mutual Intent	Relies on the mutual intention to bind both signatories and non-signatory group members.
Arbitration as a Tool	Offers an alternative to court litigation, with enforceable decisions by neutral arbitrators.
Root in International Jurisprudence	Based more on international arbitration practices than domestic law.
Indian Legal Precedent	Established by Chloro Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. case (2013).
Criteria for Application	Set by the Indian Supreme Court, includes mutual intent, relationship between entities, common subject matter, transaction nature, and contract performance.
Objective	Aims to prevent dispute fragmentation in complex, multi-party transactions.
Recent Supreme Court Ruling	Clarified conditions under which non-signatories can be bound by arbitration agreements, focusing on legal relationships and demonstrated intentions.