Introduction
Modern warfare is no longer about firepower alone; it is equally about deception. As precision-guided missiles, drones, and AI-enabled targeting systems grow deadlier, militaries are turning to decoy technologies to confuse radars, mislead missiles, and protect valuable assets. India’s reported use of the AI-enabled X-Guard decoy during Operation Sindoor shows how deception has become a central element of national security strategy.
The Growing Relevance of Deception in Modern Warfare:
- Evolving threat environment: Precision-guided munitions, drones, and AI-enabled targeting systems make military platforms highly vulnerable.
- Strategic asset: Decoys create confusion, waste enemy munitions, and buy crucial time for retaliation.
- Game-changing event: Operation Sindoor showcased India’s successful use of an AI-enabled decoy, termed by experts as “the best instance of spoofing and deception ever seen.”
Inside the X-Guard Fibre-Optic Towed Decoy
- Lightweight & reusable: At just 30 kg, retractable and deployable in flight.
- Radar mimicry: Replicates the Rafale’s Radar Cross Section (RCS), doppler velocity, and spectral signature across multiple bands.
- 360-degree jamming: Works seamlessly with the Rafale’s SPECTRA suite to form a layered defensive shield.
- Operational success: Reports suggest Pakistan’s J-10C fighters misidentified decoys as actual aircraft, wasting advanced PL-15E missiles.
Global landscape of comparable decoy systems:
- BriteCloud (Leonardo UL): Used on Eurofighter Typhoons, Gripen-Es, and some F-16s.
- AN/ALE-50/55 series (Raytheon/BAE Systems): Deployed on U.S. Navy F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.
- Adaptability to UAVs: Modified for platforms like Israeli Herons and U.S. MQ-9 Reapers.
Battlefield deception on Land Forces:
- Inflatable & heat-emitting decoys: Simulate tanks, artillery, and missile batteries to divert strikes.
- Ukraine’s wooden & 3D-printed fakes: Exhaust Russian drone and missile stocks.
- Russia’s Inflatech decoys: Create entire armoured formations in minutes.
- Indian Army initiative (2025): Issued a request for decoys mimicking T-90 tanks, including thermal and acoustic signatures.
Naval countermeasures and Decoy strategies
- Layered naval countermeasures: Chaff, acoustic decoys, and offboard active deception protect against missiles and submarines.
- Nulka decoy (Australia–U.S.): Self-propelled system mimicking large ship radar signatures to mislead missile guidance.
Conclusion
Deception, once limited to camouflage and dummy equipment, has evolved into a sophisticated digital-age shield. Airborne fibre-optic decoys, inflatable ground tanks, and naval missile deflectors now define modern survivability. India’s reported use of the X-Guard highlights its adaptation to the evolving battlefield. For a relatively low investment, such systems deliver high-impact protection, proving that in the wars of tomorrow, deception may be as decisive as destruction.
PYQ Relevance
“How is S-400 air defence system technically superior to any other system presently available in the world?”
Linkage: This question shows UPSC’s focus on defence technology and comparative capability analysis. The same lens applies to India’s deployment of AI-enabled decoys like the X-Guard FOTD, which enhance survivability against advanced missile systems. Both highlight the importance of evaluating cutting-edge military technology for national security.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
Independence Day speeches are often symbolic, but in 2025 the Prime Minister shifted focus to frontier technologies, semiconductors, clean energy, AI, quantum computing, and defence indigenisation. Unlike earlier years, this vision was paired with the acknowledgment that bureaucratic inertia and regulatory red tape remain India’s toughest hurdles. The central challenge is whether India’s governance structures can keep pace with its technological ambitions.
Significance of the 2025 Speech by the Prime Minister
- Future focus: Strong emphasis on frontier areas like semiconductors, EVs, and jet engines.
- Symbolic push: The PM asked if fighter jet engines should not be Indian-made.
- Bold promise: India will shed dependency in two decades.
- Data milestone: India is the largest per capita data consumer (32 GB), ahead of China and the US.
India’s current position in technology and self-reliance
- Strength in mid-tech: Success in fintech, data access, and digitisation
- Emerging hubs: Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune, Gurugram drive high-tech growth.
- Import dependency: India depends heavily on imports in semiconductors, defence hardware, AI hardware, and clean energy technologies.
- Global presence: Firms like Nvidia and IBM rely on India’s talent pool, but domestic ecosystems remain thin.
|
Bureaucratic Challenges that obstruct deep-tech ambition
- Colonial bureaucratic legacy: The Westminster model prioritised control over innovation and accountability.
- Rigid steel frame: The “steel frame” of the civil services designed to ensure subservience to colonial administrators remains rigid even a century after the Public Service Commission’s creation in 1926.
- Unrealised reforms: The Veerappa Moily Committee (2005) suggested domain experts and ethics codes-still pending.
- Lateral entry limits: Attempts at inducting experts face systemic resistance.
Why are regulatory and judicial reforms critical?
- Persistent red tape: The Deregulation Commission (2025) was set up to identify redundant compliance norms, but structural bottlenecks persist.
- Judicial backlog: Slow dispute resolution and investment climate, affectshigh-tech sectors.
- Comparative lessons:
- US & China: Despite different models, both empower political leadership over bureaucracy to push national interests.
- UK: Even Britain debates its bureaucratic model, Dominic Cummings under Boris Johnson pushed for external competition and greater ministerial control.
How does this link to Viksit Bharat@2047?
- Ambition vs. architecture: India’s goal of becoming a deep-tech powerhouse is contingent not just on financial investment but on restructuring governance.
- Symbolic timing: The UPSC centenary in 2026 is a historic chance for overhaul.
- Future-readiness: Without structural reform, Atmanirbhar Bharat may remain aspirational.
Conclusion
India’s ambition to lead in deep-tech must be matched with institutional reform. The PM’s 2025 speech acknowledged that Atmanirbharta is as much about fixing bureaucratic bottlenecks as building jet engines or quantum labs. The centenary of UPSC offers an opportune moment to align India’s governance with its 2047 goals.
| Value Addition |
| Committees on Civil Service Reforms
1. Santhanam Committee (1964)
- Focus: Preventive corruption measures.
- Key suggestion: Creation of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC).
2. Kothari Committee (1976)
- Focus: Recruitment and exam structure of Civil Services.
- Key suggestion: Recommended 3-stage exam (Prelims, Mains, Interview), which is still followed today.
3. Satish Chandra Committee (1989)
- Focus: Review of recruitment and selection.
- Key suggestion: Increased emphasis on aptitude and ethics in recruitment.
4. Hota Committee (2004)
- Focus: Ethics, transparency, and performance.
- Key suggestion: Right to Information, performance-linked incentives, citizen charters.
5. Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) – Veerappa Moily (2005–2009)
Most comprehensive civil service reform report (15 volumes). Key suggestions:
- Lateral entry of domain experts.
- Code of Ethics & Code of Conduct.
- Citizen-centric administration
- Performance-based appraisal system.
- Training in e-governance and modern management practices
6. Punchhi Commission (2010) – on Centre-State relations
- Relevant link: Stressed need for civil service neutrality in federal governance.
7. Baswan Committee (2016)
- Focus: UPSC exam age and attempts.
- Key suggestion: Reduce maximum age for UPSC CSE (though not implemented).
8. Current initiatives
- Lateral entry into Joint Secretary and Director-level posts.
- Mission Karmayogi (2020): National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building (NPCSCB) to train officers with competency-based framework.
- Deregulation Commission (2025): Identifying and scrapping redundant compliances.
|
Mapping Microthemes
- GS Paper-II: Civil Service Reform, Regulation, Judiciary
- GS Paper -III: Tech missions, Defence Indigenisation, Atmanirbhar Bharat
- GS Paper -IV: Accountability, Ethics in governance
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2016] Civil Services “Traditional bureaucratic structure and culture have hampered the process of socio-economic development in India.” Comment.
Linkage: PM Modi’s Independence Day 2025 address highlighted that despite India’s technological advances, the colonial-era bureaucratic “steel frame” continues to obstruct innovation, investment, and governance reforms. The traditional bureaucratic structure—designed for control rather than development—remains a bottleneck in achieving Atmanirbhar Bharat. Thus, the speech directly echoes the UPSC 2016 theme that outdated bureaucratic culture hampers socio-economic transformation.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
Canada has decided to drop retaliatory tariffs and mirror the U.S. exemptions on goods covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This represents a success in preserving tariff-free trade for over 85% of Canada-U.S. commerce. But sector-specific tariffs like the 50% duties on steel and aluminium continue to hurt Canadian industries. The development is crucial, given Canada’s heavy reliance on the U.S. market, with more than 75% of its exports heading south.
Significance of the News
- Tariff Alignment: Canada has chosen to align its tariff exemptions with those of the U.S., signaling a conciliatory move in contrast with earlier retaliatory tariffs.
- First-time Reset: For the first time since retaliatory duties were announced, Canada is rolling them back to match U.S. exemptions under USMCA, a notable policy reversal.
- Trade Dependence: With over 75% of Canadian exports going to the U.S., the stakes are extremely high, making tariff negotiations critical for economic stability.
- Striking Data: 85% of Canada-U.S. trade is still tariff-free, reflecting both success in negotiations and risks if the pact weakens.
What is USMCA?
- USMCA Pact: Signed in 2020, it replaced NAFTA and provides preferential treatment for Canadian and Mexican goods entering the U.S.
- Carve-out Mechanism: Goods shielded under the agreement are protected from punitive tariffs, preserving market access.
- Upcoming Review : The pact is up for review in 2026, adding urgency to Canada’s attempt to preserve smooth trade relations.
How does Canada benefit from this carve-out?
- Preferential Access: Canadian goods remain shielded from most punitive duties.
- Export Stability: With 75% of exports going to the U.S., the pact secures critical market access.
- Low Tariff Burden: U.S. average tariffs on Canadian goods remain among the lowest globally.
What are the challenges despite tariff exemptions?
- 232 Tariffs: The U.S. has imposed sector-specific duties, including 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium, straining Canadian industries.
- Renegotiation Risk: U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has hinted at reopening USMCA talks, creating uncertainty.
- Dependence Dilemma: Canada retains some retaliatory tariffs, but its heavy reliance on U.S. markets weakens bargaining power.
Why is this crucial for North American trade stability
- Export Dependence: More than 75% of Canada’s exports and 80% of Mexico’s exports head to the U.S., underlining their vulnerability.
- Regional Integration: The USMCA has reestablished tariff-free trade for the majority of goods, preventing economic disruption in North America.
- Geopolitical Context: At a time of growing global protectionism, North America’s internal trade pact provides a stabilising force, but also exposes Canada and Mexico to unilateral U.S. decisions.
Conclusion
Canada’s decision to align its tariffs with U.S. exemptions under USMCA reflects both pragmatism and vulnerability. While the pact secures tariff-free trade for the majority of goods, sector-specific tariffs and the looming threat of renegotiation highlight the fragile foundation of North American trade integration. For Canada, the challenge lies in balancing sovereignty with economic dependence, a dilemma increasingly relevant in today’s protectionist world.
Value Addition
|
United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA)
Key Features (vs. NAFTA)
- Rules of Origin – Higher thresholds for auto production (75% North American content vs. 62.5% under NAFTA).
- Labour Provisions – Stronger labour standards; Mexico required to reform labour laws.
- Digital Trade – New rules on data flows, e-commerce, and IP rights absent in NAFTA.
- Sunset Clause – Agreement reviewed every 6 years; expires after 16 years unless renewed.
- Agriculture – U.S. gained greater access to Canadian dairy market.
|
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2018] How would the recent phenomena of protectionism and currency manipulations in world trade affect macroeconomic stability of India?
Linkage: The USMCA episode shows how U.S. protectionism through sectoral tariffs (like 50% on steel/aluminium) can destabilize even close trade partners like Canada. Such measures reflect the larger global trend of tariff wars and currency leverage, which disrupt supply chains and investment flows. For India, this highlights risks to macroeconomic stability via trade deficits, inflationary pressures, and exchange rate volatility.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
The India-China equation has once again come into focus with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s recent visit to India. Coming at a time when Donald Trump’s unpredictable moves are reshaping US–China relations and India faces pressure over its Russian oil purchases, the visit is being viewed as a tactical outreach by Beijing. For the first time since the Galwan clash, both sides agreed on a 10-point understanding, from reopening border trade points to restarting stalled dialogues. Yet, beneath the gestures of cooperation, deep mistrust lingers: unresolved tensions in Ladakh, Beijing’s quiet backing of Pakistan, and economic vulnerabilities that India cannot ignore. The central question remains, is this the start of a cautious reset, or will rivalry continue to define the relationship?
Current State of India-China Relationship
- A Cautious Thaw: Signs of easing after years of strain post-2020 Galwan clashes. The visit of Chinese Foreign Minister and the expected Modi–Xi meeting at the SCO summit reflect cautious engagement.
- Unfinished Border Business:
- Unfinished disengagement: Restrictions continue on Indian troop patrolling and herdsmen grazing in Ladakh buffer zones.
- De-escalation talks: Both sides have now agreed to discuss principles and modalities of de-escalation, but with little progress so far.
- Historical baggage: From the 1962 war to Doklam and Galwan, border issues repeatedly resurface as the defining irritant.
- Persistent Trust Deficit: India remains wary of China’s military links with Pakistan, dam projects on the Brahmaputra, and use of economic dependencies such as rare-earths and critical technologies as leverage.
China–Pakistan Axis and India’s Security Concerns
- Operation Sindoor 2025: China provided Pakistan with real-time ISR, command-and-control integration, and advanced weaponry.
- Extended theatre: While not directly engaging militarily, China’s operational support widened the conflict spectrum.
- Strategic consequences: India now faces a two-front dynamic made more acute by China’s active involvement.
Trade Dependence Shaping Geopolitical Weakness
- Weaponisation of dependencies: China has denied India supplies of rare-earth magnets, fertilisers, tunnel-boring machines.
- Industrial impact: Foxconn withdrew hundreds of Chinese technicians under pressure from Beijing.
- Hydropower concerns: A massive dam, thrice the size of Three Gorges, threatens India’s lower riparian interests.
Can tactical outreach substitute for structural resolution?
- Wang Yi’s visit: Led to a 10-point understanding including resumption of flights, border trade, and talks on border issues.
- Tactical gestures: China seeks to ease tensions but has not offered substantive concessions on India’s concerns.
- India’s position: PM Modi emphasised the need for “stable, predictable and constructive” relations, but only grounded in realism.
Why outright conflict remains unlikely
- Geographical constraints: The Himalayas pose immense logistical challenges for a sustained full-scale war.
- China’s strategic calculus: Since 1979, Beijing has avoided wars to focus on economic growth.
- Cost of conflict: War with India risks derailing China’s “great power” ambitions vis-à-vis the US.
The limits of aligning with China against the US
- US factor: Trump’s inconsistent China policy has unsettled India’s geopolitical calculations.
- Chinese spin: Beijing portrayed India as siding with it against “unilateral bullying” (implicitly the US).
- MEA clarification: India reaffirmed no change in its One-China policy stance, signalling caution.
Way Forward
- Strengthen Border Posture: Accelerate infrastructure and surveillance along LAC to counter tactical surprises.
- Diversify Dependencies: Invest in domestic capacity for critical minerals, semiconductors, and rare earths.
- Engage but Verify: Continue talks on de-escalation and economic ties, but measure outcomes, not promises.
- Diplomatic Balancing: Maintain strategic autonomy while leveraging QUAD, SCO, BRICS without being trapped in binaries.
- Water Security Mechanisms: Push for institutionalised basin-sharing frameworks on Brahmaputra with multilateral backing.
Conclusion
The India-China relationship sits at a crossroads. While tactical outreach such as Wang Yi’s visit creates openings for engagement, the structural drivers of mistrust remain too deep for a true reset. India cannot overlook the challenges of border tensions, economic weaponisation, and China-Pakistan collusion. At the same time, the high costs of conflict and shared economic interests provide space for pragmatic management. The way forward lies in carefully calibrated diplomacy, neither falling into the trap of confrontation nor harbouring illusions of a reset.
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2017] ‘China is using its economic relations and positive trade surplus as a tool to develop potential military power status in Asia’, In the light of this statement, discuss its impact on India as her neighbour.
Linkage: China’s growing economic leverage over Pakistan, seen in CPEC and debt dependence, is increasingly shaping a strategic-military partnership. This aligns with the UPSC 2017 theme of economic tools being converted into hard power. For India, this intensifies security challenges on both borders and limits regional strategic space. |
Mapping microthemes
- GS Paper II (IR): India-China relations, India-US-China triangle, border disputes, strategic autonomy.
- GS Paper III (Security): Two-front challenge, defence preparedness, technology denial regimes.
- GS Paper IV (Ethics): Diplomacy, realpolitik vs idealism in foreign policy.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
The Supreme Court recently questioned whether it should remain passive when Governors indefinitely withhold assent to Bills, stalling elected legislatures. This issue, highlighted by Tamil Nadu’s Bills pending for four years, raises fundamental questions about judicial review, federalism, and democratic accountability.
Why in the News
Tamil Nadu’s unprecedented case of Bills pending for years has brought the Governor’s discretionary powers under sharp scrutiny. The Supreme Court’s April 8 judgment imposing time limits on Governors is now contested by the Union as judicial overreach, sparking a crucial debate on separation of powers.
Why does the role of Governors come under scrutiny
- Governor’s Inaction: Governors, appointed by the Union, are integral to State legislatures, yet their indefinite withholding of Bills undermines State autonomy.
- Tamil Nadu Example: Crucial Bills remained pending for nearly four years without reasons being communicated, sparking judicial concern.
- Democratic Will Thwarted: Prolonged silence from Governors makes elected legislatures ineffective.
How has the Supreme Court responded
- CJI’s Question: Should the Court suspend its role as custodian of the Constitution while Governors block Bills indefinitely?
- Judicial Review Precedent: The Court has struck down even constitutional amendments (e.g., 42nd Amendment) that sought to limit judicial review.
- Concern of Vacuum: Justice P.S. Narasimha highlighted the risk of Bills hanging in limbo without timelines.
What is the Union Government’s stand
- Encroachment Argument: Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta argued the Court’s April 8 order intruded into law-making, undermining Governors and the President.
- Political Resolution: Inaction, according to the Union, should be resolved politically, not judicially.
- Governor’s Unique Role: Unlike statutory authorities, Governors hold sui generis constitutional status, not bound by timelines.
Why is the tussle between judiciary and executive significant
- Separation of Powers: Union argues judiciary must not micro-manage executive discretion.
- Checks and Balances: CJI asserted that unchecked gubernatorial delay undermines democracy, and the Court cannot abdicate review.
- Democratic Accountability: Legislators face people every five years; Governors do not. Hence judicial review is necessary.
What are the implications for federalism
- Centre–State Tensions: Delays fuel mistrust between States and the Union.
- Judicial Intervention: Without court oversight, States may face legislative logjams.
- Limited Litigation: Union argues only “two or three States” have complained, but the principle has pan-India significance.
Way Forward: A structured framework for assent is necessary to prevent legislative paralysis. The Supreme Court’s suggested timelines strike a balance between constitutional discretion and democratic accountability. Moving ahead, three steps are essential:
- Codifying Timelines: Parliament may consider amending the law or issuing guidelines to institutionalise clear deadlines.
- Ensuring Accountability: Governors must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, barring exceptional constitutional reasons.
- Judicial Oversight as Safeguard: Courts should step in only when gubernatorial inaction undermines constitutional morality, keeping political disputes largely within the legislative sphere.
Conclusion
Unchecked gubernatorial inaction risks turning elected assemblies powerless. While the Union calls for political remedies, the Court stresses its duty as constitutional guardian. The outcome will redefine the balance between State autonomy, judicial review, and the Governor’s role in India’s federal framework.
Value Addition
|
Timeline for Governor’s action on bills
While the Constitution of India doesn’t explicitly state a timeline, the Supreme Court has addressed the issue of delays in Governor’s assent, particularly in the context of recent conflicts between Governors and state governments.
Based on a recent Supreme Court ruling (April 2025) and subsequent discussions, here’s a breakdown of the suggested timelines for the Governor’s actions on a Bill under Article 200 of the Constitution:
- Granting Assent, Withholding Assent (with advice of Council of Ministers), or Reserving for President’s Consideration: The Governor must act on the bill within a maximum of one month.
- Withholding Assent (against advice of Council of Ministers): The Governor should return the bill to the legislature with reasons for reconsideration within three months.
- Reserving for President’s Consideration (against advice of Council of Ministers): The Governor must reserve the bill within three months.
- Reconsideration by the Legislature: If the Governor returns a non-Money Bill for reconsideration, the legislature must reconsider it, and if it’s passed again (with or without amendments), the Governor is then bound to give assent within one month.
|
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2022] Discuss the essential conditions for exercise of the legislative powers by the Governor. Discuss the legality of re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature.
Linkage: This issue links directly with the 2022 UPSC question as both highlight the constitutional checks on the Governor’s legislative powers. The re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval undermines democratic accountability. Hence, examining Governor’s ordinance powers is central to debates on federalism and executive overreach.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
The recognition of gender identity in India rests on strong legal foundations, the NALSA v. Union of India (2014) judgment and the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. Yet, lived realities remain different, as shown in the Manipur High Court order directing fresh academic certificates for Dr. Beoncy Laishram. What should have been a routine correction instead became a legal battle, exposing the gap between law and practice.
Why is this issue in the news?
The Manipur High Court directed the State to issue fresh academic certificates to Dr. Beoncy Laishram, a transgender doctor, after her university refused to update her records citing procedural hurdles. This is significant because it highlights how basic rights, already guaranteed by law, are still denied in practice. The case reflects a larger systemic problem where bureaucratic rigidity overrides constitutional guarantees under Articles 14 and 21, forcing transpersons into prolonged legal battles to claim what is already legally theirs.
Bureaucratic Inertia vs. Transgender Justice
- Administrative inertia: Officials often defer to rigid procedural rules rather than the spirit of the law.
- Sequential corrections: Universities and boards insisted that records must be corrected starting from the earliest certificate, creating cascading hurdles.
- Binary mindset: Authorities still stick to birth-assigned gender over self-identity.
The NALSA Judgement Mandate on Self-Identification
- Right to self-identify: In NALSA v. Union of India (2014), the Supreme Court recognised transgender persons’ right to self-identify their gender.
- Welfare entitlements: Declared them socially and educationally backward, eligible for reservations and welfare schemes.
- Constitutional backing: Linked to Articles 14 (equality before law) and 21 (right to life and dignity), making recognition a constitutional obligation.
Statutory Guarantees under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
- Statutory obligation: Authorities are legally required to recognise self-identified gender and update official records.
- Codification of self-identification: Law translated the NALSA principle into binding statutory practice.
- Gap in implementation: Despite clarity in law, officials often refuse compliance unless compelled by courts.
The Precedent of Dr. Laishram’s Case (A Landmark for Institutional Accountability)
- Individual justice: The order ensures her academic and professional records reflect her affirmed identity.
- Precedential value: Signals to other institutions that procedural rigidity cannot override constitutional rights.
- Systemic spotlight: Reveals how transpersons are forced into legal struggles for routine matters, expending time and resources disproportionately.
Reforms for Bridging Law and Reality
- Institutional reform: Simplify procedures and enforce compliance through clear administrative circulars.
- Cultural change: Bureaucracy must embrace gender as lived reality, not paperwork.
- Awareness and sensitivity training: Officials must be sensitised to constitutional principles and human dignity.
Conclusion
The Manipur High Court’s ruling is a milestone, but it also highlights how rights guaranteed in law often falter in practice. True empowerment will come only when institutions operationalise constitutional principles with sensitivity, ensuring that gender identity is recognised as a matter of dignity, not just paperwork.
Value Addition
|
Key Features of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
- Definition of Transgender Person: Includes trans-men, trans-women, persons with intersex variations, genderqueer, and persons with socio-cultural identities (like hijra, aravani, jogta).
- Right to Self-Perceived Gender Identity: Allows individuals to identify as male, female, or transgender.
- Prohibition of Discrimination: No discrimination in education, employment, healthcare, housing, access to services, or public places.
- Recognition and Certificates: Provides for a certificate of identity issued by the District Magistrate, recognising a person as “transgender.”
- Welfare Measures: Mandates governments to frame welfare schemes for education, healthcare, vocational training, and social security.
- Offences and Penalties: Criminalises denial of services, removal from household, physical/sexual abuse; punishable with imprisonment (6 months–2 years) and fine.
- National Council for Transgender Persons (NCT): Advisory body to monitor implementation, headed by Union Minister for Social Justice & Empowerment.
Criticisms
- Certification process: Seen as bureaucratic and violating the spirit of self-identification under NALSA (2014)
- No reservation policy: Act does not clearly guarantee reservations in jobs/education despite Supreme Court directions.
- Weak enforcement: Implementation depends heavily on state-level rules; lack of accountability mechanisms.
International Value Addition
- Argentina’s Gender Identity Law (2012): Considered the most progressive globally; allows self-declared gender without medical/psychological proof.
- Nepal (2007): One of the first Asian countries to legally recognise a “third gender” category.
- Yogyakarta Principles: International guidelines on sexual orientation and gender identity as human rights.
Reports & Data
- National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) Report, 2017 – Found that over 92% of transpersons are denied basic rights like jobs, healthcare, education.
- Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020 – Prescribed simple process for self-identification, but implementation is patchy.
Governance & Ethics Lens
- Administrative Sensitisation: Training needed to reduce “file-based rigidity” and promote human dignity.
- Constitutional Morality vs. Social Morality: Governance must align with constitutional principles rather than prevailing biases.
|
Mapping Microthemes
- GS Paper I: Social empowerment, issues faced by vulnerable sections.
- GS Paper II: Constitutional provisions (Articles 14, 21), governance issues, judicial interventions.
- GS Paper IV: Ethics in governance, dignity, empathy, sensitivity in administration.
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2017] Does the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensure effective mechanisms for empowerment and inclusion of the intended beneficiaries in the society? Discuss.
Linkage: Just as UPSC asked in 2017 about whether the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensures real empowerment, a similar question can be framed on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. Both laws highlight that while statutory recognition exists, bureaucratic inertia and weak implementation dilute inclusion, making judicial intervention critical for the intended beneficiaries. |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
India is entering a new era of space exploration with lunar success, Gaganyaan, and the proposed Bharat Antariksh Station. Yet, one critical element is missing, a national space law. While India has ratified global treaties like the Outer Space Treaty (1967), it lacks a domestic legal framework to regulate private participation, ensure liability, and attract investment. As space activities expand beyond government agencies to startups and private players, the absence of clear laws poses risks to accountability, innovation, and global competitiveness.
The Urgency of a National Space Law
- Major milestone vs. missing law: India’s scientific achievements are unmatched, but the legal architecture remains absent, risking accountability gaps.
- Private participation: With startups entering, lack of clarity on licensing, FDI rules, liability, and insurance creates operational hurdles.
- International responsibility: Under the Outer Space Treaty, India is responsible for both governmental and private activities, yet it lacks the domestic framework to enforce compliance.
- Global contrast: Countries like the U.S., Japan, and Luxembourg already have national legislation that provides legal certainty and attracts investment.
Principles of the Outer Space Treaty
- Foundational principles: Space is the province of all mankind, prohibiting national appropriation and militarisation.
- State responsibility: Nations are responsible for activities in space, whether by state or private entities.
- Liability framework: Countries bear liability for damages caused by their space objects.
- Not self-executing: According to UNOOSA, national laws are essential to translate treaty principles into enforceable domestic regulations.
India’s Incremental Approach to Space Legislation
- Methodical strategy: India is incremental and cautious, ensuring technical regulations precede overarching law.
- Catalogue of Indian Standards: A framework to ensure safety of space operations.
- Indian Space Policy (ISP), 2023: Encourages non-governmental participation in space activities.
- IN-SPACe Norms, Guidelines and Procedures (NPG): Provide procedures for authorisation of space activities.
- Pending gap: The broader Space Activities Law that incorporates treaty obligations is still not enacted.
Industry Concerns and Operational Challenges
- Statutory authority gap: IN-SPACe lacks formal legal backing, leaving decisions open to procedural challenges.
- Licensing and delays: Companies face multiple ministry clearances, creating uncertainty.
- FDI rules: Industry demands clarity, such as 100% automatic FDI in satellite components to attract capital.
- Liability and insurance: While India is internationally liable, companies need affordable third-party insurance to cover risks.
- Intellectual property protection: Current frameworks risk talent and tech migration to IP-friendly nations.
- Space debris management: Absence of mandatory accident investigations and debris laws increases operational risks.
The Importance of Affordable Insurance for Space Startups
- High-value assets: Satellites and payloads involve massive investments; startups cannot absorb losses alone.
- Global liability: India bears responsibility internationally, so private players must secure third-party insurance.
- Investor confidence: Insurance frameworks encourage investors, reducing risk aversion.
- Innovation support: Affordable insurance ensures startups can experiment and grow, without fear of crippling liability.
Conclusion
India’s space programme has made historic strides, but without a comprehensive national space law, its progress risks being undermined by regulatory gaps. A forward-looking framework ensuring clarity, liability management, insurance, IP protection, and statutory backing for IN-SPACe is essential to balance innovation with responsibility. The future of India’s space leadership will depend as much on strong laws as on strong rockets.
Value Addition
|
- UNOOSA Insight: National laws act as the domestic enabler of international obligations. Without them, treaty principles remain unenforceable.
- Comparative Perspective:
- United States: Commercial Space Launch Act allows private launches with liability coverage.
- Luxembourg: Pioneered space mining rights to attract global investors.
- Japan: Provides licensing, insurance, and debris mitigation guidelines.
- Governance Lens: Reflects the larger theme of state capacity to regulate frontier technologies, similar to how data protection laws govern digital economies.
- Economic Angle: A robust legal framework will strengthen India’s space economy, valued at nearly $9.6 billion (2020) and projected to grow to $13 billion by 2025.
- Investor Confidence: Insurance frameworks, clear FDI rules, and IP protection create a trustworthy ecosystem for global investors.
- Security Dimension: Dual-use nature of space technologies necessitates clarity in export controls and defence linkages.
- Ethical Dimension: Covers responsibility towards space debris management and sustainability of outer space as a global commons.
|
Mapping Microthemes
- GS Paper II (Governance, International Relations):
-
- Outer Space Treaty (1967) – India’s obligations and global responsibility
- Role of UNOOSA – multilateral governance of outer space
- Need for National Legislation – predictability, legal clarity, statutory backing for IN-SPACe
- GS Paper III (Science & Technology, Economy, Security):
-
- Growth of India’s Space Economy – Chandrayaan-3, Gaganyaan, startups, private players
- Insurance and Liability – affordability for startups, international responsibility for damages
- Intellectual Property Rights – preventing brain drain, encouraging innovation
- Space Debris Management – sustainability and accident investigation procedures
- Dual-Use Technology Challenge – balancing civilian and defence aspects
- GS Paper IV (Ethics & Governance):
-
- Accountability in Outer Space – who bears liability for damage?
- Ethics of Space Exploration – sustainability, “province of mankind” principle
- Equitable Access – preventing monopolisation of space resources by few nations
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2016] Discuss India’s achievements in the field of Space Science and Technology. How the application of this technology has helped India in its socio-economic development?
Linkage: While India’s space achievements like Chandrayaan-3 and Gaganyaan highlight scientific progress, the absence of a national space law shows a governance gap. A legal framework is crucial to translate these achievements into sustainable socio-economic gains through private participation, investment, and accountability. |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
On August 12, 2025, The Wire’s editors Siddharth Varadarajan and Karan Thapar were summoned by the Assam Police under Section 152 of the BNS, even as the Supreme Court had that very day issued protection while examining the constitutional validity of the new sedition law. This open defiance of judicial authority and the use of procedurally defective summons marks a serious blow to press freedom. What makes this moment significant is that the law being challenged is wider and harsher than colonial sedition provisions, despite India claiming to have moved away from such colonial baggage.
Introduction
The sedition debate in India has returned in a new form. While Section 124A IPC was suspended in 2022, the government introduced Section 152 of the BNS, which critics say is “sedition by another name.” The law widens state powers and lowers the threshold for prosecution, making legitimate criticism vulnerable to criminalisation. Recent cases against journalists show how easily this provision can be misused.
Section 152 and Its Differences from the Old Sedition Law
- Expanded scope: Goes beyond “disaffection” against government, criminalising acts deemed to endanger sovereignty, unity, and integrity.
- Lower bar for prosecution: Words like “knowingly” dilute intent requirements; mere criticism can be dragged into criminality.
- Colonial continuity: Despite being marketed as decolonisation, Section 152 retains the same suppressive essence as 124A IPC.
The Wire Case and Procedural Violations
- Summons despite SC protection: Assam Police issued notices on the very day of SC’s order, reflecting executive defiance.
- Lack of transparency: Summons omitted FIR dates, details of offence, and copies of FIR, violating BNSS safeguards.
- Political overtones: Linked to The Wire’s report on Operation Sindoor, raising concerns of vendetta-driven policing.
Threats to Press Freedom
- Chilling effect: Journalists may self-censor for fear of harassment.
- Vague definitions: Broad terms like “unity” and “sovereignty” give unchecked power to authorities.
- Targeting dissent: Questioning government policy risks being equated with undermining national integrity.
Judicial Response and Challenges
- Supreme Court scrutiny: SC is examining the constitutional validity of Section 152.
- Precedent of 2022: Earlier suspension of sedition cases showed judicial recognition of misuse.
- Executive overreach: Assam Police’s defiance underlines the need for stronger judicial safeguards and guidelines.
Broader Democratic Implications
- Freedom of expression at stake: Democracy thrives on criticism; silencing it weakens accountability.
- Comparative perspective: UK repealed sedition in 2009; US limits it only to violent overthrow.
- Governance paradox: Instead of transparency, India risks sliding into a majoritarian security state.
Way Forward
- Clear legislative safeguards: Narrow the scope of Section 152 with precise definitions of terms like “unity” and “sovereignty” to prevent misuse.
- Judicial guidelines: The Supreme Court can lay down binding principles (on the lines of Kedar Nath Singh and Shreya Singhal) that limit sedition to cases of direct incitement to violence or armed rebellion
- Independent oversight: A judicial or quasi-judicial body should vet sedition cases before FIR registration, reducing frivolous prosecutions.
- Strengthening press freedom: Institutional mechanisms like a Media Commission or independent ombudsman can address grievances without criminalisation.
- Comparative best practices: India can draw from the UK model of repeal and the US model of narrow application, balancing national security with democratic freedoms.
- Civic education: Promoting awareness among citizens, journalists, and law enforcement about constitutional morality and reasonable restrictions can ensure a culture of restraint and accountability.
Conclusion
Section 152 represents the persistence of colonial-style suppression under a new name. Unless the judiciary firmly strikes it down or introduces robust safeguards, it will continue to erode press freedom and democratic dissent, pillars without which India’s constitutional promise cannot stand strong.
Value Addition
|
Constitutional Angle
- Article 19(1)(a): Freedom of speech.
- Article 19(2): Reasonable restrictions (sovereignty, unity, public order, etc.).
- Basic Structure Doctrine: Democracy, liberty, and rule of law as inviolable.
Judicial Precedents
- Kedar Nath Singh vs State of Bihar (1962): Sedition valid only when incitement to violence/public disorder is proven.
- Shreya Singhal vs Union of India (2015): Vague terms in laws (like IT Act Section 66A) struck down for chilling free speech.
- SC Order 2022: Suspended all 124A cases, acknowledging misuse.
Reports & Perspectives
- Law Commission of India (2018): Recommended clearer safeguards; questioned necessity of sedition.
- Global practices: UK repealed sedition; US restricts it narrowly.
- BNSS debate: Marketed as decolonisation but seen as repackaging colonial control.
|
Mapping Microthemes
- GS Paper II: Freedom of speech, judiciary, Centre-State federalism
- GS Paper III: Internal security vs. dissent.
- GS Paper IV: Misuse of power, ethics in public life, constitutional morality.
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2014] What do you understand by the concept “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do the films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.
Linkage: The 2014 question on freedom of speech, hate speech, and films mirrors today’s debate on Section 152. Just as films face stricter scrutiny due to mass impact, the new sedition law risks wrongly placing legitimate criticism and dissent in the same bracket as hate speech or violent incitement. This makes the boundary of free expression a central issue in both contexts. |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
In the 1960s, India was reeling under the threat of famine, dependent on food aid like PL-480 imports from the U.S. It was during this crisis that M.S. Swaminathan, in collaboration with Norman Borlaug and with strong political support from leaders like Lal Bahadur Shastri and C. Subramaniam, spearheaded the Green Revolution. By introducing high-yielding dwarf wheat varieties, India moved from “ship-to-mouth” dependence to food self-sufficiency.
His story is not just about agricultural science, it is about leadership, political will, and atmanirbharta in its truest sense. Today, as India aspires for Viksit Bharat and faces the challenge of climate change, his legacy offers critical lessons.
M.S. Swaminathan in the news today:
- Centenary Year: 2025 marks 100 years since the birth of Swaminathan, celebrated with the release of a biography M.S. Swaminathan: The Man Who Fed India.
- Historical Significance: His leadership in the 1960s achieved food self-sufficiency, India’s most successful experiment in aatmanirbharta.
- Relevance Today: India now faces a new agricultural crisis due to climate change, water stress, and soil degradation, making Swaminathan’s lessons critical for the future.
- Striking Contrast: In the 1960s, India relied on foreign food aid; today, India is a food grain exporter, largely due to the foundation Swaminathan built.
Collaboration and scientific exchange in shaping the Green Revolution
- Cross-fertilisation of ideas: Swaminathan’s initial experiments with radiation-induced mutations failed. A Japanese scientist’s input on dwarf wheat and Norman Borlaug’s Mexican varieties changed the course.
- Networking with global scientists: Swaminathan leveraged his contacts to bring Borlaug’s seeds to India, overcoming bureaucratic hurdles.
- Lesson: Science thrives on openness, collaboration, and reduced bureaucracy, not isolation.
The role of political leadership in Swaminathan’s success
- Direct dialogue with scientists: C. Subramaniam (Agriculture Minister) listened directly to Swaminathan, bypassing bureaucratic resistance.
- Evidence-based decisions: Lal Bahadur Shastri personally visited fields to see the new wheat varieties before approving large-scale imports.
- Leadership support: Indira Gandhi carried forward the momentum after Shastri’s death, ensuring continuity.
- Lesson: Strong political will + scientific advice = transformative policy outcomes.
Challenges and criticisms of the Green Revolution
- Opposition from multiple fronts: Finance Ministry resisted spending ₹5 crore in forex; Planning Commission doubted the seeds; Left parties opposed U.S. connections (Rockefeller Foundation funding).
- Environmental fallout: Excessive water use, soil degradation, and fertilizer dependence became long-term challenges.
- Swaminathan’s foresight: He himself warned against unsustainable practices and advocated for “evergreen revolution”, productivity with sustainability.
Lessons from Swaminathan’s legacy for Viksit Bharat
- Science-Policy Linkages: Scientists must be given autonomy, direct access to policymakers and freedom from bureaucratic bottlenecks.
- R&D Investment: India spends 0.43% of agricultural GDP on R&D, half of China’s share; none of India’s agricultural institutes are in the world’s top 200, while China has eight in the top 10.
- Sustainability: A climate-resilient agriculture strategy is urgent to prevent food insecurity in the era of global warming.
- Atmanirbharta parallel: Just as Swaminathan made India self-sufficient in food, similar investments are needed in the digital economy, AI and green technologies.
Conclusion
M.S. Swaminathan’s work reminds us that nation-building rests on the fusion of science and statesmanship. His Green Revolution made India food-secure, but his vision of an “evergreen revolution”, where productivity meets sustainability, remains unfulfilled. To truly honour him, India must invest in agricultural research, empower scientists, and align policy with long-term sustainability. The man who fed India has left us with not just a legacy but also a roadmap for the future.
Value Addition
|
Key Achievements
- Food Self-Sufficiency: India moved from being a food-deficit, aid-dependent country (“ship-to-mouth”) to self-sufficiency in food grains by the 1970s.
- Wheat Production Boom: From 12 million tonnes (1965), 23 million tonnes (1971), over 100 million tonnes (2020s).
- Avoided Famines: Helped avert large-scale famine during population boom (India’s population doubled between 1950–1980).
- Global Recognition: M.S. Swaminathan + Norman Borlaug collaboration hailed as a model of science-policy partnership.
Criticisms & Limitations
- Regional Imbalance: Benefits concentrated in Punjab, Haryana, Western UP; other states lagged behind.
- Mono-cropping: Focus on wheat and rice discouraged diversification → vulnerability in nutrition and soil health
- Environmental Degradation:
-
- Over-extraction of groundwater → water table crisis in Punjab & Haryana.
- Excessive fertilizer/pesticide use → soil toxicity & health hazards.
- Inequality: Large farmers gained more due to access to credit, irrigation, inputs → widening rural inequality.
- Neglect of Coarse Grains & Pulses: Led to declining production of millets, crucial for nutrition and climate resilience.
Reports & Data
- NITI Aayog (2021): 89% of India’s groundwater used for irrigation → unsustainable.
- FAO Report (2019): Green Revolution improved calorie sufficiency but failed in ensuring nutrition security.
- ICAR Data: Only 0.43% of agricultural GDP is spent on R&D in India vs ~0.86% in China.
Concepts Introduced
- Evergreen Revolution (Swaminathan): Increasing productivity in perpetuity without ecological harm → focus on sustainability.
- Second Green Revolution: Emphasis on pulses, oilseeds, and eastern states under the National Food Security Mission (2007).
- Climate-Resilient Agriculture: Shift towards water-use efficiency, precision farming, and millets revival (2023: International Year of Millets).
Comparative Perspective
- China vs India: China diversified faster into horticulture, aquaculture, and biotech crops; India stayed wheat-rice centric.
- Mexico: Norman Borlaug’s work initially focused there, but India scaled it into a nationwide revolution.
- Africa: “Green Revolution for Africa” attempts underway, but limited success due to weak infrastructure.
|
Mapping Microthemes for GS Papers
- GS Paper I: Post-independence consolidation, Nehruvian vision, famine & food security history.
- GS Paper II: Science-policy interface, role of political leadership, bureaucratic hurdles in governance.
- GS Paper III: Food security, Green Revolution, R&D in agriculture, climate change impact, sustainable agriculture.
- GS Paper IV: Leadership ethics, scientific integrity, foresight (Swaminathan warning about sustainability).
PYQ Relevance
[UPSC 2019] How was India benefited from the contributions of Sir M.Visvesvaraya and Dr. M. S. Swaminathan in the fields of water engineering and agricultural science respectively?
Linkage: Dr. M.S. Swaminathan’s pioneering role in the Green Revolution transformed India from a food-deficit nation into a self-sufficient one, ensuring food security and laying the foundation for agricultural atmanirbharta. |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
Plastic pollution represents one of the gravest environmental crises of our times. Despite decades of regulation and bans, plastics remain ubiquitous, cheap, and nearly indestructible. Talks in Geneva involving 180 countries failed to secure an internationally binding legal agreement to limit plastic pollution, reflecting deep divisions over whether the treaty should target waste alone or include production.
Global Plastic Treaty Deadlock: Why It Matters
- Global deadlock: 180 countries failed to agree on a binding treaty on plastic pollution in Geneva, despite a UNEP-backed resolution already in place.
- First-time sharp focus on health: Unlike earlier discussions centred only on waste management, the health impact of plastics is now central.
- Scale of problem: Plastics contain more than 16,000 chemicals, with little knowledge on 10,000+ of them. A Nature study showed 4,000 chemicals of concern are present across major plastic types.
- Striking evidence: Microplastics detected in blood, breast milk, placenta, bone marrow, bringing urgency to the debate.
The Persistence and Ubiquity of Plastics
- Symbol of consumption economy: Cheap and versatile, plastics reflect today’s global consumption.
- Persistence and flexibility: Synthetic, fossil-fuel-derived polymers are non-biodegradable and endure for decades.
- Waste mismanagement: Cheap production, ubiquity, and limited recycling capacity turn plastics into the prime source of litter.
Plastics and Human Health: Emerging Evidence
- Chemicals of concern: Plastics use ethylene, propylene, styrene derivatives, along with bisphenols, phthalates, PCBs, PBDEs, and PFAS.
- Products of exposure: Found in food containers, bottles, teething toys, polyester, IV bags, cosmetics, paints, electronics, adhesives.
- Health links: Studies link plastic chemicals to thyroid dysfunction, hypertension, kidney/testicular cancer, gestational diabetes.
- Evidence base: Around 1,100 studies, involving 1.1 million individuals, compiled by Boston College & Minderoo Foundation dashboard.
- Nature of studies: Mostly associative; longitudinal studies (gold standard) are still underway.
The Microplastic Menace
- Definition: Plastics smaller than 5 mm, found in additives or broken-down products.
- Recent discoveries: Detected in human blood, breast milk, placenta, bone marrow.
- Health uncertainty: Exact impacts still under study, but linked to multiple disorders.
Policy Responses: Global and Indian Perspectives
- Global scene: Negotiations divided on waste vs production; developing countries demand funding support.
- India’s stance:
- Ban on single-use plastics in ~20 States
- Administrative push for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
- Views plastics as a waste management issue, not a health issue.
- Prefers health dimension to be dealt with at WHO, not in the plastics treaty.
Conclusion
The Geneva deadlock reflects not just a failure of diplomacy but the widening gap between scientific evidence and policy action. Plastics are no longer an invisible convenience; they are a pervasive health hazard. While India treats plastics as a waste issue, ignoring health risks leaves a blind spot in policy. A robust, binding treaty addressing both production and health impact is indispensable if the world is to prevent plastics from becoming the new tobacco of the 21st century.
PYQ Relavance
| [UPSC 2023] What is oil pollution? What are its impacts on the marine ecosystem? In what way is oil pollution particularly harmful for a country like India?
Linkage: Since UPSC has already asked about oil pollution (2023), it shows the exam’s focus on pollution and ecosystem impacts. Plastic pollution, like oil, originates from fossil fuels and has severe effects on marine life and human health. Hence, a direct question on plastic pollution and its health–environment nexus is highly probable. |
Practice Mains Question
Plastics are no longer merely a waste management problem but a serious health hazard. Critically examine the health risks associated with plastic use and evaluate India’s stance in global plastic treaty negotiations.
Mapping Microthemes
- GS-1: Impact of industrialisation and consumerism on environment.
- GS-2: International negotiations, India’s foreign policy stance in environmental treaties.
- GS-3: Pollution, waste management, health-environment nexus.
- GS-4: Ethics of sustainability, intergenerational justice, corporate responsibility.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
In August 2025, Parliament passed the Income Tax Bill, 2025, a shorter and simplified legislation with 23 chapters (down from 47) and 536 sections (down from 819). The Bill aims to reduce discretion with clearer provisions, introduce taxpayer-friendly reforms like longer timelines for return updation, and curb harassment. However, it has also expanded the powers of tax officials, especially over digital information and personal data, raising concerns about privacy and misuse.
Need for Overhauling the 1961 Income Tax Framework
- Obsolete framework: The Income Tax Act, 1961 had become outdated, riddled with amendments, and difficult for laypersons to interpret.
- Harassment potential: Excessive discretion allowed officials to harass taxpayers.
- Structural reform: New law cuts down chapters from 47 to 23 and sections from 819 to 536, simplifying compliance.
- Greater clarity: More tables (57, up from 18) and formulae (46, up from 6), along with examples to aid understanding.
From Draft Bill to Final Law: The Legislative Journey
- Initial draft (Feb 2025): Introduced in Parliament but referred to a Select Committee given the Bill’s significance.
- Committee review: Headed by Baijayant Panda, with MPs across parties; submitted a detailed report in July 2025.
- Withdrawal & replacement: Government withdrew the earlier version on August 8, 2025, to incorporate committee recommendations.
- Final Bill (Aug 11, 2025): Introduced and passed the same day, avoiding confusion through multiple versions.
Key Reforms and Structural Simplifications:
- No slab changes: Finance Minister clarified tax rates and slabs remain unchanged.
- Technical refinements: Clearer provisions for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT), separated into sub-sections.
- Taxpayer-friendly features: Returns can be updated up to 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year without penalty; Assessment reopening period reduced to 5 years.
Simplification Gains and Emerging Concerns
- Expanded search powers: Tax officers can now demand passwords of electronic devices, emails, and social media accounts.
- Override access: Officials may bypass access codes to computer systems if passwords are not shared.
- Privacy concerns: Unlike earlier provisions (limited to inspection and lock-breaking), the new law extends to personal digital data, raising red flags.
Government’s Rationale for Expanding Digital Powers
- Rationale: Much of financial data today is exchanged via messaging apps, emails, or stored digitally.
- Committee stance: Though some dissent was recorded, the Select Committee accepted the government’s view that these provisions are essential for effective investigation.
Conclusion
The Income Tax Bill, 2025 is a watershed reform, simplifying one of India’s most complex laws. While the codification of taxpayer-friendly provisions marks a progressive step, the enhanced surveillance powers granted to tax authorities highlight the thin line between efficiency and overreach. The challenge ahead lies in ensuring that simplification does not come at the cost of citizens’ trust and constitutional rights.
Value Addition for UPSC
|
- Governance angle (GS-II): Balancing simplification of laws with citizen rights and privacy.
- Economic reforms (GS-III): Tax rationalisation improves compliance and ease of doing business.
- Ethics (GS-IV): Dilemma of state surveillance vs. individual liberty; Kantian duty-based ethics vs. utilitarian approach.
- Comparative context: Similar debates exist globallye.g., U.S. IRS’s digital access powers vs. EU’s stricter GDPR protections.
|
PYQ Relevance
| [UPSC 2020] Explain the rationale behind the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act of 2017.How has COVID-19 impacted the GST compensation fund and created new federal tensions?
Linkage: The GST Compensation Act, 2017 aimed to build Centre–State trust during the GST transition but COVID-19 strained revenues, sparking federal tensions. Similarly, the Income Tax Bill, 2025 seeks to simplify direct taxes to build citizen trust but raises concerns over state overreach in digital surveillance. Both show that taxation is ultimately about trust and legitimacy in governance. |
Practice Mains Question
The Income Tax Bill, 2025 seeks to simplify India’s tax regime but also introduces stronger surveillance powers for officials. Discuss the balance between efficiency, transparency, and taxpayer rights. (250 words)
Mapping Microthemes for GS Papers
- GS-I: Evolution of economic policies post-Independence.
- GS-II: Governance, legislative reforms, fundamental rights (privacy).
- GS-III: Fiscal reforms, tax policy, ease of doing business.
- GS-IV: Ethics of surveillance, transparency, accountability.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
In August 2025, Parliament passed the Income Tax Bill, 2025, a shorter and simplified legislation with 23 chapters (down from 47) and 536 sections (down from 819). The Bill aims to reduce discretion with clearer provisions, introduce taxpayer-friendly reforms like longer timelines for return updation, and curb harassment. However, it has also expanded the powers of tax officials, especially over digital information and personal data, raising concerns about privacy and misuse.
Need for Overhauling the 1961 Income Tax Framework
- Obsolete framework: The Income Tax Act, 1961 had become outdated, riddled with amendments, and difficult for laypersons to interpret.
- Harassment potential: Excessive discretion allowed officials to harass taxpayers.
- Structural reform: New law cuts down chapters from 47 to 23 and sections from 819 to 536, simplifying compliance.
- Greater clarity: More tables (57, up from 18) and formulae (46, up from 6), along with examples to aid understanding.
From Draft Bill to Final Law: The Legislative Journey
- Initial draft (Feb 2025): Introduced in Parliament but referred to a Select Committee given the Bill’s significance.
- Committee review: Headed by Baijayant Panda, with MPs across parties; submitted a detailed report in July 2025.
- Withdrawal & replacement: Government withdrew the earlier version on August 8, 2025, to incorporate committee recommendations.
- Final Bill (Aug 11, 2025): Introduced and passed the same day, avoiding confusion through multiple versions.
Key Reforms and Structural Simplifications:
- No slab changes: Finance Minister clarified tax rates and slabs remain unchanged.
- Technical refinements: Clearer provisions for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT), separated into sub-sections.
- Taxpayer-friendly features: Returns can be updated up to 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year without penalty; Assessment reopening period reduced to 5 years.
Simplification Gains and Emerging Concerns
- Expanded search powers: Tax officers can now demand passwords of electronic devices, emails, and social media accounts.
- Override access: Officials may bypass access codes to computer systems if passwords are not shared.
- Privacy concerns: Unlike earlier provisions (limited to inspection and lock-breaking), the new law extends to personal digital data, raising red flags.
Government’s Rationale for Expanding Digital Powers
- Rationale: Much of financial data today is exchanged via messaging apps, emails, or stored digitally.
- Committee stance: Though some dissent was recorded, the Select Committee accepted the government’s view that these provisions are essential for effective investigation.
Conclusion
The Income Tax Bill, 2025 is a watershed reform, simplifying one of India’s most complex laws. While the codification of taxpayer-friendly provisions marks a progressive step, the enhanced surveillance powers granted to tax authorities highlight the thin line between efficiency and overreach. The challenge ahead lies in ensuring that simplification does not come at the cost of citizens’ trust and constitutional rights.
Value Addition for UPSC
|
- Governance angle (GS-II): Balancing simplification of laws with citizen rights and privacy.
- Economic reforms (GS-III): Tax rationalisation improves compliance and ease of doing business.
- Ethics (GS-IV): Dilemma of state surveillance vs. individual liberty; Kantian duty-based ethics vs. utilitarian approach.
- Comparative context: Similar debates exist globallye.g., U.S. IRS’s digital access powers vs. EU’s stricter GDPR protections.
|
PYQ Relevance
| [UPSC 2020] Explain the rationale behind the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act of 2017.How has COVID-19 impacted the GST compensation fund and created new federal tensions?
Linkage: The GST Compensation Act, 2017 aimed to build Centre–State trust during the GST transition but COVID-19 strained revenues, sparking federal tensions. Similarly, the Income Tax Bill, 2025 seeks to simplify direct taxes to build citizen trust but raises concerns over state overreach in digital surveillance. Both show that taxation is ultimately about trust and legitimacy in governance. |
Practice Mains Question
The Income Tax Bill, 2025 seeks to simplify India’s tax regime but also introduces stronger surveillance powers for officials. Discuss the balance between efficiency, transparency, and taxpayer rights. (250 words)
Mapping Microthemes for GS Papers
- GS-I: Evolution of economic policies post-Independence.
- GS-II: Governance, legislative reforms, fundamental rights (privacy).
- GS-III: Fiscal reforms, tax policy, ease of doing business.
- GS-IV: Ethics of surveillance, transparency, accountability.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Introduction
Plastic pollution represents one of the gravest environmental crises of our times. Despite decades of regulation and bans, plastics remain ubiquitous, cheap, and nearly indestructible. Talks in Geneva involving 180 countries failed to secure an internationally binding legal agreement to limit plastic pollution, reflecting deep divisions over whether the treaty should target waste alone or include production.
Global Plastic Treaty Deadlock: Why It Matters
- Global deadlock: 180 countries failed to agree on a binding treaty on plastic pollution in Geneva, despite a UNEP-backed resolution already in place.
- First-time sharp focus on health: Unlike earlier discussions centred only on waste management, the health impact of plastics is now central.
- Scale of problem: Plastics contain more than 16,000 chemicals, with little knowledge on 10,000+ of them. A Nature study showed 4,000 chemicals of concern are present across major plastic types.
- Striking evidence: Microplastics detected in blood, breast milk, placenta, bone marrow, bringing urgency to the debate.
The Persistence and Ubiquity of Plastics
- Symbol of consumption economy: Cheap and versatile, plastics reflect today’s global consumption.
- Persistence and flexibility: Synthetic, fossil-fuel-derived polymers are non-biodegradable and endure for decades.
- Waste mismanagement: Cheap production, ubiquity, and limited recycling capacity turn plastics into the prime source of litter.
Plastics and Human Health: Emerging Evidence
- Chemicals of concern: Plastics use ethylene, propylene, styrene derivatives, along with bisphenols, phthalates, PCBs, PBDEs, and PFAS.
- Products of exposure: Found in food containers, bottles, teething toys, polyester, IV bags, cosmetics, paints, electronics, adhesives.
- Health links: Studies link plastic chemicals to thyroid dysfunction, hypertension, kidney/testicular cancer, gestational diabetes.
- Evidence base: Around 1,100 studies, involving 1.1 million individuals, compiled by Boston College & Minderoo Foundation dashboard.
- Nature of studies: Mostly associative; longitudinal studies (gold standard) are still underway.
The Microplastic Menace
- Definition: Plastics smaller than 5 mm, found in additives or broken-down products.
- Recent discoveries: Detected in human blood, breast milk, placenta, bone marrow.
- Health uncertainty: Exact impacts still under study, but linked to multiple disorders.
Policy Responses: Global and Indian Perspectives
- Global scene: Negotiations divided on waste vs production; developing countries demand funding support.
- India’s stance:
- Ban on single-use plastics in ~20 States
- Administrative push for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
- Views plastics as a waste management issue, not a health issue.
- Prefers health dimension to be dealt with at WHO, not in the plastics treaty.
Conclusion
The Geneva deadlock reflects not just a failure of diplomacy but the widening gap between scientific evidence and policy action. Plastics are no longer an invisible convenience; they are a pervasive health hazard. While India treats plastics as a waste issue, ignoring health risks leaves a blind spot in policy. A robust, binding treaty addressing both production and health impact is indispensable if the world is to prevent plastics from becoming the new tobacco of the 21st century.
PYQ Relavance
| [UPSC 2023] What is oil pollution? What are its impacts on the marine ecosystem? In what way is oil pollution particularly harmful for a country like India?
Linkage: Since UPSC has already asked about oil pollution (2023), it shows the exam’s focus on pollution and ecosystem impacts. Plastic pollution, like oil, originates from fossil fuels and has severe effects on marine life and human health. Hence, a direct question on plastic pollution and its health–environment nexus is highly probable. |
Practice Mains Question
Plastics are no longer merely a waste management problem but a serious health hazard. Critically examine the health risks associated with plastic use and evaluate India’s stance in global plastic treaty negotiations.
Mapping Microthemes
- GS-1: Impact of industrialisation and consumerism on environment.
- GS-2: International negotiations, India’s foreign policy stance in environmental treaties.
- GS-3: Pollution, waste management, health-environment nexus.
- GS-4: Ethics of sustainability, intergenerational justice, corporate responsibility.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
The Election Commission of India’s (ECI) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has become a focal point of debate, extending beyond a routine update. The ECI’s insistence on specific identity and citizenship proofs, most notably the birth certificate, has sparked a critical discussion. The core issue is the potential for widespread voter exclusion, which stands in stark contrast to the foundational democratic principle of ensuring the broadest possible inclusion of all eligible citizens. A recent Lokniti-CSDS survey, conducted across five states and one Union Territory, provides compelling data that challenges the feasibility and inclusivity of the SIR exercise as it is currently designed.
The Paradox of Electoral Reforms: Inclusion vs. Exclusion
The Unintended Consequences of the Special Intensive Revision
- Documentation Burden: Over half of all respondents lack a birth certificate. A similar proportion lacks a domicile or caste certificate, while at least two-thirds don’t have their parents’ birth certificates.
- Widespread Lack of Awareness: Only 36% of respondents were aware of the SIR exercise or its document requirements, indicating a massive information gap.
- Socio-Economic Disparities: The lack of necessary documents disproportionately affects vulnerable groups. Roughly 5% of respondents had none of the 11 documents required by the EC. This group of “No Document Citizens” had a higher percentage of women, and were predominantly from the lower economic half, with over one-fourth being SC and over 40% OBC.
Which groups are most vulnerable to exclusion?
- No-document citizens: 5% of respondents had none of the 11 documents.
- Marginalized impact: Majority of these were women, ¾ from lower economic strata, ¼ SC, and 40% OBC.
- Parental records: Absence of parental birth certificates was as high as 87% in Madhya Pradesh and 72% mothers in Uttar Pradesh.
|
Impact of the SIR on Indian democracy
- Core democratic risk: Exclusion of eligible voters undermines the principle of universal adult suffrage.
- State capacity challenge: Weak record-keeping and low administrative accessibility deepen inequalities.
- Policy dilemma: While cleansing electoral rolls is important, the current framework risks mass deletion of legitimate voters.
Administrative challenges contributing to this problem
- Inconsistent Birth Certificate Possession: The possession of birth certificates varies sharply across states, revealing significant administrative and historical disparities. In Madhya Pradesh only 11% of respondents had a birth certificate and in West Bengal, with a 49% possession rate. Even in states with higher rates like West Bengal and Delhi, at least half the population still lacks this document.
- Difficulty in Obtaining Documents: The process is perceived as “very difficult” by a substantial portion of the population in major states, including 46% in Delhi, 41% in Kerala, 40% in Madhya Pradesh, and 41% in West Bengal.
- Parental Documents as a Major Hurdle: The requirement for parental documents for those born after 1987 (and for both parents for those born after 2003) is a near-impossible condition for many.
- State Capacity Gaps: The survey highlights the varying capacity of different states to provide and maintain official records, which is a major factor in the documentation gaps.
- Exclusion of Aadhaar: The EC’s decision to exclude Aadhaar creates an unnecessary barrier for voters, especially in states where other documents are rare.
The findings of the Lokniti-CSDS survey underscore that while cleansing electoral rolls is a valid goal, the current SIR framework is not inclusive. The reliance on documents that many citizens lack, coupled with significant state-wise and socio-economic disparities in document possession, creates a high risk of voter exclusion. The data show that the exercise, as it stands, is more likely to disenfranchise legitimate voters than to simply remove errors, highlighting the need for a more pragmatic and flexible approach that accounts for the ground realities of India’s diverse population.
Value Addition
|
The SIR’s Challenge to Inclusive Democracy
The Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) aims to update voter lists but risks excluding many citizens. This is a problem because it goes against the core democratic principle of including all eligible voters.
- Cleansing vs. Exclusion: While cleaning up the voter list is a good goal, the SIR’s strict rules about documents could lead to the removal of many people who have a legal right to vote. The survey showed that 5% of people lack any of the required documents, with this problem hitting women and people from lower economic backgrounds the hardest.
- State Variation: The SIR’s uniform rules are problematic because the ability to get official documents varies greatly across India. For example, possession of a birth certificate is very low in Madhya Pradesh (11%) compared to West Bengal (49%).
- Democratic Principle: Democracy depends on everyone having the right to vote. By creating new barriers, the SIR exercise weakens the foundation of free and fair elections.
|
Mapping Micro Themes:
- GS1: Social exclusion, regional disparities in documentation.
- GS2: Electoral reforms, governance capacity, rights of citizens.
- GS3: Use of technology (Aadhaar vs exclusions), administrative bottlenecks
- GS4: Ethical governance, fairness, justice in democracy.
PYQ Relevance:
| [UPSC 2017] To enhance the quality of democracy in India the Election Commission of India has proposed electoral reforms in 2016. What are the suggested reforms and how far are they significant to make democracy successful?
Linkage: The 2016 ECI reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability (e.g., NOTA, state funding, criminal disqualification), while the SIR focuses on electoral roll accuracy. Both highlight the tension between integrity and inclusivity in democracy. The linkage shows that reforms must balance systemic credibility with citizens’ access, else democracy risks exclusion. |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
India–U.K. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), especially its Chapter 12 on Digital Trade, marks a shift from cautious digital policy to strategic global engagement. It brings major trade gains, but also sparks debate on data sovereignty and oversight. Chapter 12 of India–U.K. CETA exchanges some regulatory control for greater digital market access. Gains include mutual recognition of e-signatures, duty-free digital exports, and innovation-friendly provisions, while concerns focus on limited source-code checks and voluntary data sharing.
Digital Gains from the Agreement
- Recognition of Electronic Signatures and Contracts: Both nations commit to mutual recognition, reducing paperwork for SaaS firms and lowering entry barriers for SMEs.
- Paperless Trade & E-Invoicing: Eases cross-border documentation and payments, enhancing trade efficiency.
- Zero Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions: Preserves a Commerce Ministry–estimated $30 billion software export pipeline.
- Regulatory Sandboxes for Data Innovation: Encourages pilot projects that allow payments and data-driven firms to test tools under supervision, boosting credibility abroad.
- Duty-Free Access for Indian Merchandise: Nearly 99% of exports could enter the U.K. duty-free; textile tariffs dropping from 12% to zero will aid hubs like Tiruppur and Ludhiana.
- Openings in British Public Procurement: Expands market opportunities for Indian IT suppliers.
- Social Security Waivers: Reduces payroll costs for short-term assignments abroad by about 20%.
Digital Costs and Concerns
- Source-Code Inspection Restrictions: Ban on routine checks; regulators can only demand access in investigations or court cases.
- Voluntary Government Data Sharing: No binding obligation; India decides what data to release, and in what format.
- No Automatic MFN for Data Flows: Only a forward review mechanism exists if stricter data rules appear in other agreements.
- Review Timelines: First formal review in 5 years; critics suggest 3-year reviews to match rapid AI developments.
- Domestic Readiness Gap: Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 rules are pending notification; absence of clear internal processes could weaken negotiation leverage.
Balancing Sovereignty and Openness
- Security Exceptions Preserved: National supervision over critical infrastructure like power grids and payment systems remains intact.
- Good Governance Safeguards: Prevents disguised restrictions on trade under the guise of regulation.
- Trusted Labs Proposal: Accrediting secure labs to review sensitive code could bridge the trust gap.
- Audit Trails for Cross-Border Data Flows: Ensures accountability follows the data.
- Institutionalised Consultations: Open, pre-negotiation dialogue to anticipate and address stakeholder concerns.
Steps for Future Digital Treaties
- Integrate market openness with regulatory oversight
- Set three-year review cycles to adapt to technological change
- Develop domestic readiness before external commitments
- Maintain a balance between security and trade facilitation
Conclusion
The India–U.K. digital trade compact is both a leap and a litmus test. It affirms India’s readiness to engage strategically in global digital commerce while underscoring the necessity of robust domestic regulation. The real challenge is not in signing such pacts but in ensuring that sovereignty, security, and innovation move forward together.
Value Addition
|
Reports / Data
- Commerce Ministry (2024): India’s software exports via electronic transmissions valued at $30 billion annually.
- UNCTAD Report on Digital Economy (2023): India among top 5 global economies in digital services exports.
- NASSCOM 2023: Digital public infrastructure (UPI, Aadhaar, DigiLocker) key enablers of India’s digital leap.
Case Studies / Examples
- UPI in G20 (2023): India pushing UPI internationalisation – similar to how digital trade pacts expand India’s reach.
- Singapore & Australia FTAs: Precedent for including digital trade rules, but U.K. CETA is India’s first binding digital chapter.
- Textile exports from Tiruppur/Ludhiana: Example of how tariff elimination + digital facilitation = trade gains.
Concepts & Theories
- WTO-plus Agreements: Regional/bilateral pacts that go beyond WTO commitments (like CETA’s Chapter 12).
- Data Sovereignty vs Digital Openness: Core tension between national control over data and global free flows.
- Regulatory Sandboxes: Innovation-friendly regulatory spaces balancing innovation & oversight.
Quotes for Enrichment
- Nandan Nilekani: “India has built digital public goods at population scale, something no other democracy has attempted.”
- UNCTAD: “The digital economy is now the fastest growing trade frontier, but also the most contested.”
|
PYQ Relevance
| Though there is no direct PYQ, the digital trade compact can be used in many questions like
[UPSC 2023] What is the status of digitalization in the Indian Economy? Examine the problems faced in this regard and suggest improvement.
Linkage: The India–U.K. CETA’s digital trade provisions—like e-signatures, paperless trade, and zero customs duty—highlight India’s progress in integrating digitalization into global commerce. At the same time, issues like restricted source-code access, weak data protection readiness, and voluntary data sharing mirror the broader problems of digitalization in India. Thus, the pact underlines both India’s digital gains and the urgent need for domestic reforms and safeguards to fully leverage such agreements. |
Mapping Micro Themes
- GS-2: Trade diplomacy, sovereignty.
- GS-3: Digital trade, AI regulation, cybersecurity.
- GS-4: Transparency, public trust.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has told the J&K High Court that the Lieutenant-Governor (L-G) can nominate five Assembly members without the “aid and advice” of the elected government. This position has sparked a constitutional debate over democratic accountability in a politically sensitive Union Territory where such nominations could alter the balance of power. This is significant because these nominations could decide the majority in a 119-member House, potentially overturning the people’s electoral verdict. The High Court is examining whether this undermines the Constitution’s basic structure.
Core issues before the J&K High Court
- Constitutional question: Whether the 2023 amendments to the J&K Reorganisation Act, allowing the L-G to nominate five members, violate the Constitution’s basic structure.
- Potential impact: These five voting members could “convert a minority government into a majority government and vice versa,” influencing governance stability.
- Judicial scope: Goes beyond statutory interpretation into democratic essence.
Provisions of the 2023 amendments
- Sections 15A & 15B of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019: Allows nomination of two Kashmiri migrants (including one woman) and one from Pakistan-occupied J&K, in addition to two women if inadequately represented.
- Total seats: Creates five nominated members in the 119-member Assembly.
- Voting rights: These nominees have full voting powers.
Centre’s justification of this power
- MHA’s submission: Nominations fall outside the elected government’s remit, citing K. Lakshminarayanan vs Union of India (Puducherry).
- Legal references: Invokes “sanctioned strength” concept, including elected + nominated members, and Section 12 of the 1963 Union Territories Act on voting procedures.
- Approach: Focuses on legal technicalities rather than broader constitutional implications.
Concerns over democratic implications
- Risk of mandate distortion: In a tight Assembly, nominees could decide government stability.
- Precedent in Puducherry: In 2021, nominated members plus defectors contributed to the collapse of the Congress-led government.
- UT context: J&K’s downgrade from State to UT in 2019 happened without consultation with elected representatives, making accountability critical.
Supreme Court jurisprudence on L-G’s powers
- Delhi Services Cases (Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Union of India (2018), Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Union of India & Anr. (2023)): SC held that the L-G should act on the “aid and advice” of the elected government, with discretion as the exception.
- Contradiction: MHA’s stance that nominations lie outside the elected government’s domain runs counter to this jurisprudence.
Conclusion
The J&K nominations issue highlights the tension between administrative authority and the democratic mandate. In politically sensitive regions, bypassing elected governments in decisions that can shift Assembly majorities risks undermining public trust and the constitutional promise of representative governance.
Value Addition
|
- Basic Structure Doctrine: It evolved through landmark cases such as Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973), which holds that Parliament cannot amend the Constitution in a way that damages its essential features. Representative democracy and federalism are recognised as part of this basic structure.
- Lakshminarayanan Case (2019): In K. Lakshminarayanan vs Union of India, the Supreme Court upheld the Centre’s power to nominate MLAs in Puducherry without consulting the elected government. While constitutionally valid, the aftermath showed that nominated members could be politically aligned with the Centre, leading to destabilisation of the elected government. This precedent is now central to the J&K dispute, as similar powers are being exercised by the L-G.
- Delhi vs L-G Jurisprudence: Through Government of NCT of Delhi vs Union of India (2018) and Government of NCT of Delhi vs Union of India & Anr. (2023), the Supreme Court emphasised that the L-G should act on the “aid and advice” of the elected Council of Ministers, except in explicitly stated matters of discretion. This jurisprudence reinforces the principle that administrative authority should not override the electoral mandate, making the MHA’s argument in J&K appear contrary to evolving constitutional norms.
- Union Territory Governance Model: Union Territories with legislatures (like Delhi, Puducherry, and now J&K) operate under a hybrid governance system where the Centre retains significant control while local governments have legislative powers. This model inherently contains tensions between central authority and local democratic accountability. In politically sensitive UTs like J&K, such tensions are magnified, especially when powers like nominations can shift legislative majorities.
|
Mapping Micro Themes for GS Paper II
| Topic |
Micro Theme |
Example |
| Centre–State Relations |
Constitutional role of L-G in UTs & states |
J&K L-G nominations without elected govt’s aid and advice |
| Electoral Process Integrity |
Impact of nominated members on Assembly majority |
Puducherry 2021 govt collapse case |
| Basic Structure Doctrine |
Threat to democratic accountability |
HC challenge to J&K Reorganisation Act amendments |
| Comparative Jurisprudence |
Lakshminarayanan vs Union of India precedent |
Puducherry nominated MLAs case |
| Federalism in Special Regions |
J&K statehood restoration debate |
SC acknowledgement & public demand |
PYQ RELEVANCE
| [UPSC 2016] Discuss the essentials of the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act and the controversies regarding the powers of the Lieutenant Governor vis-à-vis the elected government in the NCT of Delhi.
Linkage: The 69th Constitutional Amendment Act created a legislative assembly for Delhi and defined the relationship between the L-G and the elected government, leading to recurring disputes over whether the L-G must act on the “aid and advice” of the Council of Ministers.
The J&K nominations case mirrors this constitutional tension—while Delhi’s dispute involved administrative control and services, J&K’s controversy centres on the L-G’s power to nominate voting members without elected government concurrence. Both situations raise a common constitutional question: Can the L-G exercise discretionary powers in a manner that can override or alter the democratic mandate? This makes Delhi’s precedent and Supreme Court rulings directly relevant to interpreting J&K’s case. |
Practice Mains Question
Discuss the constitutional implications of granting the Lieutenant-Governor of Jammu & Kashmir the power to nominate Assembly members without the aid and advice of the elected government. In your answer, examine its impact on the democratic process in light of Supreme Court jurisprudence.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
For two decades, China has led Africa’s mining sector, securing vast stakes in cobalt, lithium, copper, and iron ore. Now, African governments and civil society are challenging opaque contracts, environmental damage, and lack of value addition. The old “raw resources for infrastructure” model is giving way to demands for local processing, transparency, and economic sovereignty.
Significance
For the first time in decades, China’s unchallenged hold on African mining is weakening. Nations like the DRC, Namibia, and Zimbabwe are renegotiating deals, banning raw mineral exports, and holding Chinese firms accountable for environmental and labour violations. The scale is significant, in 2024 alone, DRC lost $132 million due to tax exemptions for Chinese companies. These actions could reshape global cobalt and lithium supply chains essential for the green economy.
China’s Long-standing Dominance in Africa’s Mining
- Control over critical minerals: DRC produces 80% of the world’s cobalt; China controls ~80% of that output via deals like Sicomines.
- Infrastructure-for-resources model: Chinese firms exchanged infrastructure for mining rights, but local benefits have been minimal.
Drivers of the Pushback Against Chinese Projects
- Civil society pressure: Groups like Congo Is Not for Sale exposed $132 million revenue loss in 2024.
- Market-linked risks: Contracts tied to commodity prices risk leaving nations with no investment in downturns.
- Government renegotiations: DRC raising stake in joint venture with Sinohydro & China Railway Group from 32% to 70%.
African Nations Taking Assertive Measures
- DRC: Cancelled Chemaf Resources’ sale to China’s Norin Mining after state miner Gecamines’ opposition.
- Namibia: Alleged $50 million bribe by Xinfeng Investments; failure to build promised processing facilities.
- Zimbabwe: $300 million Huayou Cobalt lithium plant; benefits may flow back to China without safeguards.
Environmental and Social Concerns from Chinese Mining
- Pollution incidents: Acid spill in Zambia contaminated the Kafue River.
- Biodiversity protection: Hwange National Park coal permit blocked for ecological reasons.
- Community and heritage impacts: Cameroon’s Lobé-Kribi Iron Ore Project opposed by NGOs over health and cultural threats.
Policy Shifts for Economic Sovereignty
- Export bans: Zimbabwe (2022) and Namibia (2023) banned unprocessed lithium exports to promote local beneficiation.
- Retention of value: Policy aims to strengthen domestic processing, but risk of elite capture remains without broader reforms.
Conclusion
China remains Africa’s largest mining partner, but African nations are increasingly asserting control through renegotiations, environmental enforcement, and value addition. If sustained, these actions could reposition Africa from a raw material supplier to an active player in global green economy supply chains.
Value Addition
|
China’s Role in Mining in Africa (2000–2024)
Scale of Presence
- Largest external mining partner: Operates in over 15 African countries.
- Dominance in cobalt & lithium: Controls ~80% of DRC’s cobalt output; major stakes in lithium mines in Zimbabwe, Namibia.
Investment Model
- Infrastructure-for-resources deals: e.g., Sicomines agreement in DRC (mining rights in exchange for roads, hospitals, railways).
- High-value acquisitions: Purchase of mining stakes from global and local firms to secure long-term supply chains.
Strategic Objectives
- Securing supply for EV & battery industries: Critical minerals channelled to Chinese manufacturing hubs.
- Vertical integration: Ownership from extraction to processing facilities (mostly located in China).
Criticism & Concerns
- Limited local benefits: Minimal skills transfer, inadequate job creation.
- Environmental damage: Incidents like Zambia’s Kafue River acid spill.
- Opaque contracts: Alleged bribery (Namibia) and lack of transparency in revenue flows.
Shifts & Resistance
- Renegotiations and policy pushback: DRC increasing state stake in ventures; export bans in Zimbabwe and Namibia.
- Civil society pressure: Activist coalitions exposing revenue losses and demanding fairer contracts.
Critical Minerals Geopolitics
- Strategic importance: Minerals like cobalt, lithium, and copper are essential for EV batteries, renewable energy storage, and electronics manufacturing.
- Global competition: Control over their supply chains influences technological dominance in the clean energy transition.
- China’s leverage: By securing ~80% of DRC’s cobalt and significant lithium reserves, China holds a strategic advantage over rivals such as the US, EU, and Japan.
- UPSC linkage – Relevant for GS II (International Relations) and GS III (Economy, Technology), particularly in questions on energy security and global trade politics.
Resource Nationalism
- Definition: A policy stance where nations assert control over natural resources to maximise domestic benefit and reduce foreign dependency.
- African examples: Zimbabwe and Namibia banning export of unprocessed lithium; DRC renegotiating mining contracts to increase state ownership.
- Implications: Can boost domestic processing industries but may deter foreign investment if not paired with stable policy frameworks.
|
Mapping Micro Themes
| GS Paper |
Theme/Topic |
Micro Theme |
Example |
| GS Paper II |
International Relations |
South-South cooperation & friction |
China-Africa mining ties |
| GS Paper II |
Governance |
Resource nationalism |
DRC renegotiation of Sicomines |
| GS Paper III |
Environment |
Ecological threats from mining |
Hwange NP permit denial, Kafue River spill |
PYQ Relevance
| [UPSC 2021] “The USA is facing an existential threat in the form of China, that is much more challenging than the erstwhile Soviet Union.” Explain
Linkage: While the question is US–China centric, Africa’s mining sector is a key arena of US–China competition. China’s dominance over Africa’s critical minerals gives it strategic leverage in global supply chains, posing long-term geopolitical and economic challenges to the US, a dimension comparable to Cold War-era resource and influence battles. |
Practice Mains Question
Examine how Africa’s policy shift in mineral governance could alter global supply chains for critical minerals.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News:
Elon Musk’s Starlink will soon launch in India, promising high-speed internet access in regions beyond the reach of ground-based networks. This is significant as it can bridge rural-urban gaps, improve disaster resilience, and strengthen defence capabilities. Globally, satellite internet has been a lifeline during Hurricane Harvey and a tactical tool in the Russia-Ukraine war. For India, it represents both a technological leap and a strategic necessity.
Introduction:
In today’s digitised and interconnected world, internet access is as vital as electricity or transport. Traditional cable and tower-based networks excel in cities but falter in remote terrains. Satellite internet, powered by mega-constellations like Starlink, offers a borderless, high-resilience alternative that operates irrespective of geography.
Why are ground-based internet networks economically unviable in certain regions?
- Physical Infrastructure Limits: Cables and towers are uneconomical for sparsely populated or remote regions
- Disaster Vulnerability: Infrastructure can be wiped out during floods, earthquakes, or storms
- On-the-Go Connectivity Gap: Mobile and temporary operations (airplanes, ships, oil rigs) often remain underserved
How does satellite internet overcome these challenges?
- Global Coverage: Operates regardless of terrain or terrestrial infrastructure
- Rapid Deployment: Can be set up quickly to meet sudden demand surges
- Mobility Advantage: Supports moving platforms and remote sites
- Dual-Use Potential: Functions for both civil and military purposes (e.g., Ukrainian defence, Siachen Glacier operations)
What makes the new wave of satellite internet significant?
- Mega-Constellations: Networks like Starlink have thousands of satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
- Disaster Response Role: Viasat aided Hurricane Harvey operations when 70% of cell towers failed.
- Defence Integration: Ukrainian drones fitted with Starlink to bypass Russian jamming; Indian Army use in high-altitude conflict zones
- Security Concerns: Smuggled Starlink devices used by insurgent groups and drug cartels
Working of satellite internet:
- Two Segments: Space segment (satellites) and ground segment (user terminals, gateways).
- Service Life: Satellites operate for 5–20 years depending on design.
- Orbits:
- GEO (35,786 km): Wide coverage, high latency; unsuitable for real-time apps. Example: Viasat GX.
- MEO (2,000–35,786 km): Medium latency, requires constellations. Example: O3b.
- LEO (<2,000 km): Low latency, small coverage; requires mega-constellations. Example: Starlink’s 7,000+ satellites.
Key Differences between satellites in GEO, MEO AND LEO:
| Feature |
Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) |
Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) |
Low Earth Orbit (LEO) |
| Altitude |
35,786 km above equator |
2,000 – 35,786 km |
Below 2,000 km |
| Relative Motion |
Stationary relative to a point on Earth |
Moves relative to Earth |
Moves quickly relative to Earth |
| Coverage |
~1/3 of Earth (no polar coverage) |
Larger than LEO, smaller than GEO; needs constellation for global coverage |
Small footprint; single satellite covers area like an Indian metro city |
| Satellite Size |
Large |
Large |
Smaller, often table-sized |
| Cost & Deployment |
Expensive, long deployment |
Expensive, smaller constellations |
Cheaper, quicker to deploy |
| Latency |
High (unsuitable for time-sensitive apps) |
Medium (lower than GEO but still limits real-time use) |
Very low (good for real-time use) |
| Example |
Viasat Global Xpress (GX) |
O3b constellation (20 satellites) |
Starlink (7,000+ satellites, aiming for 42,000) |
| Key Drawback |
High delay due to distance |
Still costly, latency not ideal for all uses |
Needs thousands of satellites for global coverage |
How do LEO mega-constellations maintain connectivity?
- On-Board Processing: Improves efficiency and reduces terminal complexity
- Optical Inter-Satellite Links: Satellites communicate directly in space for faster routing
- Seamless Handoff: Steerable antennas track multiple satellites to maintain uninterrupted service
What are the key applications of satellite internet?
- Civil Connectivity: Rural broadband, IoE (Internet of Everything)
- Transportation: Navigation, self-driving cars, logistics optimisation
- Public Administration: Smart cities, disaster warnings, rescue coordination
- Healthcare: Telemedicine, remote diagnostics
- Agriculture: Precision farming, crop health monitoring
- Defence & Security: Real-time communication in conflict zones, strategic surveillance
Conclusion
Satellite internet represents not just a technological upgrade but a strategic asset in the digital era. For India, it offers a pathway to bridge the digital divide, enhance national resilience, and project influence in the global communications domain. However, its dual-use nature demands strong regulatory frameworks to balance innovation, accessibility, and security.
Value Addition
|
Key Terms & Phrases Explained
- Satellite Internet: A communication service where internet connectivity is provided through satellites orbiting the Earth, rather than terrestrial cables/towers. It enables access in remote, disaster-hit, or mobile scenarios.
- Mega-Constellation: A large network of hundreds or thousands of satellites, often in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), working in coordination to provide continuous coverage. Example: Starlink (planned 42,000 satellites).
- Latency: Time taken for a signal to travel from sender to receiver; critical for real-time applications like video conferencing or online gaming.
- Optical Inter-Satellite Links (OISL): Laser-based connections between satellites, enabling direct space-to-space data transfer without routing through ground stations, reducing delays and congestion.
- Dual-Use Technology: A technology with both civilian and military applications. In satellite internet, the same network can support remote learning and healthcare or battlefield communication and drone operations.
- Digital Divide: The socio-economic gap between those with access to modern digital technologies (internet, computing) and those without.
- International Telecommunication Union (ITU): A UN agency responsible for coordinating global telecom networks, including orbital slot and spectrum allocation for satellites.
- On-Board Processing: Satellite’s ability to process data directly in orbit, improving signal quality, speed, and reducing complexity of user terminals.
- Seamless Handoff: Automatic switching of user connection from one satellite to another as satellites move, ensuring uninterrupted service.
- Internet of Everything (IoE): An extension of IoT where not only devices, but also data, processes, and people are interconnected via the internet.
|
Mapping Micro Themes
| Paper |
Macro Theme |
Micro Themes |
Sub-Micro / Example |
| GS Paper III |
Types of Orbits |
GEO (Geostationary) |
INSAT series, GSAT satellites |
| MEO (Medium Earth Orbit) |
O3b constellation for broadband |
| LEO (Low Earth Orbit) |
Starlink, OneWeb |
| GS Paper III |
Application in Navigation |
GNSS Variants |
GPS (USA), GLONASS (Russia), Galileo (EU), IRNSS/NavIC (India) |
| LEO & MEO in Navigation |
Faster signals, better coverage |
| GS Paper II |
Policy & Governance |
India’s Space Policy 2023 |
PPP in satellite communication |
| International Coordination |
ITU spectrum allocation |
Practice Mains Question:
Discuss the potential of satellite internet in bridging the digital divide in India. Examine the associated security and regulatory challenges.
PYQ Linkage:
| [UPSC 2018] Why is the Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System [IRNSS] needed? How does it help in navigation?
Linkage: IRNSS (also called NavIC) is India’s indigenous satellite-based navigation system providing accurate position information over India and surrounding regions.
Just like IRNSS uses satellites for positioning, satellite internet uses similar orbital infrastructure for data connectivity. Understanding satellite orbits, latency, and ground segments from this topic directly aids in explaining IRNSS’s working, advantages, and strategic value in navigation. |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
The government has recently approved the Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) Scheme as one of the largest fiscal commitments towards employment generation in recent years. The scale of underemployment in India is striking, over 53% of graduates are working in semi-skilled jobs and 46% of low-skill workers earn less than ₹1 lakh a year raising questions about whether such a scheme can genuinely address unemployment or will deepen structural inequalities.
Significance of ELI Scheme:
- Government Approval: Cleared on July 1, 2025, with ₹99,446 crore outlay.
- Primary Aim: Provide fiscal incentives to employers for job creation, especially in manufacturing.
- Significance: Represents one of the largest government-led employment incentive packages in India.
Issues with the ELI Scheme’s design:
- Employer-Centric Approach: Focuses on incentivising employers rather than directly empowering workers.
- Capital-Labour Asymmetry: Risks strengthening employer bargaining power while leaving workers vulnerable.
- Exclusion of Informal Sector: 90% of India’s workforce, largely informal, is excluded as the scheme prioritises EPFO-registered firms.
- Underprepared Workforce: Only 4.9% of youth have received formal vocational training, creating a mismatch between jobs and skills.
Skill Mismatch and Underemployment Trends in India:
- Low Skill Utilisation: Only 8.25% of graduates work in jobs matching their qualifications.
- High Underemployment: 53% of graduates and 36% of postgraduates in semi-skilled or elementary roles.
- Wage Disparity: 46% of low-skilled workers earn < ₹1 lakh/year, while only 4.2% of specialised graduates earn ₹4–8 lakh/year.
- Inefficient Education-to-Employment Pipeline: Shows systemic disconnect between education system and industry needs.
Sectoral Imbalance and Employment Implications:
- Manufacturing Bias: Targets manufacturing despite its declining employment elasticity.
- Employment Share: Manufacturing employs <13% of total workforce, while agriculture and services employ ~70%.
- Potential Marginalisation: Rural youth, women, and informal workers, largely in low-skill services/agriculture, risk being left out.
- Automation Pressure: Capital-intensive manufacturing growth reduces labour absorption.
Risks to Job Quality and Employment Sustainability:
- Disguised Unemployment: May encourage enterprises to relabel old jobs as new to claim subsidies.
- Structural Inequality: Channels fiscal benefits to already formalised enterprises.
- Bypassing Informal Workforce: Misses the majority of new labour market entrants in the informal sector.
- Stagnant Productivity: Without skill investment, job creation may remain low-quality.
Policy Alternatives for Equitable Employment Generation:
- Investment in Skilling: Strengthen vocational training to prepare low-skilled workers
- Education Reforms: Align curricula with industry demands
- Social Security Inclusion: Extend benefits to informal workers for equity
- Shift to Long-Term Strategy: Focus on productivity, job quality, and labour rights rather than short-term headcount increases.
Conclusion
The ELI Scheme reflects a high-investment, employer-focused strategy that risks deepening existing inequalities in India’s labour market. Without addressing the skill mismatch, informal sector exclusion, and sectoral imbalances, the scheme may generate headcount without creating sustainable livelihoods. A shift towards worker-centric, skill-driven, and socially inclusive employment policies is essential to ensure equitable economic growth.
Value Addition
|
Economic Survey 2024–25
- Key Insight: Reveals that only 8.25% of graduates are in jobs matching their qualifications, with 53% of graduates underemployed in semi-skilled or elementary roles.
- Relevance: Strengthens arguments on the education–employment disconnect and the urgent need for targeted skilling reforms.
- Application: Can be quoted in answers on unemployment, skill development, or human capital formation.
Dual Labour Market Theory
- Concept: The labour market is split into two segments, formal (primary) with stable jobs, better wages, and benefits; and informal (secondary) with insecure, low-paid work and no social protection.
- Relevance to ELI Scheme: The scheme’s EPFO-based targeting inherently supports the formal sector while neglecting the 90% informal workforce, deepening this divide.
- Application: Useful in analysing structural inequality in employment policies.
Employment Elasticity
- Definition: The responsiveness of employment growth to GDP growth.
- India’s Case: Manufacturing’s employment elasticity is declining due to automation and capital-intensive processes.
- Relevance to ELI Scheme: Explains why heavy focus on manufacturing may not yield proportional employment gains.
- Application: Adds depth when evaluating sectoral choices in employment policy.
ILO’s “Decent Work” Agenda
- Framework: Promotes productive employment, rights at work, social protection, and social dialogue.
- Relevance: The ELI Scheme lacks strong components on worker rights, social protection for informal workers, or job quality improvement — thereby falling short of ILO’s standards.
- Application: Ideal for international comparison in labour policy answers.
Disguised Unemployment
- Definition: A situation where more workers are employed than necessary, resulting in negligible or zero marginal productivity.
- Indian Context: Common in agriculture and informal services.
- Relevance to ELI Scheme: Risk of enterprises relabeling existing jobs as new to claim subsidies, creating apparent employment without productivity gains.
- Application: Can be linked to inefficiencies in job creation schemes and low productivity traps.
|
Mapping Microthemes:
| GS Paper |
Theme |
Micro Theme |
Example from Article |
| GS Paper III |
Economy |
Employment generation policies |
₹99,446 crore ELI Scheme |
| GS Paper III |
Economy |
Formal–informal sector divide |
90% informal workforce excluded |
| GS Paper III |
Economy |
Skill mismatch & underemployment |
8.25% graduates in matching jobs |
| GS Paper III |
Economy |
Sectoral imbalance |
Manufacturing bias despite low share in jobs |
| GS Paper II |
Governance |
Policy design flaws |
Employer-centric incentives |
Practice Mains Question
- Critically evaluate the Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) Scheme in the context of India’s structural labour market challenges. Suggest policy measures to ensure equitable and sustainable employment growth. (250 words)
PYQ Linkage:
| [UPSC 2014] “While we flaunt India’s demographic dividend, we ignore the dropping rates of employability.” What are we missing while doing so? Where will the jobs that India desperately needs come from? Explain.
Linkage: Address the role of skilling in tackling unemployment, evaluate gaps in current initiatives, and connect with how ELI Scheme mirrors or misses these elements. The PMKVY question emphasises the necessity of industry-relevant skills for employment generation. The ELI Scheme, while aiming at job creation, lacks a robust skilling component, risking the same shortcomings seen in earlier programmes like PMKVY. |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
The Google–Competition Commission of India (CCI), anti-trust case is a pivotal moment for India’s digital market regulation. It revolves around allegations that Google abused its dominant position in the Android ecosystem to indulge in anti-competitive practices, especially through mandatory Google Play Billing System (GPBS) usage and bundling of proprietary apps. The matter now rests with the Supreme Court, which will hear appeals from Google, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), and the Alliance Digital India Foundation (ADIF) in November 2025.
Background: The Core Dispute in Brief
CCI’s Key Findings (2022)
- Abuse of Dominance under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
- Mandatory use of Google Play Billing System (GPBS) for in-app purchases (15–30% commission).
- Self-preferencing — exempting YouTube from GPBS, giving it a cost advantage.
- Bundling of Google apps (Search, Chrome, YouTube) with Android licensing.
- Imposed a ₹936.44 crore fine and behavioural remedies (decoupling payment system, transparency in billing data, no use of developer data for competitive advantage).
Google’s Defence
- Open-Source Nature: Open-source Android with no obligation to install Google apps if the Play Store is not licensed.
- Pre-installation improves user experience and security.
- Security and User Experience: GPBS ensures fraud protection and global distribution reach.
- Exemptions for in-house services reflect different business models.
- Market Competition: Success of major Indian apps (like PhonePe and Paytm) on the Android platform as proof of competitive market
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Ruling (March 2025)
- Upheld parts of CCI’s findings (bundling & GPBS abuse).
- Reduced penalty to ₹216.69 crore (proportionality principle).
- Struck down some remedies, reinstated two key transparency-related directions in review.
Broader Implications and Stakeholders
- Consumers: More choice and possibly lower in-app prices via alternative payment gateways; risk of Android ecosystem fragmentation.
- Indian Startups & Developers: Level playing field, competitive payment options, and stronger bargaining power against Big Tech.
- Smartphone Manufacturers (OEMs): Greater flexibility to pre-install own services or use alternative Android versions without losing Play Store access.
- Google & Global Tech: May need to re-evaluate global Android business model; could trigger similar regulations in other countries.
- Regulatory Bodies: Will define CCI’s role in digital market regulation and set precedent for balancing innovation, competition, and consumer rights.
Conclusion
The Google antitrust case is not just about app payments — it is about defining the rules of engagement in India’s platform economy. The Supreme Court’s verdict will influence how innovation, competition, and consumer rights are balanced in the digital age. It could either mark a new era of platform accountability or reinforce the status quo, shaping the way over a billion Indians interact with their smartphones
Value Addition:
|
Antitrust:
- It refers to a set of laws and regulations designed to prevent monopolies, stop abuse of market dominance, and ensure fair competition in the market.
- Purpose: Protect consumers, encourage innovation, and maintain a level playing field for businesses.
- Example in India: The Competition Act, 2002, enforced by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), is India’s primary antitrust law
- Example globally: The Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) in the U.S.
- In simple words: Antitrust laws stop big companies from becoming so powerful that no one else can compete with them fairly.
|
Mapping Micro Themes
| Subject |
Topic Name |
Micro Theme |
Example |
| GS Paper -II |
Regulatory Institutions |
Role, functions, and challenges of statutory bodies like CCI & quasi-judicial bodies like NCLAT |
CCI’s penalty on Google for abuse of dominance; NCLAT’s partial reversal |
| Government Policies |
Policy needs for digital governance & fair digital ecosystem |
Draft Digital Competition Bill; TRAI’s consultation on platform regulation |
| Judicial Intervention |
Role of judiciary in interpreting digital economy laws |
Supreme Court hearing Google–CCI appeal |
| GS Paper-III |
Competition Law |
Abuse of dominance, anti-competitive practices, cartelisation in the digital economy |
Google Play Billing System commission model |
| Digital Economy |
Impact of Big Tech on market structure, innovation, startups |
App developers’ reduced bargaining power due to Google’s policies |
| Innovation vs Regulation |
Balancing tech growth and preventing monopolistic behaviour |
CCI’s remedies vs Google’s claim of user experience efficiency |
| Digital Public Goods |
Need for open, fair ecosystems for inclusive growth |
UPI as an open-access payment system in contrast to GPBS |
| Platform Neutrality |
Equal treatment for all apps/services on digital platforms |
Ban on self-preferencing in EU’s Digital Markets Act |
PYQ Linkage
| [UPSC 2020] How is the Government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by pharmaceutical companies?
Linkage: This question demands explaining legal, institutional, and international mechanisms (like TKDL, Patents Act provisions, WIPO engagement) that protect India’s traditional medicinal knowledge from unfair patenting. Similarly, in the Google–CCI case, India is using competition law and regulatory bodies to protect local digital market interests against global corporate dominance, ensuring fair competition and safeguarding the domestic innovation ecosystem. |
Practice Mains Question:
“In the context of India’s Competition Act, 2002, discuss how the Google–CCI case reflects the challenges of regulating digital platform dominance. Suggest measures to balance innovation and market fairness.”
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now