Cyber Security – CERTs, Policy, etc

Struggling with poor cyber security

Note4Students

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Mains level: Cyber attack-related issues;

Why in the News?

Kaveri 2.0, a web portal launched in 2023 to make property registrations in Karnataka easier was recently hit by a DDoS attack carried out using AI-powered bots.

What is a DDoS attack? 

  • A Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack is a type of cyberattack where multiple computers or bots flood a website or online service with excessive traffic, overwhelming its servers and causing it to slow down or crash.

What are the key issues with Karnataka’s response to cyber attacks, specifically the DDoS attack on Kaveri 2.0?

  • Lack of Proactive Cybersecurity Measures: Despite previous cyber incidents like the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack and the 2019 e-procurement portal hack, the State failed to implement robust preventive measures. The DDoS attack on Kaveri 2.0 in December 2024 – February 2025 exposed the absence of real-time threat monitoring systems.
  • Poor Coordination Between Departments: The e-Governance Department did not involve the State cyber crime police until February 7, 2025, despite weeks of disruption. Resistance within departments to share cybersecurity concerns with law enforcement delayed incident response, worsening the crisis.
  • Lack of a Dedicated Cybersecurity Infrastructure: Karnataka lacks a Cyber Security Operation Centre like Maharashtra and Odisha. A ₹20 crore cybersecurity centre, proposed in February 2023, was scrapped after the new government took over, leaving critical digital infrastructure vulnerable.
  • Government Response and Security Measures: While the government has initiated a police probe and FIR registration under the Information Technology Act, and the Kaveri 2.0 application has been restored with enhanced security measures,
    • Karnataka launched a cyber security policy in 2024 to combat rising cybercrime, focusing on awareness, skill building, and industry promotion.

How have past attacks influenced the current state of cyber security?

  • Failure to Implement Robust Cybersecurity Measures: Despite the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack on the Karnataka State Data Centre and the 2019 e-Procurement portal hack (₹11.5 crore stolen), the state did not establish strong preventive mechanisms.
    • The lack of a dedicated Cyber Security Operation Centre resulted in inadequate monitoring and delayed responses to threats like the recent DDoS attack on Kaveri 2.0 (2024-25).
  • Persistent Coordination Gaps Between Departments: Earlier attacks, such as the 2022 cyber attack on NIMHANS, highlighted poor inter-departmental coordination, yet similar gaps persisted during the Kaveri 2.0 DDoS attack.
    • The e-Governance Department handled the crisis alone without informing the cyber crime police, delaying investigative action until February 7, 2025.
  • Neglect of Cybersecurity Infrastructure Development: A ₹20 crore Cyber Security Operation Centre, proposed in February 2023, was dropped in the May 2023 budget revision after a change in government.
    • Unlike Maharashtra and Odisha, which have dedicated cyber security setups, Karnataka still lacks a real-time threat detection system, leaving it vulnerable to repeated cyber attacks.

Why has the coordination between the e-Governance Department and the State Police been ineffective during cyber incidents?

  • Lack of a Unified Cybersecurity Framework: Karnataka’s Cyber Security Committee (2023) is led by bureaucrats without police representation, unlike national-level bodies like I4C (Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre) and NCIIPC (National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre).
    • This results in fragmented decision-making, where cybersecurity response remains within the e-Governance Department, sidelining law enforcement agencies.
  • Delayed Involvement of the Cyber Crime Police: In the Kaveri 2.0 DDoS attack (2024-25), the e-Governance Department did not inform the State cyber crime police until February 7, 2025—long after the attack began in December 2024.
    • Earlier incidents like the 2019 e-Procurement portal hack and 2022 NIMHANS cyber attack also saw delayed police involvement, allowing attackers more time to operate.
  • Departmental Hesitation to Engage Law Enforcement: Sources indicate a reluctance within the e-Governance Department to involve the police, possibly due to bureaucratic hurdles or fears of administrative scrutiny.
    • This lack of trust and procedural clarity has led to independent firefighting efforts rather than a coordinated response between technical teams and law enforcement.

Why is it crucial for the state to establish a Cyber Security Operation Centre similar to the national model?

  • Real-Time Threat Detection and Response: The DDoS attack on Kaveri 2.0 (2024-25) went undetected for weeks, causing major disruptions in property registrations. A Cyber Security Operation Centre (CSOC) would enable 24/7 monitoring and early detection of cyber threats.
    • National agencies like I4C (Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre) and NCIIPC (National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre) use AI-driven analytics and real-time threat intelligence to mitigate cyber risks, a model Karnataka must adopt.
  • Coordinated and Rapid Incident Response: Karnataka’s e-Governance Department handled the Kaveri 2.0 attack alone, only involving cyber crime police weeks later, delaying mitigation efforts.
    • A CSOC would centralize cybersecurity efforts, ensuring immediate coordination between technical experts, government departments, and law enforcement agencies to prevent prolonged disruptions.

Way forward: 

  • Establish a Cyber Security Operation Centre (CSOC): Revive the ₹20 crore CSOC proposal with real-time threat monitoring, AI-driven analytics, and centralized coordination between government agencies and law enforcement.
    • Implement automated response mechanisms to detect and neutralize cyber threats before they escalate.
  • Strengthen Inter-Departmental Coordination and Cybersecurity Framework: Mandate immediate police involvement in cyber incidents and integrate law enforcement into cybersecurity governance structures like the Cyber Security Committee.
    • Conduct joint cybersecurity drills between the e-Governance Department, State Police, and IT experts to improve incident response efficiency.

Mains PYQ:

Q What are the different elements of cyber security? Keeping in view the challenges in cyber security, examine the extent to which India has successfully developed a comprehensive National Cyber Security Strategy. (UPSC IAS/2022)

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.

💥Mentorship February Batch Launch
💥💥Mentorship January Batch Launch