North-East India – Security and Developmental Issues

UNLF Peace Accord: Why one pact is not peace

Note4Students

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level: UNLF peace accord

Mains level: Successful peace deals in Northeastern states

Central idea 

In a volatile state like Manipur, peace agreements can be challenging to implement because of the multiplicity of stakeholders and their divergent interests and grievances

Key Highlights:

  • Welcoming a Milestone Accord: Recent peace accord between UNLF in Manipur and the government of India viewed positively for its potential impact on regional normalcy.
  • Regional Peace Trends: Successful peace deals in Northeastern states like Mizoram, Tripura, and Shillong, along with significant progress in Assam through accords with separatist groups.

Key Challenges:

  • Lurking Threat of Looted Arms: The presence of approximately 4,500 looted arms in various hands poses a substantial threat to the journey towards lasting peace.
  • Complexities in UNLF Accord: Lack of clarity on the terms of the UNLF peace accord and potential complications arising from the involvement of militants in ethnic conflicts.
  • Diverse Demands and Historical Grievances: Reconciling diverse demands and historical grievances from various ethnic and tribal communities in Manipur emerges as a complex challenge.

Key Terms/Phrases:

  • Peace Dynamics: Peace accord, insurgency, Suspension of Operations (SoO) agreement.
  • Challenges in Reconciliation: Multiplicity of stakeholders, ethnic conflicts, geopolitical factors.
  • Key Players: Separatist groups, militant factions, political negotiations.

Key Quotes/Statements:

  • “Any peace initiative is welcome — more so if it deals with a militant group abjuring arms to join the mainstream.”
  • “The biggest hurdle in the road to peace remains the floating looted arms numbering around 4,500 in various hands.”
  • “Diverse demands from various ethnic and/or tribal communities… making it hard to arrive at a resolution that satisfies all parties.”

Key Examples/References:

  • Positive Precedents: Peace accords in Mizoram, Tripura, Shillong, and Assam leading to regional normalization.
  • NSCN-IM Accord: The signing of an accord by the National Socialist Council of Nagaland — Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM) in 2015.
  • Militant Factions in UNLF: Presence of factions like the Pambei faction advocating for dialogue.

Key Facts/Data:

  • Ban Extension: The ban extension on nine Meiti extremist groups, including UNLF and Manipur People’s Army (MPA).
  • Surrender Statistics: Tripartite accords initiated by the Centre since 2014 leading to 6,112 insurgents surrendering.
  • Arms Challenge: Presence of 4,500 looted arms posing a significant challenge to peace efforts.

Critical Analysis:

  • Distrust and External Influences: Challenges in implementing peace agreements due to historical distrust, external influences, and divergent interests.
  • Fragility of Agreements: The fragility of peace agreements highlighted by disruptions caused by extremist factions or splinter groups.
  • State’s Volatility: Manipur’s volatile state demands comprehensive efforts for lasting peace.

Way Forward:

  • Addressing Arm Threat: Focus on resolving the issue of looted arms to ensure a major cause of concern is adequately addressed.
  • Transparent Communication: Clearly communicate the terms of the UNLF peace accord to manage expectations and foster understanding.
  • Holistic Approach: Focus on political negotiations, rehabilitation of displaced individuals, and dismantling militant-controlled zones.
  • Inclusive Engagement: Engage all political parties, appoint a political negotiator, and seek a comprehensive agreement that satisfies various stakeholders.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.

💥Mentorship New Batch Launch
💥Mentorship New Batch Launch